3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
All Topics

Cancer & Tumors

5 min read
Share:
Key Finding: 63% of 293 studies on cancer & tumors found biological effects from EMF exposure.

Of 293 studies examining cancer & tumors, 63% found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure.

Lowest Documented Effect

Research found effects on cancer & tumors at exposures as low as:

Study Exposure Level in ContextA logarithmic scale showing exposure levels relative to Building Biology concern thresholds and regulatory limits.Study Exposure Level in Context0.00002, 0.0002, 0.008Extreme Concern1,000 uW/m2FCC Limit10M uW/m2Effects observed in the No Concern range (Building Biology)FCC limit is 500,000,000,000x higher than this exposure level

Research Overview

  • -When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention.
  • -Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
  • -This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development. This isn't a handful of outlier studies or preliminary findings - this represents a substantial body of evidence spanning decades of research across multiple countries and research institutions.

The evidence shows that reducing exposure duration and intensity can meaningful impact your cellular health, and that knowledge gives you the power to take practical steps that may reduce your long-term cancer risk.

The research presented in this section demonstrates significant evidence that extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) exposures can cause DNA damage and genetic alterations relevant to leukemia development.

Source: BioInitiative Working Group. BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation. Edited by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, BioInitiative, 2012, updated 2020. www.bioinitiative.org

Showing 293 studies

Improved Mitochondrial and Methylglyoxal-Related Metabolisms Support Hyperproliferation Induced by 50 Hz Magnetic Field in Neuroblastoma Cells.

Falone S et al. · 2016

Researchers exposed human neuroblastoma cells (a type of brain cancer cell) to 50 Hz magnetic fields at 1 milliTesla and found the fields made the cancer cells grow faster and become more aggressive. The magnetic field exposure triggered protective mechanisms in the cancer cells that helped them survive and multiply more effectively. This suggests that power frequency magnetic fields might promote the growth of existing brain tumors.

Extremely low frequency magnetic fields regulate differentiation of regulatory T cells: Potential role for ROS-mediated inhibition on AKT

Tang R, Xu Y, Ma F, Ren J, Shen S, Du Y, Hou Y, Wang T · 2016

Researchers exposed mice with lung cancer to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (7.5 Hz, 0.4 Tesla) for 2 hours daily over 27 days and found the treatment significantly reduced tumor spread in the lungs. The magnetic fields worked by altering immune cell behavior - specifically reducing regulatory T cells (immune cells that normally suppress anti-tumor responses) and increasing cellular stress molecules called reactive oxygen species. This suggests that certain magnetic field exposures might enhance the body's natural ability to fight cancer by modifying immune system function.

Power frequency magnetic fields affect the p38 MAPK-mediated regulation of NB69 cell proliferation implication of free radicals.

Martínez MA, Úbeda A, Moreno J, Trillo MÁ · 2016

Researchers exposed human brain tumor cells (neuroblastoma) to 50 Hz magnetic fields at 100 microtesla - similar to levels near power lines - for various time periods. The magnetic field exposure triggered specific cellular pathways that increased cell proliferation, with the effects appearing to be mediated by reactive oxygen species (free radicals). This suggests that power frequency magnetic fields can stimulate abnormal cell growth through oxidative stress mechanisms.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Mobile phone use and risk of glioma: a case-control study in Korea for 2002-2007.

Yoon S, Choi JW, Lee E, Ahn H, Kim HS, Choi HD, Kim N. · 2015

Korean researchers studied 285 brain tumor patients and 285 healthy controls to investigate whether mobile phone use increases the risk of gliomas, a serious type of brain cancer. The study found no significant overall increase in brain tumor risk from mobile phone use, though there was a non-significant trend toward higher risk when people used phones on the same side of their head where the tumor developed. The researchers concluded their findings don't support the idea that mobile phones cause brain tumors, but suggested more research is needed for long-term users.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Pituitary tumor risk in relation to mobile phone use: A case-control study.

Shrestha M, Raitanen J, Salminen T, Lahkola A, Auvinen A · 2015

Finnish researchers studied whether mobile phone use increases the risk of pituitary tumors by comparing 80 tumor patients with 240 healthy controls. They found no increased risk of pituitary tumors from mobile phone use, even after 10 years of use. However, the study had limited data on very long-term users (beyond 10 years), so questions remain about potential risks from decades of use.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Exposure to 3G mobile phone signals does not affect the biological features of brain tumor cells.

Liu YX et al. · 2015

Researchers exposed human brain tumor cells to 3G mobile phone radiation (1950-MHz) for up to 48 hours at high power levels (SAR of 5 W/kg) to see if the radiation would promote tumor growth or change cell behavior. They found no significant effects on cell growth, gene expression, or tumor formation ability. This suggests that 3G signals at these exposure levels don't act as tumor-promoting agents in already-existing brain cancer cells.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

First epidemiological study on occupational radar exposure in the French Navy: a 26-year cohort study.

