Unknown authors · 2007
This 2007 study explains how humans and animals can actually hear microwave pulses, a phenomenon where electromagnetic waves create audible sounds inside the head. The research shows that pulsed microwaves heat tissue, creating pressure waves that travel through bone to the inner ear, where they're perceived as clicking or buzzing sounds. This finding has important implications for understanding exposure to wireless devices and MRI equipment.
Platano D et al. · 2007
Researchers studied the non-thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on barium currents through voltage-gated calcium channels in primary cultures of rat cortical neurons using the patch-clamp technique. Neurons were exposed for one to three periods of 90 seconds to 900 MHz continuous wave or GSM-modulated signals during whole-cell recording at specific absorption rates of 2 W/kg for both modulation types. Single or multiple acute exposures to either continuous wave or GSM-modulated 900 MHz fields did not significantly alter the current amplitude or the current-voltage relationship through voltage-gated calcium channels.
Platano D et al. · 2007
Italian researchers exposed rat brain cells to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used by GSM cell phones) for short periods to see if it affected calcium channels, which are crucial for nerve cell communication. They found no changes in how calcium moved through these channels, even at radiation levels of 2 W/kg. This suggests that brief cell phone-level exposures may not immediately disrupt this particular aspect of brain cell function.
Shirai T et al. · 2007
Pregnant F344 rats received a single dose of ENU on gestational day 18. Rats were exposed to a 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signal for 90 minutes a day, 5 days a week, for 104 weeks starting at 5 weeks of age. Brain average specific absorption rates were designed to be .67 and 2.0 W/kg for low and high exposures, respectively. The incidence and numbers of brain tumors in female rats exposed to 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signals showed tendencies to increase but without statistical significance, and overall no significant increase in incidences or numbers was detected in either males or females.
Juutilainen J, Heikkinen P, Soikkeli H, Mäki-Paakkanen J. · 2007
Unknown authors · 2007
Researchers tested 84 young healthy adults on two forced-choice tasks to detect a GSM mobile phone field at 902 MHz pulsed at 217 Hz. Participants completed 600 trials across three conditions per task with a monetary prize for 75% accuracy, but performance was no better than chance and no one won. Two participants scored 97% and 94% in one condition but failed to replicate the result in a retest one month later. Six participants who reported being able to perceive the field performed no better than others.
Chauhan V et al. · 2007
Researchers exposed human-derived cell lines TK6, HL60, and Mono-Mac-6 to intermittent 1.9 GHz pulse-modulated RF fields for 6 hours at SARs of 0, 1, and 10 W/kg. Cell viability, apoptosis, and cell cycle kinetics were measured immediately after exposure and 18 hours later. Cytokine expression (TNFA, IL1B, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL12) was also assessed. No detectable changes in cell viability, cell cycle kinetics, apoptosis, or cytokine expression were observed in any exposed group compared to sham controls. The positive heat-shock control showed decreased viability, increased apoptosis, and a G(2)/M cell cycle block.
Sanchez et al. · 2007
The study investigated heat-shock protein expression and apoptosis in human primary keratinocytes and fibroblasts. The exposure used a GSM-1800 signal at 1800 MHz with 217 Hz modulation for 48 hours at an SAR of 2 W/kg. The GSM-1800 exposure produced no effect on either cell type, while UVB radiation and heat shock injured cells. The authors concluded that the GSM-1800 signal does not act as a stress factor on human primary skin cells in vitro.
Del Giudice E et al. · 2007
Italian researchers exposed human brain cancer cells to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields (the same frequency as European power lines) and found significantly increased production of beta-amyloid peptide, a toxic protein that accumulates in Alzheimer's disease. The overnight exposure at 3.1 millitesla didn't kill the cells but stimulated them to produce more of the harmful protein linked to dementia.
Del Giudice E et al. · 2007
Researchers tested whether low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure could affect amyloid-related processes in cultured cells. The study exposed H4 neuroglioma cells, which overexpress human mutant amyloid precursor protein, to a 3.1 mT 50 Hz electromagnetic field. Overnight exposure led to a significant increase in amyloid-beta peptide secretion, including the isoform Abeta 1-42, without affecting cell survival.
Unknown authors · 2007
Researchers crushed the sciatic nerves of rats and exposed them to electromagnetic fields at three different amplitudes plus a sham control. Whole-body exposure lasted four hours per day for five days using a solenoid coil that generated bipolar rectangular pulses at two pulses per second. Walking function was measured over 43 days by video recording the spread of toes one through five on the injured and uninjured hind limbs. No difference in toe-spread recovery appeared between any of the electromagnetic field treatments and the sham exposure.
