3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Research Guide

Cell Phones for Children: What Age Is Safe?

Based on 676 peer-reviewed studies

Share:

Parents frequently ask at what age children should get their first cell phone. Beyond social and developmental considerations, there are scientific factors to consider regarding children's unique vulnerability to radiofrequency radiation.

Children are not miniature adults when it comes to RF exposure. Research has documented that children's thinner skulls, higher brain water content, and developing nervous systems result in different exposure patterns than adults experience from the same devices.

This page examines the research relevant to children's cell phone use and what science suggests about age-appropriate exposure.

Key Research Findings

  • Children's heads absorb more cell phone radiation than adults
  • Younger children have thinner skulls providing less RF shielding
  • Early and heavy cell phone use shows associations with health outcomes

Related Studies (676)

Cognitive effects of radiation emitted by cellular phones: the influence of exposure side and time.

Luria R, Eliyahu I, Hareuveny R, Margaliot M, Meiran N. · 2009

Israeli researchers tested how cell phone radiation affects thinking speed by having 48 men perform memory tasks while GSM phones were placed on different sides of their heads. They found that when the phone was on the left side of the head, participants responded significantly slower with their right hand during the first few minutes of exposure. This suggests cell phone radiation can temporarily impair cognitive performance, and that the specific placement of the phone and timing of exposure matter for detecting these effects.

Association of tinnitus and electromagnetic hypersensitivity: hints for a shared pathophysiology?

Landgrebe M, Frick U, Hauser S, Hajak G, Langguth B. · 2009

German researchers compared 89 people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) to 107 matched controls to examine connections between EMF sensitivity and tinnitus (ringing in the ears). They found that tinnitus occurred in 50.7% of EHS patients versus only 17.5% of controls - nearly three times higher. The researchers suggest both conditions may stem from an overactive brain stress network rather than direct EMF exposure effects.

Mobile phone use and location of glioma: A case-case analysis.

Hartikka H et al. · 2009

Finnish researchers studied 99 brain tumor patients to see if gliomas (a type of brain cancer) occurred more often in the part of the brain closest to where people hold their cell phones. They found that mobile phone users were twice as likely to develop tumors within 4.6 centimeters of their phone's typical position compared to non-users (28% vs 14%). This innovative approach directly examined whether radiofrequency radiation causes localized cancer effects in the brain region receiving the highest exposure.

Cancer & Tumors202 citations

Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours.

Hardell L, Carlberg M. · 2009

Swedish researchers analyzed brain tumor patients and found that people who used mobile phones or cordless phones on the same side of their head where tumors developed had significantly higher cancer risks. The risk was especially pronounced for those who started using wireless phones before age 20, with mobile phone users showing a 5.2-fold increased risk for astrocytoma (a type of brain cancer). The study also found that brain cancer rates in Sweden increased by over 2% annually during the 2000s, coinciding with widespread wireless phone adoption.

Cell phone use and acoustic neuroma: the need for standardized questionnaires and access to industry data.

Han YY, Kano H, Davis DL, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. · 2009

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh reviewed 11 studies examining whether cell phone use increases the risk of acoustic neuroma, a type of brain tumor that develops near the ear. While most studies found no link, those that followed people for 10 years or longer showed cell phone users had 2.4 times higher risk of developing these tumors on the same side of their head where they held their phone. The researchers concluded that better study methods and access to actual phone usage data are needed to determine the true risk.

Mobile Phones exposure induces changes of Contingent Negative Variation in humans.

de Tommaso M et al. · 2009

Researchers tested how 900 MHz cell phone signals affect brain electrical activity by measuring a specific brainwave pattern called contingent negative variation (CNV) in 10 volunteers. They found that both active phones and sham phones (with internal circuits running but no RF emission) reduced brain arousal and expectation responses compared to phones that were completely off. The study suggests that both the GSM radio signal and the low-frequency magnetic fields from the phone's battery and circuits can alter normal brain function.

The effect of electromagnetic radiation in the mobile phone range on the behaviour of the rat.

Daniels WM, Pitout IL, Afullo TJ, Mabandla MV. · 2009

Researchers exposed rats to electromagnetic radiation in the mobile phone frequency range and tested their behavior, brain structure, and stress hormone levels. While they found no changes in learning ability or brain structure, exposed rats showed decreased movement, increased grooming behaviors, and higher stress hormone levels. These behavioral changes suggest that mobile phone radiation may disrupt normal brain function even when obvious structural damage isn't visible.

Acute mobile phones exposure affects frontal cortex hemodynamics as evidenced by functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Curcio G et al. · 2009

Italian researchers used functional near-infrared spectroscopy to measure blood flow changes in the frontal cortex (the brain region behind your forehead) while 11 volunteers were exposed to cell phone radiation for 40 minutes. They found that real phone exposure caused a gradual increase in deoxygenated blood in this brain region, while fake exposure did not. This suggests that cell phone radiation can alter brain blood flow patterns even during short-term use.

Are people living next to mobile phone base stations more strained? Relationship of health concerns, self-estimated distance to base station, and psychological parameters.

Augner C, Hacker GW. · 2009

Austrian researchers studied 57 people who believed they lived close to cell phone towers to see if proximity affected their stress levels. Those who reported living within 100 meters of base stations showed significantly higher levels of stress hormones in their saliva and reported more anxiety, obsessive thoughts, and physical symptoms. The findings suggest that people near cell towers experience measurable biological stress, though the study couldn't determine whether this was due to actual electromagnetic field exposure or other factors.

Thermal effects of mobile phones on facial nerves and surrounding soft tissue.

