Browse 3,138 peer-reviewed studies on electromagnetic field health effects from the BioInitiative Report database.
Showing 1,644 studies in Brain & Nervous System
Cammaerts MC, Rachidi Z, Bellens F, De Doncker P · 2013
Researchers exposed ant colonies to cell phone-frequency radiation for 180 hours. The ants lost their ability to follow chemical trails, find food, and return to their nests, causing colonies to deteriorate. This shows EMF radiation disrupts navigation systems essential for insect survival.
Baş O et al. · 2013
Researchers exposed pregnant rats to cell phone frequency radiation (900 MHz) for one hour daily during a critical brain development period and examined their female offspring at 32 days old. They found significant loss of pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus, a brain region crucial for learning and memory. This suggests that prenatal EMF exposure during critical development windows may cause lasting brain damage that persists into later life.
Banaceur S, Banasr S, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H · 2013
Researchers exposed mice genetically programmed to develop Alzheimer's-like symptoms to WiFi signals (2.4 GHz) for 2 hours daily over one month. Surprisingly, they found the WiFi exposure actually improved cognitive performance in the Alzheimer's mice compared to unexposed controls. This unexpected result suggests radiofrequency radiation might have some protective effects on brain function in certain disease states.
Aboul Ezz HS, Khadrawy YA, Ahmed NA, Radwan NM, El Bakry MM · 2013
Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation (1800 MHz) for 24 hours daily over 1-4 months and measured key brain chemicals called neurotransmitters in four brain regions. The radiation significantly altered levels of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin - chemicals that control mood, memory, learning, and stress responses. These changes persisted even after radiation exposure stopped, suggesting that chronic cell phone use may disrupt normal brain chemistry.
Yu D, Zhang R, Liu Q. · 2012
Researchers used computer modeling to study how metal dental work affects radiation absorption from cell phones held against the head. They found that certain types of metal dental crowns can more than double the amount of electromagnetic energy absorbed in nearby tissues when positioned parallel to the phone's antenna. Despite this significant increase, the radiation levels remained within current safety limits set by international health organizations.
Wallace D et al. · 2012
Researchers tested whether TETRA radio signals (used by UK police and emergency services) cause health symptoms in people who report being sensitive to electromagnetic fields. When participants didn't know whether they were exposed to real or fake signals, neither the sensitive individuals nor control subjects showed any physical or psychological effects from TETRA exposure. However, when people knew they might be exposed, those claiming sensitivity reported feeling worse, suggesting their symptoms stem from worry about EMF rather than the signals themselves.
Wallace D et al. · 2012
Researchers tested whether TETRA radio signals (used by emergency services) affect brain function and physical responses in 183 people, including 51 who reported being sensitive to electromagnetic fields. Participants were exposed to 420 MHz signals at levels similar to living near a cell tower while performing memory and attention tests. The study found no differences in cognitive performance or physical responses between real exposure and fake exposure in either group.
Trunk A et al. · 2012
Hungarian researchers exposed 43 people to 30 minutes of 3G mobile phone radiation and measured their brain activity using EEG (electroencephalography), which records electrical signals in the brain. They found no changes in brain wave patterns, auditory processing, or the brain's ability to detect unexpected sounds compared to fake exposure sessions. This suggests that brief 3G phone exposure doesn't immediately alter measurable brain electrical activity.
Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Zetterberg H, Hardell L · 2012
Swedish researchers measured β-trace protein levels (an enzyme involved in producing a natural sleep hormone) in 314 randomly selected adults to see if wireless phone use affected sleep biochemistry. Overall, they found no significant association between phone use and protein levels, though younger adults (18-30 years) showed some indication of lower protein levels with heavier long-term phone use. The study suggests wireless phones may not substantially disrupt the body's natural sleep-promoting chemical pathways.
Poulletier de Gannes F et al. · 2012
French researchers exposed pregnant rats to Wi-Fi signals (2.45 GHz) for 2 hours daily during pregnancy to test whether this radiation could harm developing babies. They found no birth defects, developmental problems, or other harmful effects in the rat pups, even at the highest exposure level tested (4 W/kg). This study suggests that Wi-Fi exposure during pregnancy may not cause developmental harm at levels tested.
Mohler E et al. · 2012
Swiss researchers followed 955 adults for one year to see if cell phone use or other everyday radiofrequency (RF) radiation affected their sleep quality. They found no connection between RF exposure and sleep problems, even when they objectively measured both radiation levels in bedrooms and sleep patterns using wrist monitors. This suggests that typical environmental RF exposure may not be disrupting sleep as some people fear.
Liu YX et al. · 2012
Chinese researchers exposed brain cells (astrocytes) to cell phone radiation at 1950 MHz for up to 48 hours and found that prolonged exposure damaged the cells' power centers (mitochondria) and triggered programmed cell death. While the radiation didn't promote tumor formation, it caused significant cellular damage through a specific biological pathway involving proteins that control cell death. This suggests that continuous exposure to cell phone frequencies may harm healthy brain cells even when it doesn't directly cause cancer.
