3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Cell Phone Radiation Research

RF Radiation

Research on electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones, including 2G, 3G, 4G LTE, and 5G NR signals.

1,326
Studies
73%
Showed Bioeffects
1
EMF Type
700 MHz - 2.7 GHz
Frequency

Related Studies (1,326)

Reactive oxygen species elevation and recovery in Drosophila bodies and ovaries following short-term and long-term exposure to DECT base EMF

Manta AK, Stravopodis DJ, Papassideri IS, Margaritis LH. · 2014

Researchers exposed fruit flies to cordless phone base station radiation and found cellular damage markers doubled in fly bodies after 6 hours. Female reproductive organs showed even faster responses, with damage markers increasing 2.5 times after just 1 hour of exposure.

Evaluation of exposure to electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation in the indoor workplace accessible to the public by the use of frequency-selective exposimeters.

Gryz K, Karpowicz J, Leszko W, Zradziński P. · 2014

Polish researchers measured radiofrequency radiation in 45 office buildings from cell towers, WiFi, and broadcast transmitters. They found exposure levels were generally low, with highest readings near indoor cell antennas (1.8 V/m) and radio transmitters (3.8 V/m), but all remained below international safety limits.

Adaptive Response in Mice Exposed to 900 MHz Radiofrequency Fields: Bleomycin-induced DNA and Oxidative Damage/Repair.

Zong C, Ji Y, He Q, Zhu S, Qin F, Tong J, Cao Y. · 2014

Researchers exposed mice to cell phone frequency radiation (900 MHz) for 4 hours daily for a week, then injected them with a DNA-damaging drug called bleomycin. They found that mice pre-exposed to the radiation showed less DNA damage from the drug and better antioxidant defenses compared to mice that received only the drug. This suggests the radiation exposure triggered protective cellular responses that helped the mice resist subsequent damage.

The effect of 2100 MHz radiofrequency radiation of a 3G mobile phone on the parotid gland of rats.

Aydogan F et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed rats to 3G mobile phone radiation (2100 MHz) for 6 hours daily and found significant damage to their parotid glands (the saliva-producing glands near your ears). The damage included changes to cell structure, blood vessels, and cellular components, with more severe effects after longer exposure periods (40 days versus 10 days). This matters because the parotid glands are located exactly where you hold your phone during calls.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Effect of 950 MHz UHF electromagnetic radiation on biomarkers of oxidative damage, metabolism of UFA and antioxidants in the livers of young rats of different ages

Furtado-Filho OV et al. · 2014

Brazilian researchers exposed young rats to cell phone-level radiation (950 MHz) for 30 minutes daily, starting before birth and continuing up to 30 days after birth. They found no evidence of oxidative stress or DNA damage in most age groups, though 30-day-old rats showed some genetic changes and newborns had altered fatty acid levels in their livers. The study suggests that developing animals may be more resilient to short-term RF radiation exposure than previously thought.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Behavior and memory evaluation of Wistar rats exposed to 1·8 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation.

Júnior LC et al. · 2014

Brazilian researchers exposed lab rats to cell phone radiation at 1.8 GHz (the frequency used by GSM phones) for three days and tested their behavior and memory. While the rats showed no anxiety or memory problems, they did exhibit stress-related behaviors. The study suggests that cell phone radiation may not directly harm brain function but could trigger stress responses in the nervous system.

Impact of head morphology on local brain specific absorption rate from exposure to mobile phone radiation.

Adibzadeh F et al. · 2014

Researchers used computer models to study how mobile phone radiation is absorbed in the brains of 20 different people with varying head shapes and sizes. They found that radiation absorption (called SAR) varied dramatically between individuals - up to 16 times higher in some people compared to others, depending on their unique head anatomy. This means current safety testing, which uses only standard dummy heads, may not accurately predict radiation exposure for real people with different head shapes.

Effect of a 2.45-GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field on neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis in differentiated human HL-60 cells.

Koyama S et al. · 2014

Japanese researchers exposed immune cells called neutrophils to 2.45-GHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used in WiFi and microwave ovens) at levels up to 10 W/kg for up to 24 hours. They found no significant effects on the cells' ability to migrate toward threats or engulf harmful particles - two critical immune functions. This suggests that RF exposure at current safety limits may not impair these specific immune responses.

Analysis of the influence of handset phone position on RF exposure of brain tissue.

