6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Personal Device EMF Research

RFELF Magnetic

Research on EMF from devices you carry or wear daily - phones, earbuds, smartwatches, and laptops.

3
Sources
3,602
Studies
2
EMF Types

EMF in Personal Devices & Wearables

  • -These are the devices that travel with you everywhere-in your pocket, on your wrist, in your ears, and on your lap.
  • -Personal devices and wearables represent your most intimate EMF exposure because they're designed to stay close to your body throughout the day.
  • -Your smartphone radiates radiofrequency energy just inches from your brain during calls, your laptop emits magnetic fields directly onto your lap, and your wireless earbuds transmit Bluetooth signals inside your ear canals.

These are the devices that travel with you everywhere-in your pocket, on your wrist, in your ears, and on your lap. Personal devices and wearables represent your most intimate EMF exposure because they're designed to stay close to your body throughout the day. Your smartphone radiates radiofrequency energy just inches from your brain during calls, your laptop emits magnetic fields directly onto your lap, and your wireless earbuds transmit Bluetooth signals inside your ear canals.

Related Studies (3,602)

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Primary DNA Damage in Human Blood Lymphocytes Exposed In Vitro to 2450 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation.

Vijayalaxmi, Leal BZ, Szilagyi M, Prihoda TJ, Meltz ML · 2000

Human peripheral blood samples from three volunteers were exposed to pulsed-wave 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation for 2 hours. The exposure used a net forward power of 21 W with an average power density of 5 mW/cm2 and a mean specific absorption rate of 2.135 W/kg. DNA damage was measured using the alkaline comet assay immediately and 4 hours after exposure. No significant differences were found in comet tail length, fluorescence intensity, or tail moment between RF-exposed and sham-exposed lymphocytes at either time point. The response of lymphocytes exposed to ionizing radiation was significantly different from RF-radiation- and sham-exposed cells.

Increased chromatid-type chromosomal aberrations in mouse m5S cells exposed to power-line frequency magnetic fields

Unknown authors · 2000

Researchers exposed mouse m5S cells to power-line frequency magnetic fields at flux densities of 5, 50, and 400 mT for 40 hours. Cells were either untreated or pretreated with mitomycin C or X-rays before exposure. Exposure to 400 mT fields significantly increased chromosomal aberration frequency compared to unexposed controls. The induced aberrations were predominantly chromatid-type, with a three-fold increase at 400 mT. ELFMF exposure also deepened S or G2 arrest after DNA damage.

Pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic field affects human sleep and sleep electroencephalogram.

Borbely et al. · 1999

Researchers exposed healthy young subjects during an entire night-time sleep episode to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field at a maximum specific absorption rate of 1 W/kg. The exposure schedule consisted of alternating 15-min on-15-min off intervals. Compared with a control night with sham exposure, the amount of waking after sleep onset was reduced from 18 to 12 min, and EEG spectral power in non-rapid eye movement sleep was increased. The researchers concluded that pulsed high-frequency EMF in the range of radiotelephones may promote sleep and modify the sleep EEG.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found236 citations

Power-frequency electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia in Canada

Unknown authors · 1999

Researchers conducted a case-control study of 399 children with leukemia and 399 controls across five Canadian provinces from 1990 to 1994. Exposure assessment included 48-hour personal EMF measurement, wire coding, residential magnetic field measurements from conception to diagnosis, and 24-hour bedroom magnetic field measurement. Personal magnetic fields were not related to risk of leukemia (adjusted OR = 0.95, p for trend = 0.73) or acute lymphatic leukemia (OR = 0.93, p for trend = 0.64). No clear associations were found with predicted magnetic field exposure two years before diagnosis, over the lifetime, or with personal electric field exposure.

Reduced excretion of a melatonin metabolite in workers exposed to 60 Hz magnetic fields

Unknown authors · 1999

Researchers studied 142 male electric utility workers in Colorado to see how 60 Hz magnetic fields affect melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep. Workers exposed to temporally stable magnetic fields had reduced levels of melatonin metabolites in their urine, but only when they also had low light exposure at work. This suggests that power line frequency magnetic fields can disrupt the body's natural hormone production.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Proto-oncogene mRNA levels and activities of multiple transcription factors in C3H 10T 1/2 murine embryonic fibroblasts exposed to 835.62 and 847.74 MHz cellular phone communication frequency radiation.

Goswami PC et al. · 1999

Researchers exposed C3H 10T 1/2 mouse embryo fibroblasts to 835.62 MHz FMCW or 847.74 MHz CDMA microwaves at an average SAR of 0.6 W/kg and measured proto-oncogene expression. The exposures did not alter proto-oncogene expression kinetics after serum stimulation, nor did they change Jun and Myc mRNA levels or AP1, AP2, and NF-kappaB DNA-binding activity during the transition to plateau phase. However, 835.62 MHz FMCW exposure increased Fos mRNA about 2-fold in exponential and plateau-phase cells, and 847.74 MHz CDMA exposure increased it 1.4-fold.

