3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Research Guide

Cell Phones for Children: What Age Is Safe?

Based on 676 peer-reviewed studies

Share:

Parents frequently ask at what age children should get their first cell phone. Beyond social and developmental considerations, there are scientific factors to consider regarding children's unique vulnerability to radiofrequency radiation.

Children are not miniature adults when it comes to RF exposure. Research has documented that children's thinner skulls, higher brain water content, and developing nervous systems result in different exposure patterns than adults experience from the same devices.

This page examines the research relevant to children's cell phone use and what science suggests about age-appropriate exposure.

Key Research Findings

  • Children's heads absorb more cell phone radiation than adults
  • Younger children have thinner skulls providing less RF shielding
  • Early and heavy cell phone use shows associations with health outcomes

Related Studies (676)

Cellular EffectsNo Effects Found

Whole-body exposure of radiation emitted from 900 MHz mobile phones does not seem to affect the levels of anti-apoptotic bcl-2 protein.

Yilmaz F, Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Kilinc N. · 2008

Researchers exposed rats to radiation from 900 MHz cell phones for 20 minutes daily for one month to see if it affected bcl-2, a protein that helps prevent cell death in the brain and testes. They found no changes in bcl-2 levels compared to unexposed rats. This suggests that at least for this specific cellular protection mechanism, short-term phone radiation exposure may not cause immediate harm to these organs.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

No effect of an UMTS mobile phone-like electromagnetic field of 1.97 GHz on human attention and reaction time.

Unterlechner M, Sauter C, Schmid G, Zeitlhofer J. · 2008

Researchers exposed 40 healthy volunteers to UMTS mobile phone-like electromagnetic fields at 1.97 GHz while testing their attention and reaction time on computer tasks. The study found no statistically significant effects on cognitive performance, even at exposure levels up to 1.49 W/kg SAR (specific absorption rate, a measure of how much energy the body absorbs). This suggests that short-term exposure to 3G mobile phone signals does not immediately impair basic cognitive functions like attention and reaction speed.

Symptoms & SensitivityNo Effects Found

Nocebo as headache trigger: evidence from a sham-controlled provocation study with RF fields.

Stovner LJ, Oftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A · 2008

Norwegian researchers studied 17 people who reported getting headaches from mobile phone use, exposing them to both real radiofrequency (RF) signals and fake exposures in a controlled setting. Participants experienced the same types of headaches whether they were exposed to actual RF fields or just thought they were, suggesting their 'mobile phone headaches' were caused by negative expectations (called the nocebo effect) rather than the electromagnetic fields themselves.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Cognitive function and symptoms in adults and adolescents in relation to rf radiation from UMTS base stations.

Riddervold IS et al. · 2008

Danish researchers tested whether 45-minute exposures to UMTS cell tower radiation (2140 MHz) affected cognitive performance and symptoms in 40 teenagers and 40 adults. They found no significant differences in cognitive test performance between real and sham exposures, though participants reported slightly more headaches during radiation exposure, which may have been due to baseline differences rather than the radiation itself.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Meningioma and mobile phone use--a collaborative case-control study in five North European countries.

Lahkola A et al. · 2008

Researchers studied 1,209 people with meningiomas (a type of brain tumor) and 3,299 healthy controls across five European countries to see if mobile phone use increases tumor risk. They found that regular mobile phone users actually had a 24% lower risk of developing meningiomas compared to non-users or occasional users. The study found no increased risk regardless of how long people used phones, how many calls they made, or what type of network they used.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Effects of weak mobile phone - electromagnetic fields (GSM, UMTS) on event related potentials and cognitive functions.

Kleinlogel H et al. · 2008

Researchers tested whether cell phone radiation from GSM and UMTS networks affects brain activity and cognitive performance in 15 healthy adults. They measured brain waves and reaction times during various mental tasks while participants were exposed to phone radiation at levels typical of actual phone use. The study found no significant changes in brain activity or cognitive function during EMF exposure compared to fake (sham) exposure.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Effects of weak mobile Phone-Electromagnetic fields (GSM, UMTS) on well-being and resting EEG.

Kleinlogel H et al. · 2008

Researchers exposed 15 healthy adults to electromagnetic fields from both GSM (2G) and UMTS (3G) mobile phones while measuring their brain activity with EEG and asking about their well-being. They found no significant changes in brain wave patterns or reported symptoms compared to fake (sham) exposure. The study suggests that typical mobile phone radiation levels don't produce detectable immediate effects on brain activity in healthy users.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Characterization of biological effect of 1763 MHz radiofrequency exposure on auditory hair cells.

