6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

DNA & Genetic Damage

Cytogenetic Studies in Human Blood Lymphocytes Exposed In Vitro to Radiofrequency Radiation at a Cellular Telephone Frequency (835.62 MHz, FDMA).

No Effects Found

Vijayalaxmi , Leal BZ, Meltz ML, Pickard WF, Bisht KS, Roti Roti JL , Straube WL, Moros EG · 2001

View Original Abstract
Share:

This study found no DNA damage in blood cells exposed to cell phone radiation, but lab results don't always predict real-world biological effects.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed human blood cells to cell phone radiation at 835.62 MHz for 24 hours to see if it caused DNA damage. They found no increase in chromosomal breaks or other genetic damage markers compared to unexposed cells, even at high exposure levels. This suggests that this specific type of cell phone radiation may not directly damage DNA in blood cells under laboratory conditions.

Why This Matters

This study represents one piece of a complex puzzle in EMF research. While the researchers found no DNA damage in blood lymphocytes exposed to cell phone frequencies, it's important to understand the limitations. The study used exposure levels of 4.4-5.0 W/kg, which are higher than typical cell phone use (around 1.6 W/kg maximum). The research was also conducted on isolated cells in laboratory dishes, not living organisms where complex biological interactions occur. What this means for you is that while this particular study didn't find genetic damage, it doesn't settle the broader question of EMF health effects. The scientific literature contains studies showing both harmful and neutral effects, and many researchers argue that DNA damage may not be the primary mechanism of EMF biological effects. Other studies have found impacts on cellular function, protein expression, and oxidative stress that don't necessarily involve direct chromosomal breaks.

Exposure Details

SAR
4.4 or 5.0 W/kg
Power Density
86 mW/cm²
Source/Device
835.62 MHz
Exposure Duration
24 hours

Exposure Context

This study used 86 mW/cm² for radio frequency:

This study used 4.4 or 5.0 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 86 mW/cm²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)This level is 86 times the FCC limit
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 835.6 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 835.6 MHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

The aim of this study is to investigate Cytogenetic Studies in Human Blood Lymphocytes Exposed In Vitro to Radiofrequency Radiation at a Cellular Telephone Frequency (835.62 MHz, FDMA).

Freshly collected peripheral blood samples from four healthy human volunteers were diluted with RPMI...

The data indicated no significant differences between RF-radiation- and sham-exposed lymphocytes wit...

Thus, under the experimental conditions tested, there is no evidence for the induction of chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro for 24 h to 835.62 MHz RF radiation at SARs of 4.4 or 5.0 W/kg.

Cite This Study
Vijayalaxmi , Leal BZ, Meltz ML, Pickard WF, Bisht KS, Roti Roti JL , Straube WL, Moros EG (2001). Cytogenetic Studies in Human Blood Lymphocytes Exposed In Vitro to Radiofrequency Radiation at a Cellular Telephone Frequency (835.62 MHz, FDMA). Radiat Res 155(1):113-121, 2001.
Show BibTeX
@article{vijayalaxmi_2001_cytogenetic_studies_in_human_3470,
  author = {Vijayalaxmi  and Leal BZ and Meltz ML and Pickard WF and Bisht KS and Roti Roti JL  and Straube WL and Moros EG},
  title = {Cytogenetic Studies in Human Blood Lymphocytes Exposed In Vitro to Radiofrequency Radiation at a Cellular Telephone Frequency (835.62 MHz, FDMA).},
  year = {2001},
  
  url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11121222/},
}
PubMed: 11121222

Cited By (94 papers)

View all 94 citing papers on Semantic Scholar

Quick Questions About This Study

No, a 2001 study found no chromosomal damage in human blood lymphocytes exposed to 835.62 MHz FDMA radiation for 24 hours. Researchers detected no increase in chromosomal breaks, fragments, or micronuclei compared to unexposed cells, even at high exposure levels of 4.4-5.0 W/kg.
Research using 835.62 MHz radiation showed no damage to human white blood cells (lymphocytes) after 24-hour laboratory exposure. The study found no significant differences in mitotic activity, chromosomal aberrations, or cellular damage markers between exposed and unexposed blood cells.
Laboratory testing suggests 835.62 MHz FDMA radiation may not directly harm blood lymphocytes. A controlled study found no evidence of genetic damage, chromosomal breaks, or cellular abnormalities in human blood cells exposed for 24 hours at specific absorption rates up to 5.0 W/kg.
No, exposure to 835.62 MHz radiation at SAR levels of 4.4 and 5.0 W/kg did not increase micronuclei formation in human blood lymphocytes. The 2001 laboratory study found no significant difference in micronuclei incidence between radiation-exposed and control cells after 24-hour exposure.
Unlike gamma radiation, 835.62 MHz radiofrequency radiation caused no detectable DNA damage in human blood cells. While gamma radiation significantly increased all genetic damage markers, the cell phone frequency showed no difference from unexposed control cells in laboratory testing.