A magnetic field-responsive domain in the human HSP70 promoter

Unknown authors · 1999

HSP70 gene expression is induced by 60-Hz electromagnetic fields. Earlier work showed magnetic field induction occurs at the transcription level through c-myc binding at two nCTCTn sequences at -230 and -160. This study identified a third c-myc binding site between -158 and -162 that regulates magnetic field-induced HSP70 expression. The heat shock element between -180 and -203 is required for magnetic field induction, while the HSE at -100 alone is insufficient.

Increased exposure to pollutant aerosols under high voltage power lines

Unknown authors · 1999

Researchers modeled and measured how 222Rn decay product aerosols behave in the 50 Hz electric field under high voltage power lines to assess increased exposure to airborne pollutants. The model predicted a two- to three-fold increase in aerosol deposition on spherical surfaces mimicking the human head. Experimental measurements using detectors on grounded metal spheres confirmed enhanced deposition of both 218Po and 214Po aerosols. Enhanced 218Po deposition on 400 kV lines ranged from 1.96 to 2.86 times, while 214Po deposition on 275 kV and 132 kV lines was 1.43 and 1.11 times, with the latter not significant.

Increased exposure to pollutant aerosols under high voltage power lines

Unknown authors · 1999

University of Bristol researchers found that high voltage power lines create electric fields that dramatically increase the deposition of airborne pollutants on human skin. Using radioactive marker particles, they measured 2-3 times more pollutant particles depositing on surfaces under 400 kV power lines compared to areas away from the lines. This means people living or working near power lines face significantly higher exposure to whatever air pollution is present.

Induction of stress proteins by electromagnetic fields in cultured HL-60 cells

Unknown authors · 1999

Researchers exposed HL-60 cells to a sinusoidal 0.1 or 1 mT magnetic field at 60 Hz for 2 hours and then pulse-labeled them with radioactive isotopes. In control cultures without magnetic field exposure, the cognate form of stress protein 72c was faintly observed, and 0.1 mT exposure did not alter stress protein metabolism compared to controls. At 1 mT, the inducible form of stress protein 70i was synthesized, stress protein 90 was phosphorylated but not synthesized, and stress protein 27 isoforms a and b were induced. Statistical analysis of Western blot data confirmed a significant increase in stress proteins 90 and 27a after 1 mT exposure.

Microwaves and cellular immunity. I. Effect of whole body microwave irradiation on tumor necrosis factor production in mouse cells.

Fesenko, EE, Makar, VR, Novoselova, EG, Sadovnikov, VB, · 1999

Researchers exposed male NMRI mice to whole body microwave irradiation at 8.15-18 GHz and a power density of 1 microW/cm2 and measured tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production in immune cells. Shorter exposures ranging from 5 hours to 3 days significantly enhanced TNF production in peritoneal macrophages and splenic T lymphocytes. Chronic irradiation for 7 days decreased TNF production in peritoneal macrophages. Microwave treatment increased endogenously produced TNF more effectively than lipopolysaccharide, described as one of the most potent stimuli of this cytokine.

Effects of mobile GSM radiotelephone exposure on the auditory brainstem response (ABR).

Kellenyi, L, Thuroczy, G, Faludy, B, Lenard, L · 1999

The study investigated effects of mobile GSM radiotelephone exposure on the auditory brainstem response. A 15-minute exposure to GSM phone radiation caused an increase in auditory brainstem response in the exposed side of human subjects. Subjects also showed a hearing deficiency in the high frequency range of 20 dB from 2 KHz to 10 KHz.

Evaluation in humans of the effects of radiocellular telephones on the circadian patterns of melatonin secretion, a chronobiological rhythm marker.

de Seze R, Ayoub J, Peray P, Miro L, Touitou Y · 1999

Researchers evaluated maximum serum melatonin concentration, time of maximum, and area under the curve of the hormone profile. Thirty-eight men aged 20 to 32 years were exposed to GSM 900 or DCS 1800 phones for 2 hr/day, 5 days/wk, for 4 wk at maximum power. Blood samples were collected hourly during the night and every 3 hr in the daytime across four sessions at 15-day intervals. The melatonin circadian profile was not disrupted by the exposure.

Human exposure at two radio frequencies (450 and 2450 MHz): similarities and differences in physiological response.

Adair ER, Cobb BL, Mylacraine KS, Kelleher SA, · 1999

Researchers measured thermoregulatory responses in two groups of seven adult volunteers exposed for 45 minutes to whole-body radio-frequency fields at either 450 or 2450 MHz. At each frequency, two power densities were tested at each of three ambient temperatures (24, 28, and 31 degrees C), along with no-RF control conditions. No change in metabolic heat production occurred under any exposure conditions at either frequency. At both frequencies, normalized peak SARs in excess of ANSI/IEEE C95.1 guidelines were easily counteracted by normal thermophysiological mechanisms.

