6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Microwave Cataracts

B. Appleton · 1974

Biomicroscopically detectable lens signs considered precursors of cataract occurred equally in both groups. A registry of seven acute high-level microwave exposures found no superficial burns or eye damage, with ocular status consistent with age. The authors concluded that lens damage probably has not occurred from cumulative low-level exposure and probably could not occur from acute exposure without severe facial burns. A separate study of 19 diathermy workers showed no difference in ocular examinations compared to controls.

Applications of Microwave Thawing to the Recovery of Deep Frozen Cells and Organs: A Review

W. A. G. Voss, R. V. Rajotte, J. B. Dossetor · 1974

Researchers applied 2450 MHz microwave energy to thaw deep-frozen tissue culture cells, fetal mouse hearts, and adult canine kidneys at rates up to 300°C/min. Chinese hamster cells thawed by microwave at 100–250°C/min survived as well as or better than water-bath-thawed cells when final temperature stayed below about 10°C. After implantation in syngeneic mouse ears, microwave-thawed hearts showed 67% survival at 6–15 days and 59% beyond 30 days, with electrical activity identical to unfrozen controls. Canine kidneys were thawed uniformly at 100–300°C/min from −79°C to 23°C with variation under ±12°C when perfusion was complete, but full functional recovery was not achieved.

Hazard Protection and Performance Effectiveness - Chapter 4: Radiation Environments

Unknown authors · 1974

Existing federal safety criteria of 10 mW/cm2 were based on 1950s microwave data and provisional EMP criteria from 1971 were under review. Researchers reported that biological effects may be frequency-specific, with 1.7 GHz potentially more injurious than 2.4 GHz, and that magnetic fields may be more biologically important than electric fields at lower frequencies.

BIOMEDICAL ASPECTS OF NONIONIZING RADIATION

CDR William C. Milroy, MC, USN · 1974

The one-day symposium was held on 10 July 1973 at the Naval Weapons Laboratory in Dahlgren, Virginia. The symposium marked the opening and dedication of a new Biomedical Research Laboratory and the start of a multidisciplinary research effort on nonionizing radiation bioeffects. Six invited papers covered bio-engineering, comparative biology, human exposure factors, high power pulses, and EMP bioeffects. The proceedings were published because of a large number of requests for reprints of the presented papers.

The Electromagnetic Pulse From Nuclear Detonations

Gary H. Price · 1974

The review classifies nuclear electromagnetic pulse generation into three models: Compton electron currents from prompt gamma radiation, photoelectron currents from primary X radiation, and field displacement from expanding plasma perturbing the geomagnetic field. For each model the review discusses causes of asymmetry in the current system necessary for radiation, including the earth-atmosphere interface, atmospheric density gradient, geomagnetic field anisotropy, nonuniform radiation emission, and device case asymmetries. Available experimental data establish the models as probably correct in identifying principal generation processes but are inadequate for quantitative assessment of model accuracy.

Polarization and frequency effects on whole animal absorption of RF energy

Gandhi OP · 1974

Researchers used a parallel-plate waveguide to measure RF absorption in rats and phantom bodies across 285 to 4000 MHz. The waveguide results agreed well with free-space irradiation measurements. The El4 orientation (electric field along the major length) was the most absorbing, while the A14 orientation was the least absorbing, and the k14 orientation was only slightly more absorbing than A14. In rats, peak absorption frequencies decreased with increasing body weight, with maximum absorption at 1217, 1020, 900, and 760 MHz for 96-, 158-, 261-, and 390-g animals respectively. Waveguide absorption measurements were in quantitative agreement with behavioral experiments showing shorter work-stoppage times at frequencies with higher absorption.

A Microwave Decoupled Brain-Temperature Transducer

Lawrence E. Larsen, Robert Avery Moore, John Acevedo · 1974

Bench tests of conventional temperature transducers in microwave fields showed artifacts of several degrees centigrade. In waveguide tests, the conventional glass electrode produced a fast artifact of approximately 11/2°C at 19.5 mm penetration, while the MIC electrode with 5-μm microline showed about 0.1°C artifact. Thermographic testing revealed the MIC electrode itself was undetectable, but metallic lead wires heated to approximately 10°C above the mount during 2-minute exposures at 50 mW/cm² and conducted heat to the upper substrate.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.