Radiofrequency radiation at 1950 MHz (UMTS) does not affect key cellular endpoints in neuron‐like PC12 cells
Unknown authors · 1950
Research on electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones, including 2G, 3G, 4G LTE, and 5G NR signals.
Your cell phone is likely the most significant source of EMF exposure in your daily life. Every time you make a call, send a text, or stream a video, your phone emits radiofrequency (RF) radiation in the 700 MHz to 2.7 GHz range to communicate with cell towers. This radiation doesn't stop at your phone's case-it penetrates into your body, with the strongest exposure occurring in tissues closest to the device.
Unknown authors · 1950
Unknown authors · 1950
Researchers exposed rat brain immune cells (microglia) to 1950 MHz cell phone radiation at various power levels for 2 hours and monitored them for 3 days. The study found no activation of these immune cells and no inflammatory response, even at radiation levels up to 2 W/kg. This suggests that this specific frequency may not trigger brain inflammation in laboratory conditions.
Joseph P. Engel et al. · 1950
Researchers exposed anesthetized and trained dogs to microwave diathermy at 2,450 megacycles per second and measured temperature changes in tibial cortex, marrow, muscle, and subcutaneous tissue. For subcutaneously located bone, 30 minutes at 65 watts raised tibial cortex temperature by 5.0 degrees (C.) and marrow by 3.4 degrees (C.). For submuscularly located bone, the same exposure raised cortex by 3.8 degrees (C.) and marrow by 3.0 degrees (C.). A rectangular director allowed higher temperatures in subcutaneously located bone without excessively heating adjacent soft tissue. An impedance-matching transformer increased tissue temperature rises by approximately 300 per cent.
Boyle AC, Cook HF, Buchanan TJ · 1950
W. H. Oldendorf · 1949
H. Schwan · 1948
This 1948 research by Schwan examined how temperature affects the dielectric properties of human blood when exposed to low-frequency electromagnetic fields. The study investigated how blood's electrical characteristics change with temperature variations, providing foundational data for understanding how EMF interacts with biological tissues. This early work helped establish the scientific basis for measuring electromagnetic effects in living systems.
C. J. Imig, J. D. Thomson, H. M. Hines · 1948
OSBORNE, SL, FREDERICK, MS · 1948
Horvath SM, Miller RN, Hutt BK · 1948
This 1948 study by Horvath examined how microwave radiation heats human tissues, investigating temperature gradients and thermal effects in the body. The research explored microwave diathermy applications and measured tissue temperature changes during exposure. This represents some of the earliest scientific investigation into how microwave energy interacts with human biology.
Willis Jackson · 1946
T. M. Caffaratto · 1946
Kenneth S. Cole, Robert H. Cole · 1941
This 1941 technical study by K.S. Cole examined how dielectric materials (insulators like those in electronic devices) respond to alternating current electrical fields. The research explored fundamental properties like dielectric constants and relaxation times that determine how materials absorb and scatter electromagnetic energy.
HERBERT J. JOHNSON · 1940
Prof. W. E. Curtis, F.R.S., Dr. F. Dickens, and S. F. Evans · 1936
A. BACHEM · 1935
William Bierman · 1934
This 1934 study by Dr. William Bierman examined how radiation-induced fever (hyperpyrexia) affected white blood cell counts in humans. The research investigated the relationship between radiation exposure, elevated body temperature, and changes in the immune system's white blood cells. This early work represents some of the first documented research into radiation's effects on human blood cells.
Paul Groag, Victor Tomberg · 1933
Dr. W. Haase, Dr. E. Schliephake · 1931
Stern
During each session, alternating 15-minute control and exposure periods presented 2450 MHz continuous wave microwaves at power densities of 5, 10, and 20 mW/cm². The proportion of time the heat lamp stayed on decreased as microwave power density increased, and a linear regression showed an intercept of 0.324, slope of -0.0063 (p<0.001), with power density accounting for 61% of the variation. Randomization tests confirmed significant differences at all power densities versus zero exposure (p<0.003), except at 5 mW/cm² versus all zero exposures (p=0.023) and versus adjacent 10 mW/cm² (p=0.021).
Michael H. Repacholi
Unknown authors
Handling alone lowered pregnancy rate from 86 percent to 72 percent during days 1-6, with further drops to 65 percent at 21 mW/cm2 and 50 percent at 30 mW/cm2, while heated controls showed no extra decrease. Congenital malformations increased significantly only at 30 mW/cm2 during days 6-15, rising from 1.7 percent to 3.1 percent, with two-thirds being cleft palate.
A. DEFICIS, J.C. DUMAS, S. LAURENS
Unknown authors
Stephen F. Cleary, William T. Ham, Jr.
Unknown authors