6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Research Guide

Is 5G Safe? What the Research Actually Shows

Based on 415 peer-reviewed studies

Share:
At a Glance

Of the 412 peer-reviewed studies in this collection on radiofrequency exposure, 298 — 72.3% — reported biological effects. Millimeter waves are represented, but as cell-culture work at 60 GHz rather than at the 24–47 GHz bands high-band 5G deploys on, and not in people — so the distinctive part of 5G is studied at one remove rather than directly. Lower-band 5G uses frequencies already covered by decades of research, where effects are documented but dose matters: one careful study found no DNA damage in human cells until average absorption reached at least 5.0 W/kg.

Based on analysis of 415 peer-reviewed studies

5G technology has generated significant public concern about health effects. The topic has also attracted misinformation, making it difficult for people to understand what scientific research actually shows about 5G safety.

5G operates across different frequency bands—some similar to existing 4G networks, others using higher frequencies (millimeter waves) that are relatively new for widespread consumer exposure. This page focuses on what peer-reviewed research says about radiofrequency radiation at 5G frequencies.

We present the scientific evidence objectively, including both studies that raise concerns and those that find no effects, so you can make informed judgments based on actual research.

Key Findings

  • -298 of 412 studies (72.3%) in this collection found biological effects from radiofrequency exposure
  • -Millimeter-wave research here is laboratory work at 60 GHz — exposure changed keratinocyte gene expression only when it raised temperature, leaving a small residual effect the heat control did not reproduce (Habauzit 2014); nothing covers the 24–47 GHz bands 5G deploys on, and nothing is in people
  • -Dose determines the result — exposure of human lymphocytes for 3 or 24 hours produced no significant DNA damage, while 24-hour exposure at an average absorption of at least 5.0 W/kg did induce chromosomal damage (Tice 2002)
  • -DNA strand breaks in rat brain cells rose with dose rate across 0.6 and 1.2 W/kg after two hours of 2450 MHz exposure (Lai and Singh 1995)
  • -The mechanism appears to be free radicals — melatonin and a spin-trap compound, both free radical scavengers, blocked radiofrequency-induced DNA strand breaks (Lai and Singh 1997)

What the Research Shows

What 5G Actually Is, for Research Purposes

5G is not one thing. Low-band and mid-band 5G operate at frequencies overlapping what 4G, WiFi and cordless phones have used for years, and those frequencies carry decades of study. High-band 5G uses millimeter waves, which is genuinely new for consumer deployment. Of the 412 peer-reviewed studies indexed here on radiofrequency exposure, of which 298 (72.3%) reported biological effects, millimeter waves are represented — but the work sits at 60 GHz, above the 24–47 GHz range high-band 5G actually deploys on, and it is done in cell cultures rather than people.

Habauzit and colleagues (2014) exposed human keratinocytes to 60 GHz and found 665 genes differentially expressed. When the temperature rise was held constant, that change disappeared. A heat-shock control did not reproduce the exposure exactly, leaving 34 genes that suggest a small specific electromagnetic effect on top of the heating. Le Quément and colleagues (2014) exposed the same cell type at 20 mW/cm² and found no change in endoplasmic-reticulum stress markers at baseline; where exposure did alter the stress response, the controls tied it to heat.

That is the shape of the millimeter-wave evidence here: mostly thermal, with a small residual effect, in cells. For the part of 5G that resembles existing technology, there is direct evidence. For the part that is new, there is adjacent evidence at the wrong frequency and the wrong scale.

What the Existing Research Found, and at What Dose

Tice and colleagues (2002) exposed cultured human blood cells to four different cellular signal technologies at 837 and 1909 MHz, including analog, TDMA, CDMA and GSM formats. Exposure for 3 or 24 hours did not produce a significant increase in DNA damage in leukocytes, and 3 hours did not increase micronucleated lymphocytes. Extended exposure at an average specific absorption rate of at least 5.0 W/kg did induce chromosomal damage. The conclusion is specific: these signals can damage chromosomes under extended exposure at that dose.

Lai and Singh (1995) exposed rats for two hours to 2450 MHz and found a dose-rate-dependent increase in DNA single-strand breaks in brain cells at whole-body absorption rates of 0.6 and 1.2 W/kg. Notably, immediately after pulsed exposure no significant effect appeared — the effect emerged with continuous-wave exposure and at four hours after pulsed exposure. Their 1996 follow-up found both single- and double-strand breaks at 1.2 W/kg.

