Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. · 2005
Researchers conducted a case-control study of benign brain tumors with 413 cases and 692 controls. For meningioma, analogue phone use yielded an odds ratio of 1.7 (95% CI 0.97-3.0), which increased to 2.1 (95% CI 1.1-4.3) with a latency period greater than 10 years. For acoustic neuroma, analogue phone use gave an odds ratio of 4.2 (95% CI 1.8-10) that rose to 8.4 (95% CI 1.6-45) with a latency period greater than 15 years, though based on low numbers. Digital phone use was associated with an odds ratio of 2.0 (95% CI 1.05-3.8) for acoustic neuroma, while cordless phone use did not show a significant increase. In multivariate analysis, analogue phones were a significant risk factor for acoustic neuroma.
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. · 2005
Researchers investigated the association between cellular or cordless telephone use and brain tumour risk in urban and rural areas of Sweden. The study included 1429 cases and 1470 controls aged 20 to 80 years diagnosed between 1997 and 2000. Use of different phone types was assessed by questionnaire with one control matched for sex and age per case. Rural residence with digital phone use showed an odds ratio of 1.4 increasing to 3.2 with longer latency, while urban residence showed odds ratios of 0.9. The effect was most obvious for malignant brain tumours.
Garcia Callejo FJ et al. · 2005
Researchers evaluated a group of healthy mobile phone users and a control group of non-users with audiometry at baseline and after three years. Mobile phone users made an average of 24.3 active contacts and accumulated 50.4 days of phone use over three years. After the follow-up, users had a 1 to 5 dB HL greater increase in hearing threshold at speech tones than controls (p<0.001). A trend linked longer phone use to greater hearing loss but was not statistically significant. The authors concluded that frequent mobile phone use over a middle period of time allows to detect a mild hearing loss, but the cause remains unclear.
Curcio G et al. · 2005
Researchers recorded resting EEG from 20 healthy subjects to study the effect of mobile phone EMF on waking brain activity. Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups and exposed double-blind to a 902.40 MHz signal modulated at 217 Hz with 0.25 W average power before or during EEG recording. Real exposure influenced alpha band spectral power in some bins compared to baseline and sham, with a greater effect when the EMF was on during recording. The authors concluded that pulsed high-frequency EMF can affect normal brain functioning, but no health effect conclusions were drawn.
Bit-Babik et al. · 2005
The study used FDTD computations to calculate locally averaged SAR in anatomically correct adult and child head models with the IEEE standard averaging algorithm. Peak local average SAR over 1 g and 10 g of tissue and electromagnetic energy penetration depths were about the same across all head models under the same exposure conditions. Child head models were created by linear scaling of the adult model and by transforming adult models based on children's external head shapes, with tissue properties kept the same. Modeling and experimental measurements also used three spheres filled with tissue-equivalent mixture to approximate heads of increasing size.
Bianchi A, Phillips JG. · 2005
Researchers drew potential predictors from addiction literature to predict problematic mobile phone use from extraversion, self-esteem, neuroticism, gender, and age. They devised and validated the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale as a reliable self-report instrument against the Addiction Potential Scale and overall mobile phone usage levels. Problem use was a function of age, extraversion, and low self-esteem, but not neuroticism. The study supports community concerns about mobile phone use and identifies groups for intervention campaigns.
Barteri M, Pala A, Rotella S. · 2005
Researchers exposed an aqueous solution of electric eel acetylcholinesterase to emissions from a commercial cellular phone. The exposure altered the enzyme's activity and irreversibly affected its structural and biochemical characteristics. The authors note that the results cannot determine hazardous health effects but may be a first step for further verification.
Barcal J, Cendelín J, Vozeh F, Zalud V. · 2005
Researchers performed direct registration of brain cortical and hippocampal activity during high-frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Experiments used urethane anaesthesia in Lurcher mutant mice with wild type littermates as controls. Animals were exposed to HF EMF with frequency corresponding to cellular phones. ECoG evaluation showed a distinct shift to lower frequency components in healthy mice but only gentle differences in Lurcher mutant mice. Hippocampal rhythmicity showed gentle changes with increase of higher frequencies and changes in theta oscillations in both animal types.
Balikci K, Cem Ozcan I, Turgut-Balik D, Balik HH. · 2005
Janssen T, Boege P, von Mikusch-Buchberg J, Raczek J. · 2005
Researchers investigated potential effects of electromagnetic fields from GSM cellular phones on outer hair cells by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in 28 normally hearing subjects. No significant change in DPOAE level was found in response to EMF exposure. After compensating for undesired side effects, an extremely small exposure-correlated change of less than 1 dB was observed in some subjects, which the researchers suggested was physiologically irrelevant given the very large dynamic range of hearing in humans.
Huber R et al. · 2005
Researchers investigated the effects of radio frequency electromagnetic fields similar to those emitted by mobile phones on waking regional cerebral blood flow in 12 healthy young men. Positron emission tomography scans were taken after 30 min unilateral head exposure to pulse-modulated 900 MHz RF EMF, and a sham control condition was also included. Only the 'handset-like' signal, which had stronger low-frequency components, increased relative cerebral blood flow in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the side of exposure; the 'base-station-like' signal did not.
Monnery PM, Srouji EI, Bartlett J · 2004
Researchers recruited 12 volunteers with normal hearing and measured their otoacoustic emissions. The volunteers were exposed to a mobile telephone placed over the mastoid process during receive and transmit modes. There was no change in the trace signature and no statistically significant change in trace figures. The researchers concluded that PEMF from mobile phones has no measurable effect on outer hair cell function during use.
