6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Cancer & Tumors

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 75% of 572 primary studies on cancer & tumors found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 572 studies examining cancer & tumors, 75% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on cancer & tumors at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context200 µW/m²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Severe Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 50,000 times higher than this level

Research Overview

  • -Nearly four out of five studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure and cancer risk have documented measurable effects.
  • -Out of 738 total studies on this topic, 584 show evidence of cancer-related harm-a 79% concordance rate that reflects a substantial body of scientific concern.
  • -This isn't a marginal or disputed finding relegated to fringe research.

Nearly four out of five studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure and cancer risk have documented measurable effects. Out of 738 total studies on this topic, 584 show evidence of cancer-related harm-a 79% concordance rate that reflects a substantial body of scientific concern. This isn't a marginal or disputed finding relegated to fringe research.

Of the 738 studies in our Cancer & Tumors collection, 584 identified effects ranging from DNA damage and increased cancer cell proliferation to disrupted cellular repair mechanisms.

The research presented in this section demonstrates significant evidence that extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposures can cause DNA damage and genetic alterations relevant to leukemia development.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 627 studies

Investigation and Identification of Sources of Residential Magnetic Field Exposures in the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study (UKCCS), HPA-RPD-005 - ISBN 0 85951 564 8

Unknown authors · 2005

The report describes scientific research on health effects from household appliances, regulations, magnetic field strengths near devices, and resulting exposures. Exposure to electric and magnetic fields from most household appliances is below EU recommended levels. No short-term health effects are expected for those appliances. Outdated literature suggests some older equipment still in use may exceed EU levels, but newer appliances meeting European standards are less likely to exceed them. EU exposure levels are based on effects occurring during or shortly after exposure, and research does not point to a link between cancer and household appliance use.

Induction of tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells by ELF electromagnetic fields

Unknown authors · 2005

Researchers exposed two clones of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to 50Hz electromagnetic fields and calculated IC(50) values from tamoxifen dose-response curves. The dose-response curves shifted to higher tamoxifen concentrations in an intensity-dependent manner, with a maximal response at 1.2muT. The authors hypothesized that electromagnetic field exposure could contribute to tamoxifen resistance observed in breast cancer after long-term treatment.

Cancer & Tumors429 citations

Melatonin-depleted blood from premenopausal women exposed to light at night stimulates growth of human breast cancer xenografts in nude rats

Unknown authors · 2005

Researchers exposed rats bearing human breast cancer xenografts to increasing intensities of white fluorescent light during the dark phase and collected blood from premenopausal women at daytime, nighttime, or after 90 minutes of bright light at night. Tumors perfused with nocturnal melatonin-rich blood showed markedly suppressed proliferative activity and linoleic acid uptake compared with tumors perfused with daytime melatonin-deficient blood. Tumors perfused with blood collected after ocular light-at-night exposure exhibited the daytime pattern of high tumor proliferative activity, and the tumor growth response to light during darkness was intensity dependent.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Effects of 2450 MHz electromagnetic fields with a wide range of SARs on methylcholanthrene-induced transformation in C3H10T1/2 cells.

Wang J et al. · 2005

Researchers exposed mouse C3H10T1/2 cells to 2450 MHz HFEMF at SARs of 5 to 200 W/kg for 2 hours, with or without methylcholanthrene (MC) and the tumor promoter TPA. Transformed foci of Type II and Type III were counted as the endpoint. No significant differences were observed in malignant transformation frequency between controls and HFEMF with or without TPA. Transformation frequency increased for HFEMF at SAR above 100 W/kg when combined with MC or MC plus TPA, while heat exposure did not increase transformation.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Chronic exposure to a 1.439 GHz electromagnetic field used for cellular phones does not promote N-ethylnitrosourea induced central nervous system tumors in F344 rats

Shirai T et al. · 2005

A 1.439 GHz TDMA signal was used for exposure of the rat head starting from 5 weeks of age, 90 min a day, 5 days a week, for 104 weeks. Brain tumorigenesis was initiated by an intrauterine exposure to N-ethylnitrosourea (ENU) on gestational day 18. No increase in the incidences or numbers per group of brain and/or spinal cord tumors, either in the males or females, was detected in the EMF exposed groups. There were no inter-group differences in body weights, food consumption, and survival rates.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found243 citations

Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of the Interphone case-control study in five North European countries

Schoemaker MJ et al. · 2005

Researchers conducted six population-based case-control studies in four Nordic countries and the UK to assess acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile phone use. Data were collected by personal interview from 678 cases of acoustic neuroma and 3553 controls. The risk of acoustic neuroma in relation to regular mobile phone use was not raised (OR=0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.1). Risk of a tumour on the same side of the head as reported phone use was raised for use for 10 years or longer (OR=1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1).

Cellular EffectsNo Effects Found

The Heat-Shock Factor is not Activated in Mammalian Cells Exposed to Cellular Phone Frequency Microwaves.

