Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Chromosome damage and micronucleus formation in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to radiofrequency radiation at a cellular telephone frequency (847.74 MHz, CDMA).
Vijayalaxmi, Bisht KS, Pickard WF, Meltz ML, Roti Roti JL, Moros EG. · 2001
View Original AbstractCell phone radiation at 847.74 MHz showed no direct DNA damage in blood cells at high exposure levels over 24 hours.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed human blood cells to cell phone radiation at 847.74 MHz for 24 hours to see if it would damage DNA or cause chromosome breaks. They found no significant genetic damage compared to unexposed cells, even at high exposure levels (4.9-5.5 W/kg SAR). This suggests that this particular frequency and exposure duration may not directly harm cellular DNA.
Why This Matters
This study provides important data on one specific aspect of EMF exposure - whether cell phone frequencies directly break chromosomes or damage DNA in immune cells. The researchers used exposure levels significantly higher than typical phone use (modern phones operate at 1.6-2.0 W/kg SAR limits), yet found no genetic damage after 24 hours. However, this represents just one piece of a much larger puzzle. The science demonstrates that EMF effects extend far beyond direct DNA damage - studies have documented impacts on cellular signaling, oxidative stress, and protein function that don't require chromosome breaks. What this means for you is that while this frequency may not directly shatter your DNA, it doesn't rule out other biological effects that could accumulate over the years of daily exposure we all experience.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 4.9 or 5.5 W/kg
- Power Density
- 95 mW/cm²
- Source/Device
- 847.74 MHz
- Exposure Duration
- 24 hours
Exposure Context
This study used 95 mW/cm² for radio frequency:
- 9,500Mx above the Building Biology guideline of 0.1 μW/m²
- 158.3Mx above the BioInitiative Report recommendation of 0.0006 μW/cm²
This study used 4.9 or 5.5 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 12.3x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The aim of this study is to investigate Chromosome damage and micronucleus formation in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to radiofrequency radiation at a cellular telephone frequency (847.74 MHz, CDMA).
Peripheral blood samples collected from four healthy nonsmoking human volunteers were diluted with t...
The data indicated no significant differences between RF-radiation-exposed and sham-exposed lymphocy...
Thus there was no evidence for induction of chromosome aberrations and micronuclei in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro for 24 h to 847.74 MHz RF radiation (CDMA) at SARs of 4.9 or 5.5 W/kg.
Show BibTeX
@article{vijayalaxmi_2001_chromosome_damage_and_micronucleus_3471,
author = {Vijayalaxmi and Bisht KS and Pickard WF and Meltz ML and Roti Roti JL and Moros EG.},
title = {Chromosome damage and micronucleus formation in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to radiofrequency radiation at a cellular telephone frequency (847.74 MHz, CDMA).},
year = {2001},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11554855/},
}Cited By (92 papers)
- Cellular and Molecular Responses to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic FieldsInfluential
J. Miyakoshi (2013) - 56 citations
- Absence of mutagenic effects of 2.45 GHz radiofrequency exposure in spleen, liver, brain, and testis of lacZ-transgenic mouse exposed in utero.Influential
T. Ono et al. (2004) - 48 citations
- Epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones and cancer risk: a reviewInfluential
J. Boice, J. Mclaughlin (2002) - 38 citations
- Micronucleus frequency in erythrocytes of mice after long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiationInfluential
J. Juutilainen et al. (2007) - 35 citations
- The influence of differently polarised microwave radiation on chromatin in human cellsInfluential
Y. Shckorbatov et al. (2009) - 28 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study.
A. Agarwal et al. (2009) - 435 citations
- POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS (EMF) ON HUMAN HEALTH
Student Ayush Verma (2006) - 314 citations
- Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
H. W. Ruediger (2009) - 191 citations
- Mobile phones, mobile phone base stations and cancer: a review
J. Moulder et al. (2005) - 188 citations