Dabouis V et al. · 2015

French researchers tracked 57,000 naval personnel over 26 years to compare death rates between those working with radar systems and those in non-radar roles. They found no increased risk of death from any cause, including cancer, among radar-exposed workers compared to unexposed personnel. This large-scale occupational study suggests that the radiofrequency radiation from naval radar systems did not significantly impact mortality rates during the study period.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Effect of cell phone-like electromagnetic radiation on primary human thyroid cells.

Silva V et al. · 2015

Israeli researchers exposed human thyroid cells to cell phone-like radiofrequency radiation to test whether it could trigger cancer-related changes. They found no effects on cell proliferation, DNA damage markers, or stress indicators that typically signal cellular harm. This suggests that under their specific test conditions, cell phone radiation did not promote thyroid cancer development in isolated human cells.

Investigation of the effects of distance from sources on apoptosis, oxidative stress and cytosolic calcium accumulation via TRPV1 channels induced by mobile phones and Wi-Fi in breast cancer cells.

Çiğ B, Nazıroğlu M. · 2015

Researchers exposed breast cancer cells to radiation from mobile phones (900 and 1800 MHz) and Wi-Fi (2450 MHz) at various distances to see how proximity affected cellular damage. They found that radiation sources placed within 10 centimeters of the cells triggered harmful effects including oxidative stress, cell death, and calcium overload, while sources placed 20-25 centimeters away showed no significant effects. This suggests that distance from EMF sources matters significantly for cellular protection.

Pooled analysis of Swedish case-control studies during 1997 2003 and 2007-2009 on meningioma risk associated with the use of mobile and cordless phones.

Carlberg M, Hardell L. · 2015

Swedish researchers analyzed 1,625 meningioma (brain tumor) cases and 3,530 healthy controls to examine whether mobile and cordless phone use increases tumor risk. They found no overall increased risk, but heavy users who talked for more than 1,436 hours showed a 20% increased risk for mobile phones and 70% increased risk for cordless phones. The heaviest users (over 3,358 hours) had double the risk from cordless phones, suggesting prolonged exposure may contribute to these slow-growing brain tumors.

A cross-sectional case control study on genetic damage in individuals residing in the vicinity of a mobile phone base station.

Gandhi G, Kaur G, Nisar U. · 2015

Researchers studied 63 people living within 300 meters of a cell phone tower and compared their DNA damage to 28 people living farther away. They found significantly more genetic damage (DNA breaks and mutations) in the blood cells of those living near the tower, where radiation levels exceeded safety limits. Women showed more DNA damage than men, and the amount of damage correlated with how close people lived to the tower and how much they used their phones.

Cancer & Tumors109 citations

Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans.

Lerchl A et al. · 2015

German researchers exposed mice to radiofrequency radiation at levels similar to cell phones and found significantly higher numbers of lung, liver, and lymph node tumors compared to unexposed animals. The tumor-promoting effects occurred at very low exposure levels - well below current safety limits for mobile phone users. This replication study confirms earlier findings that RF radiation may accelerate tumor growth even when it doesn't directly cause cancer.

Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field induces apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells via oxidative stress.

Yang ML, Ye ZM · 2015

Researchers exposed bone cancer cells to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) at 50 Hz and 1 milliTesla for up to 3 hours. They found the EMF exposure triggered cancer cell death (apoptosis) by increasing oxidative stress and activating specific cellular pathways. This suggests ELF-EMF might have potential therapeutic applications against bone cancer, though this was only tested in laboratory cell cultures, not living organisms.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Long-term Mobile Phone Use and Acoustic Neuroma Risk.

Pettersson D et al. · 2014

Swedish researchers studied 451 people with acoustic neuromas (benign brain tumors near the ear) and 710 healthy controls to see if long-term mobile phone use increases tumor risk. They found no significant association between phone use and acoustic neuroma development, even among the heaviest users who talked for over 680 hours total. The study suggests that any apparent connection in previous research may be due to detection bias rather than phones actually causing tumors.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Risk of neuroblastoma, maternal characteristics and perinatal exposures: The SETIL study.

Parodi S et al. · 2014

Italian researchers studied 153 children with neuroblastoma (a childhood cancer) and 1044 healthy children to identify risk factors. They measured extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) in homes and found no association between magnetic field exposure and neuroblastoma risk. However, they did find increased cancer risk linked to maternal exposure to hair dyes and workplace chemicals during pregnancy.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

The incidence rate and mortality of malignant brain tumors after 10 years of intensive cell phone use in Taiwan.

Hsu MH et al. · 2014

Taiwanese researchers tracked brain tumor rates across their entire population of 23 million people for 10 years (2000-2009) as cell phone use became widespread. They found only 4 cases of malignant brain tumors and 4 deaths during this period, with no correlation between intensive cell phone use and brain cancer rates. The study suggests that a decade of heavy cell phone adoption did not increase brain tumor incidence in Taiwan.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Exposure to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields From Broadcast Transmitters and Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Census-based Cohort Study.