Laszlo et al. · 2005

Researchers measured heat-shock factor DNA-binding activity in hamster, mouse, and human cells after exposure to FDMA- or CDMA-modulated microwaves at low or high SARs. The assay could detect a 10% increase in HSF activation from a 1°C temperature rise. No increase in HSF DNA-binding ability was detected from any exposure tested. The results do not support activation of the stress response by mobile communication microwaves.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Effect of radiofrequency radiation exposure on mouse skin tumorigenesis initiated by 7,12-dimethybenz[alpha]anthracene.

Huang TQ, Lee JS, Kim TH, Pack JK, Jang JJ, Seo JS. · 2005

The study used 80 male ICR mice initiated with DMBA and then exposed to 849 MHz or 1,763 MHz RF radiation at 0.4 W/kg SAR for 19 weeks. No skin tumors were observed in the sham or RF-exposed groups, while the TPA positive control group had a 95% tumor incidence. Pathological examination and PCNA staining showed no differences between sham and RF-exposed groups, and cyclin D1 and c-fos expression was only detected in TPA-induced tumors. The researchers concluded that RF radiation does not act as a tumor promoter for skin tumors in this model.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found106 citations

Cellular telephones and risk for brain tumors: A population-based, incident case-control study.

Christensen et al. · 2005

Researchers conducted a nationwide population-based case-control study in Denmark. Cellular telephone use was associated with lower risk for high-grade glioma (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.90). Risk estimates were near unity for low-grade glioma (OR 1.08) and meningioma (OR 1.00). The results did not support an association between cellular telephone use and risk for glioma or meningioma.

Cancer & Tumors
Not an original health-effects study

Selection bias due to differential participation in a case-control study of mobile phone use and brain tumors.

Lahkola A, Salminen T, Auvinen A. · 2005

Researchers evaluated selection bias in a Finnish case-control study of mobile phone use and brain tumors by comparing full and incomplete participants. Among controls, 83% of full participants and 73% of incomplete participants regularly used a mobile phone, while among cases the figures were 76% and 64%. The odds ratio for brain tumor based on the combined group was slightly closer to unity than that based only on full participants. Selection bias tends to distort effect estimates below unity, while analyses based on more comprehensive material gave results close to unity.

Use of cellular or cordless telephones and the risk for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Hardell L, Eriksson M, Carlberg M, Sundstrom C, Mild KH. · 2005

B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was not associated with the use of cellular or cordless telephones. For T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a latency period of more than five years, cordless phone use showed an odds ratio of 2.47 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.09 to 5.60. The authors noted that the results indicate an association between T-cell NHL and phone use but are based on low numbers and must be interpreted with caution.

Cancer & Tumors139 citations

Case-control study on cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for acoustic neuroma or meningioma in patients diagnosed 2000-2003.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. · 2005

Researchers conducted a case-control study of benign brain tumors with 413 cases and 692 controls. For meningioma, analogue phone use yielded an odds ratio of 1.7 (95% CI 0.97-3.0), which increased to 2.1 (95% CI 1.1-4.3) with a latency period greater than 10 years. For acoustic neuroma, analogue phone use gave an odds ratio of 4.2 (95% CI 1.8-10) that rose to 8.4 (95% CI 1.6-45) with a latency period greater than 15 years, though based on low numbers. Digital phone use was associated with an odds ratio of 2.0 (95% CI 1.05-3.8) for acoustic neuroma, while cordless phone use did not show a significant increase. In multivariate analysis, analogue phones were a significant risk factor for acoustic neuroma.

Use of cellular telephones and brain tumour risk in urban and rural areas.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. · 2005

Researchers investigated the association between cellular or cordless telephone use and brain tumour risk in urban and rural areas of Sweden. The study included 1429 cases and 1470 controls aged 20 to 80 years diagnosed between 1997 and 2000. Use of different phone types was assessed by questionnaire with one control matched for sex and age per case. Rural residence with digital phone use showed an odds ratio of 1.4 increasing to 3.2 with longer latency, while urban residence showed odds ratios of 0.9. The effect was most obvious for malignant brain tumours.

Cellular Effects131 citations

Electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequency induce apoptosis and inactivation of the multi-chaperone complex in human epidermoid cancer cells.

Caraglia M et al. · 2005

Researchers exposed human epidermoid cancer KB cells to non-thermal microwave electromagnetic fields at 1.95 MHz. The exposure induced time-dependent apoptosis reaching 45% after 3 hours, accompanied by a roughly 2.5-fold decrease in expression of ras and Raf-1 and activity of ras and Erk-1/2. A 2.5-fold increase in ubiquitination of ras and Raf-1 was observed, and proteasome inhibition with lactacystin counteracted the degradation, indicating proteasome-dependent degradation. MW-EMF differentially activated stress pathways, increasing JNK-1 activity and HSP70 and HSP27 expression while reducing p38 kinase activity and HSP90 expression; overexpression of HSP90 completely blocked apoptosis and the inactivation of the ras-Erk survival signal, while Erk inhibition reversed this protection.

Radiofrequency-induced carcinogenesis: cellular calcium homeostasis changes as a triggering factor.

