8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Cancer & Tumors

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 79% of 742 studies on cancer & tumors found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 742 studies examining cancer & tumors, 79% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on cancer & tumors at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in Context0.00002, 0.0002, 0.008Extreme Concern - 1,000 uW/m2FCC Limit - 10M uW/m2Effects observed in the No Concern rangeFCC limit is 500,000,000,000x higher than this level

Research Overview

  • -When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention.
  • -Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
  • -This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development. This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

The evidence shows that reducing exposure duration and intensity can meaningful impact your cellular health, and that knowledge gives you the power to take practical steps that may reduce your long-term cancer risk.

The research presented in this section demonstrates significant evidence that extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposures can cause DNA damage and genetic alterations relevant to leukemia development.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 742 studies

Microwave electromagnetic field regulates gene expression in T-lymphoblastoid leukemia CCRF-CEM cell line exposed to 900 MHz.

Trivino Pardo JC, Grimaldi S, Taranta M, Naldi I, Cinti C. · 2012

Italian researchers exposed leukemia cells to 900 MHz microwave radiation (the same frequency used by many cell phones) and found that it altered gene expression patterns within the cells. The study identified specific biological pathways that were disrupted by the electromagnetic field exposure. This suggests that cell phone frequency radiation can trigger measurable changes at the genetic level in cancer cells.

2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca²⁺ influx in human leukemia cancer cells.

Nazıroğlu M, Ciğ B, Doğan S, Uğuz AC, Dilek S, Faouzi D. · 2012

Researchers exposed human leukemia cancer cells to 2.45 GHz radiation (the same frequency used by WiFi and microwaves) for periods ranging from 1 to 24 hours. They found that this radiation caused cancer cells to multiply more rapidly and triggered harmful oxidative stress by allowing excess calcium to flood into the cells. The longer the exposure, the more pronounced these effects became.

Mobile phone use and glioma risk: comparison of epidemiological study results with incidence trends in the United States.

Little MP et al. · 2012

Researchers compared cancer registry data from 1992-2008 with predictions based on two major studies that found increased brain cancer (glioma) risk from mobile phone use. They found that actual brain cancer rates remained steady during this period, even as mobile phone use increased from nearly 0% to almost 100% of the US population. This suggests the higher cancer risks reported in one Swedish study may not reflect real-world population-level impacts.

A population-based case-control study of radiofrequency exposure in relation to childhood neoplasm.

Li CY, Liu CC, Chang YH, Chou LP, Ko MC. · 2012

Taiwanese researchers analyzed cancer rates in over 2,600 children living near cell phone towers, comparing them to nearly 78,000 healthy children. They found that children living in areas with higher radiofrequency radiation from cell towers had a 13% increased risk of developing cancer overall. While the increased risk for specific cancers like leukemia and brain tumors wasn't statistically significant, the pattern suggests concern about long-term exposure to tower radiation.

Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones and Survival of Patients with Glioma.

Hardell L, Carlberg M. · 2012

Swedish researchers followed 1,251 brain tumor patients for over a decade to see if wireless phone use affected their survival after diagnosis. They found that patients with glioma (a type of brain tumor) who used mobile or cordless phones for more than 10 years had a 20% higher risk of dying compared to non-users. The effect was strongest for the most aggressive type of brain tumor (glioblastoma), where long-term phone users had a 30% higher death rate.

Are frequent dental x-ray examinations associated with increased risk of vestibular schwannoma?

Han YY et al. · 2012

Researchers studied 343 patients with vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma), a type of brain tumor that develops on the nerve connecting the ear to the brain. They found that people who received dental X-rays once a year or every 2-5 years had more than double the risk of developing these tumors compared to those who had dental X-rays less than once every 5 years. Interestingly, the study found no association between cell phone use and these tumors, contradicting some previous research.

On the association between glioma, wireless phones, heredity and ionising radiation.

Carlberg M, Hardell L. · 2012

Swedish researchers analyzed brain tumor cases over six years and found that people who used mobile phones or cordless phones on the same side of their head where tumors developed had nearly 3 times higher risk of glioma (a serious brain cancer) after 10+ years of use. The risk was even higher for aggressive tumors and for people who started using wireless phones before age 20. This suggests long-term wireless phone use may increase brain cancer risk, especially when the phone is held against the same side of the head where tumors later appear.

Effects of extremely low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on morphological and biochemical properties of human breast carcinoma cells (T47D).

Sadeghipour R et al. · 2012

Researchers exposed human breast cancer cells to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and found the EMF slowed cancer cell growth while increasing cellular stress. Higher frequencies (217 Hz) caused more dramatic effects than lower ones (100 Hz), showing cancer cells respond differently to specific EMF frequencies.

Cancer & Tumors160 citations

Interphone Study Group (2011) Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study

Unknown authors · 2011

The INTERPHONE study examined 1,105 acoustic neuroma patients and 2,145 controls across 13 countries to investigate whether mobile phone use increases brain tumor risk. Overall, the study found no increased risk of acoustic neuroma with regular mobile phone use, even after 10+ years of use. However, the heaviest users (over 1,640 hours of lifetime use) showed mixed results depending on the analysis method.

Mobile phones and head tumours: the discrepancies in cause-effect relationships in the epi studies-how do they arise

Levis et al · 2011

Researchers analyzed all major studies on mobile phones and head tumors to understand why results vary so dramatically. They found that well-designed, unbiased studies consistently show nearly doubled tumor risk after 10+ years of phone use, while industry-influenced studies systematically underestimate risks. The analysis reveals that long-term mobile phone use significantly increases brain tumor and acoustic neuroma risk on the same side of the head where phones are typically held.

