Eltiti S et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 88 people (including those who reported electromagnetic sensitivity) to cell tower signals for 50 minutes while testing their memory, attention, and heart rate. The study found no differences in cognitive performance or physiological measures between real exposure and fake exposure sessions. This suggests that brief exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't immediately impair thinking or basic body functions.
Aldinucci C et al. · 2009
Italian researchers exposed rat brain nerve terminals (synaptosomes) to 50 Hz magnetic fields at 2 milliTesla for 2 hours to study effects on basic cellular functions. They found no changes in energy production, calcium levels, membrane function, or oxidative stress markers. This suggests that power-frequency magnetic fields at this intensity don't disrupt fundamental brain cell processes.
Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L · 2009
Researchers measured blood levels of S100B protein (a marker of blood-brain barrier damage) in 314 Swedish adults to see if wireless phone use affected brain barrier function. They found no significant association between mobile or cordless phone use and elevated S100B levels, suggesting these devices don't appear to damage the protective barrier around the brain based on this marker.
Rağbetli MC, Aydinlioğlu A, Koyun N, Rağbetli C, Karayel M. · 2009
Researchers exposed pregnant mice to mobile phone radiation and examined whether it affected brain cell development in their offspring, specifically counting pyramidal cells in the hippocampus (a brain region crucial for memory and learning). They found no significant difference in brain cell numbers between exposed and unexposed mouse pups. While this suggests no developmental harm at the exposure levels tested, the researchers noted that more studies are needed given widespread mobile phone use around pregnant women.
Parazzini M et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 134 healthy young adults to 20 minutes of radiofrequency radiation from UMTS mobile phones at maximum power while testing their hearing function before and after exposure. The study found no consistent changes in hearing ability, ear function, or auditory processing after the RF exposure. This suggests that short-term exposure to cell phone radiation at typical usage levels does not cause immediate measurable damage to human hearing.
Lipping T et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed anesthetized pigs to GSM mobile phone radiation (890 MHz) to test whether radio frequency signals could trigger brain activity changes detectable in EEG measurements. The study used a highly sensitive testing method where anesthetized animals show exaggerated responses to even minor stimuli. Despite exposure levels of 31 W/kg (much higher than typical phone use), no changes in brain electrical activity were observed, though the animals did experience increased body temperature and heart rate.
Kwon MS et al. · 2009
Finnish researchers tested whether GSM mobile phone radiation affects the brain's ability to automatically detect changes in sounds, a key function for processing speech and music. They measured brain responses in 17 healthy adults while exposing them to 902 MHz radiation at levels typical of cell phone use (SAR up to 1.21 W/kg). The study found no changes in the brain's automatic sound processing abilities during EMF exposure.
Finnie JW, Chidlow G, Blumbergs PC, Manavis J, Cai Z · 2009
Researchers exposed pregnant mice to 900 MHz cell phone radiation (at 4 W/kg) for one hour daily throughout pregnancy to see if it caused stress in developing fetal brains. They found no evidence of cellular stress responses when they examined the brain tissue using specialized markers called heat shock proteins. This suggests that this level of radiofrequency exposure during pregnancy may not trigger detectable stress responses in developing brain tissue.
Finnie JW, Blumbergs PC, Cai Z, Manavis J · 2009
Researchers exposed mice to cell phone radiation at 900 MHz for either one hour or two years to see if it would increase a brain protein called aquaporin-4, which rises when the blood-brain barrier becomes leaky. They found no increase in this protein after either short or long-term exposure, suggesting that cell phone radiation at this level doesn't make the blood-brain barrier more permeable.
Eltiti S et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 88 people (including those who claimed to be sensitive to electromagnetic fields) to cell tower signals for 50 minutes while they performed memory and attention tests. The study found no effects on cognitive performance or physiological measures like heart rate and skin conductance in either sensitive or control participants. This suggests that short-term exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't impair brain function or cause detectable physical responses.
de Gannes FP et al. · 2009
French researchers exposed rats' heads to cell phone radiation (900 MHz GSM) for 2 hours to test whether it damages the blood-brain barrier (the protective layer around the brain) or kills brain cells. They found no evidence of brain damage or barrier leakage at exposure levels both below and above typical cell phone use. This study contradicted earlier research that had suggested cell phone radiation could harm the brain's protective barrier.
Abramson MJ et al. · 2009
Researchers studied 317 Australian teenagers to see if mobile phone use affected their thinking abilities. They found that teens who made more phone calls had faster but less accurate responses on cognitive tests, with poorer working memory and learning performance. Importantly, the same effects occurred with text messaging, suggesting the changes came from phone usage habits rather than radiofrequency radiation exposure.
Zareen N, Khan MY, Minhas LA. · 2009
Researchers exposed developing chicken embryos to mobile phone radiation during critical stages of eye development and found significant disruptions in retinal growth and pigmentation. Embryos exposed for 10 days showed stunted retinal growth, while those exposed for 15 days showed excessive growth with intense pigmentation changes. This suggests that radiofrequency radiation from mobile phones can interfere with normal eye development in developing embryos.