Huang TQ et al. · 2008

Researchers exposed mouse auditory hair cells (the cells responsible for hearing) to cell phone radiation at 1763 MHz for up to 48 hours at extremely high power levels - 10 times stronger than typical phone use. They found no DNA damage, no changes in cell cycles, no stress responses, and only 29 out of 32,000 genes showed any change. The study suggests that even at these high exposure levels, cell phone radiation doesn't cause measurable biological damage to the specialized cells in our ears.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Histopathological examinations of rat brains after long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation.

Grafström G et al. · 2008

Swedish researchers exposed rats to GSM-900 cell phone radiation once weekly for over a year at power levels similar to what humans experience during phone calls. When they examined the rats' brains afterward, they found no signs of damage including blood-brain barrier leakage, cell death, or aging-related changes. This suggests that intermittent cell phone radiation exposure at typical usage levels may not cause detectable brain tissue damage.

Symptoms & SensitivityNo Effects Found

Exposure to mobile phone electromagnetic fields and subjective symptoms: a double-blind study.

Cinel C, Russo R, Boldini A, Fox E. · 2008

Researchers exposed 496 volunteers to mobile phone radiation in a controlled, double-blind study to see if it caused symptoms like headaches or dizziness. They found only one inconsistent effect - dizziness in one group that wasn't replicated in the other groups. The study concluded there's no consistent evidence that mobile phone radiation causes immediate physical symptoms.

Cellular EffectsNo Effects Found

Whole-body exposure of radiation emitted from 900 MHz mobile phones does not seem to affect the levels of anti-apoptotic bcl-2 protein.

Yilmaz F, Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Kilinc N · 2008

Turkish researchers exposed rats to radiation from 900 MHz cell phones for 20 minutes daily over one month to see if it affected bcl-2, a protein that helps prevent cell death in the brain and reproductive organs. They found no changes in bcl-2 levels in either brain or testicular tissue. This suggests that at least for this specific protein marker, short-term cell phone radiation exposure may not trigger cellular death pathways in these organs.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

No effect of an UMTS mobile phone‐like electromagnetic field of 1.97 GHz on human attention and reaction time

Unterlechner M, Sauter C, Schmid G, Zeitlhofer J · 2008

Researchers exposed 40 healthy adults to 3G mobile phone signals at 1.97 GHz for 90 minutes while testing their attention and reaction time through computer tasks. The study found no immediate effects on cognitive performance at exposure levels up to 0.63 W/kg SAR (specific absorption rate), which represents the amount of RF energy absorbed by brain tissue. This suggests that short-term exposure to 3G phone signals does not impair basic mental functions like attention and reaction speed.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Effects of twenty-minute 3G mobile phone irradiation on event related potential components and early gamma synchronization in auditory oddball paradigm.

Stefanics G, Thuróczy G, Kellényi L, Hernádi I · 2008

Researchers exposed 29 people to 3G mobile phone radiation for 20 minutes and measured their brain's electrical activity while they performed a listening task that required attention and focus. They found no measurable changes in brain wave patterns or response times compared to fake exposure sessions. This suggests that brief exposure to 3G phone radiation doesn't immediately alter basic brain processing functions related to hearing and attention.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Cognitive function and symptoms in adults and adolescents in relation to rf radiation from UMTS base stations

Riddervold IS et al. · 2008

Danish researchers exposed 80 people (teenagers and adults) to cell tower radiation at 2.14 GHz for 45 minutes to test whether it affected their thinking abilities and caused symptoms. They found no significant impact on cognitive performance, though participants reported slightly more headaches during exposure compared to fake exposure sessions. The study suggests cell tower radiation at these levels doesn't impair mental function in the short term.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Effects of weak mobile phone - electromagnetic fields (GSM, UMTS) on event related potentials and cognitive functions.

Kleinlogel H et al. · 2008

Swiss researchers tested whether cell phone radiation from both older GSM and newer UMTS networks affects brain function and cognitive performance in 15 healthy adults. They measured brain wave responses and reaction times during various mental tasks while exposing participants to phone radiation at levels similar to actual phone use (SAR 0.1 and 1 W/kg). The study found no significant changes in any measured brain or cognitive functions compared to fake exposure.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Effects of weak mobile phone - electromagnetic fields (GSM, UMTS) on well-being and resting EEG.