The Mechanism

Lai and Singh (1997) tested whether free radicals explain the damage by treating rats with melatonin or the spin-trap compound PBN before and after exposure. Both blocked the DNA strand breaks. Since both are efficient free radical scavengers, the result points at oxidative stress as the pathway rather than heating.

Leszczynski and colleagues (2002) showed a separate non-thermal response: one hour of mobile phone exposure changed the phosphorylation status of numerous proteins in human endothelial cells, including heat shock protein-27, at intensities that did not heat the cells.

Putting Dose in Context

The exposures producing these effects — 0.6 to 5.0 W/kg — are far above what a person absorbs from a distant 5G antenna, and in the range of a phone held against the head. Ambient exposure from network infrastructure is typically thousands of times lower than the levels in these experiments. A guide that reports the effects without the doses leaves out the part that determines whether they apply to you.

What the Evidence Does Not Show

No study here demonstrates harm from 5G. The millimeter-wave work in this collection is cell-culture research at 60 GHz, not at 5G's own bands and not in people, which means claims that high-band 5G is dangerous and claims that it is proven safe are both running ahead of the evidence. The lower-band research shows real non-thermal biological effects, at doses generally above ambient network exposure and comparable to handset use.

Reducing Exposure If You Choose To

The dominant source for almost everyone is their own handset, not the network. Speaker mode or wired headphones remove most head exposure. Texting over calling reduces transmit time. Keeping the phone out of the bedroom overnight removes hours of close proximity. Using WiFi rather than cellular in weak-signal areas matters because a phone reaching for a distant tower transmits at higher power — which is also why more, closer antennas can lower handset output rather than raise total exposure.

Related Studies (415)

Comparison of chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes from people occupationally exposed to ionizing and radiofrequency radiation.

Lalic H, Lekic A, Radosevic-Stasic B. · 2001

Researchers investigated genotoxic effects of occupational exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation in 25 hospital workers and 20 radio-relay station workers using chromosome aberration analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes. Total chromosome aberrations were almost equally higher in both exposed groups compared to unexposed controls. Acentric fragments were the most frequent aberration and were significantly higher in both exposed groups than in controls. Dicentric fragments were also elevated in both exposed groups, while chromatid breaks increased only after ionizing radiation.

2-Methoxyethanol metabolism, embryonic distribution, and macromolecular adduct formation in the rat: the effect of radiofrequency radiation-induced hyperthermia.

Cheever KL et al. · 2001

Researchers exposed pregnant rats to 10 MHz radiofrequency radiation and measured metabolism and distribution of 2-methoxyethanol and its metabolite methoxyacetic acid. Radiofrequency exposure reduced total body clearance of radiolabeled 2-methoxyethanol but did not change methoxyacetic acid levels in serum, embryos, or extraembryonic fluid. Protein adduct formation in embryos did not differ in a way that would explain the reported synergy between radiofrequency radiation and 2-methoxyethanol.

Effects of acute exposure to the radiofrequency fields of cellular phones on plasma lipid peroxide and antioxidase activities in human erythrocytes.

Moustafa YM, Moustafa RM, Belacy A, Abou-El-Ela SH, Ali FM. · 2001

Researchers investigated the effect of acute exposure to radiofrequency fields from commercially available cellular phones on oxidative stress parameters in 12 healthy adult male volunteers. Each volunteer placed the phone in his pocket in standby position with the keypad facing the body. The parameters measured were lipid peroxide and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), total glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and catalase. Plasma lipid peroxide increased significantly after 1, 2, and 4 hours of exposure. SOD and GSH-Px activities in erythrocytes showed significant reduction, while catalase activity did not decrease significantly.

Effects of radiofrequency exposure on the GABAergic system in the rat cerebellum: clues from semi-quantitative immunohistochemistry

Mausset A, de Seze R, Montpeyroux F, Privat A · 2001

Researchers injected rats with gamma-vinyl-GABA to increase GABA levels and then used immunohistochemistry and image analysis to measure cerebellar GABA content. They exposed rats to 900 MHz pulsed radiofrequency at 4 W/kg SAR and continuous waves at 32 W/kg SAR. Pulsed exposure selectively reduced the stained processes area in the Purkinje cell layer, while continuous exposure decreased optical density in all three cell layers. The authors noted that it is unknown whether these effects are partly due to local tissue heating.

Effect of extremely high frequency electromagnetic radiation of low intensity on parameters of humoral immunity in healthy mice.

