Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Radiofrequency radiation does not induce stress response in human T-lymphocytes and rat primary astrocytes.
Lee JS, Huang TQ, Kim TH, Kim JY, Kim HJ, Pack JK, Seo JS. · 2006
View Original AbstractRF radiation at cell phone safety limits did not trigger cellular stress responses in immune and brain cells during short-term exposure.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed human immune cells and rat brain cells to cell phone-level radiofrequency radiation (1763 MHz) at power levels of 2 and 20 W/kg for up to one hour while carefully controlling temperature. They found no activation of cellular stress responses, including heat shock proteins and stress-signaling pathways that typically activate when cells are damaged. This suggests that RF radiation at these levels does not trigger the cellular alarm systems that respond to harmful stressors.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 763 MHz Duration: 30 min or 1 h
Study Details
In this study, we attempted to determine whether radiofrequency (RF) radiation is able to induce a non-thermal stress response.
Human T-lymphocyte Jurkat cells and rat primary astrocytes were exposed to 1763 MHz of RF radiation ...
No detectable difference was observed in the expression levels of HSP90, HSP70, and HSP27. The phosp...
These results indicate that 1763 MHz RF radiation alone did not elicit any stress response, nor did it have any effect on TPA-induced MAPK phosphorylation, under our experimental conditions.
Show BibTeX
@article{js_2006_radiofrequency_radiation_does_not_3189,
author = {Lee JS and Huang TQ and Kim TH and Kim JY and Kim HJ and Pack JK and Seo JS.},
title = {Radiofrequency radiation does not induce stress response in human T-lymphocytes and rat primary astrocytes.},
year = {2006},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16838270/},
}Cited By (50 papers)
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.Influential
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations
- Radiofrequency Radiation and Gene/Protein Expression: A ReviewInfluential
J. McNamee, V. Chauhan (2009) - 67 citations
- Molecular responses of Jurkat T-cells to 1763 MHz radiofrequency radiationInfluential
Taiqin Huang et al. (2008) - 40 citations
- Proteomics analysis of human endothelial cells after short-term exposure to mobile phone radiationInfluential
R. Nylund (2011) - 9 citations
- Exposure to Low Levels of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Emitted from Cell-phones as a Promising Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Scoping Review StudyInfluential
Kiarash Shirbandi et al. (2023) - 8 citations
- Genome-wide Response of Normal WI-38 Human Fibroblast Cells to 1,763 MHz Radiofrequency RadiationInfluential
Chang-Nim Im et al. (2010)
- Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including the long-term epidemiologic data.
V. G. Khurana et al. (2009) - 294 citations
- WHO research agenda for radiofrequency fields
E. van Deventer et al. (2011) - 183 citations
- Considerations for Developing an RF Exposure System: A Review for in vitro Biological Experiments
A. Paffi et al. (2010) - 90 citations
- Mobile phone exposure does not induce apoptosis on spermatogenesis in rats.
S. Dasdag et al. (2008) - 90 citations