Sulpizio M et al, (Augst 2011) Molecular basis underlying the biological effects elicited by extremely low-frequency magnetic field (ELF-MF) on neuroblastoma cells, J Cell Biochem

Unknown authors · 2011

Italian researchers exposed human neuroblastoma cells to 50 Hz magnetic fields (the same frequency as power lines) for up to 15 days and found significant changes in cellular proteins and behavior. The magnetic field exposure triggered the production of nine new proteins involved in cell defense and organization, while also altering cell growth patterns and internal structure. Most concerning, the researchers concluded that this power-line frequency radiation could push cells toward a more invasive, potentially cancerous phenotype.

ELF magnetic fields: Animal studies, mechanisms of action

Unknown authors · 2011

This 2011 review examined animal studies on extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields like those from power lines, focusing on potential health risks to children. Researchers found that while childhood leukemia shows consistent association with ELF exposure in human studies, animal experiments have provided limited supporting evidence, partly because most didn't use appropriate leukemia models or expose animals during the critical pregnancy period when childhood leukemia may originate.

Cytostatic response of NB69 cells to weak pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals

Unknown authors · 2011

Spanish researchers exposed human neuroblastoma cancer cells to weak 2.2 GHz radar-like signals for 24 hours and found a 13.5% reduction in cell numbers compared to unexposed controls. The radiation also disrupted cell division cycles, causing more cells to remain stuck in growth phases. Importantly, liver cancer cells showed no response to the same treatment, suggesting some cell types are more vulnerable than others.

Cancer & Tumors143 citations

Zimmerman JW et al, (December 2011) Cancer cell proliferation is inhibited by specific modulation frequencies, Br J Cancer

Unknown authors · 2011

Scientists exposed liver and breast cancer cells to 27.12 MHz radiofrequency fields modulated at specific frequencies previously identified in cancer patients. The cancer-specific frequencies significantly reduced cancer cell growth while leaving healthy cells unaffected. This suggests certain EMF frequencies might selectively target malignant cells without harming normal tissue.

Occupational exposure to magnetic fields from transformer stations and electric enclosures in Turkey

Unknown authors · 2011

Turkish researchers measured magnetic field exposure for office workers in buildings above or near electrical transformer stations and enclosures. They found 83% of workers were exposed to levels above 0.2 μT, which epidemiological studies have linked to increased leukemia risk. The highest measured exposure was 6.8 μT, significantly above typical home background levels of 0.3 μT.

Occupational and residential exposure to electric and magnetic field and its relationship on acute myeloid leukemia in adults - A Meta-analysis

Unknown authors · 2011

Chinese researchers analyzed 9 studies from 1980-2010 examining electromagnetic field exposure and acute myeloid leukemia in adults. They found a 24% increased risk overall, with the highest risk (51% increase) in people exposed to magnetic fields of 0.2 microtesla or higher. This suggests consistent evidence linking EMF exposure to this serious blood cancer in adults.

Exposure to magnetic fields and childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Unknown authors · 2011

Brazilian researchers studied 162 children with acute lymphocytic leukemia and 565 healthy controls to examine whether exposure to 60 Hz magnetic fields from power lines increases leukemia risk. Children living within 50 meters of power lines showed 3.57 times higher odds of developing leukemia, though the small sample size limited the statistical strength of findings.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Reid A et al, (October 2011) Risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia following parental occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields, Br J Cancer. 2011 Oct 25;105(9):1409-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.365

Unknown authors · 2011

Australian researchers studied 379 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 854 healthy controls to examine whether parental workplace exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (like from power lines) increased childhood leukemia risk. They found no association between either mother's or father's occupational EMF exposure and their children developing this blood cancer.

Exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and the risk of childhood cancer: Update of the epidemiological evidence

Unknown authors · 2011

This 2011 review by the International Agency for Research on Cancer examined studies on extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (like those from power lines) and childhood cancer. The analysis confirmed that children exposed to magnetic fields of 0.4 microTesla or higher have approximately double the risk of leukemia, but found little evidence linking these fields to childhood brain tumors.

ELF magnetic fields: Animal studies, mechanisms of action

Unknown authors · 2011

This 2011 review examined animal studies on extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields from power lines and appliances, focusing on childhood cancer risks and developmental effects. While animal studies haven't definitively proven cancer or birth defect risks, researchers identified potential biological mechanisms involving cryptochrome proteins that could explain how ELF fields might affect health. The authors noted significant gaps in existing animal research, particularly regarding childhood leukemia studies.

Cytostatic response of NB69 cells to weak pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals

Unknown authors · 2011

Researchers exposed human cancer cells to weak radar-like signals at 2.2 GHz for 24 hours and found that neuroblastoma cells showed a 13.5% reduction in cell growth, while liver cancer cells were unaffected. The radiation levels were extremely low (similar to ambient environmental exposure) yet still caused measurable biological changes in sensitive cell types.

Cytostatic response of NB69 cells to weak pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals

Unknown authors · 2011

Spanish researchers exposed human cancer cells to weak, pulse-modulated 2.2 GHz radar-like signals for 24 hours at very low power levels. The neuroblastoma cancer cells showed a 13.5% reduction in cell number and altered cell cycle patterns, while liver cancer cells were unaffected. This demonstrates that certain cell types can respond to extremely low-power pulsed radiofrequency radiation.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including cancer & tumors, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Cancer & Tumors

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
The SYB Research Database includes 742 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and cancer & tumors. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
79% of the 742 studies examining cancer & tumors found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 587 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 21% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.