6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Absence of corneal endothelium injury in non-human primates treated with and without ophthalmologic drugs and exposed to 2.8 GHz pulsed microwaves.

No Effects Found

Lu ST, D'Andrea J, Chalfin S, Crane C, Marchello D, Garay R, Hatcher D, Ziriax J. · 2010

View Original Abstract
Share:

Intense microwave exposure showed no corneal damage in primates at levels hundreds of times higher than typical wireless device exposure.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed four rhesus monkeys to intense 2.8 GHz microwave radiation for 36 hours total over three weeks and measured any damage to the corneal endothelium (the inner layer of cells in the eye's cornea). The study found no changes in corneal cell density or thickness, even at power levels more than ten times higher than previous studies that reported eye damage. This suggests that microwave exposure at these levels may not harm this specific part of the eye.

Why This Matters

This study addresses important safety concerns about microwave radiation and eye damage, particularly relevant given our increasing exposure to similar frequencies from wireless devices and radar systems. The researchers used power densities of 291-464 W/cm² - extraordinarily high levels compared to typical cell phone exposures (which produce around 0.001-0.01 W/cm²). What makes this research significant is that it directly contradicts earlier studies suggesting corneal damage from pulsed microwave exposure. However, the study's small sample size (four monkeys) and focus on just one specific eye structure limits broader conclusions about microwave safety. The reality is that while these findings are reassuring for this particular biological endpoint, they don't address other potential effects of RF exposure on different body systems that have been documented in the scientific literature.

Exposure Details

SAR
5.07 W/kg
Power Density
291000, 464000 mW/cm²
Source/Device
2.8 GHz
Exposure Duration
4 h/day, 3 days/week for 3 weeks (nine exposures and 36 h total)

Exposure Context

This study used 291000, 464000 mW/cm² for radio frequency:

This study used 5.07 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 291000, 464000 mW/cm²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)This level is 13 times the FCC limit
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 2.80 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 2.80 GHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

The aim of this study is to investigate Absence of corneal endothelium injury in non-human primates treated with and without ophthalmologic drugs and exposed to 2.8 GHz pulsed microwaves.

In an attempt to confirm these observations, four adult male Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) under p...

Pulsed microwave exposure did not cause alterations in corneal endothelial cell density and corneal ...

Cite This Study
Lu ST, D'Andrea J, Chalfin S, Crane C, Marchello D, Garay R, Hatcher D, Ziriax J. (2010). Absence of corneal endothelium injury in non-human primates treated with and without ophthalmologic drugs and exposed to 2.8 GHz pulsed microwaves. Bioelectromagnetics.31(4):324-333,2010.
Show BibTeX
@article{st_2010_absence_of_corneal_endothelium_3213,
  author = {Lu ST and D'Andrea J and Chalfin S and Crane C and Marchello D and Garay R and Hatcher D and Ziriax J.},
  title = {Absence of corneal endothelium injury in non-human primates treated with and without ophthalmologic drugs and exposed to 2.8 GHz pulsed microwaves.},
  year = {2010},
  
  url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41175517_Absence_of_corneal_endothelium_injury_in_non-human_primates_treated_with_and_without_ophthalmologic_drugs_and_exposed_to_28_GHz_pulsed_microwaves},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

A 2010 study exposed rhesus monkeys to intense 2.8 GHz microwave radiation for 36 hours over three weeks and found no damage to corneal endothelium cells. The research showed no changes in corneal cell density or thickness, even at power levels more than ten times higher than previous studies reporting eye damage.
Research on rhesus monkeys found that pulsed 2.8 GHz microwave exposure did not affect corneal thickness. The study measured corneal endothelium after 36 hours of total exposure over three weeks, finding no alterations in cell density or tissue thickness even at very high power levels.
The 2010 primate study tested whether ophthalmologic drugs offered protection against 2.8 GHz microwave radiation, but found no eye damage occurred with or without the drugs. This suggests the microwave exposure itself didn't harm the corneal endothelium, making drug protection unnecessary at these exposure levels.
The 2010 study used 2.8 GHz microwave radiation at power levels more than ten times higher than previous research that reported eye damage. Despite this intense exposure over 36 hours across three weeks, researchers found no damage to the corneal endothelium in rhesus monkeys.
The 2010 rhesus monkey study could not confirm previous reports of corneal damage from pulsed microwave exposure. Using 2.8 GHz radiation at power levels more than ten times higher than earlier studies, researchers found no changes in corneal endothelial cell density or thickness.