6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

AIRCRAFT RADAR MEASUREMENTS IN THE NEAR FIELD

Richard A. Tell, Norbert N. Hankin, David E. Janes, Jr. · 1976

Researchers measured microwave exposure levels near parked commercial aircraft from weather radar installed in the nose of the aircraft on five aircraft with three radar types. Measurements were made on stationary antennas and average values of power density were calculated taking into account antenna rotation. With the antennas rotating, only one system produced a level in excess of the current OSHA-ANSI standard of 10 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2). For rotating antennas the power density decreased to less than 1 mW/cm2 at distances greater than 3.5 m (11.5 ft.) for all systems measured. The measured values agree well with values calculated from a model employing near-field gain correction factors.

An Investigation of the Use of Microwave Radiation for Pulmonary Diagnostics

P. C. PEDERSEN, C. C. JOHNSON, C. H. DURNEY, D. G. BRAGG · 1976

Researchers used a 13 cm by 13 cm applicator at 915 MHz with power levels of 50 to 100 microwatts to measure microwave reflection during human respiration. Deep breathing produced maximum amplitude and phase changes of about 1 dB and 5 degrees with the applicator on the chest and 2 dB and 10 degrees on the back. In a dog with artificially induced edema, baseline amplitude shifts followed edema progression up to 15 times normal respiratory changes, while only a small phase shift occurred. The authors concluded the technique may allow qualitative monitoring of lung water changes but not quantitative determinations or discrimination between intra- and extravascular fluid.

A review of microwaves for food processing

A. J. H. Sale · 1976

Microwave heating alone has led to few commercial successes but combined with conventional heating has greater potential and several successful processes. Successful applications include pasta drying using a combination of microwave heating with hot air that reduces drying time from about 10 hours to about half an hour, and doughnut proofing that reduces proofing time from 30-40 minutes to 4 minutes with more than twenty units installed.

Journal of Microwave Power

M. de Vecchis et al. · 1976

A simple way to obtain a low-cost high sensitivity detector is to use an active device, especially a transistor oscillator, coupled to an antenna. The detector operates in a frequency-selective mode at low power densities and can switch to a non-selective mode at higher densities by adjusting the antenna coupling.

Pacemakers and External Interference

Elmqvist H · 1976

The paper describes interference mechanisms, the most common sources of external electromagnetic interference, and their influence on different types of pacemakers. It identifies three ways external electromagnetic interference can influence pacemaker function. Remote sources include microwave ovens, radar installations, and radio-transmitters, while direct contact sources include defibrillation, diathermy, short-wave treatment equipment, and household appliances with poor insulation. A survey of over 2200 patients found only 10 cases of interference with no serious consequences. Modern pacemakers use an interference filter that discriminates signals by repetition rate and a metal encapsulation that reduces microwave effects.

Technical Data Models 1036 and 1037 Digital Power Meter

Pacific Measurements Inc. · 1976

Model 1036 measures from -40 dBm to +10 dBm in a single range while Model 1037 measures from -30 dBm to +20 dBm. The instruments achieve rated accuracy of +0.02 dB on the upper 30 dB and +0.04 dB on the lower 20 dB of the power range. A self-check feature uses a front-panel calibrator providing 10 milliwatts accurate within +0.06 dB at 30 MHz. The detectors are protected against overloads up to 10 times full-scale rating and are field-repairable.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.