3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Cancer & Tumors

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 63% of 293 studies on cancer & tumors found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 293 studies examining cancer & tumors, 63% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on cancer & tumors at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in Context0.00002, 0.0002, 0.008Extreme Concern1,000 uW/m2FCC Limit10M uW/m2Effects observed in the No Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 500,000,000,000x higher than this exposure level

Research Overview

  • -When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention.
  • -Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
  • -This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development. This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

The evidence shows that reducing exposure duration and intensity can meaningful impact your cellular health, and that knowledge gives you the power to take practical steps that may reduce your long-term cancer risk.

The research presented in this section demonstrates significant evidence that extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposures can cause DNA damage and genetic alterations relevant to leukemia development.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 293 studies

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Meningioma and mobile phone use--a collaborative case-control study in five North European countries.

Lahkola A et al. · 2008

Researchers studied 1,209 people with meningiomas (a type of brain tumor) and 3,299 healthy controls across five European countries to see if mobile phone use increases tumor risk. They found that regular mobile phone users actually had a 24% lower risk of developing meningiomas compared to non-users or occasional users. The study found no increased risk regardless of how long people used phones, how many calls they made, or what type of network they used.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Mobile phone base station radiation does not affect neoplastic transformation in BALB/3T3 cells.

Hirose H et al. · 2008

Researchers exposed mouse cells to radiofrequency radiation from mobile phone base stations for six weeks to see if it would cause cancerous changes. Even at high exposure levels (800 mW/kg), the radiation did not increase the rate of cell transformation into cancer cells. This suggests that base station radiation at these levels doesn't directly promote tumor formation in laboratory conditions.

Cancer & Tumors174 citations

Meta-analysis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumours.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Hansson Mild K. · 2008

Researchers analyzed data from multiple studies examining whether long-term mobile phone use increases brain tumor risk. They found that when people used phones for 10 years or longer on the same side of their head where tumors developed, the risk of glioma (a type of brain cancer) doubled and acoustic neuroma (a benign tumor) risk increased by 140%. However, using phones on the opposite side of the head showed no increased risk.

[Mutagenic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects induced by radiofrequency electromagnetic field of mobile phone.]

Chen ZJ, He JL. · 2008

Chinese researchers reviewed existing studies on whether mobile phone radiofrequency radiation causes DNA mutations, cancer, or birth defects. They found conflicting results across different studies, with most research not supporting the idea that RF exposure causes these genetic effects. However, the authors noted that more research is needed on health effects from low-level RF exposure.

Distribution of RF energy emitted by mobile phones in anatomical structures of the brain.

Cardis E et al. · 2008

Researchers measured how radio frequency energy from mobile phones distributes throughout the brain by testing 110 different phone models. They found that 97-99% of the RF energy is absorbed in the brain hemisphere closest to the phone, with 50-60% concentrated in the temporal lobe (the area above your ear). This uneven distribution pattern was consistent across different phone types and suggests that if mobile phones pose cancer risks, brain tumors would most likely develop in these high-absorption areas.

A 60-Hz sinusoidal magnetic field induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells through reactive oxygen species.

Koh EK, Ryu BK, Jeong DY, Bang IS, Nam MH, Chae KS · 2008

Researchers exposed prostate cancer cells to 60-Hz magnetic fields (the frequency of household electricity) and found the fields killed cancer cells by increasing harmful molecules called reactive oxygen species. This suggests power-line frequency magnetic fields might potentially be developed as cancer treatments.

Study on potential effects of "902-MHz GSM-type Wireless Communication Signals" on DMBA-induced mammary tumours in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Hruby R, Neubauer G, Kuster N, Frauscher M · 2008

Researchers exposed rats to 902 MHz GSM-type wireless signals (similar to cell phone radiation) for 4 hours daily over 6 months after giving them a chemical known to cause breast cancer. The RF-exposed rats showed statistically significant increases in palpable tissue masses and more malignant tumors compared to sham-exposed controls, though the researchers concluded these differences were likely incidental due to high variability in the cancer model used.

Direct current electrical fields induce apoptosis in oral mucosa cancer cells by NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species

Wartenberg M et al. · 2008

German researchers exposed oral cancer cells to weak electric fields (2-16 volts per meter) for 24 hours. The fields triggered cancer cell death by generating harmful molecules called reactive oxygen species that damaged the cells' internal systems, suggesting potential therapeutic applications for treating cancer.

