6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Brain & Nervous System

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 83% of 1,950 primary studies on brain & nervous system found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 1,950 studies examining brain & nervous system, 83% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on brain & nervous system at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context4.3 × 10⁻⁵ mGExtreme Concern - 5 mGFCC Limit - 2,000 mGEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.2 mG)FCC limit is 46.5 million times higher than this level

Research Overview

  • -When you review the peer-reviewed literature on electromagnetic field exposure and brain function, the numbers tell a compelling story: 84% of the 2,753 studies examining this relationship have documented measurable effects.
  • -This isn't a fringe concern or preliminary finding.
  • -This is the dominant scientific picture, and it deserves your attention.

When you review the peer-reviewed literature on electromagnetic field exposure and brain function, the numbers tell a compelling story: 84% of the 2,753 studies examining this relationship have documented measurable effects. This isn't a fringe concern or preliminary finding. This is the dominant scientific picture, and it deserves your attention. The documented effects span multiple systems within your nervous system.

Of 2,753 studies examining EMF effects on the brain and nervous system, approximately 84 percent found measurable biological effects.

The scientific evidence demonstrates that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phones and wireless devices produce measurable effects on nervous system function and cellular processes in the brain.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Research Statistics by EMF Type

EMF TypeStudiesShowing EffectsPercentage
ELF22920891.00%
RF30522272.00%

Source: Dr. Henry Lai research database

Showing 2,030 studies

Vestibular schwannoma, tinitus and cellular telephones.

Hardell L et al. · 2003

The aim of the study was to investigate vestibular schwannoma, tinnitus, and cellular telephones. An increased odds ratio of 3.45 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.77-6.76 was found for vestibular schwannoma associated with analogue cell phone use. The age-standardized incidence of vestibular schwannoma in Sweden increased significantly by 2.53% per year from 1960 to 1998, with the increase only significant in the period 1980-1998.

Cancer & Tumors193 citations

Further aspects on cellular and cordless telephones and brain tumours.

Hardell L, Mild KH, Carlberg M. · 2003

Researchers conducted a case-control study of 1,617 patients aged 20-80 with histopathology-verified brain tumours diagnosed from 1997 to 2000, each matched to a control from the Swedish Population Register. Tumours in the temporal area on the same side as phone use had higher risk for analogue phones (OR=2.3, 95% CI=1.2-4.1), acoustic neurinoma risk was OR=4.4 (95% CI=2.1-9.2) for analogue users, and risk rose per year of analogue use (OR=1.04 per year, 95% CI=1.01-1.08).

Assessment of specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in the head from a TETRA handset.

Dimbylow P, Khalid M, Mann S. · 2003

Researchers performed FDTD calculations of SAR from a representative TETRA handset in an anatomically realistic head model. The handset operating at 1 W in normal use complied with both ICNIRP occupational and public exposure restrictions. The handset with a monopole antenna operating at 3 W in normal use also complied with both ICNIRP occupational and public exposure restrictions. The handset with a helical antenna at 3 W complied with the occupational restriction but exceeded the public restriction by up to 50% if held at the maximum SAR position for 6 minutes continuously. Calculations covered handset positions in front of the face and at both sides of the head.

Human brain wave activity during exposure to radiofrequency field emissions from mobile phones.

D'Costa H et al. · 2003

Researchers recorded EEG from ten awake subjects while a mobile phone behind the head emitted radiofrequency fields. The study tested a GSM phone at full radiated power and a phone in active standby mode, each with five active and five sham exposures in randomized five-minute intervals. The experiment was single-blind and compared average EEG band power between active and sham recordings. Statistical tests showed significant differences in the full-power trial for EEG alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-32 Hz) bands. Analysis of median spectral power across 32 discrete frequencies found significant differences in 7 frequencies overall.

Preliminary evaluation of nanoscale biogenic magnetite-based ferromagnetic transduction mechanisms for mobile phone bioeffects.

Cranfield C, Wieser HG, Al Madan J, Dobson J. · 2003

Researchers tested a bacterial analogue (Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum) that produces intracellular biogenic magnetite similar to that in the human brain. Exposure to mobile phone emissions resulted in a significantly higher proportion of cell death in exposed cultures versus sham exposure (p = 0.037). The authors noted it is not yet clear whether this would extrapolate to a deleterious health effect in humans.

Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response.

Consiglio W, Driscoll P, Witte M, Berg WP. · 2003

The experiment studied the effect of phone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Twenty-two participants used a laboratory station that simulated foot activity in driving. Mean reaction time was measured across five conditions: control, listening to a radio, conversing with a passenger, conversing using a hand-held phone, and conversing using a hands-free phone. Conversation, whether in-person or via cellular phone, slowed reaction time, while listening to the radio did not.

