3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Cancer & Tumors

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 63% of 293 studies on cancer & tumors found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 293 studies examining cancer & tumors, 63% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on cancer & tumors at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in Context0.00002, 0.0002, 0.008Extreme Concern1,000 uW/m2FCC Limit10M uW/m2Effects observed in the No Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 500,000,000,000x higher than this exposure level

Research Overview

  • -When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention.
  • -Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
  • -This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development. This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

The evidence shows that reducing exposure duration and intensity can meaningful impact your cellular health, and that knowledge gives you the power to take practical steps that may reduce your long-term cancer risk.

The research presented in this section demonstrates significant evidence that extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposures can cause DNA damage and genetic alterations relevant to leukemia development.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 293 studies

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Primary DNA Damage in Human Blood Lymphocytes Exposed In Vitro to 2450 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation.

Vijayalaxmi, Leal BZ, Szilagyi M, Prihoda TJ, Meltz ML, · 2000

Researchers exposed human blood cells to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used in microwave ovens and some WiFi) for 2 hours to see if it would damage DNA. They found no evidence of DNA damage - the cells looked identical to unexposed cells, while cells exposed to ionizing radiation showed clear damage. This suggests that RF radiation at these levels doesn't break DNA strands in human immune cells.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found345 citations

Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer.

Muscat JE et al. · 2000

Researchers studied 469 brain cancer patients and 422 healthy controls to see if cell phone use increased brain cancer risk. They found no association between handheld cell phone use and brain cancer, even among the heaviest users (over 10 hours per month). However, the study period was relatively short, with users averaging less than 3 years of exposure.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found117 citations

Radiofrequency exposure and mortality from cancer of the brain and lymphatic/hematopoietic systems.

Morgan RW et al. · 2000

Researchers followed nearly 200,000 Motorola employees for 20 years to see if workplace radiofrequency exposure increased their risk of brain cancer, lymphoma, or leukemia. Workers exposed to RF radiation actually had lower rates of these cancers compared to the general population, with no increase in cancer risk even among those with the highest exposures or longest work duration.

Cancer in Radar Technicians Exposed to Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation: Sentinel Episodes.

Richter E, Berman T, Ben-Michael E, Laster R, Westin JB · 2000

Israeli researchers studied radar technicians exposed to high levels of radiofrequency radiation and found unusually high cancer rates among young workers aged 20-37. The study documented multiple cancer types including eye melanoma, testicular cancer, and lymphoma, with alarmingly short latency periods (time from exposure to cancer development). These findings suggest that prolonged exposure to intense RF radiation significantly increases cancer risk, particularly when safety measures are inadequate.

Parotid nodular fasciitis in a mobile phone user.

Pereira C, Edwards M · 2000

Researchers documented the first reported case of nodular fasciitis (a benign but rapidly growing tissue condition) affecting the deep portion of the parotid gland in a 39-year-old telephone engineer who was a heavy mobile phone user. The doctors suggested a possible connection between his extensive phone use and this unusual tissue growth near his ear. This case report raises questions about whether chronic mobile phone exposure might trigger abnormal tissue responses in areas directly exposed to radiofrequency radiation.

The effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the formation of DNA lesions.

Lourencini da Silva R et al. · 2000

Brazilian researchers exposed DNA samples (plasmids) to electromagnetic fields to see if EMF could damage genetic material. They found that EMF exposure caused DNA breaks and made the genetic material less functional, particularly when transition metals were present. This laboratory evidence suggests EMF may damage DNA through the creation of harmful molecules called reactive oxygen species, potentially explaining links between EMF exposure and certain cancers.

Inhibitory effects of low doses of melatonin on induction of preneoplastic liver lesions in a medium-term liver bioassay in F344 rats: relation to the influence of electromagnetic near field exposure.

Imaida K et al. · 2000

Researchers gave rats different doses of melatonin (a hormone that regulates sleep) and found it protected against early liver cancer development. This study was designed to understand why previous EMF exposure studies showed reduced liver tumors when EMF also reduced melatonin levels. The findings suggest that melatonin's protective effects may explain some unexpected results in EMF cancer research.

Case-control study on radiology work, medical x-ray investigations, and use of cellular telephones as risk factors for brain tumors.