Ghanmi A, Varsier N, Hadjem A, Conil E, Picon O, Wiart J. · 2014

French researchers tested 80 different positions of mobile phones against the head to measure how much radiofrequency energy (called SAR) reaches brain tissue at standard cell phone frequencies. They found that simply changing how you hold your phone can increase brain exposure by up to 20% compared to the standard cheek position used in safety testing. This means current safety tests may underestimate real-world exposure for some common phone positions.

Mobile Phone Radiation Alters Proliferation of Hepatocarcinoma Cells.

Ozgur E, Guler G, Kismali G, Seyhan N · 2014

Researchers exposed liver cancer cells to mobile phone radiation at levels typical of phone use (2 W/kg SAR) for up to 4 hours. The radiation decreased cell survival and caused DNA damage, with 1,800-MHz frequencies proving more harmful than 900-MHz. This suggests that the radiofrequency radiation from mobile phones can directly damage cells at exposure levels considered safe by current regulations.

Circadian alterations of reproductive functional markers in male rats exposed to 1800-MHz radiofrequency field.

Qin F et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed male rats to cell phone radiation (1800 MHz) for 2 hours daily over 32 days and found it disrupted their natural body clocks and harmed reproductive function. The radiation reduced testosterone levels, decreased sperm production and movement, and interfered with the normal daily rhythms that regulate these processes. This suggests that the timing of EMF exposure throughout the day may influence how severely it affects male fertility.

Evaluation of selected biochemical parameters in the saliva of young males using mobile phones

Abu Khadra KM, Khalil AM, Abu Samak M, Aljaberi A. · 2014

Researchers measured biochemical changes in saliva from 12 young men before and after using mobile phones for 15 and 30 minutes at typical exposure levels. They found that cell phone radiation significantly increased levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), an enzyme that fights cellular damage, suggesting the body was responding to oxidative stress. This provides direct evidence that even brief phone calls can trigger measurable biological responses in human cells.

Evaluation of selected biochemical parameters in the saliva of young males using mobile phones.

Abu Khadra KM, Khalil AM, Abu Samak M, Aljaberi A. · 2014

Researchers measured biochemical changes in saliva from 12 young men before and after using mobile phones at typical exposure levels (1.09 W/kg SAR). They found that just 15 minutes of phone use triggered a significant increase in superoxide dismutase (an enzyme that fights cellular damage), indicating the body was responding to oxidative stress from the radiation.

Plasma thyroid hormones and corticosterone levels in blood of chicken embryos and post hatch chickens exposed during incubation to 1800 MHz electromagnetic field.

Pawlak K, Sechman A, Nieckarz Z. · 2014

Polish researchers exposed chicken embryos to cell phone radiation (1800 MHz) during their development and measured hormone levels in their blood. They found that the radiation disrupted the thyroid system, reducing important thyroid hormones while increasing stress hormones in the embryos and newly hatched chicks. This suggests that exposure to wireless radiation during critical developmental periods can interfere with the hormone systems that control growth and metabolism.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Multigenerational effects of whole body exposure to 2.14 GHz W-CDMA cellular phone signals on brain function in rats

Shirai T et al. · 2014

Japanese researchers exposed three generations of rats to cell phone signals (2.14 GHz W-CDMA) for 20 hours daily, testing brain function and development across multiple generations. They found no adverse effects on brain function, behavior, or development in any of the three generations studied. This comprehensive multigenerational study suggests that chronic exposure to these specific cell phone frequencies at the tested levels did not cause detectable brain or developmental problems in rats.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Multigenerational effects of whole body exposure to 2.14 GHz W-CDMA cellular phone signals on brain function in rats.

Shirai T et al. · 2014

Japanese researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation (2.14 GHz W-CDMA signals) for 20 hours daily across three generations to see if it affected brain development and behavior. They found no abnormalities in brain function, behavior, or general health in any generation of rats, even with continuous exposure from pregnancy through adulthood. The study suggests that this type of cell phone radiation at these exposure levels does not cause harmful effects that pass from parents to offspring.

Diverse Radiofrequency Sensitivity and Radiofrequency Effects of Mobile or Cordless Phone near Fields Exposure in Drosophila melanogaster.

Geronikolou S et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed fruit flies (Drosophila) to radiation from both mobile phones (900 MHz) and cordless phones (1880 MHz) to study reproductive effects. They found that mobile phone radiation significantly reduced egg laying in the second generation of flies, while cordless phone radiation showed only limited effects. The study suggests that lower frequency radiation may cause stronger biological impacts.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Modeling of EEG electrode artifacts and thermal ripples in human radiofrequency exposure studies.