Wake K et al. · 2009
Researchers developed a method to accurately map how cell phone radiation (called SAR) spreads throughout the human brain using standard phone testing data. They found they could successfully estimate radiation exposure patterns in specific brain regions where tumors develop. This technique was used in the major INTERPHONE study to better understand the relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer risk.
Vrijheid M et al. · 2009
This study examined a critical flaw in mobile phone brain tumor research: people who refuse to participate in studies are less likely to use mobile phones regularly. Researchers found that non-participants used phones at lower rates (50-56%) compared to study participants (66-69%), creating a systematic bias that could underestimate cancer risks by about 10%. This means many studies may be missing the very people whose phone usage patterns could reveal stronger links to brain tumors.
Soderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L · 2009
Swedish researchers examined whether long-term mobile and cordless phone use affects the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier by measuring transthyretin, a protein that helps protect the brain. They found that men who used phones longer had higher transthyretin levels, while women showed elevated levels when blood was drawn soon after phone calls. These changes suggest that radiofrequency radiation may alter the brain's protective barriers.
Schüz J, Waldemar G, Olsen JH, Johansen C. · 2009
Danish researchers tracked over 420,000 mobile phone subscribers from 1982-1995 through 2003 to see if phone use was linked to brain and nervous system diseases. They found mobile phone users had 10-20% higher rates of migraine and vertigo, but surprisingly lower rates of dementia, Parkinson's disease, and epilepsy in men. The increased migraine and vertigo rates persisted even among long-term users of 10+ years.
Naziroğlu M, Gümral N · 2009
Turkish researchers exposed rats to WiFi-frequency radiation (2.45 GHz) for one hour daily over 28 days and found it depleted key brain antioxidants including vitamins A, C, and E. When rats were given selenium or L-carnitine supplements during exposure, these protective nutrients were largely restored, with L-carnitine showing stronger protective effects. This suggests that wireless device radiation creates oxidative stress in brain tissue, but certain antioxidants may help counteract this damage.
Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, Nayak S, Mailankot M. · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to mobile phone signals for 4 weeks (50 missed calls daily) and then tested their ability to navigate a water maze to find a hidden platform. The phone-exposed rats took three times longer to find the target area and spent half as much time in the correct location compared to unexposed rats. This suggests that mobile phone radiation may impair spatial memory and learning abilities.
Myung SK et al. · 2009
Researchers analyzed 23 studies involving nearly 38,000 people to examine whether mobile phone use increases tumor risk. While overall results showed no clear association, the highest-quality studies with proper blinding revealed a harmful effect, and people who used phones for 10 years or longer showed an 18% increased risk of tumors. The findings highlight how study design quality significantly affects results in EMF research.
Luria R, Eliyahu I, Hareuveny R, Margaliot M, Meiran N. · 2009
Israeli researchers tested how cell phone radiation affects thinking speed by having 48 men perform memory tasks while GSM phones were placed on different sides of their heads. They found that when the phone was on the left side of the head, participants responded significantly slower with their right hand during the first few minutes of exposure. This suggests cell phone radiation can temporarily impair cognitive performance, and that the specific placement of the phone and timing of exposure matter for detecting these effects.
Lu L, Xu H, Wang X, Guo G. · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) and found that this radiation broke down the blood-retinal barrier, a protective membrane that shields the eye's retina from harmful substances in the bloodstream. The breakdown occurred through increased production of nitric oxide, a chemical that damages the barrier's protective proteins. This suggests that electromagnetic radiation can compromise critical protective barriers in the eye, potentially leading to vision problems.
López-Martín E et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to GSM cell phone radiation (the type used in mobile phones) and found it specifically amplified brain activity in animals already prone to seizures. The pulse-modulated radiation from GSM signals affected different brain regions than continuous radiation, particularly areas involved in memory and emotion processing. This suggests that the specific pulsing pattern of cell phone signals may have unique effects on brain function, especially in vulnerable individuals.
Landgrebe M, Frick U, Hauser S, Hajak G, Langguth B. · 2009
German researchers compared 89 people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) to 107 matched controls to examine connections between EMF sensitivity and tinnitus (ringing in the ears). They found that tinnitus occurred in 50.7% of EHS patients versus only 17.5% of controls - nearly three times higher. The researchers suggest both conditions may stem from an overactive brain stress network rather than direct EMF exposure effects.
Hartikka H et al. · 2009
Finnish researchers studied 99 brain tumor patients to see if gliomas (a type of brain cancer) occurred more often in the part of the brain closest to where people hold their cell phones. They found that mobile phone users were twice as likely to develop tumors within 4.6 centimeters of their phone's typical position compared to non-users (28% vs 14%). This innovative approach directly examined whether radiofrequency radiation causes localized cancer effects in the brain region receiving the highest exposure.