Hardell L, Nasman A, Pahlson A, Hallquist A. · 2000

Swedish researchers studied 209 brain tumor patients and 425 healthy controls to identify risk factors for brain tumors. They found that using cell phones on the same side of the head where tumors developed increased brain tumor risk by 142% in areas with highest microwave exposure (temporal, temporoparietal, and occipital lobes). The study also confirmed that medical X-rays, laboratory work, and chemical industry exposure increased brain tumor risk.

Ets1 oncogene induction by ELF-modulated 50 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field

Romano-Spica V, Mucci N, Ursini CL, Ianni A, Bhat NK · 2000

Italian researchers exposed blood and reproductive cells to radiofrequency radiation (50 MHz) combined with extremely low frequency modulation (16 Hz) to study effects on gene activity. They found that this specific combination activated the ets1 gene, which is associated with cancer development, but only when the low-frequency modulation was present. This suggests that the pulsing or modulation of RF signals may be more biologically active than continuous exposure.

Cancer & Tumors119 citations

Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of the central nervous system in Fischer 344 rats exposed to frequency-modulated microwave fields.

Adey WR et al. · 2000

Researchers exposed 540 laboratory rats to radiofrequency signals mimicking cell phone use throughout their entire lives to test whether this exposure increases brain tumor risk. The study found no increased rates of brain tumors from the RF exposure, even when combined with a cancer-causing chemical. Interestingly, this contrasts with the same research team's previous study using digital phone signals, which showed a protective effect against brain tumors.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

TP53 tumor suppressor protein in normal human fibroblasts does not respond to 837 MHz microwave exposure.

Li et al. · 1999

Researchers exposed human cells to 837 MHz microwave radiation (the frequency used by early cell phones) for 2 hours at power levels ranging from 0.9 to 9.0 W/kg. They measured levels of TP53, a critical protein that normally increases when cells are damaged and helps prevent cancer formation. The study found no changes in TP53 levels up to 48 hours after exposure, suggesting these microwave frequencies did not trigger the cellular damage response.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields have no effect on the in vivo proliferation of the 9L brain tumor.

Higashikubo R et al. · 1999

Researchers exposed rats with brain tumors to cell phone-like radiofrequency radiation for 4 hours daily over several months to see if the radiation would affect tumor growth. The study found no difference in survival rates between rats exposed to RF radiation and those that weren't exposed. This suggests that RF radiation at levels similar to cell phones doesn't accelerate brain tumor growth in this animal model.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

No effect of short-term exposure to GSM-modulated low-power microwaves on benzo(a)pyrene-induced tumours in rat.

Chagnaud, JL, Moreau, JM, Veyret, B · 1999

Researchers exposed rats with chemically-induced tumors to GSM cell phone radiation (900 MHz) for 2 hours daily over 2 weeks to see if the radiation would accelerate cancer development. The study found no effect - the microwave exposure neither sped up nor delayed tumor growth, and didn't affect animal survival rates. The exposure levels used were within current safety limits for human whole-body exposure.

A cerebral primitive neuroectodermal tumor in a squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).

Johnson EH, Chima SC, Muirhead DE · 1999

Researchers examined an adult squirrel monkey that had been exposed to microwave radiation for an extended period and discovered a malignant brain tumor in its cerebral cortex. The tumor showed aggressive characteristics including rapid cell division and genetic abnormalities. This case report provides evidence that long-term microwave exposure may contribute to brain cancer development in primates.

Cancer & Tumors304 citations

Use of cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours: A case-control study.

Hardell et al. · 1999

Swedish researchers studied 209 brain tumor patients and 425 healthy controls to examine whether cell phone use increases brain cancer risk. While overall cancer rates appeared similar between phone users and non-users, the study found a concerning pattern: brain tumors were 2.4 times more likely to occur on the same side of the head where people held their phones. This suggests that radiation from cell phones may cause tumors specifically in the brain areas closest to the device.

Cause-specific mortality in cellular telephone users.

Dreyer NA, Loughlin JE, Rothman KJ · 1999

Researchers attempted to track cause-specific mortality (death rates from specific diseases) among cellular phone users in 1994, focusing on brain-related deaths. However, the study was cut short when a class-action lawsuit blocked access to the mortality data after just one year of surveillance. This prevented the researchers from completing their investigation into whether cell phone use was associated with increased death rates from brain tumors or other causes.

Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of the central nervous system in Fischer 344 rats chronically exposed to 836 MHz modulated microwaves.