Hauri DD et al. · 2014

Swiss researchers followed over 4,000 children for up to 23 years to see if living near radio and TV broadcast towers increased their cancer risk. They found no increased risk of childhood leukemia and mixed results for brain tumors, with their most comprehensive analysis showing no association. This large population study suggests that RF radiation from broadcast transmitters does not significantly increase childhood cancer rates.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found

Cell phone use and parotid salivary gland alterations: no molecular evidence.

de Souza FT et al. · 2014

Researchers studied whether cell phone use causes stress-related changes in the parotid salivary glands (located near the ear where phones are held) by comparing saliva from 62 people's exposed and unexposed glands. They found no differences in cellular stress markers, protein levels, or salivary flow between the phone-exposed side and the opposite side, even when accounting for years of use or calling time.

Mobile phones, non-ionizing radiofrequency fieldsand brain cancer: is there an adaptive response?

Vijayalaxmi, Prihoda TJ. · 2014

Researchers reanalyzed data from INTERPHONE, the largest study on mobile phones and brain cancer, and found something unexpected: mobile phone users actually showed lower rates of brain tumors (24.3% decreased risk for meningioma, 22.1% for glioma) compared to non-users. The authors suggest this protective effect might result from 'adaptive response,' where low-level radiofrequency exposure triggers cellular defense mechanisms that help prevent cancer.

Cell and cordless phone risk for glioma - Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009

Hardell L, Carlberg M, · 2014

Swedish researchers analyzed phone use patterns among 1,498 brain tumor patients and 3,530 healthy controls to investigate glioma risk. They found that mobile phone use increased brain tumor risk by 30% overall, with the risk tripling for users with over 25 years of exposure. Cordless phone use also increased risk by 40%, with the highest risk occurring when people held the phone on the same side of their head where the tumor developed.

Decreased Survival of Glioma Patients with Astrocytoma Grade IV (Glioblastoma Multiforme) Associated with Long-Term Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones.

Carlberg M, Hardell L. · 2014

Swedish researchers analyzed survival data from 1,678 brain cancer patients and found that those who used mobile or cordless phones for more than 20 years had significantly worse survival rates. Patients with glioblastoma (the most aggressive brain cancer) who were long-term phone users were 2-3 times more likely to die sooner than non-users. This suggests that radiofrequency radiation from wireless phones may not only increase brain cancer risk but also make existing tumors more deadly.

Connection between Cell Phone use, p53 Gene Expression in Different Zones of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Survival Prognoses.

Akhavan-Sigari R, Baf MM, Ariabod V, Rohde V, Rahighi S. · 2014

Researchers studied brain tumor tissue from 63 patients with glioblastoma multiforme (the most aggressive type of brain cancer) to see if cell phone use affected gene expression. They found that patients who used cell phones for 3 or more hours daily had significantly higher levels of mutated p53 genes in their tumors - a marker associated with cancer progression and shorter survival times. This suggests heavy cell phone use may influence how aggressive these brain cancers become at the genetic level.

Impact of head morphology on local brain specific absorption rate from exposure to mobile phone radiation.

Adibzadeh F et al. · 2014

Researchers used computer models to study how mobile phone radiation is absorbed in the brains of 20 different people with varying head shapes and sizes. They found that radiation absorption (called SAR) varied dramatically between individuals - up to 16 times higher in some people compared to others, depending on their unique head anatomy. This means current safety testing, which uses only standard dummy heads, may not accurately predict radiation exposure for real people with different head shapes.

Mobile Phone Radiation Alters Proliferation of Hepatocarcinoma Cells.

Ozgur E, Guler G, Kismali G, Seyhan N · 2014

Researchers exposed liver cancer cells to mobile phone radiation at levels typical of phone use (2 W/kg SAR) for up to 4 hours. The radiation decreased cell survival and caused DNA damage, with 1,800-MHz frequencies proving more harmful than 900-MHz. This suggests that the radiofrequency radiation from mobile phones can directly damage cells at exposure levels considered safe by current regulations.

Selenium Reduces Mobile Phone (900 MHz)-Induced Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Function, and Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells.

Kahya MC, Nazıroğlu M, Ciğ B. · 2014

Researchers exposed breast cancer cells to 900 MHz mobile phone radiation (at levels similar to typical phone use) for one hour and found it triggered cell death through oxidative stress and damaged cellular energy centers called mitochondria. However, when cells were pre-treated with selenium (an antioxidant mineral), these harmful effects were significantly reduced. This suggests that certain nutrients might help protect cells from EMF-induced damage.

Learn More

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects including cancer & tumors, along with practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.

FAQs: EMF & Cancer & Tumors

When nearly 60% of studies examining EMF exposure and cancer risk find evidence of effects, the scientific community is sending a clear signal that deserves your attention. Out of 226 peer-reviewed studies, 135 have documented associations between electromagnetic field exposure and various forms of cancer and tumor development.
The BioInitiative Report database includes 293 peer-reviewed studies examining the relationship between electromagnetic field exposure and cancer & tumors. These studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide and published in scientific journals. The research spans multiple decades and includes various types of EMF sources including cell phones, WiFi, power lines, and other common sources of electromagnetic radiation.
63% of the 293 studies examining cancer & tumors found measurable biological effects from EMF exposure. This means that 186 studies documented observable changes in biological systems when exposed to electromagnetic fields. The remaining 37% either found no significant effects or had inconclusive results, which is typical in scientific research where study design and exposure parameters vary.