Increased levels of numerical chromosome aberrations after in vitro exposure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields for 72 hours.

Mazor R et al. · 2008

Researchers exposed human blood cells to 800 MHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to cell phone frequencies) for 72 hours at levels close to current safety limits. They found significant increases in chromosome abnormalities called aneuploidy, where cells had the wrong number of chromosomes. This type of genetic damage can contribute to cancer development and other health problems.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Lymphoma development in mice chronically exposed to UMTS-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

Sommer AM, Bitz AK, Streckert J, Hansen VW, Lerchl A · 2007

German researchers exposed 320 mice to 3G (UMTS) cell phone signals 24 hours a day for their entire lives to see if the radiation would increase lymphoma rates. The mice were genetically predisposed to develop this blood cancer, making them ideal test subjects. After monitoring the animals for 43 weeks, researchers found no difference in cancer rates, survival times, or disease severity between exposed and unexposed groups.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

GSM and DCS wireless communication signals: combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study in the Wistar Rat.

Smith P, Kuster N, Ebert S, Chevalier HJ · 2007

Researchers exposed 1,170 rats to cell phone radiation (GSM and DCS signals) for 2 hours daily, 5 days a week for up to 2 years to test whether this exposure causes cancer. They found no increase in tumors or cancer rates compared to unexposed control rats, even at the highest radiation levels tested. This large, long-term study suggests that chronic exposure to these specific wireless signals at the tested levels does not increase cancer risk in rats.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Lack of promoting effects of chronic exposure to 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signals for IMT-2000 cellular system on development of N-ethylnitrosourea-induced central nervous system tumors in F344 rats.

Shirai T et al. · 2007

Researchers exposed young rats to cell phone-like radiation (1.95 GHz W-CDMA signals) for 2 years to see if it would promote brain tumor development in animals already given a cancer-causing chemical. The study found no significant increase in brain tumors from the radiation exposure at levels of 0.67 and 2.0 W/kg SAR. This suggests that chronic exposure to this type of cell phone radiation does not accelerate brain tumor formation in this animal model.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Effects of exposure of newborn patched1 heterozygous mice to GSM, 900 MHz.

Saran A et al. · 2007

Researchers exposed newborn mice genetically engineered to be highly susceptible to tumors to cell phone radiation (900 MHz GSM) for 30 minutes twice daily over 5 days. The exposed mice showed no increased cancer risk, no shortened lifespan, and no acceleration of tumor development compared to unexposed mice. This study suggests that brief early-life exposure to cell phone radiation at typical levels may not promote cancer development, even in genetically vulnerable subjects.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Carcinogenicity Study of 217 Hz Pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields in pim1 transgenic mice.

Oberto G et al. · 2007

Researchers exposed genetically modified mice to pulsed 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to cell phone signals) for 18 months to test whether it could cause cancer. Despite using exposure levels up to three times higher than a previous study that found increased lymphomas, this larger study found no increase in tumors or cancer at any of the tested exposure levels. This contradicts earlier research suggesting cell phone radiation might promote cancer development.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found100 citations

Use of mobile phones in Norway and risk of intracranial tumours.

Klaeboe L, Blaasaas KG, Tynes T. · 2007

Norwegian researchers studied 541 brain tumor patients and 358 healthy controls to see if mobile phone use increased risk of brain tumors (gliomas, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas). They found that regular mobile phone users actually had lower odds of developing these tumors compared to non-users, with no increasing risk even after 6+ years of use. This suggests mobile phones don't increase brain tumor risk, at least for the exposure levels and time periods studied.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found124 citations

Cellular phone use and brain tumor: a meta-analysis.

Kan P, Simonsen SE, Lyon JL, Kestle JR. · 2007

Researchers analyzed nine case-control studies involving over 17,000 people to examine whether cell phone use increases brain tumor risk. They found no overall increased risk for typical users, but discovered a 25% higher risk among people who used cell phones for 10 years or longer. This suggests that while short-term use appears relatively safe, long-term exposure may pose health concerns that require further investigation.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Micronucleus frequency in erythrocytes of mice after long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiation.

Juutilainen J, Heikkinen P, Soikkeli H, Mäki-Paakkanen J. · 2007

Finnish researchers exposed mice to cell phone radiation for over a year to test whether it damages DNA by looking for micronuclei (broken chromosome fragments) in blood cells. They found no DNA damage from radiofrequency exposure at levels similar to what humans experience from mobile phones. This was true across different phone technologies (analog and digital), exposure durations (52-78 weeks), and mouse strains.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Use of cellular and cordless telephones and risk of testicular cancer.

