Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers exposed rainbow trout to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (15 Hz) at various intensities for one hour daily over 60 days. The fish showed improved growth, stronger immune responses, and better disease resistance compared to unexposed controls. This suggests that certain EMF exposures may have beneficial biological effects in aquatic organisms.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured electromagnetic fields at two commercial solar farms in California, testing frequencies from 0 Hz to 3 GHz around solar panels, inverters, and transformers. All measured EMF levels fell well below established safety limits set by IEEE and ICNIRP. The highest magnetic fields occurred near transformers and inverters, with radiofrequency emissions between 5-100 kHz coming from the inverters.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured extremely low-frequency magnetic fields around electric substations at a petrochemical plant in Iran to identify hazardous exposure zones for workers. They found magnetic field levels ranging from 0.02 to 49.90 microtesla (μT), with the highest exposures near transformers, incoming panels, and cables. The study created hazard maps to help protect workers from chronic EMF exposure in industrial settings.
Prato FS · 2015
Researchers discovered that extremely low frequency magnetic fields can alter how the body responds to pain and opioid medications, with effects documented across species from snails to humans over 30 years of study. The findings show these magnetic fields can both increase and decrease pain sensitivity depending on exposure conditions. This research opens new possibilities for treating chronic pain using electromagnetic therapy.
Unknown authors · 2015
This large Nordic study tracked 5,409 acute myeloid leukemia cases and 27,045 controls across four countries to examine whether occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (like from power lines) or electrical shocks increases leukemia risk. The researchers found no association between either type of workplace exposure and acute myeloid leukemia development.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers examined whether weak 50/60 Hz magnetic fields from power lines could disrupt our internal body clocks by affecting cryptochromes, special proteins that help regulate circadian rhythms. The study tested the basic scientific premise behind this 'cryptochrome hypothesis' by looking at how static magnetic fields might change these proteins' chemical balance. This research aims to understand if everyday electromagnetic exposure could be throwing off our natural sleep-wake cycles.
Tomitsch J, Dechant E et al · 2015
Austrian researchers measured electromagnetic field levels in 219 bedrooms over six years (2006-2012), tracking changes in both power line frequencies and wireless radiation. They found power line electric fields decreased by 40% while wireless radiation nearly doubled, with urban areas showing 3.4 times higher wireless exposure than rural locations. The study reveals how our bedroom EMF environment has shifted dramatically toward wireless sources.
Unknown authors · 2015
Swedish researchers validated how accurately people remember when they first started using mobile phones by comparing self-reported dates with actual cellular network records from 207 participants. They found substantial errors in memory, with people typically misremembering their start date by several years, though both brain tumor patients and healthy controls showed similar recall problems.
Freudenstein F et al · 2015
This European study examined how people perceive risks from different radiofrequency EMF sources like cell towers and mobile phones, and whether better knowledge about EMF exposure affects their concerns. Researchers found that people worry most about cell towers compared to other RF sources, and surprisingly, those with better technical knowledge about EMF exposure actually had higher risk perception, especially for mobile phones.
Paul B et al · 2015
This 2015 Indian public health review examined the documented health effects of mobile phone radiofrequency radiation, including short-term impacts on sleep, heart rate, and blood pressure, plus long-term cancer risks. The authors called for stronger government regulations, enforcement of phone-free zones, and public education campaigns to reduce exposure.
Eltiti S et al · 2015
Researchers tested 102 people who claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields and 237 controls by exposing them to cell tower radiation in both open and double-blind conditions. People reported symptoms only when they knew they were being exposed, not during blinded trials, indicating no direct causal relationship between cell tower EMF and physical symptoms.
Gryz K et al · 2015
Researchers used computer modeling to test how the human body affects radiofrequency exposure measurements from personal monitoring devices worn at different body locations. They found that measurement errors ranged from -96% to +133% relative to the unperturbed field depending on where the device was worn, with a position on the waist toward the back or on the front of the chest reducing the range of uncertainty.
Unknown authors · 2015
This 2015 review analyzed multiple studies on mobile phone radiation and brain tumors, focusing on the French CERENAT study which found increased glioma risk with long-term mobile phone use. The authors concluded that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phones should be classified as a 'probable human carcinogen' by international health agencies.
