6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

Whole Body / General
Not an original health-effects study

Microwave and RF Hazard Standard Considerations

H. P. Schwan · 1982

The total frequency range is divided into four parts: below resonance, resonance, hot spot, and surface heating ranges. In the resonance range, absorption can be more than four times the incident radiation, with average SAR peaking near 80 MHz and extending from 30 to 300 MHz. Hot spots occur from 0.3 to 2 GHz for a human head model, with temperature elevations of 0.5°C at 10 mW/g SAR and a thermal time constant of about 3 minutes.

Magnetic Necklace: Its Therapeutic Effectiveness on Neck and Shoulder Pain

Chang-Zern Hong et al. · 1982

Researchers studied 101 volunteers in a double-blind trial with four groups matched for pain status and magnetic or nonmagnetic necklace assignment. All subjects wore the necklaces 24 hours per day for 3 weeks. Proximal ulnar nerve conduction time decreased significantly only in pain-free subjects wearing the magnetic necklace, while suprascapular nerve excitation threshold did not change in any group.

Whole Body / General
Not an original health-effects study

A STATUS REPORT ON, AND A COMPARISON OF U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL RF/MICROWAVE RADIATION STANDARDS/GUIDELINES-DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

Zory R. Glaser, Robert F. Cleveland, Jr., P. Czerski · 1982

Considerable effort has been expended in the past five (or so) years to update or develop guidance for occupational and public exposure limits for RF/microwave radiation. U.S. groups involved include OSHA, NIOSH, BRH, ANSI, DOD, ACGIH, FCC, EPA, NCRP, and various state and local governments. International efforts include the International Non-ionizing Radiation Committee, WHO, UNEP, ILO, the Commission of European Communities, and numerous countries. The presentation will discuss health protection rationale, the populations to which the effort is directed, considerations of medical surveillance, and administrative and engineering controls.

ABSTRACTS - 4th Annual Scientific Session BIOELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY

Unknown authors · 1982

The study induced posterior subcapsular cataracts in rabbit eyes using 2.45 GHz continuous wave radiation. Successive stages of cataract development were documented with color stereophotographs taken using a Donaldson stereo-ophthalmic camera with electronic flash illumination and two and one half times initial magnification on film. The photographs were viewed in a Donaldson special viewing apparatus that allowed consecutive stages to be seen by turning a circular knob. The viewed eye appeared as if seen in the living animal through a magnifying lens.

Environmental Health Criteria 16: Radiofrequency and Microwaves

Sol M. Michaelson · 1982

The review evaluates the World Health Organization's Environmental Health Criteria 16 document on radiofrequency and microwave fields from 100 kHz to 300 GHz. The reviewer finds the publication unbalanced because it accepts nonthermal interaction literature with cursory critique while neglecting refuting evidence. The review notes that the document's designations of high, medium, and low power densities are ambiguous and ignore the frequency dependence of bioeffects. It points out specific errors in Table 10 frequency designations and an incomplete discussion of chronic cataract studies that omitted rabbit and monkey data showing no ocular damage. The reviewer concludes the document does not meet the high scientific caliber and accuracy of usual WHO publications.

Effects of Cathode Ray Video Displays on Human Health

Charles Wallach · 1982

Prolonged CRT use is associated with eye, nose, throat, and skin irritations, headaches, dizziness, nausea, pain, malaise, and premature births or miscarriages. The author proposes that the high positive surface charge on CRT screens neutralizes negative ions, increases positive ion concentrations, and repels airborne particles toward operators.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.