3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 84% of 367 studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 367 studies examining whole body / general, 84% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in Context0.000000072, 2Extreme Concern0.1 W/kgFCC Limit1.6 W/kgEffects observed in the No Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 22,222,222x higher than this exposure level

Research Overview

  • -When 82.5% of studies examining EMF effects on the whole body find biological changes, we're looking at a pattern that demands attention.
  • -This isn't a handful of isolated findings-it's 113 studies out of 137 showing measurable impacts across multiple body systems, from cellular function to organ health.
  • -The documented effects span a remarkable range of biological processes.

When 82.5% of studies examining EMF effects on the whole body find biological changes, we're looking at a pattern that demands attention. This isn't a handful of isolated findings-it's 113 studies out of 137 showing measurable impacts across multiple body systems, from cellular function to organ health. The documented effects span a remarkable range of biological processes.

The evidence shows this isn't about immediate dramatic effects, but rather about the gradual erosion of your body's natural protective mechanisms through chronic, low-level exposures that surround us constantly.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 367 studies

Specific Absorption Rate Evaluation for Passengers Using Wireless Communication Devices inside Vehicles with Different Handedness, Passenger Counts, and Seating Locations.

Leung S, Diao Y, Chan K, Siu Y, Wu Y. · 2012

Researchers used computer modeling to measure how much radiofrequency energy (SAR) people absorb when using mobile phones inside vehicles versus outdoors. They found that phone users in cars absorb 5% more energy than in open spaces, and surprisingly, even passengers not using phones can absorb significant energy depending on where they sit and how many people are in the car.

Accidents and close call situations connected to the use of mobile phones.

Korpinen L, Pääkkönen R. · 2012

Finnish researchers surveyed over 6,000 working adults about accidents and near-miss situations involving mobile phone use. They found that 13.7% experienced close calls and 2.4% had actual accidents during leisure time where mobile phones played a role, with lower rates at work. Men, younger people, and those reporting sleep problems or minor aches showed higher accident rates while using phones.

Poor-to-moderate agreement between self and proxy interviews of mobile phone use.

Hutter HP, Ehrenhöfer L, Freuis E, Hartl P, Kundi M. · 2012

Researchers studied how accurately people can report their partner's cell phone usage habits by having 119 couples fill out questionnaires about both their own and their partner's phone use. They found that partners were only moderately accurate (55% agreement) when estimating usage duration and were particularly poor at knowing which side of the head their partner held the phone during calls (accuracy only slightly better than guessing). This matters because many health studies rely on family members to provide phone usage information when patients are too ill to respond themselves.

[Increased occurrence of nuclear cataract in the calf after erection of a mobile phone base station].

Hässig M, Jud F, Spiess B. · 2012

Swiss researchers investigated a dairy farm where calves developed nuclear cataracts (clouding of the eye lens) at unusually high rates after a cell tower was installed nearby. They found calves born at this farm had a 3.5 times higher risk of severe cataracts compared to the national average, after ruling out common causes like infections or poisoning. While the researchers couldn't definitively prove the cell tower caused the cataracts, they couldn't identify any other explanation for the dramatic increase.

How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones affect human hormone profiles?

Eskander EF, Estefan SF, Abd-Rabou AA. · 2012

Researchers in Egypt studied how long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiation from cell phones and cell towers affects hormone levels in people. They found significant decreases in multiple critical hormones, including stress hormones (ACTH and cortisol), thyroid hormones, and reproductive hormones like testosterone and prolactin. This suggests that chronic RF exposure may disrupt the body's delicate hormonal balance, particularly affecting the pituitary-adrenal system that controls stress response and metabolism.

The effects of long-term exposure of magnetic field via 900-MHz GSM radiation on some biochemical parameters and brain histology in rats.

Celikozlu SD et al. · 2012

Researchers exposed rats to 900-MHz cell phone radiation (30 minutes daily from before birth to 80 days old) and found significant brain damage in the cortex region. The radiation caused a 51% decrease in healthy brain cells (pyramidal neurons) and a 73% increase in damaged brain cells (ischemic neurons), while also elevating blood glucose and protein levels.

Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): A systematic review of identifying criteria.

Baliatsas C, Van Kamp I, Lebret E, Rubin GJ. · 2012

Researchers analyzed 63 studies to understand how scientists identify people who report being hypersensitive to electromagnetic fields (EMF). They found that researchers use wildly different criteria to define EMF hypersensitivity, making it nearly impossible to compare studies or understand the true scope of the condition. The lack of standardized identification methods creates confusion in both research and clinical practice.

Study of electromagnetic radiation pollution in an Indian city.

Dhami AK. · 2012

Researchers measured cell phone tower radiation near schools and hospitals in Chandigarh, India, using professional equipment to assess environmental exposure levels. They found the highest radiation levels were 11.48 mW/m² - more than 11 times higher than levels known to affect biological systems, though still below international safety limits. This reveals a significant gap between what regulators consider 'safe' and what science shows can impact human biology.

Changes in tympanic temperature during the exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phone.