Murbach et al. · 2014

Researchers investigated why radiofrequency radiation from cell phones appears to affect brain activity patterns (EEG) during sleep studies. They tested three possible explanations using computer models and found that RF exposure doesn't significantly heat the brain or interfere with electrode measurements. While the study ruled out these technical artifacts, the actual mechanism behind RF's effects on brain activity remains unexplained.

Noninvasive Assessment of Metabolic Effects of Exposure to 900 MHz Electromagnetic Fields on Djungarian Hamsters ( Phodopus sungorus).

Taberski K et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed hamsters to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields (similar to 2G cell phone signals) at different power levels for one week each to study metabolic changes. At the highest exposure level (4 W/kg), hamsters showed reduced daytime metabolism, lower food consumption, and slightly elevated skin temperature, even though their core body temperature remained stable. This suggests that high-level radiofrequency exposure can alter basic metabolic processes in mammals.

The effects of mobile phones on apoptosis in cerebral tissue: an experimental study on rats.

Yilmaz A et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed rats to mobile phone radiation at typical usage levels for four weeks, then examined brain tissue for signs of cell death (apoptosis). They found significantly increased levels of proteins that control cell death in the exposed rats compared to unexposed controls. This suggests that mobile phone radiation may trigger cellular stress responses in brain tissue at exposure levels similar to everyday phone use.

Effects of microwaves (950 MHZ mobile phone) on morphometric and apoptotic changes of rabbit epididymis.

Azadi Oskouyi E et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed male rabbits to 950 MHz microwave radiation (similar to older mobile phone frequencies) for 2 hours daily over 2 weeks. They found that the radiation caused significant damage to the epididymis (part of the male reproductive system), including tissue shrinkage, reduced testosterone levels at higher power, and increased cell death. This suggests that microwave radiation from mobile devices could potentially harm male fertility.

The effect of radiofrequency radiation generated by a Global System for Mobile Communications source on cochlear development in a rat model.

Seckin E et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed pregnant rats and their offspring to cell phone radiation (900 and 1800 MHz frequencies) for one hour daily during pregnancy and for 21 days after birth. While hearing tests showed no differences between exposed and unexposed animals, microscopic examination revealed significant cellular damage in the inner ear structures responsible for hearing. This suggests that cell phone radiation can harm developing hearing organs even when functional hearing appears normal.

Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found

Effect of long term 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation on enamel microhardness of rat's teeth.

Dasdag S, Yavuz I1, Bakkal M, Kargul B. · 2014

Turkish researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation (900 MHz) for 2 hours daily over 10 months to see if it would weaken tooth enamel. They found no changes in the hardness of the rats' tooth enamel compared to unexposed control animals. This suggests that typical cell phone use may not directly damage the structural integrity of teeth.

CardiovascularNo Effects Found

Effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on electrocardiograms of guinea pigs

Meral I, Tekintangac Y, Demir H · 2014

Researchers exposed guinea pigs to cell phone radiation for 12 hours daily over 30 days and monitored their heart function using electrocardiograms (ECGs). The study found no significant changes in heart rhythm or electrical activity compared to unexposed animals. However, the researchers noted that longer exposure periods might be needed to detect potential cardiovascular effects from mobile phone radiation.

The in vivo effects of low-intensity radiofrequency fields on the motor activity of protozoa

Sarapultseva EI, Igolkina JV, Tikhonov VN, Dubrova YE · 2014

Researchers exposed single-celled organisms called ciliates to radiofrequency radiation at levels similar to what we encounter from cell phones and wireless devices. The radiation significantly reduced the organisms' ability to move, and this damage persisted in their offspring for at least 10-15 generations even though the offspring were never directly exposed. This suggests that RF radiation can cause biological effects that are passed down to future generations.

FAQs: Cell Phones EMF Research

Of 1,326 peer-reviewed studies examining cell phones electromagnetic radiation, 73% found measurable biological effects. These studies span decades of research conducted by scientists worldwide and include both laboratory experiments and epidemiological studies examining the health effects of cell phones radiation exposure.
The BioInitiative Report database includes 1,326 peer-reviewed studies specifically examining cell phones electromagnetic radiation and its potential health effects. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research examines various biological endpoints including cellular effects, neurological impacts, reproductive health, and other health outcomes.
73% of the 1,326 studies examining cell phones electromagnetic radiation found measurable biological effects. This means that 968 studies documented observable changes when organisms were exposed to cell phones EMF. The remaining studies either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results.