Lushnikov et al. · 2001

Researchers exposed healthy male NMRI mice to 42.0 GHz electromagnetic radiation at an energy flux density of 0.15 mW/cm2 under several different exposure regimes. After repeated exposures for 20 days before immunization, thymic cellularity was reduced by 17.5% and spleen cellularity by 14.5%, both statistically significant. The humoral immune response itself did not change significantly under any of the exposure regimes tested.

Effects of mobile phone type signals on calcium levels within human leukaemic T-cells (Jurkat cells).

Cranfield CG, Wood AW, Anderson V, Menezes KG. · 2001

Researchers tested whether simulated GSM mobile phone signals at 915 MHz and 2 W kg(-1) influence calcium concentration or calcium signalling patterns in a human lymphocyte cell line. No significant changes were found in the regression slope of calcium fluorescence, mean calcium concentration, number of calcium spikes, or mean height of those spikes. A significant alteration in average frequency from Fourier spectra was found in one category only: pulsed wave exposure of activated cells.

Effects of electromagnetic fields produced by radiotelevision broadcasting stations on the immune system of women.

Boscol P et al. · 2001

The study investigated the immune systems of 19 women with a mean age of 35 years who had been exposed to electromagnetic fields from radiotelevision broadcasting stations in their residential area for at least 2 years, with a mean exposure duration of 13 years. The exposed group had mean field levels of 4.3 plus or minus 1.4 V/m in the range 500 KHz to 3 GHz, while the control group had nearby residential exposure of less than 1.8 V/m. The exposed women showed statistically significant reductions in several immune cell types and lower in vitro production of IL-2 and interferon-gamma by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The researchers concluded that high frequency electromagnetic fields reduce cytotoxic activity in the peripheral blood of women without a dose-response effect.

Effect of Exposure to 900 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation on Intrachromosomal Recombination in pKZ1 Mice.

Sykes PJ, McCallum BD, Bangay MJ, Hooker AM, Morley AA. · 2001

Researchers studied the effect of pulsed 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation at 4 W/kg on somatic intrachromosomal recombination in the spleen of pKZ1 mice. Mice were exposed daily for 30 minutes to 900 MHz fields for 1, 5, or 25 days, and spleen sections were screened for DNA inversion events three days after the last exposure. There was no significant difference between control and treated groups in the 1- and 5-day exposure groups, but a significant reduction in inversions was found in the 25-day group.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Cytogenetic investigations on microwavesemitted by a 455.7 MHz car phone

Maes A, Collier M, Verschaeve L · 2000

Researchers exposed human lymphocytes to 455.7 MHz microwaves from a car phone at a specific absorption rate of approximately 6.5 W/kg. No statistically significant difference was found between microwave-exposed and unexposed control samples for chromosome aberration or sister chromatid exchange frequency. When microwave exposure was followed by MMC treatment, some differences appeared between combined and MMC-only treatments, but results were inconsistent. Combined exposure with X-rays showed no indication of synergistic action between RF fields and X-rays. The authors concluded that the data do not support the hypothesis that RF fields act synergistically with chemical or physical mutagens.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Primary DNA Damage in Human Blood Lymphocytes Exposed In Vitro to 2450 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation.

Vijayalaxmi, Leal BZ, Szilagyi M, Prihoda TJ, Meltz ML · 2000

Human peripheral blood samples from three volunteers were exposed to pulsed-wave 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation for 2 hours. The exposure used a net forward power of 21 W with an average power density of 5 mW/cm2 and a mean specific absorption rate of 2.135 W/kg. DNA damage was measured using the alkaline comet assay immediately and 4 hours after exposure. No significant differences were found in comet tail length, fluorescence intensity, or tail moment between RF-exposed and sham-exposed lymphocytes at either time point. The response of lymphocytes exposed to ionizing radiation was significantly different from RF-radiation- and sham-exposed cells.

The simulation of the cooperative effect of development in a culture of early mouse embryos after irradiation with electromagnetic waves in the millimeter range.

Mezhevikina LM, Khramov RN, Lepikhov KA · 2000

Researchers cultured two-cell mouse embryos in vitro and exposed them to electromagnetic irradiation in the millimeter range. After 30 min of exposure, the embryos acquired the ability to develop on their own and could reach the stage of blastocyst in 150 microliters of Whitten cultural medium without serum or growth factors. The authors proposed that millimeter range electromagnetic waves activate metabolic processes and specifically the synthesis of factors controlling early embryonic development in culture.

