Kim DW, Lee JH, Ji HC, Kim SC, Nam KC, Cha EJ. · 2008
Researchers exposed 18 people who claimed electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and 19 healthy controls to both real and fake cell phone radiation from a CDMA phone for 30 minutes each. They measured heart rate, breathing rate, and heart rate variability to see if the radiation caused physical changes. The study found no measurable differences in any of these body functions between real and fake exposure in either group.
Johansson A et al. · 2008
Swedish researchers exposed 15 people with atopic dermatitis (a chronic skin condition causing inflammation and itching) to 30 minutes of cell phone-like radiofrequency radiation at 1 W/kg and measured blood markers of inflammation and stress. They found no changes in any of the measured substances compared to sham exposure, suggesting that RF exposure at typical cell phone levels does not trigger inflammatory responses in people with this sensitive skin condition.
Cinel C, Russo R, Boldini A, Fox E. · 2008
Researchers exposed 496 volunteers to mobile phone radiation in a controlled, double-blind study to see if it caused symptoms like headaches or dizziness. They found only one inconsistent effect - dizziness in one group that wasn't replicated in the other groups. The study concluded there's no consistent evidence that mobile phone radiation causes immediate physical symptoms.
Bamiou DE, Ceranic B, Cox R, Watt H, Chadwick P, Luxon LM. · 2008
Researchers tested whether 30-minute mobile phone exposures affect inner ear function in 9 people who reported symptoms from phone use and 21 healthy controls. Using precise hearing and balance tests before and after exposure to 882 MHz radiation at typical phone power levels, they found no measurable changes in either group. This suggests that short-term mobile phone use doesn't immediately impair the ear's delicate hearing or balance mechanisms.
Stovner LJ, Oftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A. · 2008
Norwegian researchers exposed 17 people to cell phone radiation (902.4 MHz) for 30 minutes to see if it caused headaches, comparing real exposure to fake exposure sessions. They found no difference in headache patterns between real and fake exposures, with most headaches being typical tension headaches. The study suggests that headaches people blame on cell phones are likely caused by psychological expectations (the nocebo effect) rather than the radio waves themselves.
Riddervold IS et al. · 2008
Danish researchers exposed 80 people (teenagers and adults) to cell tower radiation at 2.14 GHz for 45 minutes to test whether it affected their thinking abilities and caused symptoms. They found no significant impact on cognitive performance, though participants reported slightly more headaches during exposure compared to fake exposure sessions. The study suggests cell tower radiation at these levels doesn't impair mental function in the short term.
Cinel C, Russo R, Boldini A, Fox E · 2008
Researchers tested whether 40-minute exposures to mobile phone radiation caused symptoms like headaches, dizziness, or fatigue in 496 volunteers using a double-blind design where neither participants nor researchers knew when real versus fake signals were used. They found no consistent evidence that phone radiation caused subjective symptoms, with only one isolated finding of increased dizziness in one group that wasn't replicated in the other test groups. The study suggests that acute mobile phone exposure doesn't reliably produce the symptoms some people report.
Soderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L. · 2008
Swedish researchers surveyed 2,000 teenagers about their wireless phone use and health symptoms. They found that regular users of mobile and cordless phones reported more health problems including tiredness, headaches, anxiety, concentration difficulties, and sleep disturbances compared to less frequent users. Nearly all teens (99.6%) had access to mobile phones, with girls using them more frequently than boys.
Rubin GJ, Cleare AJ, Wessely S · 2008
Researchers compared three groups: people sensitive only to mobile phones, those claiming broader 'electrosensitivity' to various electrical devices, and healthy controls. They found that people identifying as 'electrosensitive' showed significantly worse overall health, more depression, and greater anxiety about modern health risks compared to both other groups. This suggests that self-reported electrosensitivity may be linked to broader health and psychological factors rather than electromagnetic field exposure alone.
Landgrebe M et al. · 2008
Researchers compared 89 people who report electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) with 107 healthy controls using brain stimulation tests and cognitive assessments. They found that EHS patients had measurable differences in brain function, including reduced ability to distinguish between real and fake electromagnetic stimulation, and altered patterns of brain excitability that varied by age. The study suggests these individuals may have genuine neurobiological differences that make them more vulnerable to electromagnetic effects.
Khan MM. · 2008
Researchers surveyed 286 medical students about their mobile phone use and health symptoms. They found that 44% of students linked their health problems to phone use, with the most common complaints being memory problems (41%), sleep issues (39%), and concentration difficulties (34%). The study suggests that even moderate daily phone use may be associated with multiple neurological and physical symptoms.
Hinrikus H, Bachmann M, Lass J, Karai D, Tuulik V. · 2008
Researchers exposed 66 healthy volunteers to low-level microwave radiation at various frequencies and measured their brain activity using EEG. They found that microwave exposure increased brain energy levels, with 13-31% of subjects showing significant changes in their brain wave patterns depending on the frequency used. The study demonstrates that microwave radiation can alter normal brain function even at exposure levels considered safe by current standards.
Liu T, Wang S, He L, Ye K. · 2008
Researchers exposed rats to power line frequency magnetic fields (50 Hz) for 25 days. Rats exposed 4 hours daily showed increased anxiety behaviors in tests, while 1-hour exposure had no effect, suggesting longer daily exposure to these fields may increase anxiety levels.
