Unknown authors · 2009
Researchers exposed mice with Ehrlich ascites carcinoma to extremely weak magnetic fields (as low as 100-300 nT at frequencies of 1, 4.4, and 16.5 Hz) combined with a static field of 42 µT. The treatment dramatically inhibited tumor growth, with tumor tissue practically absent in treated mice while control mice showed extensive cancer spread. Healthy mice showed no adverse effects from the same magnetic field exposure.
Unknown authors · 2009
German researchers exposed breast cancer cells to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields at 1.2 microTesla (similar to power line levels) and found the EMF increased production of proteins that help cancer spread to other parts of the body. The study suggests that common household electromagnetic field exposure might make existing breast tumors more likely to metastasize.
Unknown authors · 2009
This 2009 review by researcher Carl Blackman examined how current cell phone radiation safety standards focus only on heating effects, while ignoring non-thermal biological effects that research has documented since 1986. The paper argues that exposure limits based solely on thermal effects are inadequate to protect public health, especially given epidemiological studies linking long-term cell phone use to increased brain cancer rates.
Unknown authors · 2009
Researchers exposed mice with Ehrlich ascites carcinoma to extremely weak magnetic fields (1-16.5 Hz frequencies at 100-300 nanotesla intensity) combined with a static field of 42 microtesla. The treatment dramatically reduced tumor growth, with tumor tissue becoming practically absent in treated mice while control animals showed extensive cancer spread. Importantly, the same magnetic field exposure caused no harmful effects in healthy mice.
Unknown authors · 2009
German researchers exposed MCF-7 breast cancer cells to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields at 1.2 microTesla (similar to power line EMF). The EMF exposure significantly increased expression of genes that help cancer cells spread and metastasize. This suggests that common household electromagnetic fields could potentially make existing breast cancers more aggressive.
Unknown authors · 2009
Italian researchers studied 345 residents living near a 60 kV power line in Rome from 1954-2003, tracking hospital records from 1998-2003. They found significantly increased cancer rates among long-term residents (over 30 years) and those in the highest magnetic field exposure areas. The study also revealed a two-fold increase in heart disease among the most exposed residents.
Unknown authors · 2009
UK researchers measured magnetic field exposure from power lines and electrical equipment in 317 workers across 117 different occupations. They found workplace exposure was significantly higher than home exposure, with welders, printers, and telephone operators facing the highest levels. The study revealed that job classification systems alone poorly predict actual exposure levels.
Unknown authors · 2009
This 2009 Italian research review examined three decades of studies on power line magnetic fields and health, building on the landmark 1979 Wertheimer-Leeper study that first linked childhood cancer to electrical wiring configurations. The researchers found evidence connecting 50-60 Hz magnetic field exposure to increased rates of cancer, heart disease, and blood disorders in highly exposed populations.
Unknown authors · 2009
This is a commentary by Louis Slesin of Microwave News responding to a 2009 review by Kheifets and colleagues that assessed evidence linking extremely low frequency electric fields to cancer. The commentary appears to critique or provide additional perspective on the original review's conclusions about ELF electric field cancer risks.
Unknown authors · 2009
Canadian researchers studied 548 children with brain tumors and 760 healthy controls, examining their mothers' workplace exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields before and during pregnancy. They found that mothers with higher occupational EMF exposure had a 50-60% increased risk of having children who developed brain tumors, particularly astroglial tumors.
Unknown authors · 2009
Researchers in Bangkok studied 180 adult leukemia patients compared to 756 healthy controls to identify disease risk factors. They found suggestive evidence that GSM cell phone use doubled leukemia risk, while working near power lines increased myeloid leukemia risk by over 4 times. The study also confirmed strong associations with chemical exposures like benzene and pesticides.
Unknown authors · 2009
This 2009 analysis examined the methodological challenges in studying potential cancer risks from mobile phone use. Researchers found that current epidemiological studies face three major limitations: no reliable way to measure actual EMF exposure, insufficient long-term usage data, and lack of clear biological mechanisms to guide research. Despite these challenges, the overall evidence suggests an increased cancer risk, though its magnitude remains unknown.
Unknown authors · 2009
This 2009 review by researcher Carl Blackman examined evidence showing that cell phone radiation causes biological effects beyond just heating tissue. The analysis found that current safety standards, which only protect against thermal effects during 6-minute exposures, ignore non-thermal biological effects that could contribute to long-term health risks including brain cancers observed in epidemiological studies.
