3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Cancer & Tumors

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 63% of 293 studies on cancer & tumors found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 293 studies examining cancer & tumors, 63% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on cancer & tumors at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in Context0.00002, 0.0002, 0.008Extreme Concern1,000 uW/m2FCC Limit10M uW/m2Effects observed in the No Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 500,000,000,000x higher than this exposure level

Research Overview

  • -When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention.
  • -Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
  • -This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development. This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

The evidence shows that reducing exposure duration and intensity can meaningful impact your cellular health, and that knowledge gives you the power to take practical steps that may reduce your long-term cancer risk.

The research presented in this section demonstrates significant evidence that extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposures can cause DNA damage and genetic alterations relevant to leukemia development.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 293 studies

Are frequent dental x-ray examinations associated with increased risk of vestibular schwannoma?

Han YY et al. · 2012

Researchers studied 343 patients with vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma), a type of brain tumor that develops on the nerve connecting the ear to the brain. They found that people who received dental X-rays once a year or every 2-5 years had more than double the risk of developing these tumors compared to those who had dental X-rays less than once every 5 years. Interestingly, the study found no association between cell phone use and these tumors, contradicting some previous research.

On the association between glioma, wireless phones, heredity and ionising radiation.

Carlberg M, Hardell L. · 2012

Swedish researchers analyzed brain tumor cases over six years and found that people who used mobile phones or cordless phones on the same side of their head where tumors developed had nearly 3 times higher risk of glioma (a serious brain cancer) after 10+ years of use. The risk was even higher for aggressive tumors and for people who started using wireless phones before age 20. This suggests long-term wireless phone use may increase brain cancer risk, especially when the phone is held against the same side of the head where tumors later appear.

Effects of extremely low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on morphological and biochemical properties of human breast carcinoma cells (T47D).

Sadeghipour R et al. · 2012

Researchers exposed human breast cancer cells to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and found the EMF slowed cancer cell growth while increasing cellular stress. Higher frequencies (217 Hz) caused more dramatic effects than lower ones (100 Hz), showing cancer cells respond differently to specific EMF frequencies.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Lymphoma development of simultaneously combined exposure to two radiofrequency signals in AKR/J mice.

Lee HJ et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed mice genetically prone to lymphoma to combined cell phone signals (CDMA and WCDMA) for 45 minutes daily over 42 weeks at high exposure levels (4.0 W/kg total). The study found no difference in lymphoma development between exposed and unexposed mice, though there was an inconsistent pattern of brain metastasis in some exposed animals.

Whole Body / GeneralNo Effects Found

One-year, simultaneous combined exposure of CDMA and WCDMA radiofrequency electromagnetic fields to rats.

Jin YB, Lee HJ, Seon Lee J, Pack JK, Kim N, Lee YS. · 2011

Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation from both CDMA and WCDMA technologies (the frequencies used by older 2G and 3G networks) for 45 minutes daily over one full year. The exposure levels were set at 4 W/kg total, which is four times higher than current safety limits. While most health measures remained normal, the study found some changes in blood chemistry and blood cell counts, though no increase in tumors or overall illness.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study.

Frei P et al. · 2011

Danish researchers tracked nearly 60,000 mobile phone subscribers for up to 18 years to see if they developed brain tumors at higher rates than non-subscribers. They found no increased risk of brain tumors, including gliomas and meningiomas, even among people who had used phones for 13 or more years. The study provides reassuring evidence that mobile phone use doesn't appear to cause brain cancer.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study.

Aydin D et al. · 2011

Researchers studied whether mobile phone use increases brain tumor risk in children and teenagers by comparing 352 young brain tumor patients with 646 healthy controls across four European countries. They found no statistically significant increase in brain tumor risk among regular mobile phone users, and importantly, no relationship between the amount of phone use and tumor development. The study suggests that mobile phone use is not causing brain tumors in young people.

Long-term exposure to microwave radiation provokes cancer growth: evidences from radars and mobile communication systems.

Yakymenko I, Sidorik E, Kyrylenko S, Chekhun V. · 2011

Ukrainian researchers reviewed evidence linking long-term exposure to low-intensity microwave radiation (from cell towers and radar systems) to increased cancer rates. They found that both human populations living near cell towers and laboratory animals showed significantly higher cancer rates after extended exposure periods of 1-10+ years. The study challenges current safety standards, which only consider heating effects and ignore biological impacts at lower radiation levels.

A comparative study on the increased radioresistance to lethal doses of gamma rays after exposure to microwave radiation and oral intake of flaxseed oil.

Mortazavi SMJ et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed rats to microwave radiation (from mobile phones) before giving them a lethal dose of gamma rays, then tracked survival rates. The microwave-exposed rats showed 100% survival compared to only 53% in unexposed controls, suggesting microwave radiation triggered protective cellular responses. This finding raises important questions about how everyday cell phone exposure might affect medical radiation treatments like cancer therapy.

The discrepancies in cause-effect relationships in the epidemiological studies - how do they arise?

Levis AG et al. · 2011

Italian researchers examined why studies on mobile phones and brain tumors reach different conclusions by analyzing the methods used in all major studies. They found that well-designed studies consistently show nearly double the risk of brain tumors on the same side of the head where people hold their phone after 10+ years of use, while poorly designed studies (often industry-funded) systematically underestimate this risk.

Cancer & Tumors171 citations

Pooled analysis of case-control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. · 2011

Swedish researchers studied over 3,600 people to examine whether mobile and cordless phone use increases brain tumor risk. They found that people who used wireless phones for more than 10 years had 2.7 times higher risk of developing astrocytoma (the most common brain tumor), with even higher risks for those who started using phones before age 20. The risk increased with both years of use and total hours of phone use.

