Rufo MM, Paniagua JM, Jiménez A, Antolín A · 2011
Researchers measured radiofrequency total power densities and power density spectra in 35 towns in Extremadura, Spain. The spectra were taken with three antennas covering frequencies from 100 kHz to 2.2 GHz. Results showed power density levels below reference level guidelines for human exposure and differing across frequency ranges and town size categories.
Unknown authors · 2011
In part B, mice were transplanted intraperitoneally with ascites (Ehrlich-Lettre ascites, strain E) carcinoma cells and then exposed to 112 MHz amplitude-modulated radiation at 16 Hz and 2.45 GHz radiation separately for 14 days. No tumor development occurred in mice exposed to radiofrequency or microwave radiation after a single topical dose of DMBA. Mice transplanted with Ehrlich-Lettre ascites carcinoma cells and exposed to the fields showed a slight but insignificant increase in cell numbers compared to controls.
Ibitoye ZA, Aweda AM. · 2011
Xu S et al. · 2010
Researchers exposed brain neurons to cell phone radiation (1800 MHz) for 24 hours and found it damaged mitochondrial DNA-the genetic material in cells' energy centers. The radiation created harmful molecules that reduced neurons' ability to produce energy, suggesting potential cellular harm from prolonged exposure.
Campisi A et al. · 2010
Italian researchers exposed brain support cells (astrocytes) to cell phone-frequency radiation (900MHz) at levels similar to what phones emit. After just 20 minutes of exposure to modulated signals, the cells showed increased cellular damage and DNA fragmentation, while continuous waves caused no effects. This suggests that the pulsing pattern of wireless signals, not just their intensity, may be what causes biological harm.
Fragopoulou et al · 2010
Kwon MS et al. · 2010
Researchers tested whether cell phone radiation affects children's brain processing of sounds by placing GSM phones emitting 902 MHz signals next to 17 children's heads for 12 minutes while measuring brain activity. They found no statistically significant changes in the children's auditory processing abilities during exposure. However, the study was only large enough to detect major effects, meaning smaller impacts could have been missed.
Kwon MS, Jääskeläinen SK, Toivo T, Hämäläinen H. · 2010
Researchers investigated the effects of a GSM mobile phone electromagnetic field on brainstem auditory processing. Auditory brainstem responses were recorded in 17 healthy young adults at baseline without a phone and then with a phone on the ear under EMF-off and EMF-on conditions. ABR waveforms showed no significant differences due to exposure.
Kwon MS, Jääskeläinen SK, Toivo T, Hämäläinen H. · 2010
Researchers tested whether cell phone radiation affects how the brain processes sound by measuring auditory brainstem responses (electrical signals that travel from the ear to the brain) in 17 young adults exposed to GSM phone emissions. They found no differences in these brain signals whether the phone was on or off, suggesting that short-term cell phone radiation doesn't disrupt the basic pathway that carries sound information from the ear to the brain.
Bartsch H et al. · 2010
Researchers exposed unrestrained female Sprague-Dawley rats to a low-intensity GSM-like signal (900 MHz pulsed with 217 Hz, 100 µW/cm² average power flux density) across four experiments conducted from 1997 to 2008. In the life-long experiments, median survival was significantly shortened under RF-exposure by 9.06% (95% CI 2.7 to 15.0%) (p=0.0064), amounting to 72 days in experiment III and 77 days in experiment IV.
Vermeeren G et al. · 2010
Kawai H, Nagaoka T, Watanabe S, Saito K, Takahashi M, Ito K. · 2010
Researchers used computational models of pregnant women at 4 and 8 weeks of pregnancy to calculate the specific absorption rate (SAR) in embryos exposed to electromagnetic plane waves from 10 MHz to 1.5 GHz. The models had a 2 mm spatial resolution and represented a woman similar in height and weight to an average-sized Japanese adult female, with either a cubic 4-week or spheroidal 8-week embryo. The maximum average SAR in the embryos was lower than 0.08 W kg(-1) when the incident power density was at the ICNIRP reference level for the general public.
Campisi A et al. · 2010
Researchers exposed primary rat neocortical astroglial cell cultures to electromagnetic fields in the microwave range, either as continuous waves or amplitude-modulated at 50 Hz, for 5, 10, or 20 minutes. A significant increase in ROS levels and DNA fragmentation was found only after exposure of the astrocytes to modulated EMF for 20 min. Cell viability was not affected, and the irradiation conditions allowed the exclusion of any possible thermal effect.
Xu S et al. · 2010
Researchers exposed primary cultured cortical neurons to pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields at 1800 MHz modulated by 217 Hz at an average specific absorption rate of 2 W/kg. At 24 hours after exposure, researchers found a significant increase in levels of 8-hydroxyguanine, a common biomarker of DNA oxidative damage, in the mitochondria of neurons. The copy number of mitochondrial DNA and the levels of mitochondrial RNA transcripts showed an obvious reduction after RF exposure. Each of these mitochondrial DNA disturbances could be reversed by pretreatment with melatonin.
