Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields do not alter the cell cycle progression of C3H 10T and U87MG cells.
Higashikubo R, Ragouzis M, Moros EG, Straube WL, Roti Roti JL. · 2001
View Original AbstractCell phone frequencies at 0.6 W/kg didn't disrupt cell division in lab studies, but this addresses only one potential biological effect.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed mouse and human cells to radiofrequency radiation at frequencies used by cell phones (835-847 MHz) for up to 100 hours to see if it affected how cells divide and grow. They found no changes in cell division patterns compared to unexposed cells. This suggests that RF radiation at these power levels doesn't disrupt normal cellular reproduction processes.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 835.62 MHz, 847.74 MHz
Study Details
The effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMFs) on cell cycle progression of mouse fibroblasts C3H 10T(1/2) and human glioma U87MG cells were determined by the flow cytometric bromodeoxyuridine pulse-chase method.
Cells were exposed to a frequency-modulated continuous wave at 835.62 MHz or a code division multipl...
The only significant change observed in the study was that associated with C3H 10T(1/2) cell culture...
The results show that exposure to RF EMFs, at the frequencies and power tested, does not have any effect on cell progression in vitro.
Show BibTeX
@article{r_2001_radiofrequency_electromagnetic_fields_do_3081,
author = {Higashikubo R and Ragouzis M and Moros EG and Straube WL and Roti Roti JL.},
title = {Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields do not alter the cell cycle progression of C3H 10T and U87MG cells.},
year = {2001},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11741503/},
}Cited By (41 papers)
- An in vitro study of the effects of exposure to a GSM signal in two human cell lines: Monocytic U937 and neuroblastoma SK‐N‐SHInfluential
E. Gurisik et al. (2006) - 70 citations
- Bone morphogenetic protein expression in newborn rat kidneys after prenatal exposure to radiofrequency radiationInfluential
A. Pyrpasopoulou et al. (2004) - 42 citations
- Effects of Electromagnetic Fields on Mammalian CellsInfluential
Kamal Hosain (2012) - 6 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS (EMF) ON HUMAN HEALTH
Student Ayush Verma (2006) - 314 citations
- Electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequency induce apoptosis and inactivation of the multi‐chaperone complex in human epidermoid cancer cells
M. Caraglia et al. (2005) - 132 citations
- Radiofrequency radiation (900 MHz) induces Egr‐1 gene expression and affects cell‐cycle control in human neuroblastoma cells
M. Buttiglione et al. (2007) - 104 citations
- Review of possible modulation‐dependent biological effects of radiofrequency fields
J. Juutilainen et al. (2011) - 78 citations
- Proliferation and apoptosis in a neuroblastoma cell line exposed to 900 MHz modulated radiofrequency field
P. Merola et al. (2006) - 67 citations
- Non‐thermal effects of electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequency on the refolding of an intracellular protein: Myoglobin
Fabrizio Mancinelli et al. (2004) - 58 citations