Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Human skin cell stress response to GSM-900 mobile phone signals. In vitro study on isolated primary cells and reconstructed epidermis
Sanchez S, Milochau A, Ruffie G, Poulletier de Gannes F, Lagroye I, Haro E, Surleve-Bazeille JE, Billaudel B, Lassegues M, Veyret B. · 2006
View Original AbstractHuman skin cells showed minimal stress responses to cell phone radiation at legal safety limits, suggesting skin can adapt to typical phone exposures.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed human skin cells to cell phone radiation at the legal safety limit (2 W/kg SAR) for 48 hours to see if it triggered cellular stress responses. They found minimal changes - no cell death or tissue damage, with only slight increases in one stress protein in some cell types. The results suggest that skin cells can adapt to this level of radiofrequency exposure without harmful effects.
Why This Matters
This study provides reassuring evidence about skin-level effects from cell phone radiation, but it's important to view these findings in context. The researchers used the current SAR limit of 2 W/kg, which represents maximum legal exposure when a phone is pressed against your head. What this means for you is that your skin appears capable of handling this level of radiofrequency exposure without significant damage. However, this study only looked at skin cells in laboratory dishes for 48 hours. The reality is that we use our phones for years or decades, often at lower but more chronic exposure levels. While these findings are encouraging for acute skin effects, they don't address longer-term exposures or effects on other organ systems that may be more sensitive to radiofrequency radiation.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 2 W/kg
- Source/Device
- M-900 mobile phone
- Exposure Duration
- 48 h
Exposure Context
This study used 2 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 5x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
In recent years, possible health hazards due to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted by mobile phones have been investigated. Because several publications have suggested that RFR is stressful, we explored the potential biological effects of Global System for Mobile phone communication at 900 MHz (GSM-900) exposure on cultures of isolated human skin cells and human reconstructed epidermis (hRE) using human keratinocytes.
As cell stress markers, we studied Hsc70, Hsp27 and Hsp70 heat shock protein (HSP) expression and ep...
Apoptosis was not induced in isolated cells and there was no alteration in hRE thickness or prolifer...
These results suggest that adaptive cell behaviour in response to RFR exposure, depending on the cell type and culture conditions, is unlikely to have deleterious effects at the skin level.
Show BibTeX
@article{s_2006_human_skin_cell_stress_3354,
author = {Sanchez S and Milochau A and Ruffie G and Poulletier de Gannes F and Lagroye I and Haro E and Surleve-Bazeille JE and Billaudel B and Lassegues M and Veyret B. },
title = {Human skin cell stress response to GSM-900 mobile phone signals. In vitro study on isolated primary cells and reconstructed epidermis},
year = {2006},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17094784/},
}Cited By (42 papers)
- The discrepancy between maximum in vitro exposure levels and realistic conservative exposure levels of mobile phones operating at 900/1800 MHzInfluential
G. Schmid, N. Kuster (2015) - 11 citations
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations
- Proliferation, Oxidative Stress and Cell Death in Cells Exposed to 872 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation and Oxidants
A. Höytö et al. (2008) - 85 citations
- Radiofrequency Radiation and Gene/Protein Expression: A Review
J. McNamee, V. Chauhan (2009) - 67 citations
- The Influence of 1800 MHz GSM-like Signals on Hepatic Oxidative DNA and Lipid Damage in Nonpregnant, Pregnant, and Newly born Rabbits
A. Tomruk et al. (2009) - 66 citations
- Cellular and Molecular Responses to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields
J. Miyakoshi (2013) - 56 citations
- Effect of radiofrequency radiation in cultured mammalian cells: A review
Debashri Manna, R. Ghosh (2016) - 50 citations
- The Potential Effects of Electromagnetic Field: A Review
K. Ongel et al. (2009) - 44 citations
- Quality Matters: Systematic Analysis of Endpoints Related to “Cellular Life” in Vitro Data of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure
M. Simkó et al. (2016) - 43 citations