Baliatsas C et al. · 2011
Dutch researchers studied 3,611 adults living near cell towers and power lines to understand what causes non-specific physical symptoms like headaches and fatigue. They found that people's belief about how close they lived to these sources predicted symptoms better than the actual measured distance. The study suggests psychological factors and perceived risk may play a larger role in these health complaints than the electromagnetic fields themselves.
McCarty DE et al. · 2011
Scientists tested a doctor claiming electromagnetic hypersensitivity using 60 Hz electric fields in a double-blind study. She developed headaches, muscle twitching, and heart irregularities within 100 seconds of exposure, proving electromagnetic hypersensitivity can be a measurable neurological condition.
Röösli M, Frei P, Mohler E, Hug K · 2010
Researchers reviewed 17 studies examining whether cell phone towers cause health symptoms in people living nearby. They found that well-designed laboratory studies showed no connection between tower radiation and acute symptoms, while studies with less precise measurement methods were more likely to report effects. The review concluded there's strong evidence that cell tower radiation up to 10 volts per meter doesn't cause immediate symptoms, but insufficient data exists on long-term health effects.
Heinrich S, Thomas S, Heumann C, von Kries R, Radon K · 2010
German researchers used personal dosimeters to measure radiofrequency radiation exposure in nearly 3,000 children and adolescents over 24 hours, then tracked acute symptoms like headaches and concentration problems. While they found a few statistically significant associations between higher RF exposure and symptoms, the researchers concluded these were likely due to chance rather than actual health effects because the results weren't consistent and disappeared when analyzing the highest-exposed participants separately.
Danker-Hopfe H, Dorn H, Bornkessel C, Sauter C · 2010
German researchers studied nearly 400 people living near experimental cell towers to see if radio waves from base stations affect sleep quality. After monitoring participants for 12 nights with both real and fake tower signals, they found no measurable differences in sleep patterns between the two conditions. However, people who were worried about health risks from cell towers did sleep worse during all test nights, suggesting anxiety rather than electromagnetic fields was affecting their rest.
Khurana VG et al. · 2010
Researchers analyzed 10 studies examining health effects in people living near cell phone towers (base stations). They found that 8 out of 10 studies reported increased rates of neurological symptoms or cancer in populations living within 500 meters (about 1,600 feet) of these towers. Importantly, all exposures were below current safety guidelines, suggesting these standards may not adequately protect public health.
Johansson A, Nordin S, Heiden M, Sandström M. · 2010
Researchers compared 116 people who reported symptoms from mobile phones or general electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) with control groups to understand their psychological profiles. They found that people with mobile phone-specific symptoms showed higher rates of exhaustion and depression, while those with general EHS showed elevated anxiety, depression, and other psychological symptoms. The study suggests these represent two distinct conditions that may require different treatment approaches.
Heinrich S, Thomas S, Heumann C, von Kries R, Radon K. · 2010
German researchers used personal dosimeters to measure radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in nearly 3,000 children and adolescents over 24 hours, then tracked acute symptoms like headaches and concentration problems. They found a few statistically significant associations between higher RF exposure and symptoms, but these results were inconsistent and disappeared when analyzing the highest-exposed participants. The researchers concluded the observed effects likely occurred by chance rather than representing true causal relationships.
Danker-Hopfe H, Dorn H, Bornkessel C, Sauter C. · 2010
German researchers exposed 397 residents to real and fake cell tower signals (900 MHz and 1,800 MHz) over 12 nights to test whether the electromagnetic fields affect sleep quality. They found no measurable differences in sleep patterns between real and fake exposure nights, but people who worried about health risks from cell towers had worse sleep even during fake exposure nights.
Nam KC, Lee JH, Noh HW, Cha EJ, Kim NH, Kim DW. · 2009
Researchers tested 18 people who claimed to be sensitive to electromagnetic fields (called EHS or electromagnetic hypersensitivity) against 19 people without such sensitivity, exposing both groups to real and fake cell phone radiation for 30 minutes. Neither group showed any measurable physical changes or symptoms from the actual radiation exposure, and the supposedly sensitive people couldn't tell the difference between real and fake exposure any better than the control group.
Furubayashi T et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 54 women (including 11 with self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity) to cell tower radiation at 10 V/m for 30 minutes in a controlled lab setting. Neither group could detect when they were actually being exposed to EMF, and both groups showed identical biological responses whether exposed to real or fake radiation. The study found no evidence that people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity react differently to cell tower emissions than healthy controls.
Furubayashi T et al. · 2009
Japanese researchers exposed 54 women to cell tower-like radio waves for 30 minutes to test whether people who report mobile phone sensitivity can actually detect electromagnetic fields. They found that sensitive individuals couldn't tell when they were being exposed any better than control subjects, but they consistently reported more discomfort regardless of whether the EMF was on or off. This suggests that electromagnetic hypersensitivity symptoms aren't directly caused by the radio waves themselves.
