3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Cancer & Tumors

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 63% of 293 studies on cancer & tumors found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 293 studies examining cancer & tumors, 63% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on cancer & tumors at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in Context0.00002, 0.0002, 0.008Extreme Concern1,000 uW/m2FCC Limit10M uW/m2Effects observed in the No Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 500,000,000,000x higher than this exposure level

Research Overview

  • -When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention.
  • -Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
  • -This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development. This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

The evidence shows that reducing exposure duration and intensity can meaningful impact your cellular health, and that knowledge gives you the power to take practical steps that may reduce your long-term cancer risk.

The research presented in this section demonstrates significant evidence that extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposures can cause DNA damage and genetic alterations relevant to leukemia development.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 293 studies

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Brain tumour development in rats exposed to electromagnetic fields used in wireless cellular communication.

Salford LG, Brun A, Persson BRR · 1997

Researchers injected brain tumor cells into 154 pairs of rats, then exposed half to 915 MHz microwaves (the frequency used by early cell phones) for 7 hours daily over 2-3 weeks while keeping the other half as controls. They found no difference in tumor growth between exposed and unexposed rats, suggesting that microwave exposure did not accelerate existing brain tumors in this particular experimental setup.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Focus formation of C3H/10T1/2 cells and exposure to a 836.55 MHz modulated radiofrequency field.

Cain CD, Thomas DL, Adey WR · 1997

Researchers exposed mouse cells to cell phone-like radiation (836.55 MHz TDMA signals) for 28 days to see if it would enhance cancer cell formation when combined with a known tumor-promoting chemical. The radiation exposure at levels similar to cell phone use did not increase cancer cell formation compared to unexposed cells. This suggests that this type of radiofrequency exposure does not act as a tumor promoter in laboratory cell cultures.

Mortality of plastic-ware workers exposed to radiofrequencies.

Lagorio S et al. · 1997

Researchers tracked the health outcomes of 481 Italian women who worked with radiofrequency-emitting heat sealing equipment in plastic manufacturing from 1962 to 1992. They found elevated rates of cancer deaths, particularly leukemia, among workers in the sealing department where RF exposure occurred compared to other areas of the factory. While the study couldn't rule out other workplace chemicals as contributing factors, it suggests a potential link between occupational RF exposure and increased cancer risk.

Cancer & Tumors184 citations

Cancer incidence near radio and television transmitters in Great Britain. II. All high power transmitters.

Dolk H, Elliott P, Shaddick G, Walls P, Thakrar B · 1997

British researchers studied cancer rates around 20 high-power TV and radio transmitters from 1974-1986, examining over 3,000 adult leukemia cases within 10 kilometers. They found only a weak decline in adult leukemia risk with distance from transmitters, with no increased cancer risk within 2 kilometers of the towers. This large-scale study failed to replicate earlier findings from a single transmitter site, suggesting that broadcast towers may not significantly increase cancer risk in nearby communities.

Cancer & Tumors193 citations

Cancer incidence near radio and television transmitters in Great Britain. I. Sutton Coldfield transmitter.

Dolk H et al. · 1997

British researchers investigated cancer rates around a major TV and radio transmitter in Sutton Coldfield, England, studying 13 years of cancer registry data within a 10-kilometer radius. They found an 83% increased risk of adult leukemia within 2 kilometers of the transmitter, with cancer risk declining significantly as distance from the transmitter increased. This pattern remained consistent across different time periods and appeared independent of an initially reported cancer cluster.

Cancer & Tumors449 citations

Lymphomas in E mu-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to pulsed 900 MHZ electromagnetic fields.

Repacholi et al. · 1997

Scientists exposed genetically cancer-prone mice to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields (similar to cell phone signals) for 30 minutes twice daily for up to 18 months. The exposed mice developed lymphoma (a type of cancer) at 2.4 times the rate of unexposed mice. This suggests that cell phone-type radiation may accelerate cancer development in those already genetically susceptible.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found160 citations

Radiation exposure, socioeconomic status, and brain tumor risk in the US Air Force: a nested case-control study.

Grayson JK · 1996

Researchers studied US Air Force personnel to examine whether electromagnetic field exposures from their jobs increased brain tumor risk. They found that men exposed to extremely low frequency fields (power lines, electrical equipment) had a 28% higher risk of brain tumors, while those exposed to radiofrequency/microwave radiation had a 39% higher risk. Interestingly, higher-ranking officers were at significantly greater risk than enlisted personnel, suggesting occupational exposures may play a role in brain tumor development.

Cancer & Tumors248 citations

Incidence of breast cancer in Norwegian female radio and telegraph operators.

