Schüz J, Waldemar G, Olsen JH, Johansen C. · 2009
Danish researchers tracked over 420,000 mobile phone subscribers from 1982-1995 through 2003 to see if phone use was linked to brain and nervous system diseases. They found mobile phone users had 10-20% higher rates of migraine and vertigo, but surprisingly lower rates of dementia, Parkinson's disease, and epilepsy in men. The increased migraine and vertigo rates persisted even among long-term users of 10+ years.
Myung SK et al. · 2009
Researchers analyzed 23 studies involving nearly 38,000 people to examine whether mobile phone use increases tumor risk. While overall results showed no clear association, the highest-quality studies with proper blinding revealed a harmful effect, and people who used phones for 10 years or longer showed an 18% increased risk of tumors. The findings highlight how study design quality significantly affects results in EMF research.
Mousavy SJ et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed human hemoglobin (the protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen) to cell phone radiofrequency radiation at 910MHz and 940MHz frequencies. They found that the radiation altered hemoglobin's ability to carry oxygen and changed its molecular structure, with greater effects at higher radiation intensities and longer exposure times. This suggests that cell phone radiation could potentially interfere with your blood's fundamental ability to transport oxygen throughout your body.
Luria R, Eliyahu I, Hareuveny R, Margaliot M, Meiran N. · 2009
Israeli researchers tested how cell phone radiation affects thinking speed by having 48 men perform memory tasks while GSM phones were placed on different sides of their heads. They found that when the phone was on the left side of the head, participants responded significantly slower with their right hand during the first few minutes of exposure. This suggests cell phone radiation can temporarily impair cognitive performance, and that the specific placement of the phone and timing of exposure matter for detecting these effects.
Landgrebe M, Frick U, Hauser S, Hajak G, Langguth B. · 2009
German researchers compared 89 people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) to 107 matched controls to examine connections between EMF sensitivity and tinnitus (ringing in the ears). They found that tinnitus occurred in 50.7% of EHS patients versus only 17.5% of controls - nearly three times higher. The researchers suggest both conditions may stem from an overactive brain stress network rather than direct EMF exposure effects.
Kühn S, Jennings W, Christ A, Kuster N. · 2009
Researchers used computer models to test how radio frequency electromagnetic fields are absorbed by different human body types, from 6-year-old children to large adult men. They found that current safety guidelines and measurement standards for RF exposure don't accurately reflect how these fields actually interact with real human bodies. This suggests that existing safety limits may not be properly protecting people from RF radiation.
Kristiansen IS et al. · 2009
Danish researchers surveyed 1,004 people to understand public concerns about mobile phone radiation. They found that 28% of respondents worried about phone radiation and 15% worried about cell tower radiation, while 82% were concerned about pollution. Most people underestimated the potential health risks, with nearly half comparing mobile phone radiation mortality risk to being struck by lightning rather than more serious health threats.
Joseph W, Verloock L, Tanghe E, Martens L. · 2009
Belgian researchers measured radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure from FM radio, cell phone towers (GSM), and 3G networks (UMTS) in public spaces over one week. They found that short-term measurements often underestimate actual exposure levels, with cell phone signals showing the most variation over time. This research helps establish better methods for measuring real-world EMF exposure that people experience in their daily lives.
Hu J, Lu Y, Zhang H, Xie H, Yang X. · 2009
Chinese researchers measured radiofrequency radiation levels around 18 residential areas with cell phone base stations compared to 10 areas without them. They found significantly higher radiation levels near the base stations, with peak exposure occurring about 10 meters away, and discovered that some apartment windows exceeded China's safety standards. The study also showed that aluminum security screens provided partial protection while glass windows offered no shielding.
Hässig M, Jud F, Naegeli H, Kupper J, Spiess B. · 2009
Swiss researchers tracked 253 veal calves from conception to slaughter, examining eye cataracts and their proximity to cell phone towers during pregnancy. They found that 32% of calves developed cataracts, with higher rates in animals whose mothers were closer to mobile phone base stations during the critical first trimester of pregnancy. The study also measured increased oxidative stress (cellular damage from free radicals) in the eyes of affected calves.
Hardell L, Carlberg M. · 2009
Swedish researchers analyzed brain tumor patients and found that people who used mobile phones or cordless phones on the same side of their head where tumors developed had significantly higher cancer risks. The risk was especially pronounced for those who started using wireless phones before age 20, with mobile phone users showing a 5.2-fold increased risk for astrocytoma (a type of brain cancer). The study also found that brain cancer rates in Sweden increased by over 2% annually during the 2000s, coinciding with widespread wireless phone adoption.
Han YY, Kano H, Davis DL, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. · 2009
Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh reviewed 11 studies examining whether cell phone use increases the risk of acoustic neuroma, a type of brain tumor that develops near the ear. While most studies found no link, those that followed people for 10 years or longer showed cell phone users had 2.4 times higher risk of developing these tumors on the same side of their head where they held their phone. The researchers concluded that better study methods and access to actual phone usage data are needed to determine the true risk.