Acar GO, Yener HM, Savrun FK, Kalkan T, Bayrak I, Enver O. · 2009

Researchers exposed rabbits to cell phone radiation (1900 MHz) for 25 minutes and measured temperature changes and nerve function in facial tissues. They found that the radiation increased tissue temperature by 0.39°C and temporarily impaired facial nerve function, with both effects returning to normal 25 minutes after exposure ended.

Mobile telephone use is associated with changes in cognitive function in young adolescents.

Abramson MJ et al. · 2009

Australian researchers tested cognitive function in 317 seventh-grade students and found that those who made more mobile phone calls performed differently on thinking tasks. Students with higher phone use showed faster but less accurate responses on complex cognitive tests, along with poorer working memory. However, since texting showed similar patterns, the researchers concluded these changes likely resulted from behavioral adaptations to frequent phone use rather than radiofrequency radiation exposure.

Effect of mobile phone exposure on apoptotic glial cells and status of oxidative stress in rat brain.

Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Ulukaya E, Uzunlar AK, Ocak AR. · 2009

Turkish researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation (900 MHz) for 2 hours daily over 10 months to study brain cell death and oxidative stress. Surprisingly, they found that radiation exposure actually reduced brain cell death (apoptosis) and increased antioxidant activity compared to unexposed rats. This unexpected protective effect challenges assumptions about cell phone radiation's impact on brain tissue.

Spatial memory performance of Wistar rats exposed to mobile phone.

Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, Nayak S, Mailankot M · 2009

Researchers exposed rats to mobile phone signals (50 missed calls daily for 4 weeks) and then tested their ability to navigate a water maze to find a hidden platform. Phone-exposed rats took 3 times longer to find the target area and spent half as much time in the correct location compared to unexposed rats. This suggests mobile phone radiation may impair spatial memory and learning ability.

Cognitive effects of radiation emitted by cellular phones: The influence of exposure side and time

Luria R, Eliyahu I, Hareuveny R, Margaliot M, Meiran N. · 2009

Researchers had 48 men perform memory tasks while exposed to cell phone radiation on different sides of their heads. Left-side phone exposure significantly slowed right-hand reaction times during early testing, demonstrating that cell phone radiation can measurably affect brain function and cognitive performance.

Moffat SD Mobile phone exposure and spatial memory.

Wiholm C et al. · 2009

Researchers exposed participants to mobile phone radiation at 1.4 W/kg (similar to real phone use) for 2.5 hours while they performed spatial memory tasks on a computer. Surprisingly, people who reported symptoms from phone use actually performed better during radiation exposure, while those without symptoms showed no change. This unexpected finding challenges assumptions about how phone radiation affects brain function.

Exposure to an 890-MHz mobile phone-like signal and serum levels of S100B and transthyretin in volunteers.

Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K, Hardell L · 2009

Researchers exposed 41 volunteers to cell phone radiation for 30 minutes and measured blood markers that indicate whether the blood-brain barrier (the protective shield around your brain) had been compromised. They found that one marker called transthyretin increased significantly after exposure, suggesting the radiation may have affected this critical barrier. This is concerning because a compromised blood-brain barrier could allow harmful substances to enter the brain more easily.

GSM base stations: Short-term effects on well-being.

Augner C, Florian M, Pauser G, Oberfeld G, Hacker GW. · 2009

Austrian researchers exposed 57 people to different levels of radiofrequency radiation from cell phone base stations during controlled laboratory sessions. They found that participants felt significantly calmer when exposed to higher radiation levels compared to those exposed to minimal radiation. This suggests that cell tower signals may affect psychological well-being by reducing mental arousal.

Mobile phone exposure and spatial memory

Wiholm C et al. · 2009

Researchers exposed volunteers to cell phone radiation for 2.5 hours while they performed spatial memory tasks (navigating a virtual maze). Surprisingly, people who already experienced symptoms from phone use actually performed better on the memory tasks during radiation exposure, while those without symptoms showed no change. This unexpected finding suggests that radiation may affect the brain differently depending on whether someone is already sensitive to electromagnetic fields.

Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone.

Nittby H et al. · 2009

Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation at various power levels for 2 hours, then examined their brains 7 days later. They found that the blood-brain barrier (the protective shield that normally keeps toxins out of the brain) became more permeable, allowing proteins to leak into brain tissue. This suggests that even a single exposure to cell phone radiation can compromise the brain's protective barrier for at least a week.

Mobile phones exposure induces changes of contingent negative variation in humans

de Tommaso M et al. · 2009

Italian researchers exposed 10 volunteers to cell phone radiation at 900 MHz and measured their brain's electrical activity using EEG. They found that both active phones and phones with blocked radiation (but still powered on) reduced brain arousal and expectation responses compared to phones that were completely off. This suggests that cell phone exposure affects how the brain processes and anticipates information.

Effect of mobile phone exposure on apoptotic glial cells and status of oxidative stress in rat brain

Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Ulukaya E, Uzunlar AK, Ocak AR · 2009

Researchers exposed rats to 900 MHz cell phone radiation for 2 hours daily over 10 months to study brain cell death (apoptosis) and oxidative stress. Surprisingly, they found reduced cell death and increased antioxidant activity in exposed rats compared to controls. This unexpected finding suggests the brain may activate protective mechanisms in response to chronic low-level radiation exposure.

Acute mobile phones exposure affects frontal cortex hemodynamics as evidenced by functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Curcio G et al. · 2009

Researchers used brain imaging technology to measure blood flow changes in the frontal cortex of 11 volunteers during 40 minutes of cell phone exposure. They found that real phone exposure caused a gradual increase in deoxygenated blood in brain tissue compared to fake exposure, indicating altered brain activity. This suggests that even brief cell phone use can measurably change how blood flows through critical brain regions.

Further Reading

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects and practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.