Tynes T, Hannevik M, Andersen A, Vistnes AI, Haldorsen T · 1996

Norwegian researchers tracked 2,619 female radio and telegraph operators from 1920 to 1980, comparing their breast cancer rates to the general population. They found these women had a 50% higher risk of developing breast cancer, particularly after age 50. The operators were exposed to radio frequency radiation, night shift work, and some extremely low frequency fields during their careers.

Cancer morbidity in subjects occupationally exposed to high frequency (radiofrequency and microwave) electromagnetic radiation.

Szmigielski, S · 1996

Polish researchers tracked cancer rates in 128,000 military personnel over 15 years, comparing those occupationally exposed to radiofrequency and microwave radiation with unexposed colleagues. They found the exposed group had more than double the overall cancer rate (119 vs 58 cases per 100,000 annually), with particularly striking increases in blood cancers like leukemia (up to 14 times higher) and brain tumors. This large-scale occupational study provides compelling evidence that RF/microwave exposure significantly increases cancer risk.

Overall mortality of cellular telephone customers.

Rothman KJ, Loughlin JE, Funch DP, Dreyer NA · 1996

Researchers tracked mortality rates among more than 250,000 cellular phone customers in 1994, comparing users of portable phones (which expose the head to radio frequency energy) with mobile phone users (whose antennas were separate from the handset). They found no significant difference in death rates between the two groups, with portable phone users actually showing slightly lower mortality rates.

Cancer & Tumors122 citations

Intraocular melanoma linked to occupations and chemical exposures.

Holly EA, Aston DA, Ahn DK, Smith AH. · 1996

Researchers studied whether certain jobs and chemical exposures increase the risk of uveal melanoma, a rare eye cancer. They found that men working as chemists, chemical engineers, and technicians had nearly 6 times higher odds of developing this cancer, while welders and those exposed to ultraviolet light, asbestos, and various chemicals also showed elevated risks. This suggests occupational exposures may be an important but overlooked factor in eye cancer development.

Effects of 2.45-GHz microwave radiation and phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate on dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in mice.

Wu RY, Chiang H, Shao BJ, Li NG, Fu YD · 1994

Researchers exposed mice to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation (the same frequency used in WiFi and microwave ovens) for 3 hours daily over 5 months to see if it would accelerate colon cancer development. The mice were also given a known cancer-causing chemical. The microwave radiation did not increase cancer rates or make tumors worse compared to the chemical alone.

Poly ADP ribosylation as a possible mechanism of microwave--biointeraction

Singh N, Rudra N, Bansal P, Mathur R, Behari J, Nayar U · 1994

Researchers exposed young rats to microwave radiation at 2.45 GHz (the same frequency as WiFi and microwaves) for 60 days and found significant changes in an enzyme called poly ADPR polymerase that helps control gene expression. The enzyme activity increased by 20-35% in liver and reproductive organs but decreased by 20-53% in brain regions. These changes suggest microwave exposure may interfere with cellular processes linked to DNA repair and cancer development.

Microwave induced alteration in the neuron specific enolase gene expression.

Verma M, Dutta SK. · 1993

Researchers exposed cells containing neuron-specific enolase genes to low-level microwave radiation (915 MHz) and found it increased production of neuron-specific enolase, a protein that serves as a diagnostic marker for brain and lung cancers. The exposure level was extremely low at 0.05 milliwatts per kilogram, far below current safety limits. This suggests that even minimal microwave exposure can alter the expression of genes linked to cancer markers.

X-rays, microwaves and vinyl chloride monomer: their clastogenic and aneugenic activity, using the micronucleus assay on human lymphocytes.

Fucic A, Garaj-Vrhovac V, Skara M, Dimitrovic B · 1992

Researchers tested how three different agents - X-rays, microwaves, and vinyl chloride - damage human immune cells at the genetic level. They found that microwaves caused DNA breaks similar to X-rays, but also showed some characteristics typically seen with chemical toxins like vinyl chloride. This suggests microwaves can damage our genetic material in ways that resemble both radiation and chemical exposure.

Neoplastic transformation of C3H/10T1/2 cells following exposure to 120-Hz modulated 2.45-GHz microwaves and phorbol ester tumor promoter.

Balcer-Kubiczek EK, Harrison GH. · 1991

Researchers exposed mouse cells to microwave radiation (same frequency as WiFi) plus a tumor-promoting chemical. While microwaves alone caused no harm, the combination significantly increased cancer-like cell transformation to levels matching X-ray exposure, suggesting microwaves may promote cancer under certain conditions.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including cancer & tumors, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Cancer & Tumors

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
The BioInitiative Report database includes 293 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and cancer & tumors. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
63% of the 293 studies examining cancer & tumors found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 186 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 37% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.