Hardell L et al. · 2007

Swedish researchers studied 888 men with testicular cancer and 870 healthy controls to see if using cell phones or cordless phones increased cancer risk. They found no meaningful association between phone use and either type of testicular cancer (seminoma or non-seminoma), with risk estimates hovering around normal levels regardless of phone type. The study also found no connection between where men kept their phones (like trouser pockets) and cancer development.

Cellular telephone use and time trends in brain tumour mortality in Switzerland from 1969 to 2002.

Roosli M, Michel G, Kuehni CE, Spoerri A · 2007

Swiss researchers analyzed brain tumor death rates from 1969 to 2002 to see if mobile phone introduction in 1987 led to increased brain cancer deaths. They found that brain tumor mortality rates remained stable after mobile phones were introduced, with no increase in younger age groups who used phones most frequently. However, the study acknowledges it cannot detect small risks or effects that take decades to develop.

Cancer & Tumors215 citations

Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries.

Lahkola A et al. · 2007

Researchers studied 1,522 brain cancer patients and 3,301 healthy people across five European countries to see if mobile phone use increases glioma risk. Overall, they found no increased cancer risk from regular phone use, but discovered a 39% higher risk when people used phones for more than 10 years on the same side of their head where the tumor developed. This suggests that long-term, localized exposure to the brain may pose risks that deserve further investigation.

[Cell Phones and Risk of brain and acoustic nerve tumours: the French INTERPHONE case-control study.]

Hours M et al. · 2007

French researchers studied 596 brain tumor patients and matched controls to investigate whether cell phone use increases cancer risk. They found no statistically significant increased risk for gliomas, meningiomas, or acoustic neuromas among regular cell phone users. However, the heaviest users showed a concerning trend toward higher glioma risk, though the study lacked sufficient statistical power to draw definitive conclusions.

Cancer & Tumors246 citations

Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours - increased risk associated with use for > 10 years.

Hardell LO et al. · 2007

Researchers analyzed 16 studies to examine brain tumor risk in people who used cell phones for 10 years or longer. They found that long-term users had double the risk of developing acoustic neuroma (a benign brain tumor) and glioma (a malignant brain tumor), with the highest risk occurring on the same side of the head where people typically held their phone. This suggests that extended cell phone use over a decade may increase brain tumor risk.

Pooled analysis of two Swedish case-control studies on the use of mobile and cordless telephones and the risk of brain tumours diagnosed during 1997-2003.

Hansson Mild K, Hardell L, Carlberg M. · 2007

Swedish researchers analyzed two large studies involving thousands of people to examine whether mobile and cordless phone use increases brain tumor risk. They found that each year of phone use increased brain tumor risk by 8-11%, with the highest risks appearing after 10+ years of use, particularly for aggressive brain cancers called astrocytomas. The study also found that every 100 hours of analog phone use increased acoustic neuroma (a type of brain tumor) risk by 5%.

Cancer & Tumors101 citations

Radio-frequency radiation exposure from AM radio transmitters and childhood leukemia and brain cancer.

Ha M, Im H, Lee M, Kim HJ, Kim BC, Gimm YM, Pack JK. · 2007

Researchers in South Korea studied nearly 6,000 children to examine whether living near AM radio transmitters increases cancer risk. They found that children living within 2 kilometers of high-power AM radio towers had more than double the risk of developing leukemia compared to children living more than 20 kilometers away. This suggests that radio frequency radiation from broadcasting towers may contribute to childhood blood cancers.

Anticancer effects on leiomyosarcoma-bearing Wistar rats after electromagnetic radiation of resonant radiofrequencies.

Avdikos A et al. · 2007

Greek researchers exposed cancer cells to specific radiofrequencies (10-120 kHz) and found these treated cells formed tumors that grew more slowly and caused less death in rats. When rats with existing tumors were exposed to the same resonant frequencies for 5 hours daily, one-third of their tumors completely disappeared. This suggests certain electromagnetic frequencies might have therapeutic rather than harmful effects on cancer.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including cancer & tumors, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Cancer & Tumors

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
The BioInitiative Report database includes 293 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and cancer & tumors. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
63% of the 293 studies examining cancer & tumors found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 186 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 37% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.