Kwon MS et al. · 2012
Finnish researchers used advanced brain imaging (PET scans) to measure blood flow in the brains of 15 men while they were exposed to cell phone radiation for 5 minutes from different positions around their heads. The study found no changes in brain blood flow despite the radiation causing a slight temperature increase in the ear canals, suggesting that short-term cell phone exposure doesn't immediately affect how blood circulates in the brain.
Kwon MK, Kim SK, Koo JM, Choi JY, Kim DW. · 2012
Researchers tested whether people who report electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) could actually detect cell phone radiation better than those without the condition. In a double-blind study, 37 participants were exposed to real and fake cell phone signals at levels similar to normal phone use, but neither group could reliably tell when the radiation was present. The findings suggest that EHS symptoms may not be directly caused by the ability to physically sense electromagnetic fields.
Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. · 2012
Swedish researchers analyzed data from multiple studies on mobile and cordless phone use and brain tumor risk. They found that people who used mobile phones for 10+ years had a 71% increased risk of glioma (a type of brain tumor) in the temporal lobe, and those with the heaviest usage (1,640+ hours total) had more than double the risk. The study contributed to the World Health Organization's 2011 classification of mobile phone radiation as a 'possible carcinogen.'
Ghosn R et al. · 2012
Researchers exposed 29 volunteers to 900 MHz cell phone radiation for 20 minutes while measuring blood flow in their brain arteries using ultrasound technology. They found no changes in blood flow velocity or other circulation measures during or after exposure. This suggests that short-term cell phone use doesn't immediately affect blood circulation in the brain.
Frei P et al. · 2012
Swiss researchers followed 1,375 people for one year to see if everyday radiofrequency radiation from cell phones and broadcast towers caused symptoms like headaches, fatigue, or ringing in the ears (tinnitus). They used sophisticated models to measure both environmental RF exposure and phone usage patterns. The study found no association between RF exposure levels and these health complaints, even among people with the highest exposure levels.
Dogan M et al. · 2012
Turkish researchers exposed rats to 3G mobile phone radiation for 20 days and examined their brain tissue using advanced imaging, biochemical tests, and microscopic analysis. They found no significant differences between exposed and control rats in brain chemistry markers, antioxidant enzyme levels, or cell death. The study suggests that short-term 3G phone exposure may not cause detectable brain damage in rats.
Deltour I et al. · 2012
Researchers analyzed brain tumor rates across Nordic countries from 1979-2008 to see if mobile phone use caused increases in glioma (a type of brain cancer). Despite widespread mobile phone adoption during this period, they found no significant increase in brain tumor rates that would match the elevated risks reported in some earlier studies. The findings suggest that either mobile phones pose lower cancer risks than some studies indicated, or that cancer development takes longer than the timeframes studied so far.
Augner C, Gnambs T, Winker R, Barth A. · 2012
Researchers analyzed 17 studies involving 1,174 people to determine whether short-term exposure to cell phone radiation affects well-being in both people who consider themselves sensitive to electromagnetic fields and those who don't. They found no significant effects on either subjective symptoms (like headaches) or objective measures (like heart rate changes). The authors noted that future research should examine long-term exposure effects instead.
Wallace D et al. · 2012
Researchers tested whether exposure to TETRA radio signals (used by emergency services) affects thinking ability and physical responses in people who consider themselves sensitive to electromagnetic fields. After exposing 183 participants to real and fake TETRA signals in a controlled study, they found no differences in memory, attention, heart rate, or other measured responses. This adds to evidence that radio frequency exposure at these levels doesn't produce detectable immediate effects on cognitive function or basic physiological responses.
Mohler E et al. · 2012
Swiss researchers followed 955 adults for one year to examine whether mobile phone use and everyday radiofrequency radiation exposure affects sleep quality. Using both self-reported surveys and objective measurements in bedrooms, they found no evidence that RF-EMF exposure from phones or environmental sources caused sleep disturbances or daytime sleepiness. This large study suggests that common concerns about EMF disrupting sleep may not be supported by measurable effects.
Kwon MS et al. · 2012
Finnish researchers used advanced brain imaging (PET scans) to measure blood flow in the brains of 15 healthy men while they were exposed to cell phone radiation at 902.4 MHz for 5 minutes. The study found no changes in brain blood flow patterns, even though the radiation did cause a slight temperature increase in the ear canals. This suggests that short-term cell phone exposure doesn't immediately alter how blood circulates through the brain.
Dogan M et al. · 2012
Researchers exposed rats to electromagnetic radiation from 3G mobile phones for 20 days and examined brain tissue using advanced imaging, biochemical tests, and cellular analysis. They found no significant differences in brain metabolism, antioxidant enzyme activity, or cell death between exposed and unexposed rats. The study suggests short-term 3G phone exposure may not cause detectable brain damage in this animal model.
Curcio G et al. · 2012
Italian researchers used brain imaging (fMRI) to study whether 40 minutes of cell phone radiation exposure affects brain activity while people performed cognitive tasks. They compared real GSM phone signals to fake exposure and found no differences in brain activation patterns or reaction times. The study suggests that typical cell phone use doesn't produce detectable changes in brain function during cognitive tasks.