Unknown authors · 2009
This comprehensive review analyzed multiple studies on long-term mobile phone use and cancer risk, focusing on brain tumors. Researchers found that after 10+ years of use, mobile phone users showed a 30% increased risk for glioma (brain cancer) and acoustic neuroma, with the highest risk on the same side of the head where phones were typically held. The authors concluded that current safety standards are inadequate for long-term exposure.
Unknown authors · 2009
This comprehensive review examined radiofrequency research from 2004-2007, analyzing studies on mobile phones, wireless networks, and RF health effects including cancer, neurological impacts, and biological changes. The authors concluded there was no clear evidence of adverse health effects from RF fields during this period, though they recommended continued research especially regarding children's mobile phone use.
Unknown authors · 2009
This 2009 analysis compared early cell phone brain tumor studies and found stark differences between industry-funded research (Interphone studies) and independent Swedish studies. The industry-funded studies found no increased brain tumor risk, while independent research consistently showed significant increases in brain tumor risk from cell phone and cordless phone use.
Unknown authors · 2009
A 2009 hypothesis by epidemiologist Samuel Milham suggests that the elevated cancer rates seen in firefighters may be primarily caused by radio-frequency radiation from their communication equipment, not smoke inhalation as commonly assumed. The cancer types increased in firefighters closely match those found in workers exposed to electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation.
Unknown authors · 2009
A case-control study of 180 leukemia patients in Bangkok found no clear association with cell phone use, though usage durations were short (median 24-26 months). However, researchers found elevated leukemia risk among GSM service users and those with certain usage practices, alongside strong associations with chemical exposures and powerline work.
Unknown authors · 2009
Researchers analyzed brain tumor rates in four Nordic countries from 1974-2003, covering 60,000 cases in 16 million adults. They found steady increases in glioma and meningioma rates throughout the study period, but no acceleration after 1998 when mobile phone use exploded. This timing suggests mobile phones didn't drive the tumor increases observed.
Stang A et al. · 2009
German researchers studied 459 people with uveal melanoma (a rare eye cancer) to see if mobile phone use increased their risk. They compared these cancer patients to over 1,000 control subjects and found no connection between regular mobile phone use and developing this type of eye cancer. This study contradicted the researchers' own previous findings that had suggested a link.
Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ · 2009
British researchers studied 291 people with pituitary tumors (small growths in a brain gland that regulates hormones) and 630 healthy controls to see if cell phone use increased tumor risk. They found no association between cell phone use and pituitary tumors, even among the heaviest users or those who had used phones for over 10 years. This suggests that cell phone radiation doesn't appear to cause this specific type of brain tumor.
Billaudel B, Taxile M, Ruffie G, Veyret B, Lagroye I. · 2009
Researchers exposed mouse cells to cell phone signals (DAMPS and GSM) for one hour to see if it would increase activity of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), an enzyme linked to cell growth and potentially cancer development. They found no significant changes in ODC activity at exposure levels of 2.5 and 6 W/kg, contradicting some earlier studies that reported increased enzyme activity. This suggests that under controlled temperature conditions, these specific cell phone signals may not trigger this particular cellular response.
Billaudel B et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed human brain tumor cells to cell phone radiation similar to DAMPS and GSM signals for up to 24 hours, then measured changes in an enzyme called ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) that's involved in cell growth. They found no changes in ODC activity regardless of the type of signal, exposure duration, or radiation intensity. This suggests that typical cell phone radiation levels don't affect this particular cellular process in brain cells.
Ahlbom A et al. · 2009
Researchers from the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection reviewed all available studies on mobile phone use and brain tumor risk through 2009. They found no increased risk of brain tumors within approximately 10 years of mobile phone use, though they noted the observation period may be too short to detect slow-growing tumors that could take decades to develop. The review acknowledged significant methodological problems in existing studies, including biased recall of phone usage patterns.
Wake K et al. · 2009
Researchers developed a method to accurately map how cell phone radiation (called SAR) spreads throughout the human brain using standard phone testing data. They found they could successfully estimate radiation exposure patterns in specific brain regions where tumors develop. This technique was used in the major INTERPHONE study to better understand the relationship between cell phone use and brain cancer risk.
