Electromagnetic field could protect SH-SY5Y cells against cisplatin cytotoxicity, but not MCF-7 cells.
Mahmoudinasab H, Saadat M. · 2018
View Original AbstractMagnetic field exposure protected nerve cells but not cancer cells from drug toxicity, showing EMF effects vary dramatically by cell type.
Plain English Summary
Scientists tested whether 50 Hz magnetic fields affect how cancer drugs work on different cell types. The magnetic field protected nerve cells from chemotherapy toxicity by boosting antioxidants, but didn't protect breast cancer cells. This shows EMF can alter medical treatment effectiveness differently across cell types.
Why This Matters
This study reveals something crucial that's often overlooked in EMF research: the same electromagnetic exposure can have dramatically different effects depending on the type of cells involved. The 0.5 mT magnetic field used here is roughly 10 times stronger than what you'd encounter near household appliances, but similar to levels found very close to power lines or certain medical devices. What makes this particularly significant is that the EMF exposure actually helped nerve cells survive a toxic challenge by ramping up their antioxidant systems. This contradicts the simple narrative that EMF is universally harmful and highlights why we need nuanced, cell-type-specific research rather than broad generalizations. The reality is that your body contains dozens of different cell types, each potentially responding to EMF in unique ways. This complexity is exactly why regulatory agencies struggle to establish universal safety standards and why you should be skeptical of both industry claims that EMF is completely safe and activist claims that it's universally dangerous.
Exposure Details
- Magnetic Field
- 0.5 mG
- Source/Device
- 50 Hz
- Exposure Duration
- 15 min field-on/15 min field-off
Exposure Context
This study used 0.5 mG for magnetic fields:
- 25Kx above the Building Biology guideline of 0.2 mG
- 5Kx above the BioInitiative Report recommendation of 1 mG
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
In this study, we tried to increase the cytotoxicity of CDDP in combination with Mor and/or EMF in MCF-7 and SH-SY5Y cells. Furthermore, we evaluate the expression levels of 11 antioxidant genes in both cell lines.
We designed four treatments: CDDP alone, “CDDP+Mor,” “CDDP+EMF,” and “CDDP+Mor+EMF.” Serial dilution...
The IC50 value of CDDP in “CDDP+Mor+EMF” treatment was significantly higher than CDDP alone and “CDD...
Show BibTeX
@article{h_2018_electromagnetic_field_could_protect_415,
author = {Mahmoudinasab H and Saadat M.},
title = {Electromagnetic field could protect SH-SY5Y cells against cisplatin cytotoxicity, but not MCF-7 cells. },
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1089/dna.2017.4108},
url = {https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/dna.2017.4108},
}Cited By (3 papers)
- Cytotoxic activity of organotin carboxylates based on synthetic phenolic antioxidants and polycyclic bile acids
T. Antonenko et al. (2020) - 23 citations
- Effects of electromagnetic field, cisplatin and morphine on cytotoxicity and expression levels of DNA repair genes
Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi, M. Saadat (2018) - 10 citations
- Association Between a 50bp Ins/Del Genetic Variation at Promoter of the Superoxide Dismutase-1 (SOD1) and the Risk of Dependency to Opium and Methamphetamine
Khyber Saify, M. Saadat (2018) - 2 citations
- Electro/magnetization of saltwater alleviates its genotoxicity in Vicia faba roots
D. Souguir, Mohamed Hachicha (2026)