Electric fields are produced by voltage (electrical pressure) and exist whenever a device is plugged in, even if turned off. They are measured in volts per meter (V/m). Electric fields can be blocked by walls and most materials, but often concentrate near ungrounded wiring and electronics.
Based on Building Biology Institute guidelines (V/m (volts per meter)):
Showing 197 studies with measured electric fields exposure
Roser K et al. · 2017
Swiss researchers tracked electromagnetic field exposure in 90 teenagers for three days. They discovered that teens' own mobile phones generated 67% of their total EMF exposure, while cell towers contributed only 20%. This shows personal device usage, not environmental sources, drives adolescent EMF exposure levels.
Sagar S et al. · 2017
European researchers reviewed 21 studies measuring radiofrequency exposure from cell towers, WiFi, and phones in everyday locations. They found exposure levels ranging from 0.16 to 1.96 volts per meter, with trains showing highest levels. Inconsistent measurement methods make tracking exposure trends difficult.
Gryz K, Karpowicz J, Leszko W, Zradziński P. · 2014
Polish researchers measured radiofrequency radiation in 45 office buildings from cell towers, WiFi, and broadcast transmitters. They found exposure levels were generally low, with highest readings near indoor cell antennas (1.8 V/m) and radio transmitters (3.8 V/m), but all remained below international safety limits.
Joseph W, Verloock L, Goeminne F, Vermeeren G, Martens L. · 2012
Researchers measured real-world 4G cell tower radiation exposure in a UK city. They found 4G signals contributed only 0.4% of total electromagnetic radiation, with levels 32 times below safety guidelines. This provides important baseline data for understanding public EMF exposure.
Joseph W, Verloock L, Goeminne F, Vermeeren G, Martens L. · 2010
Researchers measured radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic field exposure from LTE cellular towers and other wireless sources at 30 locations in Stockholm, Sweden. They found that LTE towers contributed an average of only 4% to total RF exposure, with LTE levels reaching up to 0.8 volts per meter. All measured exposures remained well below international safety guidelines, though the study focused on regulatory compliance rather than biological effects.
Frei P et al. · 2009
Swiss researchers measured radiofrequency radiation exposure in 166 volunteers over one week using personal monitoring devices. They found that people are exposed to RF radiation throughout their daily lives, with the highest levels occurring on trains, in airports, and during daytime hours. The main sources of exposure were cell phone towers (32%), mobile phones (29%), and cordless phones (23%).
Urbinello D, Joseph W, Verloock L, Martens L, Röösli M. · 2014
Researchers measured radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure from sources like cell towers and WiFi across three European cities over one year. They found that RF exposure levels increased significantly - by 20% to 57% - in all outdoor areas during just 12 months, with the highest exposures occurring on public transportation. While levels remained below regulatory limits, the rapid year-over-year increases demonstrate how quickly our EMF environment is intensifying.
Joseph W, Vermeeren G, Verloock L, Heredia MM, Martens L · 2008
Scientists measured radiofrequency radiation from phones, WiFi, and other devices in 28 real-world situations. They found office environments often had higher exposure than outdoors, with the highest levels on trains and buses where phones work harder to maintain connections, affecting actual body absorption rates.
Margaritis LH et al. · 2014
Researchers exposed fruit flies to common wireless devices like cell phones, WiFi, and Bluetooth to study reproductive effects. All devices significantly reduced egg production and increased cell death, even at very low exposure levels below current safety guidelines, suggesting potential biological impacts.
Trosić I, Pavicić I. · 2009
Researchers exposed hamster cells to mobile phone radiation (935 MHz) at low power levels for 1-3 hours and tracked their growth over four days. They found that cells exposed for three hours showed reduced growth 72 hours later and immediate damage to their internal scaffolding structures called microtubules. This suggests that even brief exposures to cell phone-level radiation can disrupt normal cellular function and growth patterns.
Gürler HS, Bilgici B, Akar AK, Tomak L, Bedir A. · 2014
Researchers exposed rats to WiFi-frequency radiation (2.45 GHz) for one hour daily over 30 days and measured DNA damage in their brains and blood. The radiation caused significant genetic damage, indicated by increased levels of 8-OHdG (a marker of DNA oxidation) in both brain tissue and blood plasma. Interestingly, rats given garlic extract were protected from this DNA damage, suggesting antioxidants may help counter EMF-induced cellular harm.
Hatice Ş. Gürler et al. · 2014
Researchers exposed rats to WiFi-frequency radiation (2.45 GHz) for one hour daily over 30 days and measured damage to DNA and proteins in their brains. The radiation caused significant DNA damage in both brain tissue and blood, while also increasing harmful protein changes in the blood. Interestingly, rats given garlic supplements showed protection against these damaging effects.
