6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
All Topics

Whole Body / General

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 93% of 2,429 primary studies on whole body / general found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 2,429 studies examining whole body / general, 93% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on whole body / general at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context7.2 × 10⁻⁸ W/kgExtreme Concern - 0.1 W/kgFCC Limit - 1.6 W/kgEffects documented below the Building Biology "No Concern" threshold (0.001 W/kg)FCC limit is 22.2 million times higher than this level
View study: Analysis of in situ electric field and specific absorption r...

Research Overview

  • -When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention.
  • -This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
  • -The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family.

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology. The question isn't whether effects occur, but which ones matter most to you and your family. The documented effects span multiple biological systems.

That's what the evidence shows across the 3,798 studies in our whole body research collection: 3,591 of them identified biological changes in response to electromagnetic field exposure.

Research on chicken embryos exposed to both ELF and RF radiation demonstrated 27% less protective protein production after repeated exposures, indicating compromised cellular defense mechanisms.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 2,816 studies

Whole Body / General

Treatment of Soft-tissue Injuries by Pulsed Electrical Energy

D. H. Wilson · 1972

Twenty matched pairs of patients with recent ankle sprains received either active pulsed high-frequency electrical energy or a placebo treatment for one hour daily over three days. Treated patients showed about twice the percentage improvement of placebo patients in each category, with pain improving 74.4 versus 32.4 and disability 86.9 versus 43.9. Statistical analysis found the active treatment significantly preferable for pain, disability, and total scores, with all matched-pair P values below 0.05.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

Clinical Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation

Milton M. Zaret · 1972

The author reviewed clinical ocular injuries from nonionizing radiation, distinguishing between visible and invisible wavelengths. In workers exposed to high-intensity light sources, macular hyperpigmentation and depigmentation were each found ten times more often than in the general population. Retinal burns and melanomata were each observed in 1 percent of the examined workers.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

Viability Studies on Ascospores and Vegetative Cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Exposed to Microwaves at 2450 MHz

P. C. B. Roberts · 1972

Researchers exposed Saccharomyces cerevisiae vegetative cells and ascospores to 2450 MHz microwaves using a hexane-cooled apparatus designed to separate thermal from non-thermal effects. At 40 watts without coolant flow, total loss of viability occurred after 30 seconds for vegetative cells and 40 seconds for spores, while suspension temperatures remained below 33°C.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

FIELD TESTING OF MICROWAVE OVENS

Office of Training, Division of Electronic Products · 1972

Interlock testing requires at least two operable safety interlocks and the oven should turn off before leakage exceeds 5 mW/cm² during slow door opening. Closed-door leakage measurements use a standard water load of 275 ml in a 600 ml beaker and the probe is moved along the door crack at no faster than one inch per second. Ovens manufactured after October 6, 1971 must bear a DHEW certification label showing compliance with 42 CFR Part 78.

View Study Details
Whole Body / General

Microwave Radiation: Biophysical Considerations and Standards Criteria

Herman P. Schwan · 1972

Nonthermal effects are classified as strong (above 10 mW/cm²) or weak (below thermal levels), and the review finds no evidence for weak nonthermal effects. The 10 mW/cm² exposure standard is based on thermal considerations and applies only to microwave frequencies where the human absorption cross-section is near unity; at lower frequencies the guide numbers can be relaxed by orders of magnitude.

View Study Details
Brain & Nervous System

THE EFFECT OF MICROWAVE RADIATION ON EVOKED TACTILE AND AUDITORY CNS RESPONSE IN CATS

Arthur W. Guy, James C. Lin, Fredric A. Harris · 1972

The study exposed cat heads to 915 MHz microwave radiation and measured evoked tactile and auditory CNS responses. Changes in latency and/or amplitude occurred at a mean threshold of about 5 mW/cm2. Temperature rises were always associated with the changes. Variations in results were noted with different electrode compositions, suggesting possible artifacts.

View Study Details

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including whole body / general, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation book cover

Overpowered: The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation

Dr. Martin Blank & R Blank

Read on Amazon
Empowered: A Practical Guide to Protecting Yourself from EMF book cover

Empowered: A Practical Guide to Protecting Yourself from EMF

R Blank

Read on Amazon

FAQs: EMF & Whole Body / General

When 95% of nearly 3,800 peer-reviewed studies document biological effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, we're looking at a weight of evidence that demands attention. This isn't fringe science or industry speculation-it's the consistent finding across independent research examining how radiofrequency radiation, extremely low frequency fields, and other non-ionizing EMF sources interact with human physiology.
The SYB Research Database includes 2,429 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and whole body / general. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
93% of the 2,429 studies examining whole body / general found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 2257 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 7% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.