Effect of bluetooth headset and mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the human auditory nerve
Mandalà M, Colletti V, Sacchetto L, Manganotti P, Ramat S, Marcocci A, Colletti L. · 2013
View Original AbstractBluetooth headset exposure showed no short-term effect on auditory nerve signals, while direct mobile phone exposure significantly reduced signal amplitude and increased latency.
Plain English Summary
Researchers conducted a study to verify whether Bluetooth devices reduce the auditory nerve effects seen with direct mobile phone electromagnetic field exposure, using the same experimental protocol as a prior investigation. Twelve patients underwent retrosigmoid vestibular neurectomy to treat definite unilateral Ménière's disease while being monitored with acoustically evoked CNAPs during direct mobile phone or Bluetooth headset exposure. Bluetooth electromagnetic fields did not produce any significant change in cochlear nerve activity, while mobile phone electromagnetic fields caused a significant decrease in CNAP amplitude and an increase in latency in all subjects.
Why This Matters
The study took place in a surgical setting, where prior work by the same group had shown that direct cell phone electromagnetic field exposure deteriorates auditory evoked cochlear nerve compound action potentials in humans. The researchers acknowledged that these surgical conditions of exposure differ from those of everyday life, in which various biological tissues may reduce the electromagnetic field affecting the cochlear nerve. The CNAP measurements tracked signal amplitude and latency, both of which were described as very sensitive to electromagnetic fields produced by the tested mobile phone. The researchers suggested these novel findings may have important safety implications.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 0.82 W/kg
- Source/Device
- 900 MHz mobile phone and 2.4 GHz Bluetooth headset
- Exposure Duration
- continuous for 5 min
Exposure Context
This study used 0.82 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 2.1x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The possibility that long‐term mobile phone use increases the incidence of astrocytoma, glioma and acoustic neuroma has been investigated in several studies. Recently, our group showed that direct exposure (in a surgical setting) to cell phone electromagnetic fields (EMFs) induces deterioration of auditory evoked cochlear nerve compound action potential (CNAP) in humans. To verify whether the use of Bluetooth devices reduces these effects, we conducted the present study with the same experimental protocol.
Twelve patients underwent retrosigmoid vestibular neurectomy to treat definite unilateral Ménière's ...
We found no short‐term effects of Bluetooth EMFs on the auditory nervous structures, whereas direct ...
The outcomes of the present study show that, contrary to the finding that the latency and amplitude of CNAPs are very sensitive to EMFs produced by the tested mobile phone, the EMFs produced by a common Bluetooth device do not induce any significant change in cochlear nerve activity. The conditions of exposure, therefore, differ from those of everyday life, in which various biological tissues may reduce the EMF affecting the cochlear nerve. Nevertheless, these novel findings may have important safety implications.
Show BibTeX
@article{m_2013_effect_of_bluetooth_headset_136,
author = {Mandalà M and Colletti V and Sacchetto L and Manganotti P and Ramat S and Marcocci A and Colletti L.},
title = {Effect of bluetooth headset and mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the human auditory nerve},
year = {2013},
doi = {10.1002/lary.24103},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lary.24103},
}Cited By (13 papers)
- Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies
Dimitris J. Panagopoulos et al. (2015) - 59 citations
- Self-health monitoring and wearable neurotechnologies.
C. Cannard et al. (2020) - 23 citations
- Tinnitus and cell phones: the role of electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation
Luisa Nascimento Medeiros, T. Sanchez (2015) - 18 citations
- A Summary of Recent Literature (2007–2017) on Neurobiological Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation
Henry C. Lai (2018) - 15 citations
- Mobile Telephony EMFs Effects on Insect Ovarian Cells. The Necessity for Real Exposures Bioactivity Assessment. The Key Role of Polarization, and the “Ion Forced-Oscillation Mechanism”
Dimitris J. Panagopoulos (2017) - 12 citations
- Recent research on EMF and health risk : ninth report from SSM's scientific council on electromagnetic fields, 2014
H. Danker-Hopfe et al. (2014) - 12 citations
- Mobile Communications and Public Health
M. Markov, (2018) - 11 citations
- Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation of Mobile Phones on the Human Brain
J. Malik (2020) - 6 citations
- The potential protective effects of melatonin and omega-3 on the male rat optic nerve exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic radiation during the prenatal period
Kıymet Kübra Tüfekci et al. (2023) - 3 citations
- Can Mobile Phone Usage Affect Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Response?
N. K. Uluaydin et al. (2020) - 3 citations