Dahmen N, Ghezel-Ahmadi D, Engel A. · 2009
German researchers examined blood test results from 132 people who report electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) symptoms and compared them to 101 healthy controls. They found that EHS patients were significantly more likely to have thyroid dysfunction, liver problems, and signs of chronic inflammation in their blood work. The study suggests that some people attributing symptoms to EMF exposure may actually have undiagnosed medical conditions that could be treated.
Chauvin S et al. · 2009
Researchers measured radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in 45 workers at a mobile phone company, comparing 23 technical maintenance staff who work directly with cell tower equipment to 22 other employees. Using sophisticated analysis techniques, they found that while some exposure indicators differed significantly between the groups, the patterns weren't consistent enough to reliably distinguish technical workers from other employees based on their EMF exposure alone.
Budak GG, Muluk NB, Budak B, Oztürk GG, Apan A, Seyhan N. · 2009
Researchers exposed infant rabbits to cell phone radiation (1800 MHz) both before birth (in the womb) and after birth, then measured their hearing function using specialized tests. They found that exposure after birth decreased hearing sensitivity at certain frequencies, while exposure before birth appeared to have a protective effect. The study suggests that developing ears may be particularly vulnerable to radiofrequency radiation from mobile phones.
Budak GG et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed pregnant and non-pregnant rabbits to cell phone radiation (1800 MHz GSM) for 15 minutes daily over a week, then measured their inner ear function using sensitive hearing tests. They found that non-pregnant rabbits showed significant decreases in cochlear function (the part of the ear that converts sound to nerve signals), while pregnant rabbits were largely protected from these effects. This suggests cell phone radiation can damage hearing mechanisms, but pregnancy hormones may offer some protection.
Budak GG, Muluk NB, Budak B, Oztürk GG, Apan A, Seyhan N. · 2009
Researchers exposed infant and adult female rabbits to cell phone radiation (1800 MHz GSM) for 15 minutes daily over 7 days and measured their hearing function using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), which test how well the inner ear responds to sound. Adult rabbits showed significant hearing damage across most frequencies tested, while infant rabbits actually showed some improved responses at certain frequencies. This suggests that developing ears may be more resilient to radiofrequency damage than mature ones, possibly due to higher water content in young ear structures.
Blettner M et al. · 2009
German researchers surveyed over 30,000 people to see if living near cell phone towers was linked to health complaints. They found that people living within 500 meters of a cell tower reported slightly more health problems than those living farther away. Importantly, this increase couldn't be fully explained by people's concerns or beliefs about the towers, suggesting the proximity itself may play a role.
Berg-Beckhoff G et al. · 2009
German researchers measured actual radiofrequency radiation levels around cell phone towers and surveyed 3,526 people about their health symptoms. They found no connection between measured radiation exposure and health problems like sleep disturbances, headaches, or mental health issues. However, people who believed the towers were making them sick did report more symptoms, suggesting psychological factors may play a role in perceived health effects.
Belyaev IY, Markovà E, Hillert L, Malmgren LO, Persson BR. · 2009
Researchers exposed human white blood cells to microwave radiation from GSM and UMTS mobile phones and found that the radiation interfered with the cells' ability to repair DNA damage. The interference lasted up to 72 hours after exposure - longer than the cellular stress response from heat shock. UMTS signals (used in 3G phones) appeared to cause more biological disruption than older GSM signals, suggesting newer phone technologies may pose greater health risks.
Augner C, Hacker GW. · 2009
Austrian researchers studied 57 people who believed they lived close to cell phone towers to see if proximity affected their stress levels. Those who reported living within 100 meters of base stations showed significantly higher levels of stress hormones in their saliva and reported more anxiety, obsessive thoughts, and physical symptoms. The findings suggest that people near cell towers experience measurable biological stress, though the study couldn't determine whether this was due to actual electromagnetic field exposure or other factors.
Atay T et al. · 2009
Turkish researchers measured bone density in the hip area of 150 men who regularly carried cell phones for an average of 6.2 years and 14.7 hours daily. They found slightly lower bone density on the side where phones were carried compared to the unexposed side, though the difference wasn't statistically significant. The findings suggest that long-term phone carrying might affect bone health in ways that could matter for medical procedures requiring bone grafts.
Agarwal A et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed human sperm samples to cell phone radiation for one hour and compared them to unexposed samples from the same men. The exposed sperm showed significantly reduced movement and survival rates, plus increased oxidative stress (cellular damage from harmful molecules). This suggests that men who keep their phones in their pants pockets during calls might be harming their fertility.
Abramson MJ et al. · 2009
Australian researchers tested cognitive function in 317 seventh-grade students and found that those who made more mobile phone calls performed differently on thinking tasks. Students with higher phone use showed faster but less accurate responses on complex cognitive tests, along with poorer working memory. However, since texting showed similar patterns, the researchers concluded these changes likely resulted from behavioral adaptations to frequent phone use rather than radiofrequency radiation exposure.
Cvetkovic D, Cosic I. · 2009
Researchers exposed 33 people to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ranging from 4 to 50 Hz) and measured their brain waves using EEG. They found that specific magnetic field frequencies could alter brain wave patterns in corresponding frequency bands - for example, 10 Hz magnetic fields changed alpha brain waves (8-12 Hz). The changes depended on timing and sequence of exposure, suggesting these fields can influence brain activity in predictable ways.