Adey WR et al. · 1999

Researchers exposed pregnant rats and their offspring to cell phone radiation (836 MHz) for 24 months to study brain tumor development. Surprisingly, the radiation-exposed animals showed fewer brain tumors than unexposed controls, both naturally occurring tumors and those induced by a cancer-causing chemical. This unexpected protective effect was most pronounced in rats that died early in the study, where radiation exposure reduced chemically-induced brain tumors by a statistically significant amount.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Lack of promoting effects of the electromagnetic near-field used for cellular phones (929.2 MHz) on rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term liver bioassay.

Imaida K et al. · 1998

Japanese researchers exposed rats to 929.2 MHz cell phone radiation for 90 minutes daily over 6 weeks to test whether the radiation could promote liver cancer development. The study used relatively high SAR levels (up to 7.2 W/kg) and found no difference in pre-cancerous liver lesions between exposed and unexposed rats. This suggests that cell phone radiation at these levels does not accelerate liver cancer progression in this animal model.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

The 1.5 GHz electromagnetic near-field used for cellular phones does not promote rat liver carcinogenesis in a medium-term liver bioassay.

Imaida et al. · 1998

Researchers exposed rats to 1.439 GHz radiofrequency radiation (the type used in Japanese cell phones) to see if it would promote liver cancer development. Despite using exposure levels up to 1.91 W/kg and finding evidence of biological stress (increased stress hormones), the radiation did not increase cancer-promoting changes in the liver. This suggests that cell phone radiation at these levels does not accelerate liver cancer progression in this animal model.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Chronic, low-level (1.0 W/kg) exposure of mice prone to mammary cancer to 2450 MHz microwaves.

Frei et al. · 1998

Researchers exposed 100 mice genetically prone to breast cancer to microwave radiation at 2450 MHz (the same frequency used in microwave ovens and early WiFi) for 78 weeks, 20 hours per day. They found no difference in cancer rates between exposed mice (38%) and unexposed mice (30%), and no difference in how quickly tumors developed or grew. This suggests that chronic exposure to this specific level of microwave radiation did not increase breast cancer risk in these cancer-prone animals.

Risk of leukemia and residence near a radio transmitter in Italy.

Michelozzi P, Ancona C, Fusco D, Forastiere F, Perucci CA · 1998

Researchers investigated a cluster of leukemia cases near a high-power radio transmitter in Rome, Italy. They found that men living within 3.5 kilometers of the transmitter had 3.5 times higher leukemia death rates than expected, with risk declining significantly as distance from the transmitter increased. This suggests a potential link between proximity to radio frequency radiation sources and increased leukemia risk in men.

Case-control study on risk factors for testicular cancer.

Hardell L, Nasman A, Ohlson CG, Fredrikson M. · 1998

Swedish researchers studied 148 men with testicular cancer and 314 healthy controls to identify occupational risk factors. They found that men working with video display units (computer screens) had an 80% higher risk of testicular cancer after extended exposure (about 480 working days). Amateur radio operators, radar workers, and electronics engineers also showed elevated risks, though based on smaller numbers of cases.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Frequency of micronuclei in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of cancer-prone mice chronically exposed to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation.

Vijayalaxmi et al. · 1997

Researchers exposed cancer-prone mice to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used in microwave ovens and some WiFi) for 20 hours daily over 18 months to test whether it causes DNA damage. They measured micronuclei - tiny fragments that indicate genetic damage - in blood and bone marrow cells. The study found no significant difference in DNA damage between exposed and unexposed mice, suggesting this level of RF exposure did not cause detectable genetic harm.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in C6 glioma and primary glial cells exposed to a 836.55 MHz modulated radiofrequency field.

Stagg RB, Thomas WJ, Jones RA, Adey WR · 1997

Researchers exposed brain cells (both normal and cancerous glioma cells) to cell phone-like radiofrequency radiation at 836.55 MHz for 24 hours to see if it would promote tumor growth by affecting DNA synthesis. While they found small increases in DNA activity in some cancer cell experiments, this didn't translate to actual increased cell growth or proliferation in either normal or cancerous cells.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including cancer & tumors, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Cancer & Tumors

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
The BioInitiative Report database includes 293 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and cancer & tumors. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
63% of the 293 studies examining cancer & tumors found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 186 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 37% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.