6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Nonthermal Effects of Lifelong High-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Social Memory Performance in Rats.

Bioeffects Seen

Schneider J, Stangassinger M · 2014

View Original Abstract
Share:

GSM-exposed male rats showed a memory performance deficit at 6 months of age, while EMF-exposed females showed no differences compared with controls.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed male and female rats continuously to either 900-MHz GSM or 1.966-GHz UMTS electromagnetic fields at 0.4 W/kg. Memory was assessed using a social discrimination procedure, with differences in sniffing duration to familiar and novel juvenile rats used as the measure. EMF-exposed females showed no differences in sniffing duration compared with controls, but sniffing durations of EMF-exposed males at 3 months of age were significantly affected. At 6 months of age, GSM-exposed male adults showed a memory performance deficit, but UMTS-exposed males did not.

Why This Matters

The study used a social discrimination procedure in which a target juvenile male was introduced to the subject's home cage for 4 min, and after 30 min the same animal and a novel juvenile male were simultaneously presented for 4 min. Differences in sniffing duration to the familiar and novel target rats during Trial 2 were used to assess memory performance. The researchers stated that their findings provide new insight into the nonthermal effects of long-term high-frequency EMF exposure on memory.

Exposure Details

SAR
0.4 W/kg
Source/Device
900-MHz GSM and 1.966-GHz UMTS
Exposure Duration
Life-long up to 6 months

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 0.4 W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 4 times higher than this level
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 900 MHz - 1.97 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 900 MHz - 1.97 GHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

In the present study, male and female rats were subjected to continuous far-field exposure to a frequency of 900-MHz (Global System for Mobile Communications [GSM]) or 1.966-GHz (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System [UMTS]) at 0.4 W/kg.

Memory performance of adult EMF-exposed and sham-exposed female rats (at 6 months of age) and male r...

EMF-exposed females exhibited no differences in sniffing duration compared with controls. In contras...

These findings provide new insight into the nonthermal effects of long-term high-frequency EMF exposure on memory

Cite This Study
Schneider J, Stangassinger M (2014). Nonthermal Effects of Lifelong High-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Social Memory Performance in Rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 128(5), 633–637,2014.
Show BibTeX
@article{j_2014_nonthermal_effects_of_lifelong_180,
  author = {Schneider J and Stangassinger M},
  title = {Nonthermal Effects of Lifelong High-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Social Memory Performance in Rats.},
  year = {2014},
  
  url = {https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-27551-001},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Rats were exposed to either 900-MHz GSM or 1.966-GHz UMTS at 0.4 W/kg.
A juvenile rat was introduced to a subject's home cage, and 30 minutes later that same rat and a novel juvenile were presented together; differences in sniffing duration between the two were used to assess memory performance.
EMF-exposed females exhibited no differences in sniffing duration compared with controls.
At 6 months of age, GSM-exposed male adults showed a memory performance deficit, but UMTS-exposed males did not.
The researchers described their findings as providing new insight into the nonthermal effects of long-term high-frequency EMF exposure on memory.