Tahvanainen K et al. · 2007
Chauhan V et al. · 2007
Researchers examined the effect of RF field exposure on late onset gene expression in U87MG cells after a 24 h exposure period. A human monocyte-derived cell line (MM6) was exposed to intermittent RF fields for 6 h and gene expression was assessed immediately and at 18 h postexposure. Both cell lines were exposed to 1.9 GHz pulse-modulated RF fields for 6 or 24 h at SARs of 0.1-10.0 W/kg. The study found no evidence that nonthermal RF field exposure altered gene expression in either U87MG or MM6 cells relative to nonirradiated controls. Heat shock at 43°C for 1 h altered the expression of well-characterized heat-shock proteins in both cell lines.
Unknown authors · 2007
Ning W, Xu SJ, Chiang H, Xu ZP, Zhou SY, Yang W, Luo JH · 2007
Researchers cultured hippocampal neurons from rats and exposed them to GSM 1800 MHz microwaves at either 2.4 or 0.8 W/kg for 15 minutes each day from DIV6 to DIV14. At 2.4 W/kg, the density and mobility of dendritic filopodia at DIV8 and the density of mature spines at DIV14 were significantly decreased, and the average length of dendrites per neuron at DIV10 and DIV14 was also decreased. Dendritic arborization was unaltered in the exposed neurons, and no significant changes were found in neurons exposed to 0.8 W/kg.
Ning W, Xu SJ, Chiang H, Xu ZP, Zhou SY, Yang W, Luo JH · 2007
Researchers exposed developing rat brain cells (hippocampal neurons) to cell phone radiation at 1800 MHz for 15 minutes daily over 8 days. At the higher exposure level (2.4 W/kg), the radiation significantly disrupted normal brain cell development, reducing the formation of dendrites (the branch-like structures neurons use to communicate) and synapses (connection points between neurons). This suggests cell phone radiation during critical developmental periods could interfere with normal brain formation.
Carrubba S, Frilot C, Chesson AL, Marino AA. · 2007
Researchers exposed eight people to weak 60 Hz magnetic fields (1 gauss) for 2 seconds and measured their brain activity using specialized electrodes. They discovered that human brains can detect these low-level magnetic fields and respond in complex, nonlinear ways that standard testing methods miss. This suggests humans may have an evolutionary magnetic sensing ability that makes us vulnerable to artificial electromagnetic fields in our environment.
Unknown authors · 2007
Researchers measured electric current perception thresholds in self-declared EHS persons recruited from a self-aid group, newspaper responders, and persons seeking investigations. Quantitative electrosensitivity differed among the three recruitment groups. The self-aid group members overlapped considerably with the general population sample. Pooled EHS persons differed significantly from the general population but with pronounced overlap with the normal range.
Masuda H et al. · 2007
Researchers exposed rat heads to 1439 MHz RF-EMF for 10 minutes at three intensity doses of 0.6, 2.4, and 4.8 W/kg BASAR. They measured blood-brain barrier permeability, leukocyte behavior, plasma velocity, and vessel diameter using a closed cranial window method. No extravasation of intravenously injected dyes from pial venules was found at any BASAR level. No significant changes in the number of endothelial-adhering leukocytes after exposure were found. Plasma velocities and vessel diameters remained constant within the physiological range throughout each exposure.
Unknown authors · 2007
Cinel C, Boldini A, Russo R, Fox E · 2007
Saran A et al. · 2007
Two hundred Ptc1+/- mice and wild-type siblings were enrolled, and newborns were exposed to 900 MHz radiation at 0.4 W/kg average SAR for 5 days, 0.5 hours twice daily, or sham exposed. GSM-simulated RF fields did not affect survival, with no statistically significant differences between exposed and sham groups. No effects were seen on cerebellar tumors, rhabdomyosarcomas, or skin proliferative lesions.
Trigano A, Blandeau O, Dale C, Wong MF, Wiart J. · 2007
Researchers tested cellular phone interference with implantable loop recorders by placing phones 1 cm from externally applied devices in 45 patients. The ILR was positioned in the left parasternal region and the telemetry wand removed after regular programming. They used GSM phones at 900 MHz with 2 W output and PCS phones at 1800 MHz with 1 W output. The artifacts occurred without causing permanent device dysfunction or reprogramming.
Irlenbusch L et al. · 2007
Researchers measured the visual discrimination threshold in 33 subjects during both RF and sham exposures. Each experiment consisted of two 30-minute periods with a 5-minute break, and the threshold was recorded every 10 seconds. The RF exposure used a 902.4 MHz GSM signal pulsed at 217 Hz with a power flux density of 1 W/m². No statistically significant difference in the threshold was found between RF and sham exposures.
Irlenbusch L et al. · 2007
Researchers exposed 33 people to GSM mobile phone signals near their eyes to test whether radiofrequency radiation affects visual sensitivity (the ability to detect light differences). Using exposure levels similar to holding a phone close to your face, they found no measurable changes in visual discrimination abilities during 30-minute exposure sessions. This suggests that typical mobile phone use doesn't immediately impair basic visual function.