Estimation of the SAR in the human head and body due to radiofrequency radiation exposure from handheld mobile phones with hands-free accessories.

Bit-Babik G et al. · 2003

Researchers investigated the estimation of SAR in the human head and body from handheld mobile phones with hands-free accessories. The results show that the opposite is observed when proper dosimetric methods are employed. Human phantoms for such measurements should include the torso, not just the head, because the body strongly attenuates RF energy coupled into the accessory leads. Numerical simulations and experimental measurements agree that hands-free accessories decrease RF energy exposure in the human head.

Thirty minutes mobile phone use has no short-term adverse effects on central auditory pathways.

Arai N, Enomoto H, Okabe S, Yuasa K, Kamimura Y, Ugawa Y. · 2003

Researchers studied auditory brainstem response, ABR recovery function, and middle latency response before and after 30 minutes of mobile phone use in 15 normal-hearing volunteers. None of the three measures were affected by the exposure. The researchers concluded that 30 minutes of mobile phone use has no short-term adverse effects on the human auditory system.

Brain & Nervous System
Not an original health-effects study

Comparisons of peak SAR levels in concentric sphere head models of children and adults for irradiation by a dipole at 900 MHz.

Anderson V. · 2003

The study aimed to examine the scale and significance of differences in peak specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in the brains of children and adults exposed to radiofrequency emissions from mobile phones. Model analyses using a three-layered spherical head exposed to a dipole at 900 MHz showed that peak brain 10 g averaged SAR in 4, 8, 12, and 16 year olds increased by factors of 1.31, 1.23, 1.15, and 1.07 compared to an average adult. The researchers concluded that the relatively small scale of these increases does not warrant special precautionary measures for child mobile phone users.

1439 MHz pulsed TDMA fields affect performance of rats in a T-maze task only when body temperature is elevated.

Yamaguchi H et al. · 2003

Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to pulsed 1439 MHz TDMA fields at a brain SAR of 7.5 W/kg for 1 hour daily over 4 days or 4 weeks. Other rats were exposed at a brain SAR of 25 W/kg for 45 minutes daily for 4 days. Rats exposed at 25 W/kg for 4 days showed statistically significant decreases in correct choices in a T-maze reversal task, while rats exposed at 7.5 W/kg for 4 days or 4 weeks showed no performance impairments. Intraperitoneal temperature increased only at the 25 W/kg exposure level. The authors concluded that TDMA fields at levels about four times higher than cell phone emissions do not affect learning and memory when no thermal effects occur.

[Effects of low-intensity extremely high frequency electromagnetic radiation on chromatin structure of lymphoid cells in vivo and in vitro]

Gapeev AB et al. · 2003

Researchers exposed NMRI mice to extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation at 42.0 GHz and 0.15 mW/cm2 for 20 minutes and examined chromatin structure in immune cells using a comet assay technique. Three hours after exposure, fluorescence intensity increased by 16% in thymocytes and decreased by 16% in splenocytes, while peripheral blood leukocytes showed no change. In vitro exposure reduced fluorescence intensity by 23% in Raji human lymphoid line cells and by 18% in peripheral blood leukocytes.

Subjective symptoms among mobile phone users--a consequence of absorption of radiofrequency fields?

Wilén J, Sandström M, Hansson Mild K · 2003

Researchers selected 2,402 people from an epidemiological study who used any of the four most common GSM MP. The study combined data on symptom prevalence, calling time per day, and number of calls per day with measurements of the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). The results indicated that SAR values above 0.5 W/kg may be an important factor for the prevalence of some symptoms, especially in combination with long calling times per day.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic field exposure on APP695 transcription levels in differentiating human neuroblastoma cells

Unknown authors · 2002

Researchers exposed differentiating IMR-32 neuroblastoma cells to 60 Hz magnetic fields at 50, 100, and 200 microT for 4 hours. They measured APP695 mRNA levels using northern hybridization with Digoxygenin-labeled probes. The results provided no support for any relationship between APP695 gene transcription and either differentiation age or magnetic field exposure.

Occupational exposure to magnetic fields in case-referent studies of neurodegenerative diseases

Unknown authors · 2002

Researchers conducted case-referent studies of Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease using death records of males in Colorado from 1987 to 1996. Three exposure assessment methods were used: electrical versus nonelectrical occupations, a three-tiered job-title and industry grouping, and a job-exposure matrix with magnetic-field means. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was associated with electrical occupations but not with magnetic-field exposure from the job-exposure matrix. No consistent associations with magnetic fields were observed for Alzheimer's disease.