Unknown authors · 2015
Japanese researchers exposed developing rats to 1457 MHz radiofrequency radiation at 2.0 W/kg for 50 minutes while directly measuring blood-brain barrier permeability using advanced microscopy. They found no changes in barrier function in either juvenile or young adult rats, with no evidence of protein leakage into brain tissue.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured radiofrequency radiation exposure at two television stations in Ghana to assess worker safety. They found RF levels ranging from 0.006 to 58.5 volts per meter, which stayed below occupational safety limits but exceeded public exposure guidelines by up to 4.3 times in some areas. This highlights how workplace RF exposure can be significantly higher than what's considered safe for the general public.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers exposed Alzheimer's disease mice to 1950 MHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to cell phone frequencies) for 8 months and found it significantly reduced amyloid plaques in the brain and improved memory function. The study suggests RF exposure may have protective effects against Alzheimer's pathology, though only in mice already showing disease symptoms, not healthy brains.
Unknown authors · 2015
Israeli researchers measured radiofrequency radiation exposure across 25 occupations using RF equipment, from medical devices to walkie-talkies. They found walkie-talkie users had the highest exposures at 94% of safety limits, while most other jobs stayed below 1% of recommended thresholds. The study reveals significant workplace RF exposure variations that workers and employers should understand.
Unknown authors · 2015
This 2015 scientific review examined how radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from cell towers and wireless infrastructure may disrupt wildlife navigation systems. The research found that RF radiation at environmental levels commonly found in urban areas and near base stations can interfere with animals' ability to sense Earth's magnetic field for orientation. This poses particular risks for migratory birds and insects that rely on magnetic navigation.
Unknown authors · 2015
This 2015 policy review examined how different countries and organizations advise on children's exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from wireless devices. The researcher found wildly inconsistent approaches, ranging from no special precautions to extensive warnings, product bans, and mandatory exposure labeling. The review calls for minimum RF-EMF exposure for children as a basic health precaution, given that long-term safety cannot be guaranteed.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured radiofrequency radiation levels inside buildings across 343 locations in Hebron, Palestine, from sources like cell towers, FM radio, WiFi, and cordless phones. They found maximum exposure levels about 100 times below international safety guidelines, with FM radio contributing nearly half of total indoor RF exposure. The study reveals that most indoor RF exposure (73%) actually comes from outdoor sources like broadcasting stations and cell towers.
Kottou S et al. · 2015
Greek researchers measured electromagnetic field levels in over 4,500 indoor locations across three regions, focusing on extremely low frequency magnetic fields and radiofrequency electric fields that health agencies consider possibly cancer-causing. They found that while EMF levels varied by location and distance from sources, all measurements remained well below current safety limits set by European regulators. The study provides baseline data on typical indoor EMF exposure levels in Greek homes.
Percherancier Y et al. · 2015
Researchers exposed mouse cells to 50 Hz magnetic fields for 24 hours to study whether these fields affect gap junctions (tiny channels that allow cells to communicate with each other). They found no impact on cell communication at the magnetic field strengths tested (0.4 and 1 mT), contradicting some previous studies that suggested power frequency fields could disrupt this cellular function.
Xiong DF, Liu JW, Li ZX, Zeng GC, Li HL · 2015
Researchers studied 310 electrical workers who regularly inspect power transformers and distribution lines to see if their exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields caused oxidative stress (cellular damage from harmful molecules). They measured multiple markers of cellular damage and DNA damage in blood samples, comparing the workers to 300 office staff with minimal EMF exposure. The study found no significant differences between the two groups in any of the damage markers tested.
Zhou LY et al. · 2015
Chinese researchers surveyed over 32,000 pregnant women in Beijing from 2000 to 2013 to identify risk factors for early miscarriage. They found that living within 100 meters of a cell tower was an independent risk factor for spontaneous abortion, along with having a cold during pregnancy, home decoration, pet ownership, and high anxiety levels. The study suggests that proximity to wireless infrastructure may pose reproductive health risks.
Zalata A et al. · 2015
Researchers exposed human sperm samples from 124 men to cell phone radiation for one hour in laboratory conditions. The radiation significantly reduced sperm movement and increased DNA damage, with the worst effects seen in men who already had fertility problems. This suggests that cell phone radiation may harm male fertility by damaging sperm quality and genetic material.
