6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

Immune System
Review
128 citations

Disturbance of the immune system by electromagnetic fields-A potentially underlying cause for cellular damage and tissue repair reduction which could lead to disease and impairment.

Johansson O. · 2009

The review summarized multiple papers on the effects of man-made electromagnetic fields on the immune system. It found that electromagnetic fields disturb immune function by stimulating allergic and inflammatory responses and affecting tissue repair. The review stated that such disturbances increase the risk of diseases including cancer. The authors reported that these effects occur at exposure levels significantly below current national and international safety limits.

In-situ measurement procedures for temporal RF electromagnetic field exposure of the general public.

Joseph W, Verloock L, Tanghe E, Martens L. · 2009

Researchers categorized exposure locations by environment, population density, and mobile phone traffic, selected five sites, and collected 352,800 electric field time samples over time. They defined factor X as the ratio of actual maximal temporal measurements to estimated maximal values from short-period data, and factor R as the ratio of median to maximal momentary field measurements indicating signal variation over time. Median values of R were 0.92 for FM, 0.66 for GSM, and 0.71 for UMTS. Using an optimal method for X, median values were 1.05 for FM, 0.47 for GSM, and 0.96 for UMTS. Combining X and R allows estimation of actual maximal and median exposure during longer periods from short-period measurements.

Radio Frequency
Not an original health-effects study

[Level of microwave radiation from mobile phone base stations built in residential districts]

Hu J, Lu Y, Zhang H, Xie H, Yang X. · 2009

Researchers randomly selected 18 residential districts with base stations and 10 without, using a TES-92 monitor to measure microwave radiation indoors and outdoors. Radiation levels were higher in districts with base stations than in control districts. Radiation peaked at about 10 meters from the station and decreased with distance. Aluminum alloy security nets reduced indoor radiation, while glass windows did not. All ground-level measurements around base stations were below the primary standard, but some windows facing the station had higher levels, and a few exceeded the primary safe level.

Whole Body / General
Not an original health-effects study

Occupational exposure to ambient electromagnetic fields of technical operational personnel working for a mobile telephone operator.

Chauvin S et al. · 2009

Researchers used exposimeters to record individual exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields for 23 technical operations personnel and 22 other workers. Exposure densities were quantified using 229 exposure indicators for each of the 45 subjects. Cluster analysis did not reliably separate the two groups, although some exposure indicators differed significantly between them. A learning group method also failed to discover a predictive law to identify technical operational personnel as a subgroup.

Effects of intrauterine and extrauterine exposure to GSM-like radiofrequency on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in infant male rabbits.

Budak GG, Muluk NB, Budak B, Oztürk GG, Apan A, Seyhan N. · 2009

Researchers studied thirty-six infant male New Zealand rabbits divided into four groups with different exposure regimens. Group 2 received extrauterine exposure for 15 minutes daily over 14 days, Group 3 received intrauterine exposure for 15 minutes daily over 7 days, and Group 4 received both exposures. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions were measured across frequencies from 1.0 to 8.0 kHz. Extrauterine exposure alone decreased emission amplitudes at 4.0 and 6.0 kHz compared with controls. Combined intrauterine and extrauterine exposure increased amplitudes at 1.5, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz relative to controls and the extrauterine group.

Effects of GSM-like radiofrequency on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in pregnant adult rabbits.

Budak GG et al. · 2009

Researchers studied 18 pregnant and 18 non-pregnant New Zealand White rabbits, randomly divided into four groups. Nine pregnant and nine non-pregnant rabbits were exposed to 1800 MHz GSM-like RFR for 15 minutes daily over 7 days, while the remaining rabbits were not exposed. Cochlear function was measured using distortion product otoacoustic emissions at frequencies from 1.0 to 8.0 kHz. In pregnant rabbits, DPOAE amplitudes did not differ between exposed and unexposed groups except at 2.0 kHz. In non-pregnant rabbits, exposed animals showed lower DPOAE amplitudes at 1.0 to 4.0 kHz compared to unexposed animals.

Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: Phase 1: A population-based cross-sectional study in Germany.

Blettner M et al. · 2009

The study aimed to investigate whether proximity to mobile phone base stations and risk perception are associated with health complaints. Among 30,047 participants, 18.7% were concerned about adverse health effects and 10.3% attributed personal health effects to base station exposure. Participants concerned about or attributing health effects to base stations and those living within 500 meters reported slightly more health complaints than others. The slightly higher prevalence of health complaints near base stations could not be fully explained by attributions or concerns.

Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields.

