Redmayne M, Inyang I, Dimitriadis C, Benke G, Abramson MJ · 2010
Researchers studied the relationship between cordless phone and mobile phone use among 317 Australian teenagers. They found that students who used mobile phones frequently also tended to use cordless phones frequently, creating a strong correlation between the two types of radiofrequency exposure. This matters because most health studies only measure mobile phone exposure while ignoring cordless phones, potentially underestimating people's total RF radiation exposure.
Kwon MS et al. · 2010
Researchers tested whether cell phone radiation affects children's brain processing of sounds by placing GSM phones emitting 902 MHz signals next to 17 children's heads for 12 minutes while measuring brain activity. They found no statistically significant changes in the children's auditory processing abilities during exposure. However, the study was only large enough to detect major effects, meaning smaller impacts could have been missed.
Thomas S et al. · 2010
Australian researchers followed 236 seventh-grade students for one year to see if mobile phone use affected their thinking abilities. They found some small changes in how quickly students responded to computer tests, but these changes were likely due to statistical variations rather than actual phone exposure effects. The study suggests that mobile phone use doesn't meaningfully impact cognitive function in adolescents over a one-year period.
Kwon MS et al. · 2010
Researchers tested whether cell phone radiation affects children's ability to process sounds by measuring brain activity in 17 children aged 11-12 while they were exposed to 902 MHz signals from a GSM phone. The study found no significant changes in the brain's auditory processing or sound memory functions during short exposures (12 minutes total). However, the researchers noted their study could only detect large effects, meaning smaller impacts might have gone unnoticed.
Heinrich S, Thomas S, Heumann C, von Kries R, Radon K · 2010
German researchers used personal dosimeters to measure radiofrequency radiation exposure in nearly 3,000 children and adolescents over 24 hours, then tracked acute symptoms like headaches and concentration problems. While they found a few statistically significant associations between higher RF exposure and symptoms, the researchers concluded these were likely due to chance rather than actual health effects because the results weren't consistent and disappeared when analyzing the highest-exposed participants separately.
Thomas S et al. · 2010
Researchers followed 236 Australian teenagers for one year to see how mobile phone use affected their thinking abilities. Students who used their phones more showed faster response times on computer-based cognitive tests, though the researchers noted this improvement might be due to statistical factors rather than actual phone effects. The study found changes in reaction speed but not accuracy on mental tasks.
Thomas S, Heinrich S, von Kries R, Radon K. · 2010
Researchers measured actual radiofrequency radiation exposure in over 3,000 German children and teenagers using personal dosimeters for 24 hours, then assessed their behavior using standardized questionnaires. They found that adolescents with the highest RF exposure were 2.2 times more likely to have behavioral problems, while both children and adolescents showed nearly 3 times higher rates of conduct problems. This matters because it's one of the first studies to use objective exposure measurements rather than relying on self-reported phone use.
Heinrich S, Thomas S, Heumann C, von Kries R, Radon K. · 2010
German researchers used personal dosimeters to measure radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in nearly 3,000 children and adolescents over 24 hours, then tracked acute symptoms like headaches and concentration problems. They found a few statistically significant associations between higher RF exposure and symptoms, but these results were inconsistent and disappeared when analyzing the highest-exposed participants. The researchers concluded the observed effects likely occurred by chance rather than representing true causal relationships.
Christ A, Gosselin MC, Christopoulou M, Kühn S, Kuster N. · 2010
Researchers used MRI-based head models to compare how cell phone radiation is absorbed in children's brains versus adults' brains. They found that children absorb significantly more radiation in key brain regions like the cortex, hippocampus, and hypothalamus (over 3 dB higher), with bone marrow showing even greater increases (over 10 dB higher). This happens because children's smaller heads place these tissues closer to the phone, even though overall head absorption remains similar between age groups.
Thomas S, Heinrich S, von Kries R, Radon K · 2010
German researchers studied over 3,000 children and teens, measuring their actual radiofrequency EMF exposure from cell towers and wireless networks over 24 hours using personal dosimeters. They found that adolescents with the highest RF exposure levels were more than twice as likely to show behavioral problems, particularly conduct issues like aggression or rule-breaking. The exposure levels were well below safety limits, suggesting behavioral effects may occur at everyday environmental levels.
Söderqvist F, Hardell L, Carlberg M, Mild KH · 2010
Researchers exposed 41 people to cell phone radiation for 30 minutes and found increased levels of transthyretin, a protein that helps prevent Alzheimer's disease by blocking harmful brain plaques. This suggests certain radiofrequency exposures might offer protective effects against Alzheimer's.
