6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Exposure to radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz, GSM signal) does not affect micronucleus frequency and cell proliferation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: an interlaboratory study.

No Effects Found

Scarfi MR, Fresegna AM, Villani P, Pinto R, Marino C, Sarti M, Altavista P, Sannino A, Lovisolo GA. · 2006

View Original Abstract
Share:

This laboratory study found no DNA damage in blood cells after 24-hour exposure to cell phone radiation, but doesn't address long-term real-world exposure effects.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed human blood cells to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used by GSM cell phones) for 24 hours at various power levels to see if it caused DNA damage or affected cell growth. The study found no evidence of genetic damage or harmful effects on the cells, even at exposure levels up to 10 watts per kilogram. Two independent laboratories confirmed these results using cells from 10 different healthy volunteers.

Why This Matters

This study represents the type of controlled laboratory research that forms the foundation of our understanding about RF radiation effects on human cells. The researchers used rigorous methodology, including multiple laboratories and cross-verification of results, which strengthens confidence in their findings. However, it's important to note that this study examined only short-term exposure (24 hours) to isolated blood cells in laboratory conditions. The reality is that real-world cell phone exposure involves chronic, long-term exposure to living tissue in complex biological systems. While these negative findings are reassuring, they don't address the cumulative effects of years of daily exposure that characterize actual cell phone use patterns. The science demonstrates that laboratory studies like this one provide valuable data points, but they represent just one piece of a much larger puzzle when evaluating the health implications of our wireless technology.

Exposure Details

SAR
0, 1, 5 and 10 W/kg
Source/Device
900 MHz
Exposure Duration
24 h

Exposure Context

This study used 0, 1, 5 and 10 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0, 1, 5 and 10 W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 2 times higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 900 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 900 MHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

The objective of this study was to investigate whether 24 h exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields similar to those emitted by mobile phones induces genotoxic effects and/or effects on cell cycle kinetics in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes.

The effect of 900 MHz exposure (GSM signal) was evaluated at four specific absorption rates (SARs, 0...

The results obtained provided no evidence for the existence of genotoxic or cytotoxic effects in the...

These findings were confirmed in the two groups of five donors examined in the two laboratories and when the same slides were scored by two operators.

Cite This Study
Scarfi MR, Fresegna AM, Villani P, Pinto R, Marino C, Sarti M, Altavista P, Sannino A, Lovisolo GA. (2006). Exposure to radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz, GSM signal) does not affect micronucleus frequency and cell proliferation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: an interlaboratory study. Radiat Res. 165(6):655-663, 2006.
Show BibTeX
@article{mr_2006_exposure_to_radiofrequency_radiation_3368,
  author = {Scarfi MR and Fresegna AM and Villani P and Pinto R and Marino C and Sarti M and Altavista P and Sannino A and Lovisolo GA.},
  title = {Exposure to radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz, GSM signal) does not affect micronucleus frequency and cell proliferation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: an interlaboratory study. },
  year = {2006},
  
  url = {https://meridian.allenpress.com/radiation-research/article-abstract/165/6/655/42476/Exposure-to-Radiofrequency-Radiation-900-MHz-GSM?redirectedFrom=fulltext},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

No, 900 MHz GSM radiation does not cause genetic damage in human blood cells. A 2006 study exposed blood lymphocytes from 10 healthy volunteers to GSM signals for 24 hours at various power levels up to 10 watts per kilogram and found no DNA damage or harmful cellular effects.
No, 24-hour exposure to 900 MHz cell phone frequencies is not harmful to human lymphocytes. Research examining blood cells from healthy volunteers found no evidence of genetic damage or reduced cell growth, even at high exposure levels of 10 watts per kilogram.
No, GSM phone signals do not affect cell division in human blood. A controlled laboratory study found that 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation had no impact on cell proliferation rates in human peripheral blood lymphocytes, even after 24 hours of continuous exposure.
Researchers tested 900 MHz radiation at specific absorption rates up to 10 watts per kilogram. This 2006 interlaboratory study found no genotoxic or cytotoxic effects across the entire SAR range investigated, with results confirmed by two independent laboratories using different operators.
Yes, interlaboratory studies confirm that GSM radiation appears safe for human cells. Two independent laboratories examining the same 900 MHz exposures on blood lymphocytes from 10 donors reached identical conclusions, finding no evidence of DNA damage or cellular harm.