Differentiation of K562 Cells Under ELF-EMF Applied at Different Time Courses
Ayşe IG, Zafer A, Sule O, Işil IT, Kalkan T. · 2010
View Original AbstractA single ELF-EMF exposure decreased differentiation in K562 cells, while daily exposures for 1 hour caused an increase in differentiation.
Plain English Summary
Researchers studied the effect of ELF-EMF on the differentiation of K562 cells at different time courses. A single exposure to ELF-EMF resulted in a decrease in differentiation, while ELF-EMF applied every day for 1 hour caused an increase in differentiation. ELF-EMF increased ROS levels in K562 cells not treated with hemin, but did not change ROS levels in hemin-treated cells, indicating that ROS was not the cause of the differentiation effects.
Why This Matters
The exposure used was ELF-EMF at 50 Hz and 5 mT, applied for 1 hour. One group received a single 1-hour exposure at the onset of hemin induction, while another group received daily 1-hour exposures for four days. The researchers also tested co-stressors, including magnesium and heat-shock, and found similar results. The researchers concluded that the time-course of application is an important parameter determining the physiological response of cells to ELF-EMF.
Exposure Details
- Magnetic Field
- 5 mT
- Source/Device
- 50 Hz
- Exposure Duration
- 1h
Exposure Context
This study used 5 mT for magnetic fields:
- 250Kx above the Building Biology guideline of 0.2 mG
- 50Kx above the BioInitiative Report recommendation of 1 mG
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
This study investigated the effect of ELF-EMF on the differentiation of K562 cells at different time courses
ELF-EMF (50 Hz, 5 mT, 1 h) was applied at two different time-courses; first at the onset of hemin in...
While single exposure to ELF-EMF resulted in a decrease in differentiation, ELF-EMF applied everyday...
Overall, these results imply that the time-course of application is an important parameter determining the physiological response of cells to ELF-EMF.
Show BibTeX
@article{ig_2010_differentiation_of_k562_cells_321,
author = {Ayşe IG and Zafer A and Sule O and Işil IT and Kalkan T. },
title = {Differentiation of K562 Cells Under ELF-EMF Applied at Different Time Courses},
year = {2010},
doi = {10.3109/15368378.2010.502451},
url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2010.502451},
}Cited By (43 papers)
- Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) Trigger Cell Death and Senescence in Cancer CellsInfluential
Pavlos Pantelis et al. (2024) - 20 citations
- Magnetic Fields and Reactive Oxygen Species
Huizhen Wang, Xin Zhang (2017) - 208 citations
- Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective.
D. Belpomme et al. (2018) - 177 citations
- Manmade Electromagnetic Fields and Oxidative Stress—Biological Effects and Consequences for Health
D. Schuermann, M. Mevissen (2021) - 151 citations
- Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism
Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi, C. Simon (2022) - 145 citations
- Role of Mitochondria in the Oxidative Stress Induced by Electromagnetic Fields: Focus on Reproductive Systems
S. Santini et al. (2018) - 119 citations
- Experimental model for ELF-EMF exposure: Concern for human health.
C. D'Angelo et al. (2015) - 89 citations
- Exposure to Static and Extremely-Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields and Cellular Free Radicals
Henry C. Lai (2019) - 79 citations
- Grouping of Experimental Conditions as an Approach to Evaluate Effects of Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields on Oxidative Response in in vitro Studies
M. Mattsson, M. Simkó (2014) - 71 citations
- Effects of low frequency electromagnetic field on proliferation of human epidermal stem cells: An in vitro study
Mingsheng Zhang et al. (2013) - 69 citations