6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level
View study: Analysis of in situ electric field and specific absorption r...

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found

Effects of Ultra-High-Frequency Radiation on Animals

Martin Lubin et al. · 1960

Researchers conducted pathological studies on rabbits and rats exposed to 400 megacycle whole-body radiation. Rats were exposed at 160 mwatts per square centimeter for 30 minutes or 60 mwatts per square centimeter for 20 minutes. The data indicated that if animals survived the repeated irradiation, no pathological damage attributable to the radiation could be demonstrated.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

RADAR RADIATION HAZARDS IN THE NEAR FIELD OF APERTURE ANTENNAS

Arthur L. Haywood · 1960

Radio frequency energy with a power density equal to or greater than 0.01 watt per square centimeter is considered hazardous. Near-field gains were mathematically derived for rectangular, circular, and linear aperture antennas with various illumination distributions. A method of measuring power densities in the near field at given distances from a radar transmitter was presented and compared with theoretical calculations. Laboratory measurements compared favorably with theoretical predictions. Near-field antenna gain varies with the physical shape and size of the aperture, the aperture illumination, and the distance from the aperture.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

Infrared and Microwave Effects on Skin Heating and Temperature Sensation

E. HENDLER, J. D. HARDY · 1960

Researchers exposed the forehead area of seven subjects to controlled heating while measuring skin temperature radiometrically. Temperature sensation reports correlated best with the rate of change of skin temperature. Warmth threshold occurred at a skin temperature rise rate of 0.001°C/second and cool threshold at a fall rate of 0.005° °C/second. Microwave irradiation at about 17 mW/cm² produced a linear skin temperature increase of 0.037°C/second for the first 30 seconds. Warmth sensation persisted after microwave exposure ended, which the authors attributed to slowly dissipated heat retained in the tissues.

View Study Details

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation book cover

Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation

Dr. Martin Blank & R Blank

Read on Amazon
Empowered: A Practical Guide to Protecting Yourself from EMF book cover

Empowered: A Practical Guide to Protecting Yourself from EMF

R Blank

Read on Amazon

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.