Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitrosourea mouse model.
Tillmann T, Ernst H, Streckert J, Zhou Y, Taugner F, Hansen V, Dasenbrock C. · 2010
View Original AbstractMice pretreated with ethylnitrosourea and exposed to UMTS at 4.8 W/m(2) showed increased lung tumour rates, more lung carcinomas, higher carcinoma multiplicity, and doubled metastasising lung tumours.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed mice to UMTS fields at 0, 4.8, and 48 W/m(2) for up to 24 months starting from embryo-fetal exposure, with the 4.8 W/m(2) group also receiving prenatal ethylnitrosourea at 40 mg ENU/kg body weight. The high-level UMTS exposure (48 W/m(2)) showed tumour incidences comparable to sham and cage control groups. Mice given ethylnitrosourea and exposed to 4.8 W/m(2) UMTS had higher lung tumour rates and more lung carcinomas than ethylnitrosourea-only controls. Lung carcinoma multiplicity increased and the number of metastasising lung tumours doubled in the combined exposure group.
Why This Matters
The authors described the work as a pilot study. They reported a cocarcinogenic effect of lifelong UMTS exposure at 4.8 W/m(2) in female B6C3F1 descendants pretreated with ethylnitrosourea.
Exposure Details
- Power Density
- 0, 0.48, 4.8 mW/cm²
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
To evaluate putative effects on tumour susceptibility in mice exposed to a UMTS (universal mobile telecommunications system) test signal for up to 24 months, commencing with embryo-fetal exposure.
Animals were exposed to UMTS fields with intensities of 0, 4.8, and 48 W/m(2), the low-dose group (4...
The high-level UMTS exposure (48 W/m(2)), the sham exposure, and the cage control groups showed comp...
This pilot study indicates a cocarcinogenic effect of lifelong UMTS exposure (4.8 W/m(2)) in female B6C3F1 descendants subjected to pretreatment with ethylnitrosourea.
Show BibTeX
@article{t_2010_indication_of_cocarcinogenic_potential_1365,
author = {Tillmann T and Ernst H and Streckert J and Zhou Y and Taugner F and Hansen V and Dasenbrock C.},
title = {Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitrosourea mouse model.},
year = {2010},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20545575/},
}Cited By (70 papers)
- The Contribution of In Vivo Mammalian Studies to the Knowledge of Adverse Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation on Human HealthInfluential
A. Vornoli et al. (2019) - 31 citations
- Medicinal plants in mitigating electromagnetic radiation-induced neuronal damage: a concise reviewInfluential
S. Raghu et al. (2021) - 4 citations
- RESOLVING APPARENT INCONSISTENCIES IN EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES ON CANCER AND AUTO-IMMUNITYInfluential
V. Lauer (2015) - 3 citations
- Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).
Unknown authors (2020) - 1,297 citations
- Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective.
D. Belpomme et al. (2018) - 177 citations
- Systematic review of wireless phone use and brain cancer and other head tumors
M. Repacholi et al. (2012) - 111 citations
- Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans.
A. Lerchl et al. (2015) - 110 citations
- Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation
M. Carlberg, L. Hardell (2017) - 100 citations
- ICNIRP GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ( 100 K H Z TO 300 GH Z )
Unknown authors (2020) - 77 citations
- Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields.
Dimitris J. Panagopoulos (2019) - 71 citations