Preece AW, Georgiou AG, Dunn EJ, Farrow S · 2007
Researchers studied residents living near powerful military radio transmitters in Cyprus to investigate health complaints. They found that people living in exposed villages reported 2.7 to 3.7 times more headaches, migraines, and dizziness compared to unexposed residents, but no increase in cancer or birth defects. The researchers suggested these symptoms were more likely caused by noise from military aircraft or psychological stress from seeing the antennas rather than the radio waves themselves.
Paglialonga A et al. · 2007
Researchers tested whether 10 minutes of mobile phone exposure affects the inner ear's ability to produce tiny sounds called otoacoustic emissions (natural sounds the ear makes to help us hear). They used sophisticated wavelet analysis to detect even subtle changes in 27 healthy young adults in a double-blind study. The results showed no changes in ear function after GSM phone exposure, confirming that short-term mobile phone use doesn't appear to harm the delicate sound-producing cells of the inner ear.
Oftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A, Stovner L · 2007
Researchers tested 17 people who claimed mobile phones caused their headaches by exposing them to real phone radiation and fake radiation without telling them which was which. The participants actually reported slightly more pain during the fake exposures than the real ones, and their heart rate and blood pressure didn't change based on whether they received real or fake radiation. This suggests mobile phone headaches are likely a nocebo effect - where expecting negative effects can actually cause symptoms even without real exposure.
Eltiti S et al. · 2007
Researchers tested whether people who report electromagnetic sensitivity experience symptoms when exposed to cell tower signals by comparing their reactions to real signals versus fake exposure. When participants knew what they were being exposed to, sensitive individuals reported feeling worse with real signals. However, when neither researchers nor participants knew which exposure was real (double-blind testing), the sensitive individuals showed no consistent negative reactions to the cell tower signals.
Landgrebe M et al. · 2007
German researchers used brain stimulation techniques to measure cortical excitability in 23 people who reported electromagnetic sensitivity, comparing them to 49 healthy controls. They found that electromagnetically sensitive individuals showed measurably different brain activity patterns, specifically reduced intracortical facilitation (a type of brain cell communication). This suggests that people reporting electromagnetic sensitivity may have genuine neurological differences that could explain their symptoms.
Abdel-Rassoul G et al. · 2007
Researchers studied 85 people living near Egypt's first cell tower and compared them to 80 people living farther away. Those living near the tower experienced significantly higher rates of headaches, memory problems, dizziness, depression, and sleep issues, plus showed measurable declines in attention and memory tests. This occurred even though radiation levels were below government safety standards.
Abdel-Rassoul G et al. · 2007
Researchers studied 85 people living near Egypt's first mobile phone base station and compared them to 80 people living farther away. Those living closest to the tower showed significantly higher rates of headaches (23.5% vs 10%), memory problems (28.2% vs 5%), dizziness, depression, and sleep disturbances, plus measurable changes in cognitive test performance. This suggests that even low-level radiofrequency radiation from cell towers may affect brain function and neurological health.
Regel SJ et al. · 2006
Swiss researchers exposed 117 people (including those who claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields) to cell tower-like radio frequency signals for 45 minutes at different intensities. They found no meaningful effects on well-being or cognitive performance at any exposure level, even among people who believed they were sensitive to EMF. The study contradicted earlier Dutch research that suggested cell tower exposure could affect well-being.
Oktay MF, Dasdag S · 2006
Researchers compared hearing function in three groups of men: heavy cell phone users (2 hours daily for 4 years), moderate users (10-20 minutes daily), and non-users. Heavy users showed measurably worse hearing thresholds at specific frequencies, particularly at 4000 Hz, while moderate users showed no difference from non-users. This suggests that intensive cell phone use may contribute to hearing loss over time.
Wilen J, Johansson A, Kalezic N, Lyskov E, Sandstrom M. · 2006
Swedish researchers exposed 20 people who experience symptoms from mobile phones and 20 people without symptoms to 900 MHz cell phone radiation for 30 minutes at levels typical of phone use. While the radiation didn't cause immediate measurable changes in either group, the symptomatic individuals showed different nervous system patterns during cognitive tests, suggesting their autonomic nervous systems may function differently regardless of radiation exposure.
Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Kundi M. · 2006
Researchers measured EMF exposure from cell phone towers in the bedrooms of 365 people living nearby and tested their health and thinking abilities. Even though the radiation levels were extremely low (far below safety guidelines), people closer to the towers reported more headaches and showed changes in mental performance. This suggests that even very weak EMF exposure from cell towers might affect how people feel and think.
Wilen J, Johansson A, Kalezic N, Lyskov E, Sandstrom M · 2006
Swedish researchers exposed 20 people who experience symptoms from mobile phones (like headaches or fatigue) and 20 people without such symptoms to 30 minutes of GSM cell phone radiation at 1 W/kg SAR. While the radiation exposure itself didn't cause measurable changes in either group, the symptomatic individuals showed different nervous system patterns during cognitive tests, suggesting their autonomic nervous systems may respond differently to stress regardless of EMF exposure.
