Hagström M, Auranen J, Ekman R. · 2013
Researchers surveyed 206 Finnish people who believe they suffer from electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), a condition where individuals experience symptoms they attribute to EMF exposure from devices like computers and cell phones. The study found that 76% reported improvement when they reduced or avoided EMF exposure, with the most effective treatments being dietary changes, supplements, and exercise rather than conventional medical approaches. The findings suggest that people experiencing EHS symptoms may benefit more from EMF avoidance and lifestyle modifications than from standard psychiatric treatments.
Byun YH et al. · 2013
Researchers followed 2,422 Korean children for two years to study whether mobile phone use affects ADHD symptoms. They found that children who used mobile phones for voice calls showed increased ADHD symptoms, but only when they also had high levels of lead in their blood. This suggests that exposure to both lead and phone radiation together may worsen attention problems in children.
Alsanosi AA et al. · 2013
Researchers tested hearing function in people before and after 60 minutes of mobile phone use, measuring both hearing thresholds and inner ear responses. They found immediate hearing changes at specific frequencies (1000 Hz and 2000 Hz) and inner ear dysfunction, along with symptoms like heat and pain. This demonstrates that even short-term phone use can cause measurable, immediate effects on hearing.
Maestú C et al. · 2013
Spanish researchers tested whether very low-intensity 8 Hz magnetic fields could help women with fibromyalgia, a chronic pain condition. After eight weekly sessions, patients receiving real magnetic stimulation showed significant improvements in pain thresholds, daily functioning, chronic pain levels, and sleep quality compared to those receiving fake treatment. The benefits appeared quickly for pain relief but took six weeks to develop for other symptoms, suggesting magnetic fields may offer a safe treatment option for fibromyalgia patients.
Maestú C et al. · 2013
Spanish researchers tested whether very low-intensity magnetic field stimulation could help women with fibromyalgia, a chronic pain condition. After eight weekly sessions of 8 Hz pulsed magnetic fields, patients showed significant improvements in pain thresholds, daily functioning, sleep quality, and overall pain levels compared to those receiving fake treatment. The improvements began after just one session for pain relief, with other benefits appearing after six weeks of treatment.
Redmayne M, Smith E, and Abramson MJ · 2013
New Zealand researchers studied 400 teenagers' wireless phone use and health symptoms. Students making over 6 calls weekly had 2.4 times higher headache risk, while wireless headset users showed doubled depression and sleep problems. These findings suggest teen phone habits may impact wellbeing.
Vecsei Z, Csathó A, Thuróczy G, Hernádi I. · 2013
Researchers exposed 20 healthy adults to cell phone radiation for 30 minutes, then tested pain sensitivity using heat on their fingers. The radiation reduced the body's normal ability to adapt to repeated pain, suggesting cell phone signals can interfere with nervous system pain processing.
Havas M, Marrongelle J. · 2013
Researchers exposed 69 people to radiation from a 2.4-GHz cordless phone base station for 3-minute intervals and measured their heart rate variability (how the heart rhythm changes in response to stress). They found that 36% of participants showed some degree of sensitivity to the electromagnetic radiation, with their hearts responding as if experiencing stress. The study suggests that heart rate variability testing could help identify people who are electromagnetically sensitive.
Havas M, Marrongelle J · 2013
Researchers exposed 69 people to radiation from a 2.4-GHz cordless phone base station for 3-minute intervals and measured changes in heart rate variability (a measure of stress response). They found that 36% of participants showed measurable physiological stress responses to the EMF exposure, with 7% classified as moderately to very sensitive. The study suggests that some people may have an involuntary stress response to common household wireless devices.
Wallace D et al. · 2012
Researchers tested whether TETRA radio signals (used by UK police and emergency services) cause health symptoms in people who report being sensitive to electromagnetic fields. When participants didn't know whether they were exposed to real or fake signals, neither the sensitive individuals nor control subjects showed any physical or psychological effects from TETRA exposure. However, when people knew they might be exposed, those claiming sensitivity reported feeling worse, suggesting their symptoms stem from worry about EMF rather than the signals themselves.
Wallace D et al. · 2012
Researchers tested whether TETRA radio signals (used by emergency services) affect brain function and physical responses in 183 people, including 51 who reported being sensitive to electromagnetic fields. Participants were exposed to 420 MHz signals at levels similar to living near a cell tower while performing memory and attention tests. The study found no differences in cognitive performance or physical responses between real exposure and fake exposure in either group.
Kwon MK, Kim SK, Koo JM, Choi JY, Kim DW. · 2012
Researchers tested whether people who report electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) could actually detect cell phone radiation better than those without the condition. In a double-blind study, 37 participants were exposed to real and fake cell phone signals at levels similar to normal phone use, but neither group could reliably tell when the radiation was present. The findings suggest that EHS symptoms may not be directly caused by the ability to physically sense electromagnetic fields.
Kwon MK, Choi JY, Kim SK, Yoo TK, Kim DW. · 2012
Researchers tested whether people claiming electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) could actually detect cell phone radiation or experience symptoms from it. They exposed 17 EHS subjects and 20 healthy controls to real and fake WCDMA phone signals for 32 minutes while monitoring heart rate, breathing, and symptoms. Neither group showed any physiological changes or could reliably tell when they were being exposed to real radiation.