Rağbetlı MC et al. · 2010
Researchers exposed pregnant mice to mobile phone radiation at levels similar to what humans experience (0.95 W/kg SAR) and found a significant decrease in Purkinje cells in the developing cerebellum of offspring. Purkinje cells are critical neurons that control movement, balance, and coordination. This study suggests that prenatal exposure to mobile phone radiation may affect brain development in areas responsible for motor function.
Fragopoulou AF et al. · 2010
Researchers exposed mice to 900MHz cell phone radiation for 2 hours daily over 4 days, then tested their spatial memory using maze tasks. Exposed mice showed significant learning and memory deficits compared to unexposed mice, suggesting mobile phone radiation may impair brain function.
Arendash GW et al. · 2010
Researchers exposed mice to cell phone-level radiation (918 MHz) and found it improved memory and reduced Alzheimer's-related brain deposits in both normal and Alzheimer's mice. While promising for potential treatments, these mouse results require extensive human studies before any clinical applications.
Sun H, Che Y, Liu X, Zhou D, Miao Y, Ma Y. · 2010
Researchers exposed chick embryos to 50-Hz magnetic fields (the type from power lines) during development and tested their memory after hatching. Chicks exposed to magnetic fields showed impaired memory formation, but only when they were stressed during testing. This suggests that electromagnetic field exposure during development may make the brain more vulnerable to memory problems under stressful conditions.
Fragopoulou AF et al. · 2010
Greek researchers exposed mice to cell phone radiation (900 MHz) for 2 hours daily over 4 days. The exposed mice showed significant deficits in learning and remembering spatial information compared to unexposed mice, suggesting cell phone radiation may impair brain memory functions.
Arendash GW et al. · 2010
Researchers exposed mice to cell phone radiation (918 MHz) for one hour daily over eight months. The exposure improved memory and reduced Alzheimer's-related brain plaques in both normal and Alzheimer's-prone mice, suggesting certain electromagnetic fields might benefit brain health.
Marino AA, Carrubba S · 2009
Researchers analyzed 55 studies examining whether mobile phone radiation affects brain electrical activity measured by EEG. They found that 87% of these studies were funded by the wireless industry, and that both positive and negative studies had serious methodological flaws that prevented reliable conclusions. The authors argue that this systematic doubt about EMF effects was manufactured by industry funding rather than reflecting genuine scientific uncertainty.
Furubayashi T et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 54 women (including 11 with self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity) to cell tower radiation at 10 V/m for 30 minutes in a controlled lab setting. Neither group could detect when they were actually being exposed to EMF, and both groups showed identical biological responses whether exposed to real or fake radiation. The study found no evidence that people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity react differently to cell tower emissions than healthy controls.
Eltiti S et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 88 people (including those who reported electromagnetic sensitivity) to cell tower signals for 50 minutes while testing their memory, attention, and heart rate. The study found no differences in cognitive performance or physiological measures between real exposure and fake exposure sessions. This suggests that brief exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't immediately impair thinking or basic body functions.
Eltiti S et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 88 people (including those who claimed to be sensitive to electromagnetic fields) to cell tower signals for 50 minutes while they performed memory and attention tests. The study found no effects on cognitive performance or physiological measures like heart rate and skin conductance in either sensitive or control participants. This suggests that short-term exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't impair brain function or cause detectable physical responses.
Abramson MJ et al. · 2009
Researchers studied 317 Australian teenagers to see if mobile phone use affected their thinking abilities. They found that teens who made more phone calls had faster but less accurate responses on cognitive tests, with poorer working memory and learning performance. Importantly, the same effects occurred with text messaging, suggesting the changes came from phone usage habits rather than radiofrequency radiation exposure.
Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, Nayak S, Mailankot M. · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to mobile phone signals for 4 weeks (50 missed calls daily) and then tested their ability to navigate a water maze to find a hidden platform. The phone-exposed rats took three times longer to find the target area and spent half as much time in the correct location compared to unexposed rats. This suggests that mobile phone radiation may impair spatial memory and learning abilities.
Luria R, Eliyahu I, Hareuveny R, Margaliot M, Meiran N. · 2009
Israeli researchers tested how cell phone radiation affects thinking speed by having 48 men perform memory tasks while GSM phones were placed on different sides of their heads. They found that when the phone was on the left side of the head, participants responded significantly slower with their right hand during the first few minutes of exposure. This suggests cell phone radiation can temporarily impair cognitive performance, and that the specific placement of the phone and timing of exposure matter for detecting these effects.
Daniels WM, Pitout IL, Afullo TJ, Mabandla MV. · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to electromagnetic radiation in the mobile phone frequency range and tested their behavior, brain structure, and stress hormone levels. While they found no changes in learning ability or brain structure, exposed rats showed decreased movement, increased grooming behaviors, and higher stress hormone levels. These behavioral changes suggest that mobile phone radiation may disrupt normal brain function even when obvious structural damage isn't visible.