Berg-Beckhoff G et al. · 2009

Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study in 2006 with 3526 participants living mainly in urban regions to test whether low-level RF-EMF from mobile phone base stations was related to health disturbances. Exposure was assessed with a dosimeter measuring different RF-EMF frequencies, and health outcomes were collected via postal questionnaires on sleep disturbances, headaches, health complaints, and mental and physical health. No differences in median health scores were found between exposed and non-exposed participants, and measured RF-EMFs were not associated with adverse health effects.

Effect of electromagnetic field induced by radio frequency waves at 900 to 1800 MHz on bone mineral density of iliac bone wings.

Atay T et al. · 2009

Researchers investigated the effects of electromagnetic waves from cellular phones operating at 900 to 1800 MHz on bone mineral density of the human iliac bone wings in 150 male volunteers. Participants were divided into two groups based on the iliac side exposed to electromagnetic waves (group 1) and the unexposed side (group 2). The mean daily phone carriage duration was 14.7 hours and the mean duration of phone use was 6.2 years. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements showed slightly lower values on the exposed side but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), and values were not as low as in osteopenia or osteoporosis.

Results of a long-term low-level microwave exposure of rats.

Adang D, Remacle C, Vorst AV. · 2009

Researchers exposed four-month-old Wistar albino rats to two different microwave frequencies and exposure modes for 2 hours a day, seven days a week, over 21 months. They measured leucocytes, erythrocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, and mortality rate. After three and eight months, monocytes differed by about 20% in the 970-MHz continuous wave group; after 14 and 18 months, white blood cells increased about 15% and neutrophils about 25%; lymphocytes fell about 15% at 18 months. Mortality in exposed groups increased after 21 months at age 25 months and reached almost twice the sham-exposed value by age 28 months.

Radio Frequency
Measurement survey

Residential exposure to radiofrequency fields from mobile phone base stations, and broadcast transmitters: a population-based survey with personal meter.

Viel JF et al. · 2009

Researchers enrolled 200 randomly selected people who were supplied with personal exposure meters for 24 h measurements and kept a time-location-activity diary. They calculated the proportion of measurements above 0.05 V/m and the maximum electric field strength for each radiofrequency. Most measurements were below the detection limit, with FM having 12.3% above threshold, and maximum field strength never exceeded 1.5 V/m. GSM and DCS exposure peaked at 280 m and 1000 m from antennas, FM showed a downward trend within 10 km, while UMTS and TV signals did not vary with distance.

Mobile phone base stations-Effects on wellbeing and health.

Kundi M, Hutter HP. · 2009

Cross-sectional investigations of subjective health as a function of distance or measured field strength found indications for an effect of exposure that is likely independent of concerns and attributions. Experimental studies applying short-term exposure to base station signals gave various results, but there is weak evidence that UMTS and to a lesser degree GSM signals reduce wellbeing in persons that report to be sensitive to such exposures. Two ecological studies of cancer near base stations reported a strong increase in incidence within 350 and 400 meters, but limitations prevent firm conclusions.

Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields

Frei P et al. · 2009

Researchers measured RF-EMF exposure of 166 volunteers from Basel, Switzerland, using personal exposure meters carried for one week. Mean weekly exposure across all RF-EMF sources was 0.13 mW/m2, ranging across individuals from 0.014 to 0.881 mW/m2. Exposure varied considerably between persons and locations but was fairly consistent within persons.

[Antagonistic effect of microwave on hematopoietic damage of mice induced by gamma-ray irradiation.]

Cao Y, Xu Q, Lu MX, Jin ZD, DU HB, Li JX, Nie JH, Tong J. · 2009

Researchers treated male Kunning mice with low-dose microwave radiation before exposing them to gamma-ray irradiation, then measured survival, blood parameters, and markers of bone marrow activity. Mice pre-exposed to 120 microW/cm² 900 MHz microwave had a higher 30-day survival rate and more white blood cells compared with gamma-ray-treated mice that did not receive microwave pre-exposure. The microwave pre-exposure group also showed increases in thymus and spleen organ indexes, bone marrow cell proliferation activity, CFU-GM hematopoietic foci numbers, and serum concentrations of GM-CSF and IL-3. The researchers suggested that low-dose microwave radiation may exert potential antagonistic effects on hematopoietic injuries induced by ionizing radiation.

Radio Frequency
Not an original health-effects study

Potential health risks due to telecommunications radiofrequency radiation exposures in Lagos State Nigeria.

Aweda MA et al. · 2009

Researchers measured radiofrequency radiation output power densities from commonly used GSM handsets and wireless phones across Lagos State, Nigeria. Over 1100 handsets of different makes and models as well as wireless phones were sampled across all local government areas of the state. GSM handset power density values ranged from a minimum of 1.294 Wm-2 with Siemens model R228 to a maximum of 16.813 Wm-2 with Samsung model C140. The study concluded that the population in Lagos State may be at risk due to significant radiofrequency radiation exposures from GSM use.

