Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ · 2009
British researchers studied 291 people with pituitary tumors (small growths in a brain gland that regulates hormones) and 630 healthy controls to see if cell phone use increased tumor risk. They found no association between cell phone use and pituitary tumors, even among the heaviest users or those who had used phones for over 10 years. This suggests that cell phone radiation doesn't appear to cause this specific type of brain tumor.
Sannino A et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed human skin cells to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used by GSM cell phones) for 24 hours at power levels similar to phone use. They found no DNA damage from the RF radiation alone, and the radiation did not make cells more vulnerable to damage from a known cancer-causing chemical. This suggests that cell phone-level RF exposure may not directly break DNA strands in human cells.
Parazzini M et al. · 2009
European researchers exposed 134 healthy young adults to radiofrequency radiation from UMTS mobile phones for 20 minutes and tested their hearing immediately before and after exposure. The study found no measurable effects on hearing function, including hearing thresholds, inner ear responses, or brain processing of sound. This suggests that short-term exposure to cell phone radiation at typical usage levels doesn't immediately impact the auditory system.
Nam KC, Lee JH, Noh HW, Cha EJ, Kim NH, Kim DW. · 2009
Researchers tested 18 people who claimed to be sensitive to electromagnetic fields (called EHS or electromagnetic hypersensitivity) against 19 people without such sensitivity, exposing both groups to real and fake cell phone radiation for 30 minutes. Neither group showed any measurable physical changes or symptoms from the actual radiation exposure, and the supposedly sensitive people couldn't tell the difference between real and fake exposure any better than the control group.
Marino AA, Carrubba S · 2009
Researchers analyzed 55 studies examining whether mobile phone radiation affects brain electrical activity measured by EEG. They found that 87% of these studies were funded by the wireless industry, and that both positive and negative studies had serious methodological flaws that prevented reliable conclusions. The authors argue that this systematic doubt about EMF effects was manufactured by industry funding rather than reflecting genuine scientific uncertainty.
Lipping T et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed eleven anesthetized pigs to mobile phone radiation at 890 MHz to test whether radiofrequency signals could trigger brain activity changes in a highly sensitive state. They found no correlation between RF exposure and brain wave patterns, though the animals experienced significant temperature increases (1.6°C) and elevated heart rates during the 10-minute exposures. This suggests that while RF radiation can cause heating effects, it may not directly stimulate brain activity even under conditions of heightened neural sensitivity.
Kwon MS et al. · 2009
Researchers tested whether cell phone radiation affects the brain's ability to automatically detect changes in sounds by measuring brain waves in 17 healthy adults while a GSM phone was placed next to their ear. They found no differences in brain responses whether the phone was on or off, suggesting that acute exposure to cell phone radiation doesn't impair this basic auditory processing function. This study adds to research examining how electromagnetic fields might affect brain function during everyday phone use.
Hansteen IL et al. · 2009
Norwegian researchers exposed human immune cells (lymphocytes) to 2.3 GHz radiofrequency radiation - similar to what cell phones emit - for an entire cell cycle to see if it would damage DNA or chromosomes. They found no statistically significant genetic damage compared to unexposed cells, even when they added a known DNA-damaging chemical to make cells more vulnerable. This suggests that RF radiation at levels used by mobile devices may not directly break chromosomes in immune cells under these laboratory conditions.
Hansteen IL et al. · 2009
Norwegian researchers exposed human immune cells (lymphocytes) to high-frequency microwave radiation at levels similar to industrial applications for 53 hours to test for DNA damage. They found no statistically significant genetic damage from either continuous 18.0 GHz or pulsed 16.5 GHz radiation, though the pulsed exposure showed a non-significant trend toward increased genetic abnormalities that the researchers said needs further study.
Furubayashi T et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 54 women (including 11 with self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity) to cell tower radiation at 10 V/m for 30 minutes in a controlled lab setting. Neither group could detect when they were actually being exposed to EMF, and both groups showed identical biological responses whether exposed to real or fake radiation. The study found no evidence that people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity react differently to cell tower emissions than healthy controls.
Billaudel B et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed human brain tumor cells to cell phone radiation similar to DAMPS and GSM signals for up to 24 hours, then measured changes in an enzyme called ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) that's involved in cell growth. They found no changes in ODC activity regardless of the type of signal, exposure duration, or radiation intensity. This suggests that typical cell phone radiation levels don't affect this particular cellular process in brain cells.
Ahlbom A et al. · 2009
Researchers from the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection reviewed all available studies on mobile phone use and brain tumor risk through 2009. They found no increased risk of brain tumors within approximately 10 years of mobile phone use, though they noted the observation period may be too short to detect slow-growing tumors that could take decades to develop. The review acknowledged significant methodological problems in existing studies, including biased recall of phone usage patterns.