Dode AC et al. · 2011
Brazilian researchers analyzed cancer deaths in Belo Horizonte from 1996-2006 and found that people living within 500 meters of cell phone base stations had significantly higher cancer mortality rates (34.76 per 10,000 residents) compared to those living farther away. The study used official death records and mapped the locations of 856 cell towers, measuring radiofrequency radiation levels up to 12.4 V/m in areas with the highest cancer rates.
Aly AA et al. · 2008
Scientists exposed infection-fighting white blood cells to 900-MHz cell phone radiation. The RF exposure made cells move 50% faster and in wrong directions, away from infection sites they should target. This immune system disruption occurred within minutes at non-heating power levels.
Halgamuge MN. · 2015
Scientists measured radio waves from ship transmitters across three deck levels, taking 528 measurements. They found EMF levels on the bridge roof exceeded safety limits for the general public but stayed within workplace exposure limits, providing crucial data for maritime EMF safety standards.
Papageorgiou CC et al. · 2011
Researchers exposed 30 people to Wi-Fi signals while they performed a mental task that required focus and working memory, measuring brain activity through electrodes on the scalp. They found that Wi-Fi exposure significantly reduced brain activity (measured by P300 brain waves) in men but not women during tasks requiring mental inhibition. This suggests Wi-Fi radiation may impair attention and working memory functions differently based on gender.
Kottou S et al. · 2015
Greek researchers measured electromagnetic field levels in over 4,500 indoor locations across three regions, focusing on extremely low frequency magnetic fields and radiofrequency electric fields that health agencies consider possibly cancer-causing. They found that while EMF levels varied by location and distance from sources, all measurements remained well below current safety limits set by European regulators. The study provides baseline data on typical indoor EMF exposure levels in Greek homes.
Emre M, Cetiner S, Zencir S, Unlukurt I, Kahraman I, Topcu Z · 2011
Researchers exposed rats to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (1-40 Hz) for one hour daily over 30 days and measured liver damage markers in blood and cell death in tissues. They found increased oxidative stress indicators and changes in cell death patterns, suggesting that even low-level magnetic field exposure can trigger biological stress responses. This matters because these frequency ranges are common around power lines and household electrical systems.
Panagopoulos DJ, Margaritis LH · 2010
Researchers exposed fruit flies to cell phone radiation at specific distances and intensities to identify the exact exposure level that causes maximum reproductive harm. They found that both GSM 900 and 1800 MHz radiation create a 'bioactivity window' at 10 microwatts per square centimeter, where reproductive capacity drops significantly. This suggests that biological harm from cell phone radiation occurs at very specific intensity levels, not necessarily the highest ones.
Akar A et al. · 2012
Researchers exposed rats to WiFi-level radiation (2.45 GHz) for 2 hours daily over 21 days. They found the front layer of the cornea became significantly thicker in exposed rats compared to unexposed ones, suggesting everyday wireless device radiation may cause structural eye changes.
Riddervold IS et al. · 2008
Danish researchers exposed 80 people (teenagers and adults) to cell tower radiation at 2.14 GHz for 45 minutes to test whether it affected their thinking abilities and caused symptoms. They found no significant impact on cognitive performance, though participants reported slightly more headaches during exposure compared to fake exposure sessions. The study suggests cell tower radiation at these levels doesn't impair mental function in the short term.
Andrianome S et al. · 2017
French researchers studied whether people who report electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) have different nervous system responses compared to healthy controls, and whether exposure to common wireless signals affects their autonomic nervous system. They measured heart rate variability and skin conductance in 30 EHS individuals and 25 controls, then exposed 10 EHS participants to GSM, DECT, and Wi-Fi signals at environmental levels (1 V/m). The study found no significant differences in nervous system responses between EHS and control groups, and no measurable effects from the wireless exposures.
Malek F, Rani KA, Rahim HA, Omar MH · 2015
Malaysian researchers exposed 200 people (half claiming electromagnetic sensitivity) to cell tower signals at 1 volt per meter for short periods and measured cognitive performance, body temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure. They found no statistically significant differences between real exposure and fake exposure in either sensitive or non-sensitive individuals. This suggests that brief exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't immediately affect these basic body functions or mental performance.
Pelletier A et al. · 2014
Researchers exposed young rats to cell phone-frequency radiation (900 MHz) for five weeks and found the animals developed altered sleep patterns and temperature preferences. The exposed rats slept 15.5% longer, preferred warmer environments, and had cooler tail temperatures, suggesting the radiation disrupted their normal body temperature regulation. This provides biological evidence that radiofrequency exposure can interfere with fundamental physiological processes like sleep and thermoregulation.
Pelletier A et al. · 2014
French researchers exposed young rats to cell phone radiation (900 MHz) for five weeks. The exposed rats slept 15.5% longer and preferred warmer temperatures than unexposed rats, suggesting radiofrequency radiation disrupts natural temperature control and sleep patterns.