Survival trends in the United States following exercise-related sudden cardiac arrest in the youth: 2000–2006

Jonathan A. Drezner et al. · 2008

Researchers identified exercise-related sudden death events in young individuals through a systematic search of public media reports from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006. Over 7 years, 486 total cases of exercise-related SCA were identified in U.S. youth, with an average of 69 cases per year (range 48-96). Overall survival during this time period was 11% (55/486), with a range of 4% to 21% survival per year, and there was a statistically significant trend toward improved survival in recent years (P = .035). Females were more likely to survive sudden cardiac arrest than were males (21% vs 9%, P = .001).

Whole Body / General
Review
124 citations

Quantitative evaluations of mechanisms of radiofrequency interactions with biological molecules and processes

Unknown authors · 2008

The review examines physical principles for assessing radiofrequency interactions with biological systems at exposures up to endogenous electric field levels. It finds possible demodulation at membrane barriers for frequencies up to 10 MHz but not at higher frequencies. Molecular vibrational modes are too overdamped by water for excitation below the far infrared. Two mechanisms may plausibly affect biology: radical-pair reaction shifts below approximately 150 MHz and dielectric and resistive heating at all frequencies.

Indoor transformer stations as predictors of residential ELF magnetic field exposure

Unknown authors · 2008

Researchers measured magnetic fields in 30 buildings in three Finnish cities, comparing apartments above transformer stations with first-floor and upper-floor reference apartments. Spot measurements showed mean magnetic fields of 0.62 µT above transformer stations, 0.21 µT on first floors, and 0.11 µT on upper floors. Twenty-four-hour mean fields were 0.2 µT or higher in 97% of apartments above transformer stations, 25% of first-floor apartments, and 10% of upper-floor apartments. At a 0.4 µT cut-off, 63% of apartments above transformer stations, 14% of first-floor apartments, and 3.3% of upper-floor apartments exceeded the threshold. The authors concluded that transformer station location can reliably classify apartments into high and low magnetic field categories.

Can disturbances in the atmospheric electric field created by powerline corona ions disrupt melatonin production in the pineal gland?

Unknown authors · 2008

Recent epidemiological studies report increased leukemia risk near high voltage powerlines at distances beyond direct electric and magnetic fields. Corona ions from powerlines form plumes that generate atmospheric electric field disturbances of tens to a few hundred V/m up to several hundred meters away. The authors hypothesize that these disturbances disrupt nocturnal melatonin synthesis and circadian rhythms, leading to increased risk of adverse health effects including leukemia. A review finds that natural atmospheric electric field variation may act as a weak Zeitgeber, melatonin disruption by electric fields occurs in rats, and human circadian rhythms are disturbed by artificial fields as low as 2.5 V/m.

The effect of extremely low frequency magnetic field on the conjunctiva and goblet cells

Unknown authors · 2008

Researchers exposed 30 adult female Sprague Dawley rats to extremely low frequency magnetic field for 4 hours per day over 7 days, with 15 rats serving as controls. The exposed rats had significantly lower goblet cell density than controls (p = 0.010). They also showed conjunctival edema and inflammation (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003), but no difference in fibroblast proliferation (p = 0.422).

Exposure to 50 Hz magnetic field in apartment buildings with built-in transformer stations in Hungary

Unknown authors · 2008

Researchers measured 50 Hz magnetic fields in 31 apartment buildings with built-in transformer stations. In each building they selected three apartments: one above the transformer room, one on the same floor, and one on a higher floor. The mean magnetic field was 0.98 microT above transformers, 0.13 microT on the same floor, and 0.1 microT on higher floors. At a 0.2 microT threshold, 97% of apartments above transformers exceeded it versus 14% on the same floor and 13% on higher floors. At 0.4 microT, 81% of apartments above transformers exceeded it while none on other floors did.

Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found227 citations

Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review

Unknown authors · 2008

RF-EMF discrimination was investigated in seven studies including a total of 182 self-declared electromagnetic hypersensitive (EHS) individuals and 332 non-EHS individuals. The pooled correct field detection rate was 4.2% better than expected by chance (95% CI: -2.1 to 10.5). There was no evidence that EHS individuals could detect presence or absence of RF-EMF better than other persons. There was little evidence that short-term exposure to a mobile phone or base station causes symptoms based on eight randomized trials investigating 194 EHS and 346 non-EHS individuals in a laboratory.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Analysis of time-frequency fine structure of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions to study the effects of exposure to GSM radiofrequency fields

Unknown authors · 2008

Researchers recorded TEOAEs in 27 healthy young adults before and after 10 minutes of real or sham GSM exposure in a double-blind design. TEOAE data were analyzed both globally using broadband analysis and with wavelet transform for time-frequency fine structure. Both analyses revealed no significant effect of exposure on TEOAEs.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.