Mobile phone electromagnetic radiation activates MAPK signaling and regulates viability in Drosophila.
Lee KS, Choi JS, Hong SY, Son TH, Yu K. · 2008
View Original AbstractAt the ANSI exposure limit, mobile phone EMF triggered survival signaling in Drosophila, while a stronger dose activated apoptotic signaling.
Plain English Summary
Researchers studied biological effects of mobile phone 835 MHz electromagnetic fields in Drosophila at SAR 1.6 W/kg and SAR 4.0 W/kg. At SAR 1.6 W/kg, more than 90% of flies remained viable even after the 30 h exposure, while at SAR 4.0 W/kg viability dropped from the 12 h exposure. Both exposure levels triggered a stress response, increased reactive oxygen species production, and activated ERK and JNK signaling, but not p38 kinase signaling. SAR 4.0 W/kg strongly activated JNK signaling, expression of apoptotic genes, and amplified the number of apoptotic cells in the fly brain.
Why This Matters
The study used Drosophila as a model to examine biological effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields at different intensities. SAR 1.6 W/kg was tested because it is the proposed exposure limit by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), while SAR 4.0 W/kg represented a stronger level of exposure. At the ANSI limit dose, the dominant molecular response was activation of ERK signaling and expression of an anti-apoptotic gene. At the higher dose, JNK signaling and apoptotic gene expression were strongly activated, and apoptotic cell numbers rose in the brain.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 1.6 and 4 W/kg
- Source/Device
- 835 MHz
- Exposure Duration
- continuous for 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 h
Exposure Context
This study used 1.6 and 4 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 4x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
In this report, we show biological effects of the mobile phone 835 MHz electromagnetic field (EMF) in the Drosophila model system.
When flies were exposed to the specific absorption rate (SAR) 1.6 W/kg, which is the proposed expos...
These findings demonstrate that the exposure limit on electromagnetic radiation proposed by ANSI triggered ERK‐survival signaling but the strong electromagnetic radiation activated JNK‐apoptotic signaling in Drosophila.
Show BibTeX
@article{ks_2008_mobile_phone_electromagnetic_radiation_120,
author = {Lee KS and Choi JS and Hong SY and Son TH and Yu K.},
title = {Mobile phone electromagnetic radiation activates MAPK signaling and regulates viability in Drosophila.},
year = {2008},
doi = {10.1002/bem.20395},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bem.20395},
}Cited By (45 papers)
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.Influential
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations
- Biological monitoring of non‐thermal effects of mobile phone radiation: recent approaches and challengesInfluential
M. Gaestel (2009) - 50 citations
- Reactive oxygen species elevation and recovery in Drosophila bodies and ovaries following short-term and long-term exposure to DECT base EMFInfluential
A. Manta et al. (2014) - 30 citations
- Apoptotic cell death during Drosophila oogenesis is differentially increased by electromagnetic radiation depending on modulation, intensity and duration of exposureInfluential
N. E. Sagioglou et al. (2016) - 13 citations
- The Expression changes of AMPK, ERK-1/2, and p38 protein associated with Exercise in the Mouse hippocampus exposed to Radiofrequency RadiationInfluential
Min-Sun Lee et al. (2020)
- Mobile phone use while driving-literary review
K. Lipovac et al. (2017) - 163 citations
- Feasibility for Microwaves Energy to Affect Biological Systems Via Nonthermal Mechanisms: A Systematic Approach
F. Apollonio et al. (2013) - 89 citations
- Electromagnetic fields: mechanism, cell signaling, other bioprocesses, toxicity, radicals, antioxidants and beneficial effects
P. Kovacic, R. Somanathan (2010) - 87 citations
- Brain proteome response following whole body exposure of mice to mobile phone or wireless DECT base radiation
A. Fragopoulou et al. (2012) - 78 citations
- Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields.
Dimitris J. Panagopoulos (2019) - 71 citations