Lonn S, Ahlbom A, Hall P, Feychting M. · 2004
In this population-based case-control study, researchers identified all cases aged 20 to 69 years diagnosed with acoustic neuroma during 1999 to 2002 in certain parts of Sweden. Controls were randomly selected from the study base, stratified on age, sex, and residential area. The overall odds ratio for acoustic neuroma associated with regular mobile phone use was 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.6 to 1.5. Ten years after the start of mobile phone use the relative risk increased to 1.9 (0.9-4.1), and for tumors on the same side of the head as the phone was normally used, the relative risk was 3.9 (1.6-9.5). The researchers concluded that there was no increased risk for short-term use but suggested an increased risk for at least 10 years' duration.
Krause CM et al. · 2004
Researchers conducted a double-blind study in which subjects performed a memory task with and without exposure to a digital 902 MHz field. All eight significant EEG changes from the earlier study were not significant in this replication. The effect of EMF on incorrect answers was inconsistent, with a significant increase in errors observed in this study but not in the earlier one.
Jokela K, Puranen L, Sihvonen AP. · 2004
Researchers assessed magnetic field exposure from battery currents of digital mobile phones using ICNIRP guidelines and two evaluation approaches. The ICNIRP exposure ratio based on current density ranged from 0.04 to 0.14 for the weighted peak approach and from 0.08 to 0.27 for the multiple-frequency rule. The exposure did not exceed guidelines, and no biological data indicate health concerns from magnetic field pulses.
Haarala C et al. · 2004
Researchers studied the effects of a 902 MHz mobile phone EMF on human short term memory using a double blind, multi-centre design. Sixty-four subjects in two laboratories performed an n-back task with memory loads of 0 to 3 items under both EMF and sham exposure. The EMF had no effect on reaction times or accuracy, and performance did not differ between the two laboratories.
Christensen HC et al. · 2004
Researchers ascertained 106 incident acoustic neuroma cases and matched them with 212 population-based controls between 2000 and 2002. Data came from personal interviews, medical records, radiologic examinations, and socioeconomic records. The overall relative risk of acoustic neuroma was 0.90 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.51 to 1.57. Using a cell phone for 10 years or more did not increase risk compared with short-term use. Tumors were not more frequent on the side of the head where the phone was typically used, and tumor size did not correlate with use patterns.
Aran JM et al. · 2004
In the first experiment, guinea pigs were exposed to GSM microwaves at SARs of 1, 2, and 4 W/kg for 1 hour per day, 5 days per week, for 2 months. In the second experiment, guinea pigs were exposed at 4 W/kg and auditory brainstem response thresholds were monitored. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed no difference in DPOAE amplitudes or ABR thresholds between exposed and sham-exposed groups. Acute exposure for 1 hour also produced no statistically significant change in ABR thresholds. In vitro, organs of Corti from newborn rats exposed to 1 W/kg for 24-48 hours appeared normal under light microscopy after 2-3 days of culture.
Strayer DL, Drews FA. · 2004
The study examined the effects of hands-free cell phone conversations on simulated driving performance in younger and older adults. Compared to driving alone, cell phone use made reactions 18% slower, increased following distance by 12%, and lengthened speed recovery after braking by 17%. There was a twofold increase in rear-end collisions when drivers were conversing on a cell phone.
Pedersen W. · 2004
Researchers investigated associations between communication technology like web chat and mobile phones and sexual behaviour among Norwegian adolescents. A representative sample of 10,926 adolescents aged 13-18 completed questionnaires at school with a 92% response rate. A strong association was found between mobile phone use and sexual behaviour, with less than 10% of non-users reporting intercourse compared to two out of three of the most active users. The associations remained significant after controlling for age and contextual, family, peer and individual factors.
Papageorgiou CC et al. · 2004
Ten women and nine men performed a short memory task during baseline and during exposure to a 900 MHz signal. Baseline EEG energy was higher in men than in women, and EMF exposure decreased EEG energy in men but increased it in women. Memory performance did not change with EMF exposure or gender.
Martinez-Burdalo M, Martin A, Anguiano M, Villar R · 2004
Peak SAR1g and SAR10g trended downwards as head size decreased. The percentage of energy absorbed in the brain increased with smaller head size. SAR distributions in eyes were very similar between full-size and scaled models.
Lonn S et al. · 2004
Researchers used national cancer registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden to obtain cases of benign and malignant primary intracerebral tumors in adults aged 20-79 for the years 1969-98. Overall incidence ranged from 8.4 to 11.8 for men and 5.8 to 9.3 for women, with average annual increases of 0.6% for men and 0.9% for women. The increase was confined to the late 1970s and early 1980s, coinciding with improved diagnostic methods, and incidence remained stable after 1983 during the period of increasing mobile phone use.
Lesch MF, Hancock PA. · 2004
Kimata H. · 2004
Writing mail on a mobile phone increased plasma nerve growth factor, neurotrophin-3, and allergic skin wheal responses in atopic dermatitis patients. Viewing a comic video reduced these neurotrophin levels and allergic skin responses, while a nonhumorous video did not. Previewing the comic video also counteracted the mobile phone-mediated enhancement of neurotrophins and allergic skin wheal responses, whereas the weather video did not.