Bortkiewicz A, Gadzicka E, Szymczak W, Zmyślony M. · 2012

Polish researchers measured ear temperature in 10 young men during different patterns of cell phone exposure at 900 MHz. They found that continuous phone use for one hour raised ear temperature, while intermittent use (15 minutes on, 15 minutes off) actually lowered it compared to no exposure. The temperature changes persisted for hours after exposure ended, suggesting the body's response depends heavily on how EMF exposure is delivered.

Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in the Netherlands: Exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area.

Bolte JF, Eikelboom T. · 2012

Dutch researchers tracked radiofrequency radiation exposure in 98 people during daily activities. Average exposure was 0.180 mW/m², with highest levels during evenings and in crowded places. Other people's phone calls, cordless phones, and WiFi routers significantly contribute to your EMF exposure even when you're not using devices.

The effect of melatonin on body mass and behaviour of rats during an exposure to microwave radiation from mobile phone.

Sokolovic D et al. · 2012

Researchers exposed rats to mobile phone radiation for 4 hours daily over 60 days and found the animals lost significant body weight and developed anxiety-like behaviors including agitation and irritability. When rats were given melatonin (a natural hormone) along with the radiation exposure, these negative effects were largely prevented, suggesting melatonin may offer protective benefits against microwave radiation damage.

Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found

One-year, simultaneous combined exposure of CDMA and WCDMA radiofrequency electromagnetic fields to rats.

Jin YB, Lee HJ, Seon Lee J, Pack JK, Kim N, Lee YS. · 2011

Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation from both CDMA and WCDMA technologies (the frequencies used by older 2G and 3G networks) for 45 minutes daily over one full year. The exposure levels were set at 4 W/kg total, which is four times higher than current safety limits. While most health measures remained normal, the study found some changes in blood chemistry and blood cell counts, though no increase in tumors or overall illness.

Radio FrequencyNo Effects Found

Assessment of radiofrequency power density distribution around GSM and broadcast antenna masts in Lagos City

Ibitoye ZA, Aweda AM. · 2011

Nigerian researchers measured radiofrequency radiation levels around cell phone towers and broadcast antennas in Lagos City to assess public safety. They found power density levels ranging from 0.219 to 302.4 milliwatts per square meter, which were 20 to 50 times below international safety limits set by ICNIRP and IEEE. The study concluded that people staying at least 6 meters away from these antennas face minimal health risks from RF exposure.

Symptoms & SensitivityNo Effects Found

The impact of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields on chronic well-being in young people - A cross-sectional study based on personal dosimetry.

Heinrich S, Thomas S, Heumann C, von Kries R, Radon K. · 2011

German researchers equipped over 3,000 children and teens with personal radiation meters for 24 hours to measure their actual exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from cell phones and other wireless devices. They then looked for connections between measured exposure levels and chronic symptoms like fatigue and headaches. The study found no statistically significant link between RF exposure and health complaints, with all measured exposure levels falling far below international safety guidelines.

A comparative study on the increased radioresistance to lethal doses of gamma rays after exposure to microwave radiation and oral intake of flaxseed oil.

Mortazavi SMJ et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed rats to microwave radiation (from mobile phones) before giving them a lethal dose of gamma rays, then tracked survival rates. The microwave-exposed rats showed 100% survival compared to only 53% in unexposed controls, suggesting microwave radiation triggered protective cellular responses. This finding raises important questions about how everyday cell phone exposure might affect medical radiation treatments like cancer therapy.

Exposure to cell phone radiations produces biochemical changes in worker honey bees.

Kumar NR, Sangwan S, Badotra P. · 2011

Researchers exposed honeybee colonies to cell phone radiation and observed dramatic behavioral changes - the bees first became unusually quiet, then suddenly swarmed toward the active phone. The study also found that radiation exposure initially triggered a stress response that increased key biological molecules in the bees, followed by a decline as their bodies appeared to adapt. This research adds to growing evidence that wireless device radiation can disrupt the behavior and biology of pollinating insects that are crucial to our food supply.

Exposure assessment in front of a multi-band base station antenna.

Kos B, Valič B, Kotnik T, Gajšek P. · 2011

Researchers used computer modeling to study how radiofrequency radiation from cell tower antennas affects the human body at different distances. They found that higher frequency signals (like those used for 3G networks) create more concentrated energy absorption in body tissues, while lower frequencies spread their effects more evenly throughout the body. The study shows that workers standing very close to these antennas face different exposure risks than those further away.

Changes of Clinically Important Neurotransmitters under the Influence of Modulated RF Fields—A Long-term Study under Real-life Conditions

Buchner K, Eger H. · 2011

German researchers tracked stress hormone levels in 60 people for 18 months after a new cell tower was installed in their village. They found that exposure to radiofrequency radiation from the tower significantly increased stress hormones (adrenaline and noradrenaline) while decreasing dopamine, a brain chemical important for mood and motivation. These changes persisted for the entire study period, suggesting that chronic exposure to cell tower radiation can disrupt the body's stress response system.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 82.5% of studies examining EMF effects on the whole body find biological changes, we're looking at a pattern that demands attention. This isn't a handful of isolated findings-it's 113 studies out of 137 showing measurable impacts across multiple body systems, from cellular function to organ health. The documented effects span a remarkable range of biological processes.
The BioInitiative Report database includes 367 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
84% of the 367 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 309 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 16% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.