6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level
View study: Analysis of in situ electric field and specific absorption r...

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

Whole Body / General0

RF RADIATION HAZARDS TO SPACE STATION PERSONNEL

R. A. Inman · 1970

The purpose of this document is to examine the possible levels of RF radiation to which personnel on the space station and similar spacecraft might be exposed. The memo noted that formation of cataracts in the eyes of both experimental animals and man has been demonstrated after exposure for a few minutes. The memo concluded that personnel working in the field of these antennas should be protected from overexposure to this radiation.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General
Not an original health-effects study

LABORATORY TESTING AND EVALUATION OF MICROWAVE OVENS

Stephen W. Smith et al. · 1970

Twelve ovens were on the U.S. market and two were prototypes, tested from August 1968 to April 1970. Leakage was measured at two inches from the oven surface using a Narda 8100 survey meter. Power density was also recorded at 30 centimeters with the door fully open and interlocks defeated. The data were not collected according to the proposed standard procedures, so comparison with that standard was not justified.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

Quantifying Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields: Practical Considerations

Ronald R. Bowman · 1970

Power density is only useful for simple, uniform plane-wave fields and is unsuitable for complicated fields with reactive components or multipath interference. The total energy density of the field is the best parameter for quantifying hazardous fields, though electric energy density alone is often adequate. The field parameter approach is considered the most practical for general survey measurements.

View Study Details
Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found

ON THE POSSIBILITY OF NONTHERMAL BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION

LAWRENCE D. SHER, EDWARD KRESCH, HERMAN P. SCHWAN · 1970

The study examined two mechanisms for alternating electrical fields interacting with biological tissue: heat development and field-induced force effects. For continuous wave fields in physiologic media, heating above 1°C always occurs before any field-induced force effect can appear. Using pearl-chain formation as a model, the researchers demonstrated that pulsed fields offer no greater likelihood than CW fields of equal RMS strength for producing pearl-chain formation.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

APPLICATION OF MICROWAVE FREQUENCY MEASUREMENTS TO IDENTIFY PATHOLOGICAL COMPOUNDS IN BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENS

K. Bakin, E. E. Stickley · 1970

Dielectric relaxation times of dipole liquids are directly proportional to molecular radius and viscosity and inversely proportional to temperature. The Debye model, modified by a form factor for non-spherical molecules, can characterize molecular size and form from dielectric properties. Exploratory trials tested whether the method could detect shape or configuration variations in compounds from pathological situations. The method's sensitivity appeared to support its applicability, with further refinements in development.

View Study Details

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation book cover

Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation

Dr. Martin Blank & R Blank

Read on Amazon
Empowered: A Practical Guide to Protecting Yourself from EMF book cover

Empowered: A Practical Guide to Protecting Yourself from EMF

R Blank

Read on Amazon

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.