Case-control study on the use of mobile and cordless phones and the risk for malignant melanoma in the head and neck region.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K, Eriksson M. · 2011

Swedish researchers studied 347 people with malignant melanoma (skin cancer) on the head and neck and compared their mobile and cordless phone use to 1,184 healthy controls. They found that people who used phones for more than 365 hours and started using them before age 20 had roughly double the risk of developing melanoma in areas closest to where phones are held. The findings suggest radiofrequency radiation might promote skin cancer development, though the researchers emphasize more studies are needed to confirm this connection.

Treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with very low levels of amplitude-modulated electromagnetic fields.

Costa FP et al. · 2011

Researchers tested whether very low-level electromagnetic fields, delivered through a device placed in the mouth, could help treat advanced liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma) in 41 patients with limited treatment options. The treatment was safe and well-tolerated, with 34% of patients experiencing stable disease for more than 6 months and some showing partial tumor responses. This suggests that precisely modulated electromagnetic fields might offer a new therapeutic approach for certain cancers.

Impact of random and systematic recall errors and selection bias in case--control studies on mobile phone use and brain tumors in adolescents (CEFALO study).

Aydin D et al. · 2011

Researchers analyzed how memory errors and study participation bias affect mobile phone brain tumor studies in children and teens. They found that brain tumor patients overestimated their phone use by much smaller amounts than healthy controls, with patients overestimating call duration by 52% while controls overestimated by 163%. This suggests previous studies may have underestimated the actual risk of mobile phones causing brain tumors in young people.

Mortality by neoplasia and cellular telephone base stations in the Belo Horizonte municipality, Minas Gerais state, Brazil.

Dode AC et al. · 2011

Brazilian researchers analyzed cancer deaths in Belo Horizonte from 1996-2006 and found that people living within 500 meters of cell phone base stations had significantly higher cancer mortality rates (34.76 per 10,000 residents) compared to those living farther away. The study used official death records and mapped the locations of 856 cell towers, measuring radiofrequency radiation levels up to 12.4 V/m in areas with the highest cancer rates.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Effect of mobile phone station on micronucleus frequency and chromosomal aberrations in human blood cells.

Yildirim MS, Yildirim A, Zamani AG, Okudan N. · 2010

Researchers examined blood samples from people living near cell phone towers to look for genetic damage markers (micronucleus frequency and chromosomal aberrations) that could indicate cancer risk. They found no statistically significant differences between people living near towers and control groups. The study concluded that cell phone base stations do not produce important cancer-causing genetic changes.

Cellular EffectsNo Effects Found

Two-dimensional electrophoretic analysis of radio-frequency radiation-exposed MCF7 breast cancer cells.

Kim KB et al. · 2010

Researchers exposed breast cancer cells (MCF7) to cell phone radiation at 849 MHz for one hour daily over three days, then analyzed whether the radiation changed protein production in the cells. They found no significant or consistent changes in protein expression at either exposure level tested (2 or 10 W/kg SAR). This suggests that radiofrequency radiation at these levels does not alter how cells make proteins, which is important because protein changes can indicate cellular stress or damage.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found648 citations

Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study.

The INTERPHONE Study Group. · 2010

Researchers studied brain tumor risk in over 5,000 people across 13 countries, comparing mobile phone users to non-users. They found no overall increased risk of brain tumors from mobile phone use, but did see a 40% higher risk of glioma (a type of brain cancer) in the heaviest users who reported over 1,640 hours of cumulative call time. However, the researchers noted that recall bias and other methodological issues prevent drawing firm conclusions about causation.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found107 citations

Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States.

Inskip PD, Hoover RN, Devesa SS. · 2010

Researchers analyzed 15 years of brain cancer data from the SEER cancer registry (1992-2006) to see if rising cell phone use correlated with increased brain tumors. They found no overall increase in brain cancer rates during this period of explosive cell phone adoption, and importantly, no increases in the specific brain regions (temporal and parietal lobes) that would receive the highest radiation exposure from phones held to the ear. The one exception was frontal lobe cancers in young women, but this increase began before widespread cell phone use and occurred in brain areas with lower phone radiation exposure.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found107 citations

Mobile phone base stations and early childhood cancers: case-control study.

Elliott P et al. · 2010

British researchers examined whether children whose mothers lived near cell phone towers during pregnancy had higher rates of cancer. They compared 1,397 children with cancer to 5,588 healthy children, analyzing the distance from their birth address to nearby cell towers and the radiofrequency exposure levels. The study found no increased cancer risk associated with proximity to cell towers or higher exposure levels during pregnancy.

The controversy about a possible relationship between mobile phone use and cancer.

Kundi M. · 2010

Researchers analyzed 33 studies examining whether mobile phone use increases cancer risk, with most focusing on brain tumors. They found that current epidemiological studies cannot properly detect cancer risks because researchers lack proper exposure measurements, most users haven't used phones long enough to develop cancer, and scientists don't know which specific cancers to look for. Despite these limitations, the overall evidence suggests mobile phone use may increase cancer risk, though the exact magnitude remains unclear.

Epidemiological evidence for a health risk from mobile phone base stations.

Khurana VG et al. · 2010

Researchers analyzed 10 studies examining health effects in people living near cell phone towers (base stations). They found that 8 out of 10 studies reported increased rates of neurological symptoms or cancer in populations living within 500 meters (about 1,600 feet) of these towers. Importantly, all exposures were below current safety guidelines, suggesting these standards may not adequately protect public health.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including cancer & tumors, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Cancer & Tumors

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
The BioInitiative Report database includes 293 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and cancer & tumors. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
63% of the 293 studies examining cancer & tumors found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 186 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 37% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.