Effects on protein kinase C and gene expression in a human mast cell line, HMC-1, following microwave exposure

Unknown authors · 1999

Researchers exposed human immune cells (mast cells) to microwave radiation at 864.3 MHz for 20 minutes daily over 7 days, using power levels similar to older cell phones. The radiation altered the activity of protein kinase C and changed the expression of three important genes, including one linked to cancer development, even at temperatures too low to cause heat damage.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Effect of 13 week magnetic field exposures on DMBA-initiated mammary gland carcinomas in female Sprague- Dawley rats

Unknown authors · 1999

Researchers exposed groups of 100 female Sprague-Dawley rats to 50 Hz magnetic fields at 1 or 5 G, or 60 Hz at 1 G, for 18.5 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 13 weeks after initiating mammary tumors with DMBA. A second study used a lower DMBA dose of 2 mg and exposed rats to 50 Hz fields at 1 or 5 G for the same duration. Magnetic field exposure did not affect body weight, tumor latency, or tumor size in either study, and the authors concluded there was no evidence that 50 or 60 Hz fields promoted breast cancer.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Effect of 26 week magnetic field exposures in a DMBA initiation-promotion mammary gland model in Sprague- Dawley rats

Unknown authors · 1999

Groups of 100 female Sprague–Dawley rats were initiated with a single 10 mg gavage dose of DMBA at 50 days of age and then exposed to ambient fields, 50 Hz magnetic fields at 1 or 5 Gauss, or 60 Hz fields at 1 Gauss for 18.5 hours per day, 7 days per week for 26 weeks. There was no effect of magnetic field exposure on body weight gains or the time of appearance of mammary tumors. Carcinoma incidence was 96%, 90%, 95%, and 85% for the DMBA controls, 1 G 50 Hz, 5 G 50 Hz, and 1 G 60 Hz groups respectively, total carcinoma numbers were 649, 494, 547, and 433 with significant decreases in the 1 G 50 Hz and 1 G 60 Hz groups, and the authors concluded there was no evidence that 50 or 60 Hz magnetic fields promoted breast cancer under the conditions of this assay.

Human sleep in 60 Hz magnetic fields

Unknown authors · 1999

Researchers conducted a double-blind laboratory study of 24 healthy young men to examine effects of intermittent versus continuous exposure to a 60 Hz, 28.3 microT magnetic field on EEG measures of night sleep. Intermittent exposure was associated with less total sleep time, reduced sleep efficiency, increased Stage II sleep, and decreased REM sleep, while continuous and sham exposure showed no such effects. Subjects exposed intermittently reported sleeping less well and feeling less rested in the morning compared to the other groups. All observed effects were significant at P < or = .04 or less.

Long-term exposure to a magnetic field (5 mT at 60 Hz) increases X-ray-induced mutations

Miyakoshi J, Koji Y, Wakasa T, Takebe H · 1999

Researchers exposed Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells to 5 mT ELFMF at 60 Hz for up to 6 weeks with or without X-irradiation. Long-term exposure to 5 mT ELFMF alone did not increase mutant frequency of the HPRT gene. However, exposure to 5 mT ELFMF after X-irradiation enhanced the X-ray-induced mutation rate. As little as 1 week of ELFMF exposure after X-irradiation increased the mutation rate.

Ultrawide-band electromagnetic pulses induced hypotension in rats.

Lu ST, Mathur SP, Akyel Y, Lee JC · 1999

Researchers exposed male Wistar-Kyoto rats to ultrawide-band electromagnetic pulses at 0.5-kHz and 1-kHz for 6 minutes. They measured cardiovascular functions including heart rate, systolic, mean, and diastolic pressures using a noninvasive tail-cuff sphygmomanometer. Exposure caused a significant decrease in arterial blood pressure that was robust, consistent, and persistent, while heart rate did not change. Cardiovascular functions were evaluated from 45 minutes to 4 weeks after exposure.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields have no effect on the in vivo proliferation of the 9L brain tumor.

Higashikubo R et al. · 1999

Researchers exposed Fischer 344 rats implanted with 9L gliosarcoma cells to 835.62 MHz FMCW or 847.74 MHz CDMA fields with a nominal brain specific absorption rate of 0.75 +/- 0.25 W/kg. The animals were exposed for 4 hours a day, 5 days a week, starting 4 weeks before tumor implantation and continuing up to 150 days after. Sham-exposed rats injected with 2 to 10 cells had a median survival of 70 days with 27% surviving to 150 days; those with 11 to 36 cells had a median survival of 52 days and 14% final survival; those with 37 to 100 cells had a median survival of 45 days and 0% survival. Statistical comparison showed no significant differences in survival curves between RF-exposed and sham-exposed animals in any of the three cell-dose groups.

FAQs: EMF in Personal Devices & Wearables

These are the devices that travel with you everywhere-in your pocket, on your wrist, in your ears, and on your lap. Personal devices and wearables represent your most intimate EMF exposure because they're designed to stay close to your body throughout the day.
There are 3,602 peer-reviewed studies in our database examining EMF sources commonly found in personal devices & wearables environments. These studies cover 3 different EMF sources: Cell Phones (2,296 studies), Laptops (3,602 studies), Bluetooth Devices (822 studies). The research includes both laboratory experiments and epidemiological studies from scientists worldwide.
Laptops has the most research with 3,602 studies, followed by Cell Phones (2,296) and Bluetooth Devices (822). This research examines various biological endpoints including cellular effects, neurological impacts, and other health outcomes from EMF exposure in personal devices & wearables settings.