6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

We want you to know about microwave oven radiation

Unknown authors · 1973

The publication explains that microwaves are a nonionizing form of electromagnetic energy between radio waves and infrared waves. Most studies have shown no significant nutritional differences between microwave and conventional cooking methods. No documented radiation injuries have occurred from microwave ovens used according to manufacturer instructions, although pacemaker interference has been associated with proximity to operating ovens. The FDA established a radiation control standard requiring ovens manufactured after October 6, 1971 to limit emissions and have two safety interlocks. Ovens meeting the federal standard are considered safe for home use when operated according to instructions.

PROBLEM OF EVALUATION OF EEG FINDING IN RELATION TO THE GRADE OF EXPOSURE TO USW RADIOWAVES

Styblova V., Holovska V., Spondova V., Zubrik L. · 1973

The mean daily irradiation value was 30.7 with a range of 6.5 to 97.1, and the measurement error was stated as + 30%. No significant differences in EEG findings were found between the exposed group and the control group. A significant coincidence was found between headache incidence and EEG abnormality percentage, particularly for migraine. The authors concluded that electromagnetic energy at the exposure dose did not damage the central nervous system and that EEG abnormalities should be assessed in relation to migraine incidence.

Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found

Chick Embryo Development in a 26-KHz Electromagnetic Field

A. ZERVINS, D.V.M. · 1973

Researchers exposed fertilized chicken eggs to a 26-kHz, 160-gauss peak-to-peak alternating current field for 19 days while keeping control eggs under identical conditions without the field. The hatch rate was 64.5% for exposed eggs and 48.5% for controls. Statistical analysis yielded a Z-value of 1.79 with a probability of 0.0367, leading to rejection of the hypothesis that the field reduces hatching at the 5% significance level. No gross abnormalities were found in dead embryos, and all hatched chicks appeared normal during 36 hours of observation.

Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found

Retinal Damage Thresholds for Multiple Pulse Lasers

Robert W. Ebbers, Irving L. Dunsky · 1973

Researchers used a Q-switched neodymium laser at 1.06 µm to determine retinal damage thresholds in 100 rhesus monkey eyes. Each eye was exposed to five pulse configurations: single pulse, 10 pps for 0.5 sec, 10 pps for 1 sec, 20 pps for 0.5 sec, and 20 pps for 1 sec. Probit analysis showed no significant difference between the single-pulse ED-50 and the peak-pulse ED-50s in any pulse train. For average pulse energy, the 20 pps 0.5 sec and 20 pps 1 sec ED-50s were significantly lower than the single-pulse ED-50.

Die bioklimatologische Bedeutung des elektrostatischen Gleichfeldes / The Bioclimatological Importance of the Constant Electrostatic Field

G. Fischer · 1973

Researchers exposed NMRI-Hahn mice to a constant electrostatic field of 24000 Volt/m, a Faraday cage, or normal lab conditions for 10 days and measured total activity, food intake, and water consumption. Total activity increased in the electrostatic field and decreased in the Faraday cage, with differences highly significant (p = < 0,001). Liver oxygen consumption was significantly higher in mice from the field chamber and lower in mice from the Faraday cage compared to controls. After 15 days exposure to fields of 40, 200, 1000, 5000, and 24000 V/m, plaque-forming cells in the spleen increased most at 1000–5000 V/m, while the Faraday cage reduced plaque counts below control levels. Rectal temperature rose from 37,5°C to 37,8°C in mice exposed to the field for 20 days.

Interaction of a 2450-MHz Microwave Field with Thermocouples and Thermistors

McRee · 1973

The study evaluated the interaction of a 2450-MHz continuous wave microwave field with shielded and unshielded thermistors and thermocouples at a power level of 100 mW/cm?. Thermistors gave repeatable temperature profiles with no detectable interaction regardless of shielding or lead orientation. Unshielded thermocouples produced non-repeatable measurements with sudden temperature jumps and more variation when leads were parallel to the electric field. The authors concluded that thermistors were accurate detectors for temperature measurement while thermocouples produced erroneous information due to interaction with the microwave field.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.