8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Cellular Effects

Human skin cell stress response to GSM-900 mobile phone signals. In vitro study on isolated primary cells and reconstructed epidermis

No Effects Found

Sanchez S, Milochau A, Ruffie G, Poulletier de Gannes F, Lagroye I, Haro E, Surleve-Bazeille JE, Billaudel B, Lassegues M, Veyret B. · 2006

View Original Abstract
Share:

Human skin cells showed minimal stress responses to cell phone radiation at legal safety limits, suggesting skin can adapt to typical phone exposures.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed human skin cells to cell phone radiation at the legal safety limit (2 W/kg SAR) for 48 hours to see if it triggered cellular stress responses. They found minimal changes - no cell death or tissue damage, with only slight increases in one stress protein in some cell types. The results suggest that skin cells can adapt to this level of radiofrequency exposure without harmful effects.

Study Details

In recent years, possible health hazards due to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted by mobile phones have been investigated. Because several publications have suggested that RFR is stressful, we explored the potential biological effects of Global System for Mobile phone communication at 900 MHz (GSM-900) exposure on cultures of isolated human skin cells and human reconstructed epidermis (hRE) using human keratinocytes.

As cell stress markers, we studied Hsc70, Hsp27 and Hsp70 heat shock protein (HSP) expression and ep...

Apoptosis was not induced in isolated cells and there was no alteration in hRE thickness or prolifer...

These results suggest that adaptive cell behaviour in response to RFR exposure, depending on the cell type and culture conditions, is unlikely to have deleterious effects at the skin level.

Cite This Study
Sanchez S, Milochau A, Ruffie G, Poulletier de Gannes F, Lagroye I, Haro E, Surleve-Bazeille JE, Billaudel B, Lassegues M, Veyret B. (2006). Human skin cell stress response to GSM-900 mobile phone signals. In vitro study on isolated primary cells and reconstructed epidermis FEBS J. 273(24):5491-5507, 2006.
Show BibTeX
@article{s_2006_human_skin_cell_stress_3354,
  author = {Sanchez S and Milochau A and Ruffie G and Poulletier de Gannes F and Lagroye I and Haro E and Surleve-Bazeille JE and Billaudel B and Lassegues M and Veyret B. },
  title = {Human skin cell stress response to GSM-900 mobile phone signals. In vitro study on isolated primary cells and reconstructed epidermis},
  year = {2006},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17094784/},
}
PubMed: 17094784

Cited By (42 papers)

Quick Questions About This Study

A 2006 study found that 48 hours of GSM-900 radiation at 2 W/kg SAR did not damage human skin cells. Researchers observed no cell death, tissue damage, or thickness changes in reconstructed skin tissue, suggesting skin cells can adapt to this exposure level without harmful effects.
No, exposure to 2 W/kg SAR (the legal safety limit) did not cause skin cell death in laboratory studies. Human skin cells exposed to GSM-900 radiation for 48 hours showed no apoptosis or tissue damage, indicating cellular adaptation rather than harm.
Research shows minimal heat shock protein changes from GSM-900 exposure. While isolated skin cells showed no HSP changes, reconstructed skin tissue had slight Hsp70 increases after weeks of culture. These minor changes suggest adaptive responses rather than cellular stress.
Studies indicate GSM-900 radiation appears safe for skin tissue at regulatory limits. Human skin cells exposed to 2 W/kg SAR for 48 hours showed no cell death, tissue damage, or proliferation changes, with only minor adaptive protein responses.
Skin fibroblasts exposed to 900 MHz GSM radiation showed decreased Hsc70 protein levels, but this varied with culture conditions. The study found no cell death or tissue damage, suggesting these protein changes represent cellular adaptation rather than harm.