Cellular Effects
Not an original health-effects study

Zeeman-Stark modeling of the RF EMF interaction with ligand binding.

Chiabrera A, Bianco B, Moggia E, Kaufman JJ, · 2000

The aim of the study was to observe Zeeman-Stark modeling of the RF EMF interaction with ligand binding. The model accounts for ion collision losses, endogenous forces, metabolic non-equilibrium, and thermal noise. The model predicts that ligand binding probability may be affected by low-intensity exogenous EMF when the receptor's potential energy well matches the radiofrequency photon energy. The authors state that the results point toward electromagnetic control of biochemical processes and the need for a new database of safety standards.

Ets1 oncogene induction by ELF-modulated 50 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field

Romano-Spica V, Mucci N, Ursini CL, Ianni A, Bhat NK · 2000

Researchers analyzed gene expression in hemopoietic and testicular cell types after exposure to 50 MHz radiofrequency radiation modulated at 16 Hz. They observed overexpression of ets1 mRNA in Jurkat T-lymphoblastoid and Leydig TM3 cell lines only when the 16 Hz modulation was present. A putative candidate gene was also repressed after EMF exposure.

Induction of micronuclei in human lymphocytes exposed in vitro to microwave radiation

Zotti-Martelli L, Peccatori M, Scarpato R, Migliore L · 2000

Researchers exposed human peripheral blood lymphocytes in vitro to electromagnetic fields at two frequencies, 2.45 and 7.7 GHz, at power densities of 10, 20, and 30 mW/cm2 for 15, 30, and 60 minutes. At a power density of 30 mW/cm2 and after exposures of 30 and 60 minutes, both frequencies led to an induction of micronuclei compared to control cultures. The researchers concluded that microwaves are able to cause cytogenetic damage in human lymphocytes mainly for both high power density and long exposure time.

CardiovascularNo Effects Found

Membrane potential and currents of isolated heart muscle cells exposed to pulsed radio frequency fields.

Linz et al. · 1999

Researchers tested the effects of radio frequency fields at 180, 900, and 1800 MHz on the electrical properties of isolated ventricular myocytes from guinea pigs and rats. The fields were applied using rectangular waveguides or a TEM cell at specific absorption rates up to 880 mW/kg, with 900 and 1800 MHz signals pulsed to the GSM standard. None of the tested electrophysiological parameters, including membrane potential, action potential, L-type calcium current, and potassium currents, were significantly changed by RF exposure. Lowering the temperature from 36°C to 24°C reduced current amplitude by almost 50% and shifted voltage dependence by about 5 mV, but RF exposure at the lower temperature still did not affect L-type calcium current.

IRIDIUM exposure increases c-fos expression in the mouse brain only at levels which likely result in tissue heating.

Morrissey JJ et al. · 1999

Researchers investigated the effects of a one-hour exposure of mice to a 1.6-GHz radiofrequency signal, either continuous wave or pulse-modulated at 11 Hz (IRIDIUM), on c-fos gene expression in the brain. C-fos expression was not significantly elevated until exposure levels exceeded six times the peak dose and 30 times the whole-body average dose relative to human cellular telephone exposure limits. The pattern of c-fos elevation in limbic cortex and subcortex areas was consistent with a stress response due to thermal perception and restraint, not a direct interaction of IRIDIUM energy with brain tissue.

[Resonance interactions of surface charged lipid vesicles with the microwave electromagnetic field].

Krasil'nikov PM · 1999

The study showed that collective excitations occur in an ionic medium on the surface of lipid membranes. These excitations result from fast lateral ion mobility and high-frequency displacement currents in the Stern layer at the charged membrane surface. This mechanism can induce resonant dipole moments on lipid vesicles, potentially underlying vesicle recognition and autooscillation mode of aggregation in colloidal solution.

[Effect of millimeter waves on the early development of the mouse and sea urchin embryo].

Galat VV et al. · 1999

Researchers investigated the effects of nonthermal millimeter-range electromagnetic radiation on early development of mouse and sea urchin embryos. An MRTA-01E-03 generator with a frequency of 54-78 GHz and radiation intensity of 0.06 mWt/cm2 was used, and embryos were irradiated for 30 minutes at the two-blastomere stage. More mouse embryos reached the blastocyst stage (97.3%) compared with controls (87.5%), and the total cultivation time to reach that stage was shorter (72 h) than in controls (96 h). For sea urchin embryos, the radiation had an effect only when embryos with weakened viability were tested.