Eltiti S et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 88 people (including those who reported electromagnetic sensitivity) to cell tower signals for 50 minutes while testing their memory, attention, and heart rate. The study found no differences in cognitive performance or physiological measures between real exposure and fake exposure sessions. This suggests that brief exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't immediately impair thinking or basic body functions.
Eltiti S et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 88 people (including those who claimed to be sensitive to electromagnetic fields) to cell tower signals for 50 minutes while they performed memory and attention tests. The study found no effects on cognitive performance or physiological measures like heart rate and skin conductance in either sensitive or control participants. This suggests that short-term exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't impair brain function or cause detectable physical responses.
Schüz J, Waldemar G, Olsen JH, Johansen C. · 2009
Danish researchers tracked over 420,000 mobile phone subscribers from 1982-1995 through 2003 to see if phone use was linked to brain and nervous system diseases. They found mobile phone users had 10-20% higher rates of migraine and vertigo, but surprisingly lower rates of dementia, Parkinson's disease, and epilepsy in men. The increased migraine and vertigo rates persisted even among long-term users of 10+ years.
Landgrebe M, Frick U, Hauser S, Hajak G, Langguth B. · 2009
German researchers compared 89 people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) to 107 matched controls to examine connections between EMF sensitivity and tinnitus (ringing in the ears). They found that tinnitus occurred in 50.7% of EHS patients versus only 17.5% of controls - nearly three times higher. The researchers suggest both conditions may stem from an overactive brain stress network rather than direct EMF exposure effects.
Daniels WM, Pitout IL, Afullo TJ, Mabandla MV. · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to electromagnetic radiation in the mobile phone frequency range and tested their behavior, brain structure, and stress hormone levels. While they found no changes in learning ability or brain structure, exposed rats showed decreased movement, increased grooming behaviors, and higher stress hormone levels. These behavioral changes suggest that mobile phone radiation may disrupt normal brain function even when obvious structural damage isn't visible.
Dahmen N, Ghezel-Ahmadi D, Engel A. · 2009
German researchers examined blood test results from 132 people who report electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) symptoms and compared them to 101 healthy controls. They found that EHS patients were significantly more likely to have thyroid dysfunction, liver problems, and signs of chronic inflammation in their blood work. The study suggests that some people attributing symptoms to EMF exposure may actually have undiagnosed medical conditions that could be treated.
Berg-Beckhoff G et al. · 2009
German researchers measured actual radiofrequency radiation levels around cell phone towers and surveyed 3,526 people about their health symptoms. They found no connection between measured radiation exposure and health problems like sleep disturbances, headaches, or mental health issues. However, people who believed the towers were making them sick did report more symptoms, suggesting psychological factors may play a role in perceived health effects.
Augner C, Hacker GW. · 2009
Austrian researchers studied 57 people who believed they lived close to cell phone towers to see if proximity affected their stress levels. Those who reported living within 100 meters of base stations showed significantly higher levels of stress hormones in their saliva and reported more anxiety, obsessive thoughts, and physical symptoms. The findings suggest that people near cell towers experience measurable biological stress, though the study couldn't determine whether this was due to actual electromagnetic field exposure or other factors.
Kundi M, Hutter HP. · 2009
Researchers reviewed studies examining health effects from cell phone base stations (cell towers) and found concerning patterns. Multiple studies showed increased health complaints and cancer rates within 350-400 meters of base stations, with effects appearing at power densities around 0.5-1 milliwatts per square meter. The authors concluded that base station exposure needs urgent independent study, separate from cell phone research.
Augner C, Florian M, Pauser G, Oberfeld G, Hacker GW. · 2009
Austrian researchers exposed 57 people to different levels of radiofrequency radiation from cell phone base stations during controlled laboratory sessions. They found that participants felt significantly calmer when exposed to higher radiation levels compared to those exposed to minimal radiation. This suggests that cell tower signals may affect psychological well-being by reducing mental arousal.
Stovner LJ, Oftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A · 2008
Norwegian researchers studied 17 people who reported getting headaches from mobile phone use, exposing them to both real radiofrequency (RF) signals and fake exposures in a controlled setting. Participants experienced the same types of headaches whether they were exposed to actual RF fields or just thought they were, suggesting their 'mobile phone headaches' were caused by negative expectations (called the nocebo effect) rather than the electromagnetic fields themselves.
Riddervold IS et al. · 2008
Danish researchers tested whether 45-minute exposures to UMTS cell tower radiation (2140 MHz) affected cognitive performance and symptoms in 40 teenagers and 40 adults. They found no significant differences in cognitive test performance between real and sham exposures, though participants reported slightly more headaches during radiation exposure, which may have been due to baseline differences rather than the radiation itself.
Nieto-Hernandez R et al. · 2008
Researchers tested whether people claiming sensitivity to mobile phone signals could actually detect when phones were on versus off, then told participants their results to see if accurate feedback would change their symptoms. Even when told they couldn't actually detect phone signals, participants' sensitivity symptoms and beliefs remained unchanged six months later. The study suggests that providing scientific evidence alone may not be enough to help people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity reconsider their symptoms.