Investigation on the health of people living near mobile telephone relay stations: I/Incidence according to distance and sex

Unknown authors · 2002

Researchers surveyed 530 people (270 men, 260 women) living near or not near cellular phone base stations about 18 non-specific health symptoms. Complaint frequencies were compared by distance and sex using a chi-square test with Yates correction. Significant increases were seen for tiredness up to 300 m, for headache, sleep disturbance and discomfort up to 200 m, and for irritability, depression, memory loss, dizziness and libido decrease up to 100 m. Women reported headache, nausea, loss of appetite, sleep disturbance, depression, discomfort and visual perturbations significantly more often than men.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Lack of Mutation Induction with Exposure to 1.5 GHz Electromagnetic Near Fields Used for Cellular Phones in Brains of Big Blue Mice.

Takahashi S et al. · 2002

Researchers investigated the mutagenic potential of 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near fields using brain tissues of Big Blue mice. Male BBM were locally exposed to EMF in the head region at 2.0, 0.67, and 0 W/kg specific absorption rate for 90 min/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. There was no significant variation in the frequency of independent mutations of the lacI transgene in the brains. Deletion mutations were slightly increased in both the high and low EMF exposure groups as compared with the sham-exposed group, but the differences were not statistically significant.

Symptoms & SensitivityNo Effects Found132 citations

Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: No causal link.

Hietanen M, Hämäläinen A-M, Husman T. · 2002

The study tested the hypothesis that hypersensitive persons perceive symptoms from RF fields using double blind provocation experiments. Twenty volunteers who reported sensitivity to cellular phones participated. Exposure sources were one analogue NMT phone at 900 MHz and two digital GSM phones at 900 and 1800 MHz. Each test session lasted 30 minutes with three or four sessions in random order per day. More symptoms were reported during sham exposure than during real exposure, and no subject could distinguish real from sham exposure.

The effect of low level radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on the excretion rates of stress hormones in operators during 24-hour shifts.

Vangelova K, Israel M, Mihaylov S. · 2002

Researchers studied 12 male satellite station operators during 24-hour shifts and compared them with 12 unexposed controls. Exposure was low-level with specific absorption of 0.1127 J.kg-1. Exposed operators had significantly increased 24-hour excretion of 11-OCS and disrupted circadian rhythm, including increased mesor, decreased amplitude, and shifted acrophase. Catecholamine excretion rates also changed significantly with greater variability.

SAR / Device Absorption
Not an original health-effects study

Assessment of guidelines for limiting exposures to emf using methods of probabilistic risk analysis.

Thompson CJ, Anderson V, Rowley JT. · 2002

The broad objective was to assess radiofrequency exposure limits, hazard thresholds, and safety factors using probabilistic risk analysis. Analysis of SAR variables including conductivity and permittivity of grey brain matter and radiated field strengths supported the hypothesis that SAR values are lognormally distributed. The probability that SAR exceeds a threshold was derived and shown to be very low for handset SARs relative to allowable standard limits. The analysis focused on peak radiofrequency SAR values in the brain from digital mobile telephones operating at approximately 900 MHz.

Study of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations: I. Influence of distance and sex.

Santini R, Santini P, Danze JM, Le Ruz P, Seigne M. · 2002

Researchers conducted a questionnaire survey of 530 people, including 270 men and 260 women, living near or far from cellular phone base stations to assess 18 non-specific health symptoms. Complaint frequencies increased significantly (p < 0.05) for people living within 300 meters for tiredness, within 200 meters for headache, sleep disturbance, and discomfort, and within 100 meters for irritability, depression, loss of memory, dizziness, and libido decrease compared to those living beyond 300 meters or not exposed. Women reported headache, nausea, loss of appetite, sleep disturbance, depression, discomfort, and visual perturbations significantly more often than men (p < 0.05).

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including brain & nervous system, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Brain & Nervous System

When you review the peer-reviewed literature on electromagnetic field exposure and brain function, the numbers tell a compelling story: 84% of the 2,753 studies examining this relationship have documented measurable effects. This isn't a fringe concern or preliminary finding. This is the dominant scientific picture, and it deserves your attention. The documented effects span multiple systems within your nervous system.
The SYB Research Database includes 1,950 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and brain & nervous system. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
83% of the 1,950 studies examining brain & nervous system found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 1621 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 17% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.