Kleinlogel H et al. · 2008

Swiss researchers exposed 15 healthy adults to mobile phone signals from both older GSM phones (900 MHz) and newer UMTS phones (1950 MHz) for 30 minutes to see if the radiation affected brain activity or how people felt. Using brain wave monitoring (EEG) and self-reported wellness measures, they found no significant changes compared to fake exposure sessions. This suggests that typical mobile phone radiation levels don't immediately alter brain function or cause noticeable symptoms in healthy users.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Local exposure of 849 MHz and 1763 MHz radiofrequency radiation to mouse heads does not induce cell death or cell proliferation in brain

Kim TH et al. · 2008

Researchers exposed mice to cell phone radiation at 849 MHz and 1763 MHz frequencies for up to 12 months, delivering radiation directly to their heads at levels much higher than typical phone use. They found no evidence of brain cell death, abnormal cell growth, or other cellular changes in the exposed animals compared to unexposed controls.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Histopathological examinations of rat brains after long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation.

Grafström G et al. · 2008

Swedish researchers exposed rats to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation for 2 hours weekly over 55 weeks at very low power levels (0.6 and 60 milliwatts per kilogram). When they examined the rats' brains afterward, they found no signs of damage including blood-brain barrier leakage, cell death, or aging-related changes. This contradicts some earlier studies from the same research group that found brain effects at similar exposure levels.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Psychomotor performance is not influenced by brief repeated exposures to mobile phones

Curcio G et al. · 2008

Italian researchers exposed 24 people to GSM mobile phone radiation (902.40 MHz) for three separate 15-minute sessions and tested their reaction times and finger coordination after each exposure. They found no measurable effects on psychomotor performance, though there was a slight non-significant trend toward faster reaction times. The study suggests that brief, repeated mobile phone exposures at typical power levels don't impair basic motor skills and reflexes.

Upregulation of specific mRNA levels in rat brain after cell phone exposure.

Yan JG, Agresti M, Zhang LL, Yan Y, Matloub HS. · 2008

Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation for 6 hours daily over 18 weeks and found significant increases in brain proteins associated with injury and cellular stress. The study measured mRNA (genetic instructions for protein production) levels of four key proteins involved in brain cell damage and repair. These findings suggest that chronic cell phone exposure may cause cumulative brain injuries that could eventually lead to neurological problems.

Dialling and driving: factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving.

Walsh SP, White KM, Hyde MK, Watson B. · 2008

Researchers studied what psychological factors influence people's intentions to use mobile phones while driving, examining attitudes, social pressure, and risk perceptions across different driving scenarios. They found that personal attitudes consistently predicted phone use intentions while driving, and pressure from others influenced some decisions, but surprisingly, risk perception didn't make people choose safer driving behaviors. This suggests that reducing distracted driving requires multiple approaches targeting different psychological motivations.

Use of wireless telephones and self-reported health symptoms: a population-based study among Swedish adolescents aged 15-19 years.

Soderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L. · 2008

Swedish researchers surveyed 2,000 teenagers about their wireless phone use and health symptoms. They found that regular users of mobile and cordless phones reported more health problems including tiredness, headaches, anxiety, concentration difficulties, and sleep disturbances compared to less frequent users. Nearly all teens (99.6%) had access to mobile phones, with girls using them more frequently than boys.

Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones.

Rubin GJ, Cleare AJ, Wessely S · 2008

Researchers compared three groups: people sensitive only to mobile phones, those claiming broader 'electrosensitivity' to various electrical devices, and healthy controls. They found that people identifying as 'electrosensitive' showed significantly worse overall health, more depression, and greater anxiety about modern health risks compared to both other groups. This suggests that self-reported electrosensitivity may be linked to broader health and psychological factors rather than electromagnetic field exposure alone.

Adverse effects of excessive mobile phone use.

Khan MM. · 2008

Researchers surveyed 286 medical students about their mobile phone use and health symptoms. They found that 44% of students linked their health problems to phone use, with the most common complaints being memory problems (41%), sleep issues (39%), and concentration difficulties (34%). The study suggests that even moderate daily phone use may be associated with multiple neurological and physical symptoms.

Source of funding and results of studies of health effects of mobile phone use: systematic review of experimental studies.

Huss A et al. · 2008

Researchers analyzed 59 studies on radiofrequency radiation health effects to see if funding sources influenced results. They found that studies funded exclusively by the telecommunications industry were 90% less likely to report harmful health effects compared to studies funded by public agencies or charities. This pattern held even after accounting for study quality and other factors.

Further Reading

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects and practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.