Anghileri LJ, Mayayo E, Domingo JL, Thouvenot P. · 2005

Mice were treated with 1 hour per week of radiofrequency exposure for 4 months while a sham-exposed group served as controls. The evolution of carcinogenesis was followed up to 18 months, and the maximal life span of control mice was about 24 months. All dead animals were clinically and histologically examined to give an age-determined comparative quantification of the evolving carcinogenesis. A radiocalcium tracer method permitted the evaluation of radiofrequency effects on transmembrane transport of extracellular calcium at 1 and 24 hours after exposure, and the determination of induced lipid peroxidation completed this second study.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

E., Sheen, D. M., Wilson, B. W., Grumbein, S. L., Creim, J. A. and Sasser, L. B

Anderson, L. · 2004

Researchers conducted a two-year chronic bioassay to determine whether long-term exposure to a 1.6 GHz radiofrequency field would affect cancer incidence in Fischer 344 rats. Timed-pregnant rats were assigned to far-field RF Iridium or sham groups, with whole-body exposures starting at 19 days gestation for 2 hours per day, 7 days per week until weaning. Offspring then received near-field head-first exposures 2 hours per day, 5 days per week from 36 days old until 2 years of age at brain SAR levels of 1.6 W/kg, 0.16 W/kg, or sham. No statistically significant differences were seen among groups for live pups per litter, survival index, weaning weights, clinical signs, or neoplastic lesions, and male survival was similar across groups while female cage controls had reduced survival time.

Significant differences in the effects of magnetic field exposure on 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary carcinogenesis in two substrains of Sprague-Dawley rats

Unknown authors · 2004

Researchers compared two Sprague-Dawley substrains, SD1 and SD2, for magnetic field effects on cell proliferation, susceptibility to DMBA-induced mammary cancer, and tumor development in the DMBA model. The SD1 substrain was considered MF-sensitive and was compared with SD2 from the same breeder. Magnetic field exposure significantly increased mammary tumor development and growth in SD1 rats but not in SD2 rats. No enhanced cell proliferation was determined after magnetic field exposure in SD2 rats, unlike in SD1 rats. The researchers concluded that genetic background plays a pivotal role in magnetic field exposure effects.

Residential and occupational exposures to 50-Hz magnetic fields and breast cancer in women: a population-based study

Unknown authors · 2004

Researchers conducted a population-based case-control study in Norway to assess residential and occupational exposure to 50-Hz magnetic fields and breast cancer risk. Cases of breast cancer diagnosed from 1980 to 1996 were identified in a cohort of women living near a high-voltage power line, and each case was matched to two controls by year of birth, municipality, and cohort entry year. Residential exposure was calculated from the magnetic fields generated by the power lines before diagnosis, while occupational exposure was based on an exposure matrix. Women with residential exposure had an odds ratio of 1.58 (95% CI: 1.30, 1.92) for breast cancer, whereas the highest occupational exposure yielded an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.40).

Cancer & Tumors230 citations

The cancer epidemiology of radiation

Unknown authors · 2004

Ionizing radiation has been the subject of intense epidemiological investigation. The Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors is the predominant source of evidence, supplemented by studies of medical, occupational, and environmental exposures. Notable studied groups include underground miners exposed to radon, patients receiving therapeutic radiation, and nuclear weapons program workers in the former USSR. Low-level exposure risk is contentious but evidence suggests increased risk approximately proportional to dose. Ultraviolet radiation is established as a cause of skin cancer, while evidence for mobile phone or power line radiation is not convincing, though a childhood leukemia link to extremely low-frequency fields cannot be dismissed.

Malignant melanoma of the skin - not a sunshine story!

Unknown authors · 2004

Researchers reviewed Swedish melanoma incidence, mortality, charter travel statistics, and FM broadcasting network expansion across all counties. Melanoma trend break occurred in 1955, while increased charter sun travel began seven years later. Counties with delayed FM network rollout had stable melanoma mortality during the delay period.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Electromagnetic fields and health effects--epidemiologic studies of cancer, diseases of the central nervous system and arrhythmia-related heart disease

Unknown authors · 2004

No increased risks were found for leukemia, brain tumors, or breast cancer among the utility workers. Utility workers showed a significantly increased ALS mortality rate that rose with longer employment and higher EMF exposure. The mobile phone cohort showed no increased risk for brain tumors, acoustic neuroma, salivary gland tumors, or leukemia.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

No effects of GSM-modulated 900 MHz electromagnetic fields on survival rate and spontaneous development of lymphoma in female AKR/J mice.

Sommer AM, Streckert J, Bitz AK, Hansen VW, Lerchl A · 2004

Survival rate and lymphoma incidence did not differ between exposed and sham-exposed mice. Exposed mice gained more weight than sham-exposed mice. The data do not support the hypothesis that 900 MHz fields are a significant risk factor for lymphoma in this genetically predisposed strain.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including cancer & tumors, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Cancer & Tumors

Nearly four out of five studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure and cancer risk have documented measurable effects. Out of 738 total studies on this topic, 584 show evidence of cancer-related harm-a 79% concordance rate that reflects a substantial body of scientific concern. This isn't a marginal or disputed finding relegated to fringe research.
The SYB Research Database includes 572 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and cancer & tumors. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
75% of the 572 studies examining cancer & tumors found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 431 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 25% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.