Interaction of low level modulated RF radiation with Na+¯K+-ATPase.

Behari J, Kunjilwar KK, and Pyne S · 1998

Researchers studied the effect of low-level amplitude-modulated radiofrequency radiation on Na+–K+-ATPase activity in the brains of developing male Wistar rats aged 23 days. Rats were exposed to carrier wave frequencies of 147 MHz and its sub-harmonic frequencies 73.5 and 36.75 MHz, amplitude modulated at 16 and 76 Hz, for 30–35 days at 3 hours per day. Na+–K+-ATPase activity increased by around 19–20% in rats exposed with amplitude modulation at 16 Hz, and by around 15–16% in rats exposed with amplitude modulation at 76 Hz, compared to controls. The researchers concluded that the effect on Na+–K+-ATPase activity was insensitive to the carrier wave frequencies under investigation.

DNA damage in Molt-4 T- lymphoblastoid cells exposed to cellular telephone radiofrequency fields in vitro

Phillips et al. · 1998

Researchers exposed Molt-4 T-lymphoblastoid cells in vitro to pulsed radiofrequency signals at cellular telephone frequencies of 813.5625 MHz (iDEN® signal) and 836.55 MHz (TDMA signal) to detect DNA damage. The alkaline comet assay was used to measure DNA single-strand breaks in exposed cell cultures compared to sham-exposed cultures. At an SAR of 24 μW g−1, exposure to the iDEN® signal for 2 h and 21 h significantly increased DNA damage, while at 2.4 μW g−1 the same signal significantly decreased DNA damage. The researchers concluded that the data indicate a need to study the effects of exposure to RF signals on direct DNA damage and on the rate at which DNA damage is repaired.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in C6 glioma and primary glial cells exposed to a 836.55 MHz modulated radiofrequency field.

Stagg RB, Thomas WJ, Jones RA, Adey WR · 1997

Researchers exposed transformed and normal rat glial cells to an 836.55 MHz packet-modulated RF field at power densities of 0.09, 0.9, and 9 mW/cm2, with SARs from 0.15 to 59 muW/g. Primary rat glial cells showed no significant differences in DNA synthesis between sham and RF-exposed conditions for either log-phase or serum-starved cultures. C6 glioma cells exposed at 5.9 muW/g SAR showed small but significant increases in thymidine incorporation in 38% of experiments. Growth curves showed no differences between sham and RF-exposed cultures for either cell type, and doubling times of C6 glioma cells did not differ significantly.

What This Means for You

  1. Minimize the time your phone is directly against your body.
  2. Use speakerphone or air tube headphones for calls to keep the phone away from your head.
  3. When not in use, keep your phone at a distance rather than in your pocket.
  4. Consider a phone shield to deflect radiation away from your body. SYB Phone Shield

Further Reading:

Frequently Asked Questions

No study in this collection demonstrates harm from 5G. The frequencies 5G shares with 4G are well studied and show real non-thermal effects — DNA strand breaks in rat brain cells at 0.6 to 1.2 W/kg (Lai and Singh 1995), chromosomal damage in human cells under extended exposure at 5.0 W/kg or above (Tice 2002) — at doses generally well above ambient exposure from network infrastructure. The millimeter-wave research here is cell-culture work at 60 GHz, above the 24–47 GHz bands high-band 5G deploys on, and none of it is in people.
Partly. Low-band and mid-band 5G use frequency ranges already shared with 4G and WiFi, which carry decades of research. High-band 5G uses millimeter waves, which penetrate tissue less deeply. Millimeter-wave health research does exist here, but at 60 GHz in cell cultures rather than at the bands 5G deploys on or in people (Habauzit 2014, Le Quément 2014). Treating 5G as one uniform thing is what makes both the alarm and the reassurance imprecise.
For nearly everyone, the handset dominates. A phone held to the head delivers absorption in the range where experimental effects have been observed; a distant antenna delivers a small fraction of that. This is also why denser networks can reduce personal exposure — a phone with a strong signal transmits at lower power than one straining to reach a far-off tower.
Target the handset, since that is the dominant source. Use speaker mode or wired headphones for calls, text rather than call where it makes no difference, keep the phone out of the bedroom overnight, and prefer WiFi over cellular where the cellular signal is weak. These steps address absorbed dose directly and cost nothing.

Further Reading

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects and practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.