6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level
View study: Analysis of in situ electric field and specific absorption r...

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

Whole Body / General

Two-Dimensional in-Vitro Studies of Femoral Arterial Walls of the Dog

Françoise M. L. Attinger · 1968

Researchers tested excised femoral arteries from six dogs under control, vasoconstriction, and metabolic inhibition conditions. During control conditions the tangential modulus of elasticity was higher than the longitudinal modulus. Vasoconstriction increased nonlinearity of the stress-strain relation and decreased the arterial wall's modulus of elasticity. Total stress relaxation was very small in the longitudinal direction but larger in the tangential direction.

View Study Details
Brain & Nervous System

THE ROLE OF DIFFERENT BRAIN FORMATIONS IN EEG REACTIONS OF RABBITS TO A CONSTANT MAGNETIC FIELD AND ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS OF ULTRA HIGH AND SUPERHIGH FREQUENCIES

R. A. CHIZHENKOVA · 1967

Researchers exposed rabbits for one minute to a constant magnetic field of 460 versts, a UHF field of wavelength 7.5 z at 30 v/m, and an SHF field of wavelength 12.5 cm with power flux density 40 m W/cm?. The constant magnetic field increased the number of EEG spindles. UHF and SHF fields caused the appearance of slow high-amplitude waves, which could be accompanied by increased spindles. Unilateral ablation of the midbrain reticular formation, posterior atrolateral thalamic nucleus, or anterior hypothalamus did not hinder these EEG responses. The authors concluded that the fields act directly on the central nervous system, not reflexively.

View Study Details
Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found

Effect of Microwaves on Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis

Samuel A. Goldblith, Daniel I. C. Wang · 1967

Researchers exposed suspensions of E. coli and B. subtilis spores to microwave energy at 2,450 MHz and conventional heating, comparing inactivation quantitatively. During transient microwave heating, E. coli showed a 6 log cycle reduction in viability, nearly identical to that predicted from conventional heating at the same time-temperature profile. B. subtilis spores heated at 100°C, in ice, and during transient heating showed identical inactivation by microwave and conventional heating.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General
Not an original health-effects study

USA Standard Safety Level of Electromagnetic Radiation with Respect to Personnel

Unknown authors · 1967

The standard recommends a radiation protection guide of 10 mW/cm² for electromagnetic radiation from 10 MHz to 100 GHz averaged over any 0.1-hour period. The guide applies to both continuous and intermittent radiation and covers whole-body and partial-body exposure. Radiation at a power level tenfold smaller than the guide is considered to have no noticeable effect, while radiation tenfold larger is considered certainly dangerous.

View Study Details
Brain & Nervous System

Measurement of recovery from electrical anesthesia in primates

Arthur S. Wilson, Sanford J. Larson, Anthony Sances, Jr. · 1967

Researchers trained squirrel monkeys to press a button to avoid painful stimuli preceded by flashing lights. After training, the animals received 15 minutes of electroanesthesia followed by recovery periods ranging from 5 to 40 minutes. Performance on the decision-making task was compared before and after electroanesthesia, showing that about a 30-minute recovery period was required to return to baseline performance.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

Bacterial Lethality Predictions During Heating Based on Principles of Similitude

J. W. Zahradnik, R. E. Stumbo · 1967

The apparatus was designed around equality of the Damkohler group (rL/uC). The test organism was a 10 °'celli per ml. suspension of Salmonella genftenberg 775W, and experiments were performed at 65.6°C and one replication at 68.3°C. Lethality predictions from the model agreed with prototype measurements at the 1% significance level for a diameter scale-up of 2 and a flow-rate scale-up of 4.

View Study Details

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation book cover

Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation

Dr. Martin Blank & R Blank

Read on Amazon
Empowered: A Practical Guide to Protecting Yourself from EMF book cover

Empowered: A Practical Guide to Protecting Yourself from EMF

R Blank

Read on Amazon

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.