Sannino A et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed human skin cells to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to cell phone signals) for 24 hours at 1 W/kg to test for DNA damage. They found no genetic damage from the RF exposure alone, even when testing cells from people with Turner's syndrome who may be more sensitive. The radiation also didn't make cells more vulnerable to damage from a known water contaminant.
Brescia F et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed human immune cells to 1950 MHz cell phone radiation (the frequency used by 3G networks) to see if it would trigger oxidative stress, a cellular damage process linked to aging and disease. They tested various exposure durations and power levels, both alone and combined with iron compounds known to cause oxidative stress. The study found no increase in harmful reactive oxygen species or cell death from the radiation exposure under any conditions tested.
Furubayashi T et al. · 2009
Japanese researchers exposed 54 women to cell tower-like radio waves for 30 minutes to test whether people who report mobile phone sensitivity can actually detect electromagnetic fields. They found that sensitive individuals couldn't tell when they were being exposed any better than control subjects, but they consistently reported more discomfort regardless of whether the EMF was on or off. This suggests that electromagnetic hypersensitivity symptoms aren't directly caused by the radio waves themselves.
Eltiti S et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 88 people (including those who reported electromagnetic sensitivity) to cell tower signals for 50 minutes while testing their memory, attention, and heart rate. The study found no differences in cognitive performance or physiological measures between real exposure and fake exposure sessions. This suggests that brief exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't immediately impair thinking or basic body functions.
Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L · 2009
Researchers measured blood levels of S100B protein (a marker of blood-brain barrier damage) in 314 Swedish adults to see if wireless phone use affected brain barrier function. They found no significant association between mobile or cordless phone use and elevated S100B levels, suggesting these devices don't appear to damage the protective barrier around the brain based on this marker.
Parazzini M et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 134 healthy young adults to 20 minutes of radiofrequency radiation from UMTS mobile phones at maximum power while testing their hearing function before and after exposure. The study found no consistent changes in hearing ability, ear function, or auditory processing after the RF exposure. This suggests that short-term exposure to cell phone radiation at typical usage levels does not cause immediate measurable damage to human hearing.
Lipping T et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed anesthetized pigs to GSM mobile phone radiation (890 MHz) to test whether radio frequency signals could trigger brain activity changes detectable in EEG measurements. The study used a highly sensitive testing method where anesthetized animals show exaggerated responses to even minor stimuli. Despite exposure levels of 31 W/kg (much higher than typical phone use), no changes in brain electrical activity were observed, though the animals did experience increased body temperature and heart rate.
Kwon MS et al. · 2009
Finnish researchers tested whether GSM mobile phone radiation affects the brain's ability to automatically detect changes in sounds, a key function for processing speech and music. They measured brain responses in 17 healthy adults while exposing them to 902 MHz radiation at levels typical of cell phone use (SAR up to 1.21 W/kg). The study found no changes in the brain's automatic sound processing abilities during EMF exposure.
Eltiti S et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed 88 people (including those who claimed to be sensitive to electromagnetic fields) to cell tower signals for 50 minutes while they performed memory and attention tests. The study found no effects on cognitive performance or physiological measures like heart rate and skin conductance in either sensitive or control participants. This suggests that short-term exposure to typical cell tower radiation levels doesn't impair brain function or cause detectable physical responses.
Abramson MJ et al. · 2009
Researchers studied 317 Australian teenagers to see if mobile phone use affected their thinking abilities. They found that teens who made more phone calls had faster but less accurate responses on cognitive tests, with poorer working memory and learning performance. Importantly, the same effects occurred with text messaging, suggesting the changes came from phone usage habits rather than radiofrequency radiation exposure.
Wake K et al. · 2009
Researchers developed a method to accurately map how cell phone radiation (called SAR) spreads throughout the human brain using standard phone testing data. They found they could successfully estimate radiation exposure patterns in specific brain regions where tumors develop. This technique was used in the major INTERPHONE study to better understand the relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer risk.
Vrijheid M et al. · 2009
Researchers tracked over 60,000 phone calls across 12 countries to measure how much radiofrequency power mobile phones actually emit during real-world use. They found that phones operate at about 50% of their maximum power on average, with phones using maximum power for 39% of call time. The actual exposure levels varied dramatically between different network operators and countries, sometimes differing by 2-3 times, which has major implications for studies trying to link phone use to health effects.
Vrijheid M et al. · 2009
This study examined a critical flaw in mobile phone brain tumor research: people who refuse to participate in studies are less likely to use mobile phones regularly. Researchers found that non-participants used phones at lower rates (50-56%) compared to study participants (66-69%), creating a systematic bias that could underestimate cancer risks by about 10%. This means many studies may be missing the very people whose phone usage patterns could reveal stronger links to brain tumors.