Akimoto S et al. · 2010
Researchers calculated SAR distribution in a fetus using a numerical model of a pregnant woman exposed to the near-field of a normal mode helical antenna at 150 MHz. Fetal SARs were greatly affected by the distance and penetration path from the antenna to the fetal surface and were lower than occupational RF safety guidelines.
Peyman A, Gabriel C, Grant EH, Vermeeren G, Martens L · 2009
Dimbylow PJ, Nagaoka T, Xu XG. · 2009
The study compared foetal specific absorption rate (SAR) across three sets of pregnant female computational models. The models included a 26-week foetal model from the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Tokyo, and models at 13, 26, and 38 weeks from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. FDTD calculations were performed at a resolution of 2 mm for a plane wave with a vertically aligned electric field incident upon the body from the front, back and two sides from 20 MHz to 3 GHz under isolated conditions. The researchers compared external electric field values required to produce the ICNIRP public exposure localized restriction of 2 W kg(-1) when averaged over 10 g of the foetus with the ICNIRP reference levels.
Kwon MS et al. · 2009
Researchers recorded mismatch negativity responses to duration, intensity, frequency, and gap changes in 17 healthy young adults while a GSM phone was placed on either ear with the field on or off. The mismatch negativity was elicited by all deviant types, but its amplitude and latency showed no significant differences due to EMF exposure for any deviant type. The authors concluded there was no conclusive evidence that acute GSM mobile phone EMF exposure affects cortical auditory change detection processing reflected by the mismatch negativity.
Kwon MS et al. · 2009
Researchers tested whether cell phone radiation affects the brain's ability to automatically detect changes in sounds by measuring brain waves in 17 healthy adults while a GSM phone was placed next to their ear. They found no differences in brain responses whether the phone was on or off, suggesting that acute exposure to cell phone radiation doesn't impair this basic auditory processing function. This study adds to research examining how electromagnetic fields might affect brain function during everyday phone use.
Unknown authors · 2009
Researchers exposed 18 male and 18 female rats to 50 Hz magnetic fields at 1000 microT, 100 microT, and 0 microT, and another 18 male and 18 female rats to 1.8 GHz fields at 50 V/m, 25 V/m, and 0 V/m. They measured glucose, triglycerides, and total cholesterol. Different effects on circadian rhythms were observed, with changes in those haematochemical parameters (P < 0.05).
Unknown authors · 2009
Italian researchers exposed rats to both 50 Hz magnetic fields (like power lines) and 1.8 GHz electromagnetic fields (like cell phones) at various intensities. They found that both types of EMF exposure disrupted the natural daily rhythms of blood chemistry markers including glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol. This suggests EMF exposure interferes with fundamental biological timing systems that regulate metabolism.
Unknown authors · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to different electromagnetic fields - 50 Hz magnetic fields at power line frequencies and 1.8 GHz radiofrequency fields similar to cell phones. They found that both types of EMF exposure disrupted the natural daily rhythms of blood chemistry markers like glucose, triglycerides, and cholesterol. This suggests EMF exposure interferes with fundamental biological timing systems.
Unknown authors · 2009
Italian researchers exposed rats to both 50 Hz power line magnetic fields (at household appliance levels) and 1.8 GHz cell phone radiation, then measured blood chemistry markers like glucose and cholesterol throughout 24-hour cycles. Both types of EMF disrupted the animals' natural daily rhythms of these important metabolic markers. This suggests EMF exposure may interfere with fundamental biological timing systems that regulate metabolism.
Nagaoka T, Kunieda E, Watanabe S · 2008
Researchers used an existing Japanese adult voxel model and three-dimensional deformation to create models representing average-size Japanese children at 3, 5, and 7 years old. The models consist of cubic voxels 2 mm on each side segmented into 51 tissues and organs. They calculated whole-body-averaged and tissue-averaged specific absorption rates for the child models exposed to plane waves from 30 MHz to 3 GHz and compared the results with scaled down adult models. They also determined the incident electric-field strength needed to produce a whole-body-averaged SAR of 0.08 W kg(-1), the ICNIRP basic restriction for general public exposure.
Hinrikus H, Bachmann M, Lass J, Tomson R, Tuulik V. · 2008
Thirteen healthy volunteers were exposed to 450 MHz microwaves pulse-modulated at frequencies of 7, 14 and 21 Hz to evaluate effects on electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythms. Modulated microwaves caused an average increase in EEG alpha power of 17% and beta power of 7%, while the theta rhythm remained unaffected. Increases in EEG alpha and beta power were statistically significant during the first 30 seconds of exposure at modulation frequencies of 14 and 21 Hz, but no enhancement occurred at 7 Hz. The researchers also found differences in individual sensitivity to exposure, with increases in EEG beta power appearing statistically significant in four subjects.