Frei P et al. · 2012
Swiss researchers followed 1,375 people for one year to see if everyday radiofrequency radiation from cell phones and broadcast towers caused symptoms like headaches, fatigue, or ringing in the ears (tinnitus). They used sophisticated models to measure both environmental RF exposure and phone usage patterns. The study found no association between RF exposure levels and these health complaints, even among people with the highest exposure levels.
Augner C, Gnambs T, Winker R, Barth A. · 2012
Researchers analyzed 17 studies involving 1,174 people to determine whether short-term exposure to cell phone radiation affects well-being in both people who consider themselves sensitive to electromagnetic fields and those who don't. They found no significant effects on either subjective symptoms (like headaches) or objective measures (like heart rate changes). The authors noted that future research should examine long-term exposure effects instead.
Wallace D et al. · 2012
Researchers tested whether exposure to TETRA radio signals (used by emergency services) affects thinking ability and physical responses in people who consider themselves sensitive to electromagnetic fields. After exposing 183 participants to real and fake TETRA signals in a controlled study, they found no differences in memory, attention, heart rate, or other measured responses. This adds to evidence that radio frequency exposure at these levels doesn't produce detectable immediate effects on cognitive function or basic physiological responses.
Sudan M, Kheifets L, Arah O, Olsen J, Zeltzer L. · 2012
Researchers tracked over 52,000 Danish children from pregnancy through age seven to examine whether cell phone exposure increases headache risk. Children exposed to cell phones both before birth (through their mothers' use) and after birth had 30% higher odds of migraines and 32% higher odds of headache symptoms compared to unexposed children. While the study cannot prove cell phones directly cause headaches, the large population size and consistent pattern suggest a potential connection worth taking seriously.
Korpinen L, Pääkkönen R. · 2012
Finnish researchers surveyed over 6,000 working adults about accidents and near-miss situations involving mobile phone use. They found that 13.7% experienced close calls and 2.4% had actual accidents during leisure time where mobile phones played a role, with lower rates at work. Men, younger people, and those reporting sleep problems or minor aches showed higher accident rates while using phones.
Kato Y, Johansson O. · 2012
Researchers surveyed 75 people in Japan who reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), a condition where individuals experience symptoms they attribute to EMF exposure from devices like cell phones and base stations. The study found that 85% reported severe fatigue, 81% experienced memory and concentration problems, and many had to make major life changes including job loss and relocating to avoid EMF sources. Most participants (65%) reported feeling sick from other people's mobile phones on public transportation, highlighting the profound social and economic impacts of this condition.
Bortkiewicz A et al. · 2012
Polish researchers surveyed 500 households living near cell phone towers to assess health symptoms and their relationship to EMF exposure. They found that 57% of residents reported headaches, with the highest rates occurring in people living 100-150 meters from towers, while memory problems were most common in those living farther away. Surprisingly, symptom frequency didn't correlate with measured electric field strength, suggesting current exposure assessment methods may be inadequate.
Baliatsas C, Van Kamp I, Lebret E, Rubin GJ. · 2012
Researchers analyzed 63 studies to understand how scientists identify people who report being hypersensitive to electromagnetic fields (EMF). They found that researchers use wildly different criteria to define EMF hypersensitivity, making it nearly impossible to compare studies or understand the true scope of the condition. The lack of standardized identification methods creates confusion in both research and clinical practice.
Heinrich S, Thomas S, Heumann C, von Kries R, Radon K. · 2011
German researchers equipped over 3,000 children and teens with personal radiation meters for 24 hours to measure their actual exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from cell phones and other wireless devices. They then looked for connections between measured exposure levels and chronic symptoms like fatigue and headaches. The study found no statistically significant link between RF exposure and health complaints, with all measured exposure levels falling far below international safety guidelines.
Thomée S, Härenstam A, Hagberg M · 2011
Swedish researchers followed over 4,000 young adults for one year to examine whether mobile phone use patterns affect mental health. They found that heavy phone users were more likely to experience stress, sleep problems, and depression symptoms, with the strongest effects among those who felt pressured to always be accessible. The study suggests that how we use our phones psychologically matters as much as how often we use them.
Thomée S, Härenstam A, Hagberg M. · 2011
Swedish researchers followed over 4,000 young adults for one year to examine how mobile phone use affects mental health. They found that heavy phone users were significantly more likely to develop stress, sleep problems, and depression symptoms compared to light users. The strongest predictor wasn't just frequency of use, but feeling stressed about being constantly accessible through their phone.
Mortazavi SM et al. · 2011
Researchers tested whether people who claim to be sensitive to cell phone radiation can actually detect when they're being exposed to it. They studied 20 university students who reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity, exposing them to real and fake cell phone radiation while monitoring their vital signs. Only 25% could tell the difference between real and fake exposure (no better than random chance), and their heart rate, breathing, and blood pressure showed no changes during actual radiation exposure.
